1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
description, argument-hint
| description | argument-hint | |
|---|---|---|
| Think through consequences of consequences |
|
Ask: "And then what?" First-order thinking stops at immediate effects. Second-order thinking follows the chain.
1. State the action or decision 2. Identify first-order effects (immediate, obvious consequences) 3. For each first-order effect, ask "And then what happens?" 4. Continue to third-order if significant 5. Identify delayed consequences that change the calculus 6. Assess whether the action is still worth it after full chain analysis<output_format> Action: [what's being considered]
First-Order Effects: (Immediate)
- [Effect 1]
- [Effect 2]
Second-Order Effects: (And then what?)
- [Effect 1] → leads to → [Consequence]
- [Effect 2] → leads to → [Consequence]
Third-Order Effects: (And then?)
- [Key downstream consequences]
Delayed Consequences: [Effects that aren't obvious initially but matter long-term]
Revised Assessment: After tracing the chain, this action [is/isn't] worth it because... </output_format>
<success_criteria>
- Traces causal chains beyond obvious effects
- Identifies feedback loops and unintended consequences
- Reveals delayed costs or benefits
- Distinguishes actions that compound well from those that don't
- Prevents "seemed like a good idea at the time" regret </success_criteria>