1400 lines
38 KiB
Markdown
1400 lines
38 KiB
Markdown
# Strategic Planning
|
||
|
||
**Vision, positioning, competitive strategy, and long-term planning**
|
||
|
||
# Strategic Planning Skill
|
||
|
||
**Expert frameworks and best practices for business strategy development, competitive analysis, and growth planning**
|
||
|
||
## Core Principles
|
||
|
||
1. **Data-Driven**: Strategy based on market research and competitive intelligence
|
||
2. **Actionable**: Clear priorities with measurable objectives
|
||
3. **Realistic**: Aligned with resources and capabilities
|
||
4. **Adaptive**: Built for changing market conditions
|
||
5. **Stakeholder-Aligned**: Considers all key constituencies
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 1: Strategic Frameworks
|
||
|
||
### 1.1 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Understand industry structure and competitive dynamics
|
||
|
||
**The Five Forces**:
|
||
|
||
1. **Threat of New Entrants**
|
||
- Barriers to entry: Capital requirements, economies of scale, patents, regulations
|
||
- Brand loyalty and switching costs
|
||
- Access to distribution channels
|
||
- Government policy
|
||
- Expected retaliation from incumbents
|
||
|
||
2. **Bargaining Power of Suppliers**
|
||
- Supplier concentration vs. industry concentration
|
||
- Switching costs for suppliers and buyers
|
||
- Availability of substitutes for supplier products
|
||
- Forward integration potential
|
||
- Importance of volume to suppliers
|
||
|
||
3. **Bargaining Power of Buyers**
|
||
- Buyer concentration vs. industry concentration
|
||
- Switching costs for buyers
|
||
- Backward integration potential
|
||
- Price sensitivity
|
||
- Product differentiation
|
||
|
||
4. **Threat of Substitute Products**
|
||
- Relative price-performance of substitutes
|
||
- Switching costs
|
||
- Buyer propensity to substitute
|
||
- Emerging technologies
|
||
|
||
5. **Rivalry Among Existing Competitors**
|
||
- Number and diversity of competitors
|
||
- Industry growth rate
|
||
- Fixed vs. variable costs
|
||
- Product differentiation
|
||
- Exit barriers
|
||
- Strategic stakes
|
||
|
||
**Analysis Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Five Forces Analysis: [Industry]
|
||
|
||
### 1. Threat of New Entrants: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
- Key barriers: [List]
|
||
- Assessment: [Why high/medium/low]
|
||
- Strategic implication: [What it means for us]
|
||
|
||
### 2. Supplier Power: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
- Key factors: [List]
|
||
- Assessment: [Analysis]
|
||
- Strategic implication: [Actions needed]
|
||
|
||
### 3. Buyer Power: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
- Key factors: [List]
|
||
- Assessment: [Analysis]
|
||
- Strategic implication: [Actions needed]
|
||
|
||
### 4. Threat of Substitutes: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
- Key substitutes: [List]
|
||
- Assessment: [Analysis]
|
||
- Strategic implication: [Actions needed]
|
||
|
||
### 5. Competitive Rivalry: [Intense/Moderate/Weak]
|
||
- Key factors: [List]
|
||
- Assessment: [Analysis]
|
||
- Strategic implication: [Actions needed]
|
||
|
||
## Overall Industry Attractiveness: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
## Strategic Recommendations: [Key actions]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 1.2 SWOT Analysis
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Assess internal capabilities and external environment
|
||
|
||
**Framework**:
|
||
|
||
**Strengths** (Internal, Positive):
|
||
- What do we do well?
|
||
- What unique resources do we have?
|
||
- What do customers see as our strengths?
|
||
- What competitive advantages do we have?
|
||
|
||
**Weaknesses** (Internal, Negative):
|
||
- What could we improve?
|
||
- Where do we lack resources?
|
||
- What do customers see as weaknesses?
|
||
- What factors lose us sales?
|
||
|
||
**Opportunities** (External, Positive):
|
||
- What market trends favor us?
|
||
- What gaps exist in the market?
|
||
- What technology changes help us?
|
||
- What regulatory changes benefit us?
|
||
|
||
**Threats** (External, Negative):
|
||
- What obstacles do we face?
|
||
- What are competitors doing?
|
||
- What technology threatens us?
|
||
- What regulatory changes hurt us?
|
||
|
||
**SWOT to Strategy Matrix**:
|
||
```
|
||
SO (Strength-Opportunity): Leverage strengths to capture opportunities
|
||
WO (Weakness-Opportunity): Overcome weaknesses to pursue opportunities
|
||
ST (Strength-Threat): Use strengths to defend against threats
|
||
WT (Weakness-Threat): Defensive strategies to minimize weaknesses and threats
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices**:
|
||
- Be specific (not "good brand" but "95% brand recognition in 25-34 age group")
|
||
- Prioritize (top 3-5 in each quadrant)
|
||
- Be honest about weaknesses
|
||
- Link to data where possible
|
||
- Update quarterly
|
||
|
||
### 1.3 BCG Matrix (Growth-Share Matrix)
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Portfolio analysis for resource allocation
|
||
|
||
**Four Quadrants**:
|
||
|
||
1. **Stars** (High Growth, High Share)
|
||
- Market leaders in growing markets
|
||
- Require investment to maintain position
|
||
- Future cash cows
|
||
- Strategy: Invest heavily
|
||
|
||
2. **Cash Cows** (Low Growth, High Share)
|
||
- Market leaders in mature markets
|
||
- Generate excess cash
|
||
- Fund other ventures
|
||
- Strategy: Harvest/maintain
|
||
|
||
3. **Question Marks** (High Growth, Low Share)
|
||
- Small players in growing markets
|
||
- Require cash to grow
|
||
- Uncertain futures
|
||
- Strategy: Invest selectively or divest
|
||
|
||
4. **Dogs** (Low Growth, Low Share)
|
||
- Weak position in mature markets
|
||
- Use more resources than generate
|
||
- Strategy: Divest or reposition
|
||
|
||
**Analysis Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## BCG Matrix: [Company Portfolio]
|
||
|
||
### Stars
|
||
- [Product/Business Unit]: Market share X%, Growth rate Y%
|
||
- Investment needed: $Z
|
||
- Strategic priority: High
|
||
- Timeline: 3-5 years
|
||
|
||
### Cash Cows
|
||
- [Product/Business Unit]: Market share X%, Growth rate Y%
|
||
- Cash generation: $Z annually
|
||
- Strategic priority: Maintain
|
||
- Use cash for: [Stars/Question Marks]
|
||
|
||
### Question Marks
|
||
- [Product/Business Unit]: Market share X%, Growth rate Y%
|
||
- Decision: Invest or divest
|
||
- Investment required: $Z
|
||
- Timeline to Star status: X years
|
||
- Probability of success: Y%
|
||
|
||
### Dogs
|
||
- [Product/Business Unit]: Market share X%, Growth rate Y%
|
||
- Recommendation: Divest/Reposition
|
||
- Timeline: X months
|
||
- Expected proceeds: $Z
|
||
|
||
## Portfolio Strategy
|
||
- Overweight in: [Quadrant]
|
||
- Underweight in: [Quadrant]
|
||
- Rebalancing actions: [List]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 1.4 Ansoff Matrix (Growth Strategy)
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Identify growth opportunities
|
||
|
||
**Four Growth Strategies**:
|
||
|
||
1. **Market Penetration** (Existing Products, Existing Markets)
|
||
- Increase market share
|
||
- Increase usage by existing customers
|
||
- Win competitors' customers
|
||
- Risk: Low
|
||
- Examples: Promotions, loyalty programs, better distribution
|
||
|
||
2. **Market Development** (Existing Products, New Markets)
|
||
- New geographic markets
|
||
- New market segments
|
||
- New distribution channels
|
||
- Risk: Medium
|
||
- Examples: International expansion, B2B to B2C
|
||
|
||
3. **Product Development** (New Products, Existing Markets)
|
||
- New features
|
||
- New product lines
|
||
- Innovation
|
||
- Risk: Medium
|
||
- Examples: Product variations, next-gen products
|
||
|
||
4. **Diversification** (New Products, New Markets)
|
||
- Related diversification (leverage capabilities)
|
||
- Unrelated diversification (portfolio approach)
|
||
- Risk: High
|
||
- Examples: New business lines, acquisitions
|
||
|
||
**Decision Framework**:
|
||
```
|
||
Start with Market Penetration (lowest risk)
|
||
↓ If market saturated
|
||
Move to Market Development or Product Development (medium risk)
|
||
↓ If core market exhausted
|
||
Consider Diversification (highest risk, highest reward)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 1.5 Blue Ocean Strategy
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Create uncontested market space
|
||
|
||
**Key Concepts**:
|
||
|
||
**Red Ocean** (Compete in existing market):
|
||
- Compete in existing market space
|
||
- Beat the competition
|
||
- Exploit existing demand
|
||
- Value-cost trade-off
|
||
|
||
**Blue Ocean** (Create new market):
|
||
- Create uncontested market space
|
||
- Make competition irrelevant
|
||
- Create and capture new demand
|
||
- Break value-cost trade-off
|
||
|
||
**Four Actions Framework**:
|
||
```
|
||
Eliminate: What factors can be eliminated that industry has taken for granted?
|
||
Reduce: What factors can be reduced well below industry standard?
|
||
Raise: What factors should be raised well above industry standard?
|
||
Create: What factors should be created that industry has never offered?
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Strategy Canvas**:
|
||
- Plot your offering vs. competitors on key factors
|
||
- Identify differentiation opportunities
|
||
- Find value innovation points
|
||
|
||
**Example - Cirque du Soleil**:
|
||
- Eliminated: Star performers, animal shows, multiple rings
|
||
- Reduced: Fun and humor, thrill and danger
|
||
- Raised: Unique venues, artistic music and dance
|
||
- Created: Theme, refined environment, multiple productions
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 2: Vision, Mission, and Values
|
||
|
||
### 2.1 Vision Statement
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Aspirational future state (3-10 years out)
|
||
|
||
**Characteristics**:
|
||
- Inspirational and motivating
|
||
- Clear and memorable
|
||
- Future-oriented
|
||
- Stretch goal (ambitious but achievable)
|
||
- 1-2 sentences
|
||
|
||
**Template**:
|
||
```
|
||
To [action verb] [what] [for whom] by [timeframe], becoming [position/recognition]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Examples**:
|
||
- Microsoft: "A computer on every desk and in every home"
|
||
- Disney: "To make people happy"
|
||
- Tesla: "To accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy"
|
||
|
||
**Questions to Ask**:
|
||
- What do we aspire to become?
|
||
- What impact do we want to have?
|
||
- What legacy do we want to leave?
|
||
- Where do we see ourselves in 10 years?
|
||
|
||
### 2.2 Mission Statement
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Define current purpose and how we operate today
|
||
|
||
**Characteristics**:
|
||
- Clearly defines purpose
|
||
- Describes what we do
|
||
- Identifies who we serve
|
||
- Explains how we create value
|
||
- Present-tense
|
||
- 2-3 sentences
|
||
|
||
**Template**:
|
||
```
|
||
We [action] by [how] to [whom] so that [benefit/outcome]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Examples**:
|
||
- Amazon: "To be Earth's most customer-centric company"
|
||
- Google: "To organize the world's information and make it universally accessible"
|
||
- Nike: "To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world"
|
||
|
||
**Mission Statement Checklist**:
|
||
- [ ] What business are we in?
|
||
- [ ] Who are our customers?
|
||
- [ ] What value do we provide?
|
||
- [ ] How do we provide it?
|
||
- [ ] What makes us different?
|
||
|
||
### 2.3 Core Values
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Guiding principles for decisions and behavior
|
||
|
||
**Characteristics**:
|
||
- 3-7 core values
|
||
- Authentic (actually practiced)
|
||
- Specific (not generic)
|
||
- Actionable (guide behavior)
|
||
- Enduring (won't change)
|
||
|
||
**Development Process**:
|
||
1. Identify themes from company history
|
||
2. Survey stakeholders on what's important
|
||
3. Identify behaviors that made company successful
|
||
4. Test against real decisions
|
||
5. Refine and define each value
|
||
|
||
**Format**:
|
||
```
|
||
Value Name: One Word or Short Phrase
|
||
Definition: What it means to us (1-2 sentences)
|
||
In Practice: How it guides our actions (examples)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Examples - Netflix**:
|
||
1. **Judgment**: We make wise decisions despite ambiguity
|
||
2. **Communication**: We are candid, authentic, and articulate
|
||
3. **Courage**: We say what we think when it's in the best interest
|
||
4. **Impact**: We accomplish amazing amounts of important work
|
||
5. **Curiosity**: We learn rapidly and eagerly
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 3: OKR and KPI Frameworks
|
||
|
||
### 3.1 OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Set ambitious goals with measurable outcomes
|
||
|
||
**Structure**:
|
||
```
|
||
Objective: Qualitative, inspirational goal
|
||
Key Result 1: Quantitative, measurable outcome
|
||
Key Result 2: Quantitative, measurable outcome
|
||
Key Result 3: Quantitative, measurable outcome
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Objective Characteristics**:
|
||
- Qualitative and inspirational
|
||
- Memorable and engaging
|
||
- Time-bound (usually quarterly or annual)
|
||
- Ambitious (60-70% confidence in achieving)
|
||
|
||
**Key Result Characteristics**:
|
||
- Quantitative and measurable
|
||
- Verifiable (yes/no, achieved or not)
|
||
- Outcome-focused (not activities)
|
||
- Specific numbers or milestones
|
||
- 3-5 per objective
|
||
|
||
**Scoring**:
|
||
- 0.0 - 0.3: Failed to make progress
|
||
- 0.4 - 0.6: Made progress but fell short
|
||
- 0.7 - 1.0: Delivered (0.7 is success, 1.0 is exceptional)
|
||
|
||
**OKR Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Q1 2024 OKRs
|
||
|
||
### Company-Level OKRs
|
||
|
||
**Objective 1**: Establish market leadership in AI-powered analytics
|
||
|
||
Key Results:
|
||
- [ ] KR1: Achieve 40% market share in enterprise segment (Current: 25%)
|
||
- [ ] KR2: Net Promoter Score of 70+ (Current: 55)
|
||
- [ ] KR3: 50,000 active users by end of Q1 (Current: 30,000)
|
||
- [ ] KR4: $10M ARR with 130% net retention (Current: $6M, 115%)
|
||
|
||
Score: 0.0 (Start of quarter)
|
||
|
||
**Objective 2**: Build a world-class product team
|
||
|
||
Key Results:
|
||
- [ ] KR1: Hire 10 senior engineers (0/10 hired)
|
||
- [ ] KR2: Engineering satisfaction score 4.5/5 (Current: 3.8)
|
||
- [ ] KR3: Reduce sprint cycle time from 2 weeks to 1 week
|
||
- [ ] KR4: Ship 3 major product releases
|
||
|
||
Score: 0.0 (Start of quarter)
|
||
|
||
### Department OKRs
|
||
[Aligned with company OKRs, cascaded down]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Best Practices**:
|
||
- Top-down and bottom-up (40% from leadership, 60% from teams)
|
||
- Transparent (everyone sees everyone's OKRs)
|
||
- Weekly check-ins
|
||
- Quarterly retrospectives
|
||
- Don't tie to compensation (encourages sandbagging)
|
||
|
||
### 3.2 KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Monitor ongoing business health
|
||
|
||
**Types of KPIs**:
|
||
|
||
**Financial KPIs**:
|
||
- Revenue Growth Rate
|
||
- Gross Margin
|
||
- Net Profit Margin
|
||
- EBITDA
|
||
- Cash Flow
|
||
- Burn Rate
|
||
- CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost)
|
||
- LTV (Lifetime Value)
|
||
- LTV:CAC Ratio (should be >3:1)
|
||
|
||
**Customer KPIs**:
|
||
- NPS (Net Promoter Score)
|
||
- CSAT (Customer Satisfaction)
|
||
- Churn Rate
|
||
- Retention Rate
|
||
- Expansion Revenue
|
||
- Customer Lifetime Value
|
||
|
||
**Product KPIs**:
|
||
- DAU/MAU (Daily/Monthly Active Users)
|
||
- Engagement Rate
|
||
- Feature Adoption Rate
|
||
- Time to Value
|
||
- Product Qualified Leads (PQLs)
|
||
|
||
**Sales & Marketing KPIs**:
|
||
- MQLs (Marketing Qualified Leads)
|
||
- SQLs (Sales Qualified Leads)
|
||
- Conversion Rates (Lead→MQL→SQL→Customer)
|
||
- Sales Cycle Length
|
||
- Win Rate
|
||
- Average Deal Size
|
||
|
||
**Operations KPIs**:
|
||
- Cycle Time
|
||
- Quality Metrics (defect rate, etc.)
|
||
- On-Time Delivery
|
||
- Resource Utilization
|
||
- Employee Satisfaction
|
||
|
||
**KPI Dashboard Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Company Dashboard - [Month Year]
|
||
|
||
### Financial Health
|
||
| Metric | Current | Target | Previous | Trend |
|
||
|--------|---------|--------|----------|-------|
|
||
| MRR | $500K | $600K | $450K | ↑ +11% |
|
||
| Gross Margin | 78% | 80% | 76% | ↑ +2% |
|
||
| Burn Rate | $300K | $250K | $350K | ↑ -14% |
|
||
| Runway | 18 mo | 24 mo | 15 mo | ↑ +3mo |
|
||
|
||
### Customer Metrics
|
||
| Metric | Current | Target | Previous | Trend |
|
||
|--------|---------|--------|----------|-------|
|
||
| Active Customers | 250 | 300 | 220 | ↑ +14% |
|
||
| NPS | 65 | 70 | 60 | ↑ +5 |
|
||
| Churn Rate | 3.5% | 2% | 4% | ↑ -0.5% |
|
||
| LTV:CAC | 4.2:1 | 5:1 | 3.8:1 | ↑ |
|
||
|
||
### Product Metrics
|
||
| Metric | Current | Target | Previous | Trend |
|
||
|--------|---------|--------|----------|-------|
|
||
| DAU/MAU | 35% | 40% | 32% | ↑ +3% |
|
||
| Feature X Adoption | 45% | 60% | 40% | ↑ +5% |
|
||
| Time to Value | 7 days | 5 days | 10 days | ↑ -3d |
|
||
|
||
### Sales & Marketing
|
||
| Metric | Current | Target | Previous | Trend |
|
||
|--------|---------|--------|----------|-------|
|
||
| MQLs | 500 | 600 | 450 | ↑ +11% |
|
||
| Conversion (MQL→SQL) | 25% | 30% | 22% | ↑ +3% |
|
||
| Win Rate | 30% | 35% | 28% | ↑ +2% |
|
||
| Avg Deal Size | $25K | $30K | $23K | ↑ +9% |
|
||
|
||
🔴 Red = Below target
|
||
🟡 Yellow = Near target
|
||
🟢 Green = At or above target
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 4: Market Entry Strategies
|
||
|
||
### 4.1 Market Entry Modes
|
||
|
||
**1. Exporting**
|
||
- Direct exporting (own sales force)
|
||
- Indirect exporting (through distributors)
|
||
- Pros: Low risk, low investment
|
||
- Cons: Limited control, lower margins
|
||
|
||
**2. Licensing**
|
||
- Grant rights to foreign company
|
||
- Pros: Low risk, passive income
|
||
- Cons: Loss of control, creating future competitor
|
||
|
||
**3. Franchising**
|
||
- License business model
|
||
- Pros: Rapid expansion, local knowledge
|
||
- Cons: Quality control challenges, shared profits
|
||
|
||
**4. Joint Venture**
|
||
- Partner with local company
|
||
- Pros: Shared risk, local expertise
|
||
- Cons: Potential conflicts, profit sharing
|
||
|
||
**5. Strategic Alliance**
|
||
- Cooperative agreement without equity
|
||
- Pros: Flexibility, complementary strengths
|
||
- Cons: Limited commitment, coordination challenges
|
||
|
||
**6. Wholly-Owned Subsidiary**
|
||
- Full ownership (greenfield or acquisition)
|
||
- Pros: Full control, full profits
|
||
- Cons: High risk, high investment
|
||
|
||
**Entry Mode Selection Matrix**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
| Factor | Weight | Exporting | Licensing | JV | Acquisition |
|
||
|--------|--------|-----------|-----------|-----|-------------|
|
||
| Market knowledge needed | High | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
|
||
| Speed to market | High | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
|
||
| Capital availability | Medium | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
|
||
| Risk tolerance | Medium | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
|
||
| Control importance | High | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|
||
| **Weighted Score** | - | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
|
||
|
||
Scale: 1 (Poor fit) to 5 (Excellent fit)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 4.2 Market Entry Analysis Framework
|
||
|
||
**Step 1: Market Attractiveness**
|
||
- Market size and growth rate
|
||
- Competitive intensity
|
||
- Regulatory environment
|
||
- Infrastructure quality
|
||
- Economic stability
|
||
- Cultural distance
|
||
|
||
**Step 2: Competitive Position Assessment**
|
||
- Resource availability
|
||
- Core competencies fit
|
||
- Brand strength in new market
|
||
- Supply chain capabilities
|
||
- Local partnerships available
|
||
|
||
**Step 3: Entry Barriers**
|
||
- Tariffs and trade barriers
|
||
- Local regulations
|
||
- Capital requirements
|
||
- Distribution access
|
||
- Brand recognition needed
|
||
- Local partnerships required
|
||
|
||
**Step 4: Risk Assessment**
|
||
- Political risk
|
||
- Economic risk
|
||
- Currency risk
|
||
- Operational risk
|
||
- Reputational risk
|
||
|
||
**Market Entry Decision Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Market Entry Analysis: [Country/Region]
|
||
|
||
### Market Attractiveness (Score: X/10)
|
||
- Market Size: $XB, Growing at Y% annually
|
||
- Competition: [Assessment]
|
||
- Regulations: [Assessment]
|
||
- Overall: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
|
||
### Competitive Position (Score: X/10)
|
||
- Our Strengths: [List]
|
||
- Our Weaknesses: [List]
|
||
- Local Competition: [Analysis]
|
||
- Overall: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]
|
||
|
||
### Entry Barriers (Score: X/10)
|
||
- Key Barriers: [List]
|
||
- Mitigating Factors: [List]
|
||
- Overall: [Low/Medium/High]
|
||
|
||
### Risk Assessment (Score: X/10)
|
||
- Political Risk: [Low/Med/High]
|
||
- Economic Risk: [Low/Med/High]
|
||
- Operational Risk: [Low/Med/High]
|
||
- Overall Risk: [Acceptable/Concerning/Prohibitive]
|
||
|
||
### Recommended Entry Mode
|
||
**Mode**: [Selected mode]
|
||
**Rationale**: [Why this mode]
|
||
**Timeline**: [Phased approach]
|
||
**Investment Required**: $X
|
||
**Expected ROI**: X% over Y years
|
||
**Key Success Factors**: [List]
|
||
|
||
### Go/No-Go Decision: [GO / NO-GO / DEFER]
|
||
**Reasoning**: [Key factors in decision]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 5: M&A Evaluation Frameworks
|
||
|
||
### 5.1 M&A Strategic Rationale
|
||
|
||
**Valid Reasons for M&A**:
|
||
|
||
1. **Market Power**
|
||
- Increase market share
|
||
- Reduce competition
|
||
- Increase pricing power
|
||
|
||
2. **Synergies**
|
||
- Revenue synergies (cross-sell, market access)
|
||
- Cost synergies (economies of scale, eliminate redundancies)
|
||
- Financial synergies (tax benefits, lower cost of capital)
|
||
|
||
3. **Growth**
|
||
- Access new markets
|
||
- Acquire new products/technology
|
||
- Expand capabilities
|
||
|
||
4. **Risk Reduction**
|
||
- Diversification
|
||
- Vertical integration (secure supply chain)
|
||
|
||
**Invalid Reasons (Red Flags)**:
|
||
- Empire building (CEO ego)
|
||
- Following competitors blindly
|
||
- To use excess cash (there are better uses)
|
||
- To boost short-term earnings
|
||
|
||
### 5.2 Target Identification and Screening
|
||
|
||
**Ideal Target Profile**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Target Company Profile
|
||
|
||
### Strategic Fit
|
||
- [ ] Aligns with corporate strategy
|
||
- [ ] Fills capability gaps
|
||
- [ ] Provides market access
|
||
- [ ] Complements product portfolio
|
||
- [ ] Cultural compatibility
|
||
|
||
### Financial Profile
|
||
- [ ] Revenue: $X - $Y
|
||
- [ ] Growth rate: >Z%
|
||
- [ ] EBITDA margin: >W%
|
||
- [ ] Manageable debt levels
|
||
- [ ] Clean financial history
|
||
|
||
### Market Position
|
||
- [ ] #1 or #2 in their niche
|
||
- [ ] Defensible competitive advantages
|
||
- [ ] Strong customer relationships
|
||
- [ ] Quality brand/reputation
|
||
|
||
### Operational Characteristics
|
||
- [ ] Scalable business model
|
||
- [ ] Strong management team
|
||
- [ ] Modern technology/systems
|
||
- [ ] Efficient operations
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 5.3 Valuation Methods
|
||
|
||
**1. Comparable Company Analysis (Trading Multiples)**
|
||
```
|
||
Enterprise Value = EBITDA × Industry Multiple
|
||
or
|
||
Equity Value = Revenue × Industry Multiple
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**2. Precedent Transaction Analysis**
|
||
```
|
||
Value = Recent M&A multiples in same industry
|
||
Typical premium: 20-30% over market price
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**3. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)**
|
||
```
|
||
Present Value = Σ (Future Cash Flows / (1 + Discount Rate)^n)
|
||
Terminal Value = Final Year Cash Flow × Exit Multiple
|
||
Enterprise Value = PV + Terminal Value - Debt
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**4. Asset-Based Valuation**
|
||
```
|
||
Value = Total Assets - Total Liabilities
|
||
or
|
||
Liquidation Value = Assets at fire-sale prices - Liabilities
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Valuation Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Target Valuation: [Company Name]
|
||
|
||
### Trading Multiples (Comparable Companies)
|
||
Industry Average EV/EBITDA: 8.5x
|
||
Target EBITDA: $10M
|
||
**Implied Value: $85M**
|
||
|
||
### Precedent Transactions
|
||
Recent deals in sector: 9.5x - 11.0x EBITDA
|
||
Average premium: 25%
|
||
**Implied Range: $95M - $110M**
|
||
|
||
### DCF Analysis
|
||
Projected 5-year FCF: $8M, $10M, $12M, $14M, $15M
|
||
Terminal Value (Exit at 10x): $150M
|
||
WACC: 12%
|
||
**NPV: $92M**
|
||
|
||
### Valuation Summary
|
||
| Method | Low | Mid | High |
|
||
|--------|-----|-----|------|
|
||
| Trading Multiples | $75M | $85M | $95M |
|
||
| Precedent Transactions | $95M | $103M | $110M |
|
||
| DCF | $85M | $92M | $100M |
|
||
| **Weighted Average** | **$85M** | **$93M** | **$102M** |
|
||
|
||
### Recommended Offer Range: $88M - $96M
|
||
**Walk-Away Price: $105M**
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 5.4 Due Diligence Framework
|
||
|
||
**Financial Due Diligence**:
|
||
- Historical financials (3-5 years)
|
||
- Quality of earnings
|
||
- Working capital analysis
|
||
- Debt and obligations
|
||
- Tax liabilities
|
||
- Revenue concentration
|
||
- Customer contracts
|
||
|
||
**Legal Due Diligence**:
|
||
- Corporate structure
|
||
- Material contracts
|
||
- Intellectual property
|
||
- Litigation and disputes
|
||
- Regulatory compliance
|
||
- Employment agreements
|
||
- Environmental liabilities
|
||
|
||
**Operational Due Diligence**:
|
||
- Business model validation
|
||
- Key processes and systems
|
||
- Technology infrastructure
|
||
- Supply chain dependencies
|
||
- Capacity and scalability
|
||
- Quality control
|
||
- Key personnel
|
||
|
||
**Commercial Due Diligence**:
|
||
- Market position validation
|
||
- Customer satisfaction
|
||
- Competitive landscape
|
||
- Growth opportunities
|
||
- Sales pipeline
|
||
- Brand strength
|
||
|
||
**Due Diligence Checklist**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Due Diligence Checklist: [Target Company]
|
||
|
||
### Financial (CFO Lead)
|
||
- [ ] 3-year audited financials reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Quality of earnings analysis complete
|
||
- [ ] Working capital normalized
|
||
- [ ] Debt schedule verified
|
||
- [ ] Tax returns reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Revenue recognition validated
|
||
- [ ] Customer concentration assessed
|
||
- [ ] **Red Flags**: [None / List]
|
||
|
||
### Legal (General Counsel Lead)
|
||
- [ ] Corporate documents reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Material contracts identified
|
||
- [ ] IP portfolio assessed
|
||
- [ ] Litigation search complete
|
||
- [ ] Regulatory compliance verified
|
||
- [ ] Employment agreements reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Environmental review complete
|
||
- [ ] **Red Flags**: [None / List]
|
||
|
||
### Operational (COO Lead)
|
||
- [ ] Process documentation reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Technology stack assessed
|
||
- [ ] Key systems tested
|
||
- [ ] Supply chain mapped
|
||
- [ ] Capacity analysis complete
|
||
- [ ] Quality metrics reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Key personnel identified
|
||
- [ ] **Red Flags**: [None / List]
|
||
|
||
### Commercial (CMO Lead)
|
||
- [ ] Customer interviews conducted (top 10)
|
||
- [ ] Competitive position validated
|
||
- [ ] Market analysis updated
|
||
- [ ] Sales pipeline reviewed
|
||
- [ ] Pricing power assessed
|
||
- [ ] Brand perception evaluated
|
||
- [ ] **Red Flags**: [None / List]
|
||
|
||
### Overall Assessment
|
||
**Go/No-Go**: [GO / NO-GO / RENEGOTIATE]
|
||
**Key Risks**: [List top 3]
|
||
**Deal-Breakers**: [Any identified]
|
||
**Value Adjustment**: [If any]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 5.5 Synergy Analysis
|
||
|
||
**Revenue Synergies**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
| Opportunity | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total |
|
||
|-------------|--------|--------|--------|-------|
|
||
| Cross-sell to their customers | $1M | $3M | $5M | $9M |
|
||
| Up-sell our products | $0.5M | $2M | $4M | $6.5M |
|
||
| Geographic expansion | $0.5M | $1.5M | $3M | $5M |
|
||
| **Total Revenue Synergies** | **$2M** | **$6.5M** | **$12M** | **$20.5M** |
|
||
|
||
Probability-Adjusted (70% success): $14.4M over 3 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Cost Synergies**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
| Opportunity | Annual Savings | One-Time Cost | Net 3-Year |
|
||
|-------------|----------------|---------------|------------|
|
||
| Eliminate redundant positions | $2M | $0.5M | $5.5M |
|
||
| Consolidate offices | $0.5M | $1M | $0.5M |
|
||
| IT systems integration | $0.3M | $0.5M | $0.4M |
|
||
| Procurement savings | $0.4M | $0.1M | $1.1M |
|
||
| **Total Cost Synergies** | **$3.2M** | **$2.1M** | **$7.5M** |
|
||
|
||
Probability-Adjusted (85% success): $6.4M over 3 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Synergy Valuation**:
|
||
```
|
||
Total Synergies (PV): $18M
|
||
Less: Integration Costs: $5M
|
||
Less: Risk Adjustment (30%): $3.9M
|
||
Net Synergy Value: $9.1M
|
||
|
||
Maximum Premium Justified by Synergies: $9.1M
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 6: Business Model Canvas
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Visualize and design business model
|
||
|
||
**Nine Building Blocks**:
|
||
|
||
### 1. Customer Segments
|
||
Who are we creating value for?
|
||
- Mass market / Niche market / Segmented / Diversified / Multi-sided
|
||
|
||
### 2. Value Propositions
|
||
What problem are we solving?
|
||
- Newness, Performance, Customization, Design, Brand, Price, Cost reduction, Risk reduction, Accessibility, Convenience
|
||
|
||
### 3. Channels
|
||
How do we deliver value?
|
||
- Direct (sales force, web sales, owned stores)
|
||
- Indirect (partner stores, wholesaler)
|
||
|
||
### 4. Customer Relationships
|
||
How do we interact with each segment?
|
||
- Personal assistance, Dedicated personal, Self-service, Automated, Communities, Co-creation
|
||
|
||
### 5. Revenue Streams
|
||
How do we generate revenue?
|
||
- Asset sale, Usage fee, Subscription, Lending/Renting, Licensing, Brokerage, Advertising
|
||
|
||
### 6. Key Resources
|
||
What assets do we need?
|
||
- Physical, Intellectual, Human, Financial
|
||
|
||
### 7. Key Activities
|
||
What must we do?
|
||
- Production, Problem solving, Platform/Network
|
||
|
||
### 8. Key Partnerships
|
||
Who helps us?
|
||
- Strategic alliances, Joint ventures, Suppliers, Coopetition
|
||
|
||
### 9. Cost Structure
|
||
What are our main costs?
|
||
- Fixed costs, Variable costs, Economies of scale, Economies of scope
|
||
|
||
**Business Model Canvas Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Business Model Canvas: [Company Name]
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
|
||
│ Key Partners │ Key Activities │ Value │ Customer │
|
||
│ │ │ Propositions │ Relationships │
|
||
│ • Partner 1 │ • Activity 1 │ │ │
|
||
│ • Partner 2 │ • Activity 2 │ • Value prop 1 │ • Relationship 1│
|
||
│ • Partner 3 │ • Activity 3 │ • Value prop 2 │ • Relationship 2│
|
||
│ │ │ • Value prop 3 │ │
|
||
│ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤
|
||
│ │ Key Resources │ │ Channels │
|
||
│ │ │ │ │
|
||
│ │ • Resource 1 │ │ • Channel 1 │
|
||
│ │ • Resource 2 │ │ • Channel 2 │
|
||
│ │ • Resource 3 │ │ • Channel 3 │
|
||
├─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┤ │
|
||
│ Cost Structure │ Customer │
|
||
│ │ Segments │
|
||
│ • Cost driver 1 │ │
|
||
│ • Cost driver 2 │ • Segment 1 │
|
||
│ • Cost driver 3 │ • Segment 2 │
|
||
│ │ • Segment 3 │
|
||
│ ├─────────────────┤
|
||
│ │ Revenue Streams │
|
||
│ │ │
|
||
│ │ • Stream 1: $X │
|
||
│ │ • Stream 2: $Y │
|
||
│ │ • Stream 3: $Z │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 7: Competitive Positioning
|
||
|
||
### 7.1 Generic Competitive Strategies (Porter)
|
||
|
||
**Three Generic Strategies**:
|
||
|
||
1. **Cost Leadership**
|
||
- Be the low-cost producer
|
||
- Compete on price
|
||
- High volume, low margin
|
||
- Examples: Walmart, Southwest Airlines
|
||
|
||
2. **Differentiation**
|
||
- Offer unique value
|
||
- Compete on features/quality
|
||
- Premium pricing
|
||
- Examples: Apple, Tesla
|
||
|
||
3. **Focus (Niche)**
|
||
- Target specific segment
|
||
- Cost focus or differentiation focus
|
||
- Deep expertise in niche
|
||
- Examples: Ferrari, Lululemon
|
||
|
||
**Strategic Positioning Map**:
|
||
```
|
||
│ High Differentiation
|
||
│
|
||
Premium Differentiated
|
||
│ │
|
||
────┼─────────┼──────────► Cost
|
||
│ │
|
||
Mass Low-Cost
|
||
Market Leader
|
||
│
|
||
│ Low Differentiation
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 7.2 Competitive Advantage Sources
|
||
|
||
**Sustainable Competitive Advantages**:
|
||
|
||
1. **Proprietary Technology**
|
||
- Patents, trade secrets
|
||
- Examples: Pharma drugs, Tesla batteries
|
||
|
||
2. **Network Effects**
|
||
- Value increases with users
|
||
- Examples: Facebook, Visa, eBay
|
||
|
||
3. **Brand / Reputation**
|
||
- Customer loyalty, premium pricing
|
||
- Examples: Coca-Cola, Nike
|
||
|
||
4. **Switching Costs**
|
||
- Expensive/difficult to switch
|
||
- Examples: SAP, Adobe Creative Suite
|
||
|
||
5. **Scale Economies**
|
||
- Lower unit costs at scale
|
||
- Examples: Amazon, Costco
|
||
|
||
6. **Regulatory Licenses**
|
||
- Government-granted monopolies
|
||
- Examples: Utilities, casinos
|
||
|
||
**Advantage Sustainability Test**:
|
||
- Is it valuable? (Does it create value?)
|
||
- Is it rare? (Do few competitors have it?)
|
||
- Is it inimitable? (Hard to copy?)
|
||
- Is it organized? (Can we exploit it?)
|
||
|
||
### 7.3 Positioning Statement
|
||
|
||
**Template**:
|
||
```
|
||
For [target customer]
|
||
Who [statement of need or opportunity]
|
||
[Product/brand name] is [product category]
|
||
That [statement of benefit]
|
||
Unlike [competitive alternative]
|
||
Our product [statement of primary differentiation]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Example - Tesla**:
|
||
```
|
||
For affluent, environmentally-conscious drivers
|
||
Who want performance without compromising values
|
||
Tesla is an electric vehicle
|
||
That delivers supercar performance with zero emissions
|
||
Unlike traditional luxury cars
|
||
Tesla provides cutting-edge technology, over-the-air updates, and a sustainable ownership experience
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 8: Scenario Planning
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Prepare for multiple possible futures
|
||
|
||
**Process**:
|
||
|
||
**Step 1: Identify Focal Issue**
|
||
- What decision needs to be made?
|
||
- What time horizon matters?
|
||
|
||
**Step 2: Key Driving Forces**
|
||
- Economic trends
|
||
- Technological changes
|
||
- Regulatory shifts
|
||
- Social/demographic changes
|
||
- Competitive dynamics
|
||
|
||
**Step 3: Critical Uncertainties**
|
||
- Which forces are most uncertain?
|
||
- Which have highest impact?
|
||
- Typically: 2 dimensions create 4 scenarios
|
||
|
||
**Step 4: Develop Scenarios**
|
||
- Create plausible, distinct futures
|
||
- Name each scenario memorably
|
||
- Develop detailed narratives
|
||
|
||
**Step 5: Implications & Strategies**
|
||
- What does each scenario mean for us?
|
||
- What strategies work across scenarios?
|
||
- What are scenario-specific actions?
|
||
|
||
**Scenario Framework Template**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Scenario Planning: [Topic]
|
||
**Time Horizon**: [Year]
|
||
|
||
### Critical Uncertainties
|
||
1. [Uncertainty 1]: Will [X] happen? (High impact, High uncertainty)
|
||
2. [Uncertainty 2]: Will [Y] accelerate? (High impact, High uncertainty)
|
||
|
||
### Four Scenarios
|
||
|
||
#### Scenario A: [Memorable Name]
|
||
**Uncertainty 1**: [Outcome A]
|
||
**Uncertainty 2**: [Outcome A]
|
||
|
||
**Narrative**: [Story of how this future unfolds]
|
||
|
||
**Implications for Our Business**:
|
||
- Market size: [Estimate]
|
||
- Key opportunities: [List]
|
||
- Major threats: [List]
|
||
- Required capabilities: [List]
|
||
|
||
**Strategic Actions**:
|
||
- [ ] Action 1
|
||
- [ ] Action 2
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### Scenario B: [Memorable Name]
|
||
**Uncertainty 1**: [Outcome A]
|
||
**Uncertainty 2**: [Outcome B]
|
||
|
||
[Similar structure...]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### Scenario C: [Memorable Name]
|
||
[Similar structure...]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### Scenario D: [Memorable Name]
|
||
[Similar structure...]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Robust Strategies (Work across all scenarios)
|
||
1. [Strategy that works regardless]
|
||
2. [Strategy that works regardless]
|
||
3. [Strategy that works regardless]
|
||
|
||
### Contingent Strategies (Scenario-specific)
|
||
| Trigger Signal | Action | Timeline |
|
||
|----------------|--------|----------|
|
||
| If [signal A observed] | Then [action X] | Within [timeframe] |
|
||
| If [signal B observed] | Then [action Y] | Within [timeframe] |
|
||
|
||
### Monitoring Plan
|
||
- [ ] Track [leading indicator 1] monthly
|
||
- [ ] Review [metric 2] quarterly
|
||
- [ ] Reassess scenarios annually
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 9: Strategic Roadmapping
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Translate strategy into actionable timeline
|
||
|
||
**Time Horizons**:
|
||
- **Horizon 1** (0-12 months): Optimize core business
|
||
- **Horizon 2** (1-3 years): Build emerging opportunities
|
||
- **Horizon 3** (3-5 years): Create future options
|
||
|
||
**Roadmap Structure**:
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## Strategic Roadmap: [Company Name]
|
||
**Planning Period**: [Year 1 - Year 3]
|
||
|
||
### Horizon 1: Optimize Core (Next 12 Months)
|
||
**Objective**: Strengthen foundation and generate cash
|
||
|
||
**Q1 2024**:
|
||
- Launch [Product Enhancement]
|
||
- Expand sales team from 5 to 10 reps
|
||
- Implement CRM system
|
||
- Target: $2M revenue, 20% growth
|
||
|
||
**Q2 2024**:
|
||
- Enter [Adjacent Market]
|
||
- Achieve profitability
|
||
- Launch customer success program
|
||
- Target: $2.5M revenue, positive EBITDA
|
||
|
||
**Q3 2024**:
|
||
- Release [Version 2.0]
|
||
- Open second office
|
||
- Hire VP of Marketing
|
||
- Target: $3M revenue, 15% margin
|
||
|
||
**Q4 2024**:
|
||
- Strategic partnership with [Partner]
|
||
- Year-end: $11M total revenue, Series A fundraise
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Horizon 2: Emerging Opportunities (Years 2-3)
|
||
**Objective**: Build next-generation offerings
|
||
|
||
**Year 2 (2025)**:
|
||
- Develop [New Product Line]
|
||
- Expand internationally (UK, Germany)
|
||
- Acquire complementary startup
|
||
- Target: $20M revenue, 50% from new products
|
||
|
||
**Year 3 (2026)**:
|
||
- Launch [Platform Version]
|
||
- Establish marketplace/ecosystem
|
||
- Strategic partnership with enterprise player
|
||
- Target: $35M revenue, market leader in niche
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Horizon 3: Future Options (Years 4-5)
|
||
**Objective**: Position for transformational growth
|
||
|
||
**Year 4-5 (2027-2028)**:
|
||
- Explore [Adjacent Industry]
|
||
- R&D investment in [Emerging Technology]
|
||
- Potential IPO or strategic exit
|
||
- Target: $60M+ revenue, category leader
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Key Milestones
|
||
| Date | Milestone | Owner | Status |
|
||
|------|-----------|-------|--------|
|
||
| Q1 2024 | Product launch | CPO | ⏳ |
|
||
| Q2 2024 | Profitability | CFO | ⏳ |
|
||
| Q4 2024 | Series A close | CEO | ⏳ |
|
||
| Q2 2025 | International launch | CMO | ⏳ |
|
||
| Q4 2025 | Acquisition close | CEO | ⏳ |
|
||
| 2026 | Platform launch | CPO | ⏳ |
|
||
| 2028 | Liquidity event | Board | ⏳ |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Resource Allocation
|
||
| Horizon | % of Resources | Focus |
|
||
|---------|---------------|-------|
|
||
| H1 (Core) | 70% | Maximize existing business |
|
||
| H2 (Emerging) | 20% | Build future growth engines |
|
||
| H3 (Future) | 10% | Create options, experiment |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Strategic Themes (Across all horizons)
|
||
1. **Customer Obsession**: NPS >70 by 2025
|
||
2. **Product Excellence**: Release velocity 2x by 2024
|
||
3. **Operational Excellence**: 85%+ gross margin by 2026
|
||
4. **Talent & Culture**: Top 10 best places to work by 2027
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Dependencies & Risks
|
||
| Dependency | Risk if Delayed | Mitigation |
|
||
|------------|----------------|------------|
|
||
| Series A funding | Delayed expansion | Bootstrap Q1-2, smaller raise |
|
||
| Key hire (VP Eng) | Product delays | Engage recruiters now, retention bonus |
|
||
| Partnership deal | Market access limited | Direct sales backup plan |
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 10: Change Management
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Execute strategy through organizational transformation
|
||
|
||
### Kotter's 8-Step Change Process
|
||
|
||
1. **Create Urgency**
|
||
- Share market data showing need
|
||
- Highlight competitor threats
|
||
- Demonstrate burning platform
|
||
|
||
2. **Build Guiding Coalition**
|
||
- Assemble leadership team
|
||
- Include diverse perspectives
|
||
- Ensure authority and influence
|
||
|
||
3. **Form Strategic Vision**
|
||
- Clear picture of future
|
||
- Sensible strategy to achieve it
|
||
- Easy to communicate
|
||
|
||
4. **Enlist Volunteer Army**
|
||
- Communicate vision broadly
|
||
- Inspire and engage employees
|
||
- Create champions throughout org
|
||
|
||
5. **Enable Action by Removing Barriers**
|
||
- Remove obstacles
|
||
- Change systems and structures
|
||
- Empower broad-based action
|
||
|
||
6. **Generate Short-Term Wins**
|
||
- Plan for visible wins
|
||
- Create early successes
|
||
- Recognize and reward progress
|
||
|
||
7. **Sustain Acceleration**
|
||
- Use credibility to change systems
|
||
- Promote and develop change leaders
|
||
- Reinvigorate with new projects
|
||
|
||
8. **Institute Change**
|
||
- Articulate connections between behaviors and success
|
||
- Develop means to ensure leadership development
|
||
- Embed in culture
|
||
|
||
### Change Communication Plan
|
||
|
||
**What to Communicate**:
|
||
- Why we're changing (burning platform)
|
||
- Where we're going (vision)
|
||
- How we'll get there (strategy)
|
||
- What's in it for me (individual impact)
|
||
- What happens next (timeline)
|
||
|
||
**Communication Vehicles**:
|
||
- Town halls (for inspiration)
|
||
- Team meetings (for discussion)
|
||
- 1-on-1s (for individual concerns)
|
||
- Email updates (for consistency)
|
||
- Slack/Teams (for questions)
|
||
- Dashboard (for progress)
|
||
|
||
**Frequency**:
|
||
- Major milestones: Town hall
|
||
- Weekly: Email update
|
||
- Monthly: Team meetings
|
||
- Quarterly: Strategy review
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Best Practices Checklist
|
||
|
||
### Strategy Development
|
||
- [ ] Based on deep market and competitive analysis
|
||
- [ ] Aligned with company capabilities and resources
|
||
- [ ] Clear choices made (what NOT to do)
|
||
- [ ] Stakeholder buy-in achieved
|
||
- [ ] Risk factors identified and mitigated
|
||
- [ ] Success metrics defined
|
||
- [ ] Realistic timeline with milestones
|
||
|
||
### Vision & Mission
|
||
- [ ] Vision is inspirational and future-oriented
|
||
- [ ] Mission is clear and action-oriented
|
||
- [ ] Values are authentic and practiced
|
||
- [ ] Communicable and memorable
|
||
- [ ] Aligned throughout organization
|
||
|
||
### Strategic Planning
|
||
- [ ] Multiple frameworks used (not just one)
|
||
- [ ] Data-driven with qualitative judgment
|
||
- [ ] Includes financial modeling
|
||
- [ ] Scenario planning for uncertainty
|
||
- [ ] Resource requirements identified
|
||
- [ ] Implementation roadmap created
|
||
- [ ] Governance and review process established
|
||
|
||
### Execution
|
||
- [ ] OKRs/KPIs track progress
|
||
- [ ] Regular review cadence (monthly/quarterly)
|
||
- [ ] Transparent dashboards
|
||
- [ ] Accountability assigned
|
||
- [ ] Course corrections made quickly
|
||
- [ ] Wins celebrated and communicated
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Version**: 1.0
|
||
**Last Updated**: January 2025
|
||
**Use Cases**: Corporate strategy, business planning, competitive analysis, growth strategy, M&A evaluation
|