Files
gh-yaleh-meta-cc-claude/skills/baseline-quality-assessment/examples/testing-strategy-minimal-baseline.md
2025-11-30 09:07:22 +08:00

70 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Testing Strategy: Minimal Baseline Example
**Experiment**: bootstrap-002-test-strategy
**Baseline Investment**: 60 min
**V_meta(s₀)**: 0.04 (Poor)
**Result**: 6 iterations (standard convergence)
---
## Activities (60 min)
### 1. Coverage Measurement (30 min)
```bash
go test -cover ./...
# Result: 72.1% coverage, 590 tests
```
### 2. Ad-hoc Testing (20 min)
Wrote 3 tests manually, noted duplication issues
### 3. No Prior Art Research (0 min)
Started from scratch
### 4. Vague Automation Ideas (10 min)
"Maybe coverage analysis tools..." (not concrete)
---
## V_meta(s₀) Calculation
```
Completeness: 0/8 = 0.00 (no patterns documented)
Transferability: 0/8 = 0.00 (no research)
Automation: 0/3 = 0.00 (not identified)
V_meta(s₀) = 0.4×0.00 + 0.3×0.00 + 0.3×0.00 = 0.00
```
---
## Outcome
- Iterations: 6 (standard convergence)
- Total time: 25.5 hours
- Patterns emerged gradually over 6 iterations
---
## What Could Have Been Different
**If invested 2 more hours in iteration 0**:
- Research test patterns (borrow 5-6)
- Analyze codebase for test opportunities
- Identify coverage tools
**Estimated result**:
- V_meta(s₀) = 0.30-0.40
- 4-5 iterations (vs 6)
- Time saved: 3-6 hours
**ROI**: 2-3x
---
**Source**: Bootstrap-002, minimal baseline approach