gh-wasabeef-claude-code-cookbook-plugins-en/commands/pr-feedback.md

PR Feedback

Efficiently handle Pull Request review comments and achieve root cause resolution using a 3-stage error analysis approach.

Usage

# Retrieve and analyze review comments
gh pr view --comments
"Classify review comments by priority and create an action plan"

# Detailed analysis of error-related comments
gh pr checks
"Analyze CI errors using a 3-stage approach to identify root causes"

# Quality confirmation after fixes
npm test && npm run lint
"Fixes are complete - please check regression tests and code quality"

Basic Examples

# Classify comments
gh pr view 123 --comments | head -20
"Classify review comments into must/imo/nits/q categories and determine response order"

# Collect error information
npm run build 2>&1 | tee error.log
"Identify the root cause of build errors and suggest appropriate fixes"

# Verify fix implementation
git diff HEAD~1
"Evaluate whether this fix appropriately addresses the review comments"

Comment Classification System

🔴 must: Required fixes
├─ Security issues
├─ Functional bugs
├─ Design principle violations
└─ Convention violations

🟡 imo: Improvement suggestions
├─ Better implementation methods
├─ Performance improvements
├─ Readability enhancements
└─ Refactoring proposals

🟢 nits: Minor points
├─ Typo fixes
├─ Indentation adjustments
├─ Comment additions
└─ Naming refinements

🔵 q: Questions/confirmations
├─ Implementation intent verification
├─ Specification clarification
├─ Design decision background
└─ Alternative solution consideration

3-Stage Error Analysis Approach

Stage 1: Information Collection

Required actions

• Full error message capture
• Stack trace review
• Reproduction condition identification

Recommended actions

• Environment information collection
• Recent change history
• Related logs review

Stage 2: Root Cause Analysis

• 5 Whys analysis application
• Dependency tracking
• Environment difference checking
• Minimal reproduction code creation

Stage 3: Solution Implementation

• Immediate response (hotfix)
• Root cause resolution (essential fix)
• Preventive measures (recurrence prevention)

Response Flow

1. Comment analysis: Classification by priority
2. Fix plan: Determining response order
3. Phased fixes: Critical → High → Medium → Low
4. Quality confirmation: Testing, linting, building
5. Progress report: Description of specific fixes

Post-Fix Verification

# Basic checks
npm test
npm run lint
npm run build

# Regression tests
npm run test:e2e

# Code quality
npm run test:coverage

Reply Templates

Fix completion report

@reviewer Thank you for your feedback.
Fixes are complete:

- [Specific fix details]
- [Test results]
- [Verification method]

Technical decision explanation

Implementation background: [Reason]
Considered alternatives: [Options and decision rationale]
Adopted solution benefits: [Advantages]

Notes

• Priority adherence: Address in order of Critical → High → Medium → Low
• Test first: Confirm regression tests before making fixes
• Clear reporting: Describe fix details and verification methods specifically
• Constructive dialogue: Polite communication based on technical grounds