595 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
595 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
# Crypto/Web3 Founder Guide
|
||
|
||
Specific considerations for crypto founders, with focus on Solana ecosystem (November 2025).
|
||
|
||
## Market Context (November 2025)
|
||
|
||
### Crypto Adoption (a16z State of Crypto 2025)
|
||
|
||
**Market Size** ([a16z State of Crypto 2025](https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/state-of-crypto-report-2025/))
|
||
- **Total market cap**: Crossed $4 trillion (first time)
|
||
- **Crypto owners globally**: 716 million (+16% YoY)
|
||
- **Active onchain users**: 40-70 million
|
||
- **Mobile wallet users**: All-time highs (+20% YoY)
|
||
- **Only 5.6-9.8% of owners** actively transact onchain—massive builder opportunity
|
||
|
||
**Infrastructure Readiness**
|
||
- **3,400+ TPS** aggregate across major networks (100x growth in 5 years)
|
||
- **L2 fees dropped**: ~$24 (2021) → <$0.01 (2025)
|
||
- **Blockspace**: Now "cheap and abundant" per a16z
|
||
|
||
### Current Conditions
|
||
|
||
**Market State**
|
||
- Correction phase: BTC from $111K peak to sub-$100K
|
||
- "Extreme Fear" on sentiment indicators
|
||
- $340B market cap wipeout
|
||
- $19B in liquidations
|
||
|
||
**The Opportunity**
|
||
- Historic precedent: Extreme fear precedes major recoveries
|
||
- Companies building through volatility dominate next cycle
|
||
- Hiring strategy should be tied to execution milestones, not prices
|
||
- Your strategy should not change based on daily price action
|
||
|
||
### Funding Reality
|
||
|
||
**Q1-Q3 2025: $22.8B Total** (Sources: [Galaxy Digital Q3 2025](https://www.galaxy.com/insights/research/crypto-blockchain-venture-capital-q3), [CryptoRank Q3 2025](https://cryptorank.io/insights/reports/crypto-fundraising-report-Q3-25))
|
||
- **Q1 2025:** $4.8B (incl. $2B Binance/MGX—largest crypto VC deal ever)
|
||
- **Q2 2025:** $10B+—first quarter exceeding $10B in 3 years
|
||
- **Q3 2025:** $4.65B across 415 deals (7 deals = 50% of capital)
|
||
- **Median deal size:** $4.5M (all-time high) ([Galaxy Q3 2025](https://www.galaxy.com/insights/research/crypto-blockchain-venture-capital-q3))
|
||
- **US dominance:** 40-47% of all deals and capital
|
||
- **IPOs replacing tokens:** Circle IPO (5x return), Strategy $2.47B IPO, Bullish $1.11B IPO
|
||
- **GENIUS Act passed (Jul 2025)**—first federal stablecoin framework
|
||
- **Seed→Series A graduation:** Only 17% of seed-funded crypto companies reach Series A ([funding.decentralised.co](https://funding.decentralised.co/))
|
||
|
||
**Priority Sectors by VC Evidence** (Sources: [Galaxy Digital](https://www.galaxy.com/insights/research/crypto-blockchain-venture-capital-q3), [a16z State of Crypto 2025](https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/state-of-crypto-report-2025/), [CryptoRank](https://cryptorank.io/insights/reports/crypto-fundraising-report-Q3-25))
|
||
| Sector | Signal |
|
||
|--------|--------|
|
||
| Stablecoins/Payments | $46T transaction volume (106% YoY); $300B+ supply; #17 US Treasury holder – a16z |
|
||
| CeFi + Infrastructure | >60% of Q3 2025 funding; IPO exits proving business models – CryptoRank |
|
||
| DeFi (Solana-focused) | ~20% of spot trading on DEXs; Hyperliquid $1B+ annualized revenue – a16z |
|
||
| Crypto-AI Integration | $30T agent economy by 2030 (Gartner via a16z); top thesis for Pantera |
|
||
| DePIN | $3.5T projected by 2028 (WEF); Helium 1.4M daily users, 111K hotspots |
|
||
| RWAs/Tokenization | $30B tokenized on-chain; 4x growth in 2 years – a16z |
|
||
|
||
**What's Declining**: Security tooling, generic interoperability, NFT speculation, enterprise blockchain.
|
||
|
||
**What VCs Want**
|
||
- Revenue-generating models over speculation
|
||
- Regulatory compliance as competitive advantage
|
||
- Sustainable unit economics
|
||
- Infrastructure plays > consumer apps
|
||
|
||
**Rob Hadick** (Dragonfly): "Don't see funding levels reaching 2021-2022 highs for a very long time." Established companies (founded ~2018) getting majority of capital; newer companies get deal count but smaller checks.
|
||
|
||
### Global Developer Landscape (Electric Capital 2024)
|
||
|
||
**Geographic Shift** ([Electric Capital Developer Report 2024](https://developerreport.com/developer-report))
|
||
- **Asia overtook North America** as #1 region for crypto developers (32% vs 24%)
|
||
- **India**: Rose from 10th to 2nd globally, contributing 17% of new developers
|
||
- **US share dropped**: From 38% (2015) to 19% (2024)—81% of crypto devs now outside US
|
||
- **34% of developers** now work on multiple chains (up from <10% in 2015)
|
||
|
||
**Developer Quality vs. Quantity**
|
||
- Total monthly active devs: 23,613 (-7% YoY)
|
||
- BUT established developers (2+ years): **+27% YoY** (all-time high)
|
||
- 70% of all code commits from 2+ year developers
|
||
- 80% of developer losses from part-time/one-time contributors
|
||
|
||
**Ecosystem Rankings**
|
||
| Ecosystem | Monthly Active Devs | New Devs (2024) | YoY Growth |
|
||
|-----------|---------------------|-----------------|------------|
|
||
| Ethereum (+ L2s) | 31,869 | 16,181 | - |
|
||
| Solana | 17,708 | 7,625 | +83% |
|
||
| Bitcoin | ~1,200 | 7,400+ | Stable |
|
||
|
||
## Solana Ecosystem
|
||
|
||
### Network Performance (Q3 2025)
|
||
|
||
Source: [Messari State of Solana Q3 2025](https://messari.io/report/state-of-solana-q3-2025)
|
||
|
||
- **Avg Daily Non-Vote Txs**: 95.9M — real user activity (excludes validator votes)
|
||
- **Avg Daily Fee Payers**: 2.8M unique addresses
|
||
- **Avg Tx Fee**: $0.012 (0.000061 SOL)
|
||
- **Median Tx Fee**: $0.0012 (0.000006 SOL) — local fee markets keep costs low even during spikes
|
||
- **Active Validators**: 963 across 38 countries, 208 data centers
|
||
- **Nakamoto Coefficient**: 20 — above median of other networks
|
||
- **Uptime**: 16+ months continuous (longest since launch)
|
||
- **Peak TPS**: Briefly hit 100,000 TPS under stress test
|
||
|
||
### Economic Strength (Q3 2025)
|
||
|
||
Source: [Messari State of Solana Q3 2025](https://messari.io/report/state-of-solana-q3-2025)
|
||
|
||
- **DeFi TVL**: $11.5B (+32.7% QoQ) — #2 among all networks after surpassing TRON
|
||
- **Stablecoin Market Cap**: $14.1B (+36.5% QoQ, ATH) — USDC $10B (71%), USDT $2.4B (17%)
|
||
- **Chain GDP (App Revenue)**: $584.3M — PumpFun $118M, Jupiter $93M, Axiom $85M
|
||
- **App Revenue Capture Ratio**: 262.8% — apps earn $2.63 for every $1 in tx fees
|
||
- **Q3 REV**: $222.3M — highest of all blockchains (base fees + priority fees + MEV tips)
|
||
- **Avg Daily DEX Volume**: $4B spot (+17% QoQ), $1.6B perps (+93% QoQ)
|
||
- **RWA Value**: $682.2M (+41.9% QoQ) — USDY, BUIDL, ONyc leading
|
||
- **Developer Growth**: #1 for new developers globally with 7,625 new devs in 2024 (+83% YoY); 17,708 active total ([Electric Capital 2024](https://developerreport.com/developer-report))
|
||
- **Only country where Solana is #1**: India (27% of new Indian devs chose Solana)
|
||
|
||
### Institutional Adoption
|
||
|
||
Source: [Messari State of Solana Q3 2025](https://messari.io/report/state-of-solana-q3-2025)
|
||
|
||
- **Rex Osprey Solana Staking ETF (SSK)**: First US staking crypto ETF, launched July 2, 2025 — $330.2M flows since inception
|
||
- **9 additional SOL ETF filings** pending approval (VanEck, Invesco, Galaxy, others)
|
||
- **Digital Asset Treasury Companies (DATs)**: 20 companies hold 18.9M SOL ($3.9B)
|
||
- Forward Industries: 6.8M SOL (largest) — $1.65B raise led by Galaxy, Jump, Multicoin
|
||
- Solana Company: 2.2M SOL (backed by Pantera, Summer Capital)
|
||
- **Total Staked**: 409.6M SOL ($85.5B) — 67.1% of circulating supply
|
||
|
||
### Why Solana Wins for Payments/Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
- Sub-200ms payments match x402 speed requirements
|
||
- Sub-penny fees enable true micropayments
|
||
- Proven scale (162M+ daily transactions)
|
||
- Existing payment infrastructure (USDC, Jupiter, Drift)
|
||
- Institutional validation (Franklin Templeton, BlackRock, Pantera)
|
||
|
||
## Grants & Funding Sources
|
||
|
||
### Solana Foundation Grants
|
||
|
||
**Program Overview**
|
||
- Total deployed: $100M+ across 500+ projects
|
||
- Grant types: Milestone-based, convertible, RFPs
|
||
|
||
**How to Apply**
|
||
1. Fill application at Solana Foundation portal
|
||
2. Project overview + public good justification
|
||
3. Structured budget + milestones
|
||
4. ~1 week review process
|
||
|
||
**Recent RFPs**
|
||
- $400K for Solana Actions/Blinks open-source dev
|
||
- $275K for open-source data tooling
|
||
- Solana Mobile Builder Grants
|
||
|
||
### Superteam Grants
|
||
|
||
**Fast Track for Emerging Markets**
|
||
- Funding: $200 - $10,000 (equity-free)
|
||
- Application: <15 minutes
|
||
- Decision: 48 hours
|
||
- Contact: grants@superteam.fun
|
||
|
||
**What Gets Funded**
|
||
- Public goods for Solana community
|
||
- Decentralization/censorship resistance tools
|
||
- Technical contributions + dApps
|
||
- Content creation/community initiatives
|
||
|
||
**What Doesn't Get Funded**
|
||
- Projects unrelated to Solana
|
||
- Purely commercial without community benefit
|
||
- No clear implementation plan
|
||
|
||
### Colosseum Accelerator
|
||
|
||
**Program Details**
|
||
- Investment: $250K pre-seed per team
|
||
- Acceptance rate: ~0.68% (highly competitive)
|
||
- Major hackathons: Renaissance, Radar, Breakout (2x/year)
|
||
- Eternal Challenge: Perpetual 4-week sprints (submit anytime)
|
||
- Eternal Award: $25K USDC semi-annually
|
||
|
||
**What They Look For**
|
||
- Technical excellence
|
||
- Clear problem/solution fit
|
||
- Strong team execution
|
||
- Ecosystem integration potential
|
||
|
||
### Other Funding Sources
|
||
|
||
**Ecosystem VCs**
|
||
- RockawayX: $125M Fund II (Solana focus)
|
||
- Solana Ventures: Active ecosystem support
|
||
- Multicoin Capital: Internet Capital Markets thesis
|
||
- Galaxy Digital: Deep Solana research
|
||
|
||
**Regional Programs**
|
||
- Solana x Cal Grants: Up to $10K USDC (USA)
|
||
- Superteam country chapters
|
||
|
||
## Regulatory Environment
|
||
|
||
### Project Crypto (SEC, November 2025)
|
||
|
||
**Major Shift**
|
||
- Chair Paul Atkins: Comprehensive regulatory modernization
|
||
- Token Taxonomy: Clear Howey analysis framework coming
|
||
- Multi-Function Platforms: Enabling crypto "super-apps"
|
||
- Goal: Position U.S. as global leader in digital finance
|
||
|
||
**What This Means**
|
||
- End of "regulation by enforcement"
|
||
- Clear rules for custody, trading, exchanges
|
||
- Path for crypto businesses to return to U.S.
|
||
- Compliance = competitive advantage
|
||
|
||
### Solana ETFs
|
||
|
||
**Breaking Development (June 2025)**
|
||
- SEC requested updated filings for Solana ETFs
|
||
- Approval expected within 4 months
|
||
- Will unlock institutional capital similar to BTC/ETH ETFs
|
||
|
||
### Practical Implications
|
||
|
||
- Budget for legal from day one ($25K-50K)
|
||
- Engage crypto-specialized lawyers
|
||
- Consider jurisdiction strategy
|
||
- Document compliance efforts
|
||
- Join industry groups (Blockchain Association)
|
||
|
||
## Go-to-Market for Crypto
|
||
|
||
### Building in Public vs. Stealth
|
||
|
||
**Community-First (Recommended for Most)**
|
||
- Build community BEFORE product launch
|
||
- Attract 100 "true fans" as foundation
|
||
- Authenticity >> marketing budget
|
||
- High-quality content + ecosystem participation
|
||
|
||
**When to Go Stealth**
|
||
- Highly competitive market with copycat risk
|
||
- Novel technology requiring IP protection
|
||
- Need quiet cycles to fix unit economics
|
||
|
||
**Hybrid (Popular)**
|
||
- Stealth dev + selective community building
|
||
- Share progress with early believers
|
||
- Launch to existing community
|
||
|
||
### Distribution Channels
|
||
|
||
**Developer Relations (Critical for Infrastructure)**
|
||
- Build tools that make developers successful
|
||
- Documentation >>> marketing
|
||
- Hackathons, workshops, tutorials
|
||
- DevRel = your growth engine
|
||
|
||
**X (Twitter) as Primary Channel**
|
||
- Founder-led narrative building
|
||
- Technical deep dives + progress updates
|
||
- Engage in ecosystem discussions
|
||
- Founder faces beat brand pages
|
||
|
||
**Progressive Disclosure**
|
||
- Don't announce until you have something to show
|
||
- Ship features, then market them
|
||
- Let users discover and evangelize
|
||
|
||
### Community as Product
|
||
|
||
**Core Principle**: Your community IS the product, not a marketing channel.
|
||
|
||
**Pre-Launch**
|
||
- Build small, dedicated group (100 true fans)
|
||
- Shared mission, not speculation
|
||
- Active ecosystem participation
|
||
|
||
**Launch**
|
||
- Reward true believers (not farmers)
|
||
- Design launch FOR your community
|
||
- Community becomes distribution
|
||
|
||
**Post-Launch**
|
||
- Turn users into owners
|
||
- Governance participation
|
||
- Co-creation of roadmap
|
||
|
||
## Revenue Models That Work
|
||
|
||
### DeFi Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
- **Transaction fees**: % of volume (DEXs, lending)
|
||
- **Spread/slippage**: Market making revenue
|
||
- **Staking fees**: 5-10% of staking rewards
|
||
- **MEV capture**: Via Jito or similar
|
||
|
||
### Payments Infrastructure
|
||
|
||
- **x402 Protocol**: Agent-to-agent payments
|
||
- **Payment rails**: Crypto-native settlement
|
||
- **B2B payments**: Stablecoin invoicing
|
||
- **Subscription models**: Recurring crypto payments
|
||
|
||
### Platform/Network Effects
|
||
|
||
- Marketplaces (take rate on transactions)
|
||
- Aggregators (fee per API call)
|
||
- Infrastructure-as-a-Service (RPC, indexing)
|
||
- Data/Analytics (subscription + API)
|
||
|
||
### What to Avoid
|
||
|
||
- Token-only value capture (no cash flow)
|
||
- Mercenary liquidity mining
|
||
- Ponzi-nomics (unsustainable yields)
|
||
- Grant-dependent (no path to sustainability)
|
||
|
||
**Key Principle**: Show path to real revenue within 12 months.
|
||
|
||
## Security & Audits
|
||
|
||
### Why Audits Are Non-Negotiable
|
||
|
||
**Historical Context**
|
||
- 2021: ~$2B lost to DeFi vulnerabilities
|
||
- 2022: Ronin ($600M), Euler ($197M)
|
||
- One exploit destroys project overnight
|
||
|
||
**What One Hack Costs**
|
||
- User funds (and trust) destroyed
|
||
- Project death
|
||
- Legal liability
|
||
- Blacklisted from future funding
|
||
|
||
### Audit Cost Breakdown
|
||
|
||
| Project Type | Cost Range | Timeline |
|
||
|-------------|-----------|----------|
|
||
| Simple Token | $8K - $15K | 1-2 weeks |
|
||
| DEX/AMM (Basic) | $25K - $50K | 2-4 weeks |
|
||
| Lending Protocol | $50K - $100K | 4-6 weeks |
|
||
| Complex DeFi | $100K - $150K+ | 6-8 weeks |
|
||
|
||
**Cost Factors**
|
||
- Code complexity (LOC, architecture)
|
||
- Novel mechanisms vs. battle-tested
|
||
- Firm reputation (Tier 1 = premium)
|
||
- Documentation quality
|
||
- Timeline (rush = 20-50% more)
|
||
|
||
### Top Audit Firms (Solana)
|
||
|
||
**Tier 1 ($$$)**
|
||
- Trail of Bits
|
||
- OpenZeppelin
|
||
- Halborn
|
||
|
||
**Tier 2 ($$)**
|
||
- OtterSec (Solana-native)
|
||
- Neodyme (Solana-focused)
|
||
- Sec3
|
||
- Zellic
|
||
|
||
### Cost-Saving Strategies
|
||
|
||
1. **Clean code first**: Internal review reduces scope
|
||
2. **Clear documentation**: Saves auditor time
|
||
3. **Battle-tested libraries**: Anchor, SPL standards
|
||
4. **Start small**: Audit MVP, iterate
|
||
5. **Multiple audits**: 2 smaller audits vs. 1 expensive
|
||
|
||
### Pre-Audit Checklist
|
||
|
||
- [ ] Comprehensive test suite (>80% coverage)
|
||
- [ ] Internal security review
|
||
- [ ] Clear architecture documentation
|
||
- [ ] Threat model documented
|
||
- [ ] Known issues/assumptions listed
|
||
- [ ] Testnet deployment + stress testing
|
||
|
||
**Budget Rule**: 5-10% of development budget for audits.
|
||
|
||
## Crypto-Specific Death Patterns
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 1: Building Tech Without a Problem (~30% of failures)
|
||
|
||
"Cool tech but without ever thinking if it's solving a real problem."
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: Can't answer "Why does this need to be on-chain?" simply
|
||
**Coaching question**: "If blockchain didn't exist, how would you solve this problem?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 2: Token Before Product
|
||
|
||
Large premines, no economic flywheel, speculation-driven.
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: TGE announcement before product traction metrics
|
||
**Coaching question**: "What would your product look like if you never launched a token?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 3: Regulatory Naïveté
|
||
|
||
No legal counsel, no token classification analysis.
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: Launching in jurisdiction you don't understand
|
||
**Coaching question**: "Have you had a securities lawyer review your token structure?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 4: Ecosystem Protocol Dependency
|
||
|
||
Building on experimental chains without escape plan.
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: Core infrastructure depends on unproven L2/protocol
|
||
**Coaching question**: "What happens if [dependency] fails or pivots? What's your exit plan?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 5: VC Capital Without PMF
|
||
|
||
VCs now "laser-focused on fundamentals"—funding without product-market fit is increasingly rare.
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: Spending VC money on growth before retention metrics work
|
||
**Coaching question**: "If you couldn't raise more money, how would you get to profitability?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 6: The 53% Failure Rate
|
||
|
||
1.8M tokens failed in Q1 2025 alone; 52.7% of all cryptos since 2021 are "dead" ([CoinGecko Research, April 2025](https://www.coingecko.com/research/publications/how-many-cryptos-failed)).
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: No differentiation from existing solutions
|
||
**Coaching question**: "What's different about your approach that would make you survive when half of projects fail?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 7: Ignoring Sybil-Proofing
|
||
|
||
zkSync, Starknet heavily criticized for airdrop farmer capture.
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: Airdrop strategy without anti-sybil measures
|
||
**Coaching question**: "How do you ensure your token distribution rewards real users, not farmers?"
|
||
|
||
### Pattern 8: Hype > Delivery
|
||
|
||
Marketing roadmap commitments you can't ship.
|
||
|
||
**Death signal**: Public promises with no technical execution plan
|
||
**Coaching question**: "Can you ship what you've promised in the next 90 days? What's blocking you?"
|
||
|
||
*Note: The following percentages are estimates based on industry post-mortems and VC analysis, not a single comprehensive study.*
|
||
|
||
### Weak Security (~25% of failures)
|
||
- Rushed smart contracts
|
||
- Skipped audits
|
||
- Result: Hacks, drained treasuries
|
||
|
||
### Overhyped Fundraising (~20% of failures)
|
||
- Raise millions without sustainable product
|
||
- Burn > runway before PMF
|
||
|
||
### Poor Community Trust (~15% of failures)
|
||
- Broken promises
|
||
- Anonymous teams that rug
|
||
- Ignored feedback
|
||
|
||
### Ignoring Compliance (~10% of failures)
|
||
- "Move fast and break things" doesn't work
|
||
- Regulatory enforcement kills projects
|
||
|
||
### Pre-Revenue Specific
|
||
|
||
- Burning cash on marketing too early
|
||
- Wrong team composition (too much biz/ops before PMF)
|
||
- Chasing hype cycles (pivoting to whatever's hot)
|
||
- Neglecting audits
|
||
|
||
## Successful Project Patterns
|
||
|
||
### Jupiter (DEX Aggregator)
|
||
- Technical excellence first
|
||
- Best execution for traders
|
||
- Clean UX rivaling CEXs
|
||
- Built reputation before token
|
||
- Community-first governance
|
||
|
||
### Drift Protocol (Perpetuals)
|
||
- First-mover advantage
|
||
- Strong technical documentation
|
||
- Active community
|
||
- Continuous iteration
|
||
|
||
### Jito (Liquid Staking + MEV)
|
||
- Solved real problem (MEV redistribution)
|
||
- Built infrastructure others depend on
|
||
- Technical credibility first
|
||
- Open-source + transparent
|
||
|
||
### Common Patterns
|
||
|
||
1. **Technical Excellence First**: Product works reliably at scale
|
||
2. **Solve Real Problem**: "Must have" not "nice to have"
|
||
3. **Community-Driven**: Users become evangelists
|
||
4. **Transparent Operations**: Regular updates, public roadmap
|
||
5. **Ecosystem Integration**: Composability with other protocols
|
||
6. **Sustainable Economics**: Real revenue, not speculation
|
||
|
||
## Treasury Management
|
||
|
||
### The Challenge
|
||
- Token-based treasuries lose value in downturns
|
||
- Fundraising dries up in bear markets
|
||
- User acquisition costs rise
|
||
|
||
### Recommended Allocation
|
||
|
||
- **50%+ Stables (USDC)**: Operational runway
|
||
- **30% Blue Chips (SOL, BTC, ETH)**: Moderate exposure
|
||
- **20% Native Token**: If applicable
|
||
|
||
### Runway Discipline
|
||
|
||
- 24-month minimum runway at all times
|
||
- Burn rate tied to milestones, not price
|
||
- Monthly financial reviews
|
||
- Scenario planning (bull/bear cases)
|
||
|
||
### Hiring Strategy
|
||
|
||
- Hire for execution milestones, not market conditions
|
||
- Pay market rates (don't "time" with low salaries)
|
||
- Equity/tokens + stables (not just tokens)
|
||
|
||
## 18-Month Path to Seed
|
||
|
||
### Phase 1: Grants (Month 1-6)
|
||
- Apply: Solana Foundation, Superteam
|
||
- Target: $10K-50K initial capital
|
||
- Build MVP + core community (100 people)
|
||
|
||
### Phase 2: Accelerator (Month 4-9)
|
||
- Colosseum Eternal (anytime submission)
|
||
- Major hackathon participation
|
||
- Target: $250K pre-seed
|
||
|
||
### Phase 3: Launch + Traction (Month 6-12)
|
||
- Mainnet launch with audits
|
||
- Ecosystem partnerships
|
||
- First $10K revenue month
|
||
- Revenue model validation
|
||
|
||
### Phase 4: Seed Round (Month 12-18)
|
||
- Show revenue + community traction
|
||
- Target Solana-focused VCs
|
||
- Target: $1M-3M seed
|
||
|
||
### Budget Framework
|
||
|
||
**Capital Sources**
|
||
- Grants: $50K-100K
|
||
- Accelerator: $250K
|
||
- Early Revenue: $25K-100K
|
||
- Seed: $1M-3M
|
||
|
||
**Burn Rate**
|
||
- Pre-Accelerator: $15K-25K/month
|
||
- Post-Accelerator: $40K-60K/month
|
||
- Post-Seed: $100K-150K/month
|
||
|
||
**Key Milestones**
|
||
- Month 3: First grant received
|
||
- Month 6: Accelerator acceptance
|
||
- Month 9: MVP on mainnet
|
||
- Month 12: First $10K revenue month
|
||
- Month 18: Seed round closed
|
||
|
||
## Resources
|
||
|
||
### Communities
|
||
- Solana Discord
|
||
- Superteam (regional chapters)
|
||
- Colosseum Discord
|
||
- Helius Dev Community
|
||
|
||
### Tools
|
||
- RPC: Helius, Triton, QuickNode
|
||
- Analytics: Dune, Flipside
|
||
- Testing: Bankrun, Devnet
|
||
|
||
### Content & Research (Free)
|
||
- [Galaxy Digital Research](https://www.galaxy.com/insights/research/) - Quarterly VC reports, institutional grade
|
||
- [a16z State of Crypto](https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/state-of-crypto-report-2025/) - Annual comprehensive report
|
||
- [Electric Capital Developer Report](https://developerreport.com/developer-report) - Developer ecosystem data
|
||
- [CryptoRank Reports](https://cryptorank.io/insights/reports/) - Quarterly funding analysis
|
||
- [funding.decentralised.co](https://funding.decentralised.co/) - 15K+ funding rounds database (free)
|
||
- Helius Blog - Solana ecosystem reports
|
||
- Messari - Some free reports, enterprise paywalled
|
||
|
||
### Events
|
||
- Breakpoint (annual conference)
|
||
- Solana Hacker House (global)
|
||
- Colosseum Hackathons
|