gh-taylorhuston-ai-toolkit-plugins-ai-toolkit/commands/sync-progress.md

tags, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools, model, references_guidelines

tags	description	argument-hint	allowed-tools	model	references_guidelines
workflow manual-changes planning	Sync project state after manual changes via git diff analysis		Read Write Edit Bash Glob Grep TodoWrite	claude-sonnet-4-5	docs/development/workflows/pm-workflows.md docs/development/workflows/worklog-format.md docs/development/workflows/git-workflow.md

/sync-progress Command

WHAT: Automatically sync project state when user makes manual changes.

WHY: Analyzes git diff, updates plan to reflect progress, and documents changes in WORKLOG without manual explanation.

HOW: See pm-guide.md for plan/phase management, worklog-format.md for entry structure, git-workflow.md for git analysis.

---

Workflow

1. Analyze Changes

Run these commands to understand what changed:

# Check for uncommitted changes
git diff

# Check staged changes
git diff --staged

# Get summary of changed files
git status --short

2. Read Current State

Read the following files if they exist:

• pm/active/PLAN.md - Current task plan
• pm/active/WORKLOG.md - Work history
• pm/active/spec.md - Feature specification (if applicable)

3. Analyze and Update

For each changed file in git diff:

1. Determine intent - What was the user trying to accomplish?

   • New feature implementation
   • Bug fix
   • Refactoring
   • Configuration change
   • Documentation update

2. Compare to PLAN.md:

   • Which phase/task does this relate to?
   • Is this planned work or new direction?
   • Should any phases be marked complete?
   • Are there new tasks to add?

3. Update PLAN.md:

   • If there is ANY ambiguity clarify with user
   • Mark completed phases as [x] COMPLETED
   • Update phase descriptions if approach changed
   • Add new phases if user took different direction
   • Add notes about implementation decisions made

4. Document in WORKLOG

Write a WORKLOG entry with:

## YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM - Manual Changes Synced

**Files Changed**: [list of changed files]

**Changes Made**:
- [Brief description of each major change]
- [Why it was done - inferred from code]
- [Any patterns or decisions observed]

**Plan Updates**:
- [Which phases marked complete]
- [Any new phases added]
- [Any direction changes noted]

**Status**: [Current project state after these changes]

**Next Steps**: [Suggested next actions based on plan]

5. Summary Report

Provide user with:

• Changes detected: Count and summary of modified files
• Plan updates: Which phases completed, which added
• WORKLOG entry: Confirmation of documentation
• Next suggested action: Based on remaining plan items

---

Key Principles

1. Infer intent from code - Don't ask user to explain, analyze the diff
2. Be accurate - Only mark phases complete if truly done
3. Preserve context - Keep plan structure, don't overwrite unnecessarily
4. Document decisions - Note any technical choices made in code
5. Suggest next steps - Help user know what to work on next

---

Example Usage

Scenario: User manually implemented authentication while AI was offline

Command: /sync-progress

AI Actions:

1. Runs git diff - sees new files: auth/login.ts, auth/middleware.ts, db/users.sql
2. Reads pm/active/PLAN.md - finds Phase 2: "Implement authentication system"
3. Updates PLAN.md:
   • Marks Phase 2 as [x] COMPLETED
   • Adds notes: "Used JWT tokens, bcrypt for passwords, PostgreSQL for users table"
4. Writes WORKLOG entry documenting authentication implementation
5. Reports: "Detected authentication implementation complete. Phase 2 marked done. Next: Phase 3 - API endpoint protection"

---

Edge Cases

No PLAN.md exists:

• Create one based on git changes
• Infer project structure and goals
• Add phases for observed work

Changes conflict with plan:

• Note the deviation in WORKLOG
• Ask user if plan should be updated or reverted
• Suggest reconciliation approach

Changes are exploratory/experimental:

• Don't mark plan phases complete
• Add note to PLAN.md: "Exploration: [description]"
• Document in WORKLOG as research/spike

Multiple unrelated changes:

• Group by functional area
• Update multiple plan phases if applicable
• Create clear sections in WORKLOG entry

---

Success Criteria

✅ All git changes analyzed and understood ✅ PLAN.md accurately reflects current state ✅ Completed work properly marked ✅ WORKLOG entry is clear and comprehensive ✅ User knows what to do next