299 lines
8.3 KiB
Markdown
299 lines
8.3 KiB
Markdown
# Morphological Analysis & TRIZ Template
|
||
|
||
## Quick Start
|
||
|
||
**For Morphological Analysis:**
|
||
1. Define 3-7 parameters → 2-5 options each → Build matrix → Evaluate combinations
|
||
|
||
**For TRIZ:**
|
||
1. State contradiction (improve A worsens B) → Look up in matrix → Apply 3-4 recommended principles
|
||
|
||
**For Both:**
|
||
Use morphological analysis to explore space, TRIZ to resolve contradictions in configurations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 1: Problem Definition
|
||
|
||
**Problem Statement:** [Clear, specific description]
|
||
|
||
**Objectives:**
|
||
1. [Primary objective - measurable]
|
||
2. [Secondary objective]
|
||
3. [Tertiary objective]
|
||
|
||
**Constraints:**
|
||
- Cost: [Budget limit]
|
||
- Size/Weight: [Physical limitations]
|
||
- Time: [Timeline]
|
||
- Materials: [Allowed/prohibited]
|
||
- Performance: [Minimum requirements]
|
||
|
||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||
- [ ] [Measurable criterion 1]
|
||
- [ ] [Measurable criterion 2]
|
||
- [ ] [Measurable criterion 3]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 2: Morphological Analysis
|
||
|
||
### Step 1: Identify 3-7 Independent Parameters
|
||
|
||
**Parameter 1:** [Name] - [Why essential]
|
||
**Parameter 2:** [Name] - [Why essential]
|
||
**Parameter 3:** [Name] - [Why essential]
|
||
[Continue for 3-7 parameters]
|
||
|
||
**Independence check:** Can I change Parameter 1 without forcing changes in Parameter 2? (Yes = independent)
|
||
|
||
### Step 2: List 2-5 Options Per Parameter
|
||
|
||
**Parameter 1: [Name]**
|
||
- Option A: [Description]
|
||
- Option B: [Description]
|
||
- Option C: [Description]
|
||
[2-5 mutually exclusive options]
|
||
|
||
[Repeat for all parameters]
|
||
|
||
### Step 3: Build Morphological Matrix
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
| Parameter | Opt 1 | Opt 2 | Opt 3 | Opt 4 | Opt 5 |
|
||
|----------------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
|
||
| [Param 1] | [A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | - |
|
||
| [Param 2] | [A] | [B] | [C] | - | - |
|
||
| [Param 3] | [A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] |
|
||
|
||
Total: [N1 × N2 × N3...] = [Total configs]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Step 4: Generate 5-10 Promising Configurations
|
||
|
||
**Config 1: [Name]**
|
||
- Parameter 1: [Selected option]
|
||
- Parameter 2: [Selected option]
|
||
- Parameter 3: [Selected option]
|
||
- **Rationale:** [Why promising]
|
||
- **Pros:** [Advantages]
|
||
- **Cons:** [Disadvantages]
|
||
|
||
[Repeat for 5-10 configurations]
|
||
|
||
### Step 5: Score and Rank
|
||
|
||
| Config | Obj 1 | Obj 2 | Obj 3 | Cost | Feasibility | Total | Rank |
|
||
|--------|-------|-------|-------|------|-------------|-------|------|
|
||
| Config 1 | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Sum] | [#] |
|
||
| Config 2 | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Sum] | [#] |
|
||
|
||
**Selected:** [Top-ranked configuration]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 3: TRIZ Contradiction Resolution
|
||
|
||
### Step 1: State Contradiction
|
||
|
||
**Improving Parameter:** [What we want to increase]
|
||
- Current: [Value]
|
||
- Desired: [Target]
|
||
|
||
**Worsening Parameter:** [What degrades when we improve first]
|
||
- Acceptable degradation: [Threshold]
|
||
|
||
**Contradiction Statement:** "To improve [X], we must worsen [Y], which is unacceptable because [reason]."
|
||
|
||
### Step 2: Map to TRIZ 39 Parameters
|
||
|
||
**TRIZ 39 Parameters (Quick Reference):**
|
||
1. Weight of moving object
|
||
2. Weight of stationary object
|
||
3-4. Length (moving/stationary)
|
||
5-6. Area (moving/stationary)
|
||
7-8. Volume (moving/stationary)
|
||
9. Speed
|
||
10. Force
|
||
11. Stress/pressure
|
||
12. Shape
|
||
13. Stability of composition
|
||
14. Strength
|
||
15-16. Duration of action
|
||
17. Temperature
|
||
18. Illumination
|
||
19-20. Energy use
|
||
21. Power
|
||
22-26. Loss of (energy, substance, info, time, quantity)
|
||
27. Reliability
|
||
28-29. Measurement/manufacturing accuracy
|
||
30-31. Harmful factors (external/internal)
|
||
32-34. Ease of (manufacture, operation, repair)
|
||
35. Adaptability
|
||
36. Device complexity
|
||
37. Difficulty of detecting/measuring
|
||
38. Automation
|
||
39. Productivity
|
||
|
||
**Map your contradiction:**
|
||
- Improving: [Map to one of 39]
|
||
- Worsening: [Map to one of 39]
|
||
|
||
### Step 3: Lookup Recommended Principles
|
||
|
||
**From TRIZ Contradiction Matrix:** [Lookup improving × worsening]
|
||
|
||
**Recommended Principles:** [#N, #M, #P, #Q]
|
||
|
||
**40 Inventive Principles (Brief):**
|
||
1. Segmentation - Divide into parts
|
||
2. Taking Out - Remove disturbing element
|
||
3. Local Quality - Different parts, different functions
|
||
4. Asymmetry - Use asymmetric forms
|
||
5. Merging - Combine similar objects
|
||
6. Universality - Multi-function
|
||
7. Nesting - Matryoshka dolls
|
||
8. Anti-Weight - Counterbalance
|
||
9. Preliminary Anti-Action - Pre-stress
|
||
10. Preliminary Action - Prepare in advance
|
||
11. Beforehand Cushioning - Emergency measures
|
||
12. Equipotentiality - Eliminate lifting/lowering
|
||
13. The Other Way - Invert
|
||
14. Spheroidality - Use curves
|
||
15. Dynamics - Make adaptable
|
||
16. Partial/Excessive - Go over/under optimal
|
||
17. Another Dimension - Use 3D, layers
|
||
18. Mechanical Vibration - Use oscillation
|
||
19. Periodic Action - Pulsed vs continuous
|
||
20. Continuity - Eliminate idle time
|
||
21. Rushing Through - High speed reduces harm
|
||
22. Blessing in Disguise - Use harm for benefit
|
||
23. Feedback - Introduce adjustment
|
||
24. Intermediary - Use intermediate object
|
||
25. Self-Service - Object services itself
|
||
26. Copying - Use cheap copy
|
||
27. Cheap Short-Living - Replace expensive with many cheap
|
||
28. Mechanics Substitution - Use fields instead
|
||
29. Pneumatics/Hydraulics - Use gas/liquid
|
||
30. Flexible Shells - Use membranes
|
||
31. Porous Materials - Make porous
|
||
32. Color Changes - Change color/transparency
|
||
33. Homogeneity - Same material
|
||
34. Discarding/Recovering - Discard after use
|
||
35. Parameter Changes - Change physical state
|
||
36. Phase Transitions - Use phenomena during transition
|
||
37. Thermal Expansion - Use expansion/contraction
|
||
38. Strong Oxidants - Enrich atmosphere
|
||
39. Inert Atmosphere - Use inert environment
|
||
40. Composite Materials - Change to composite
|
||
|
||
**For detailed principle examples, see [methodology.md](methodology.md).**
|
||
|
||
### Step 4: Apply Principles
|
||
|
||
**Principle #[N]: [Name]**
|
||
- **How to apply:** [Specific adaptation to problem]
|
||
- **Resolves contradiction:** [Explain how]
|
||
- **Feasibility:** [High/Medium/Low]
|
||
|
||
[Repeat for 3-4 principles]
|
||
|
||
### Step 5: Combine Principles (Optional)
|
||
|
||
**Combined Solution:**
|
||
- **Principles:** [#N + #M]
|
||
- **Synergy:** [How they work together]
|
||
- **Result:** [Concrete design concept]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 4: Output Format
|
||
|
||
Create `morphological-analysis-triz.md`:
|
||
|
||
```markdown
|
||
# [Problem Name]: Systematic Innovation
|
||
|
||
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
||
|
||
## Problem
|
||
[Problem statement, objectives, constraints]
|
||
|
||
## Morphological Analysis (if used)
|
||
|
||
### Matrix
|
||
[Parameter-option table]
|
||
|
||
### Top Configurations
|
||
1. [Config name]: [Parameters] - Rationale: [Why] - Score: [X]
|
||
2. [Config name]: [Parameters] - Rationale: [Why] - Score: [Y]
|
||
|
||
## TRIZ Analysis (if used)
|
||
|
||
### Contradiction
|
||
Improve [X] → Worsens [Y]
|
||
|
||
### Applied Principles
|
||
- Principle #[N] ([Name]): [Application] → [Result]
|
||
- Principle #[M] ([Name]): [Application] → [Result]
|
||
|
||
### Solution Concepts
|
||
1. **[Concept name]:** [Description] - Pros: [X] - Cons: [Y]
|
||
2. **[Concept name]:** [Description] - Pros: [X] - Cons: [Y]
|
||
|
||
## Recommendation
|
||
**Primary Solution:** [Name]
|
||
- Description: [What it is]
|
||
- Why: [Rationale]
|
||
- Next Steps: [Actions]
|
||
|
||
**Alternative:** [Name] (if primary fails/too risky)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Quick Examples
|
||
|
||
**Morphological Analysis (Lamp Design):**
|
||
```
|
||
Parameters: Power (battery/wall/solar), Light (LED/halogen), Control (switch/app/voice), Size (desk/floor/wall)
|
||
Total: 3 × 2 × 3 × 3 = 54 configurations
|
||
Promising: Battery + LED + App + Desk (portable smart lamp)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**TRIZ (Electric Vehicle):**
|
||
```
|
||
Contradiction: Increase range → worsens cost (large battery expensive)
|
||
Principles: #6 (Universality - battery is structure), #35 (Parameter change - different chemistry)
|
||
Solution: Structural battery pack with high energy density cells
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Combined MA + TRIZ:**
|
||
```
|
||
1. Build morphological box → Find promising configurations
|
||
2. Identify contradictions in top configs
|
||
3. Apply TRIZ to eliminate trade-offs
|
||
4. Re-evaluate configs with contradictions resolved
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
|
||
**Morphological Analysis:**
|
||
- Keep 3-7 parameters (too many = explosion)
|
||
- Ensure independence (changing one doesn't force another)
|
||
- Don't enumerate all combinations (focus on promising clusters)
|
||
|
||
**TRIZ:**
|
||
- Verify real contradiction (not just budget constraint)
|
||
- Adapt principles creatively (metaphorical, not literal)
|
||
- Combine multiple principles for stronger solutions
|
||
- Check for new contradictions introduced by solution
|
||
|
||
**For advanced techniques:**
|
||
- Trends of evolution → See methodology.md Section 1
|
||
- Substance-field analysis → See methodology.md Section 2
|
||
- ARIZ algorithm → See methodology.md Section 3
|
||
- Detailed principle examples → See methodology.md Section 4
|