Files
2025-11-30 08:38:26 +08:00

394 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Betting Theory Fundamentals
This resource explains the core theoretical foundations of rational betting, expected value, variance management, and market efficiency.
**Foundation for:** All betting and forecasting decisions
---
## Why Learn Betting Theory
**Core insight:** Betting theory separates decision quality from outcome quality. Make +EV decisions repeatedly and survive variance.
**Enables:**
- Think probabilistically (convert beliefs to quantifiable edges)
- Manage risk rationally (distinguish bad decisions from bad outcomes)
- Avoid costly mistakes (identify predictable failure modes)
- Optimize long-term growth (balance aggression with preservation)
**Research foundation:** Kelly (1956), Samuelson (1963), Thorp (1969), behavioral economics (Kahneman & Tversky), market efficiency (Fama).
---
## 1. Expected Value Framework
### Definition and Formula
**Expected Value (EV):** Probability-weighted average of all possible outcomes.
```
EV = Σ(Probability × Outcome)
Binary bet:
EV = (P_win × Amount_won) - (P_lose × Amount_lost)
```
**Example:**
```
Bet $100 on 60% event at even odds (+100)
EV = (0.60 × $100) - (0.40 × $100) = $20
EV% = +20% per $100 wagered
```
### Positive vs Negative EV
**Decision Framework:**
- **EV > +5%:** Strong bet (after fees/uncertainty)
- **EV = 0% to +5%:** Marginal (consider passing)
- **EV < 0%:** Never bet (unless hedging)
**Critical Rule:** Judge decisions by EV, not outcomes. Good decisions lose sometimes; bad decisions win sometimes. Process matters in small samples, results matter over 100+ trials.
### Converting Market Odds to EV
**Step 1: Implied probability**
```
Decimal odds: P = 1 / Odds
Example: 1.67 → 60%
American (+): P = 100 / (Odds + 100)
Example: +150 → 40%
American (-): P = |Odds| / (|Odds| + 100)
Example: -150 → 60%
```
**Step 2: Calculate edge**
```
Your probability: 70%
Market probability: 60%
Edge = 70% - 60% = +10%
```
**Step 3: Calculate EV**
```
Bet $100 at 1.67 odds:
EV = (0.70 × $67) - (0.30 × $100) = +$16.90 = +16.9%
```
### Law of Large Numbers
**Key principle:** Observed frequency converges to true probability as sample size increases.
**Practical thresholds:**
- 10 bets: High variance, might be down despite +EV
- 100 bets: Convergence starting, likely near EV
- 1000 bets: Results tightly centered around EV
**Application:** Don't judge strategy on <30 trials. Variance dominates small samples.
---
## 2. Variance and Risk
### Standard Deviation
**Measures outcome dispersion around EV.**
**Formula:**
```
σ = √(P_win×(Win-EV)² + P_lose×(Loss-EV)²)
```
**Example ($100 bet, 60% win, even odds):**
```
EV = $20
σ = √(0.60×(100-20)² + 0.40×(-100-20)²)
σ = √9600 = $98
Coefficient of Variation: σ/EV = $98/$20 = 4.9
```
**Interpretation:** Standard deviation ($98) is 5× the EV ($20). Variance dominates signal.
### Volatility Categories
**Coefficient of Variation (CV = σ/EV):**
- CV < 1: Low volatility (10-30 trials to see EV)
- CV = 1-3: Moderate (30-50 trials)
- CV = 3-10: High (50-100 trials)
- CV > 10: Extreme (100+ trials)
**Higher CV requires:** Larger bankroll, more patience, stronger discipline.
### Risk of Ruin
**Probability of losing entire bankroll before profit.**
**Practical Guidelines:**
| Bet Size | Risk of Ruin | Assessment |
|----------|--------------|------------|
| 50% of bankroll | ~40% | Reckless |
| 25% of bankroll | ~20% | Aggressive |
| 10% of bankroll | ~5% | Moderate |
| 5% of bankroll | ~1% | Conservative |
| 2% of bankroll | ~0.1% | Very conservative |
**Kelly Criterion naturally manages risk of ruin. Never bet >10% of bankroll on single bet.**
### Managing Volatility
**1. Fractional Kelly (Primary Tool):**
- Full Kelly: 100% variance, 40%+ drawdowns
- Half Kelly: 25% variance, ~20% drawdowns
- Quarter Kelly: 6% variance, ~10% drawdowns
**2. Diversification:**
- Multiple uncorrelated +EV bets
- Requires independence (correlation < 0.3)
**3. Expected Drawdown:**
- Even optimal betting experiences 20-40% drawdowns
- Mentally prepare for temporary losses
- Don't confuse drawdown with -EV strategy
---
## 3. Bankroll Management
### Defining Your Bankroll
**Valid:** Money you can afford to lose entirely, separate from emergency fund, investment portfolio, daily expenses. **Starting:** $500-$5000 recreational, $10,000+ serious.
**NOT valid:** Money needed for bills, emergency fund, retirement, money you'd be devastated to lose.
### Separation Principle
**Why:** Prevents scared money and revenge betting. Clear accounting, tax clarity, risk containment.
**Implementation:** Separate betting account, never add money mid-downswing, withdraw profits periodically, stop if bankroll → $0.
### Growth vs Preservation
**Preservation (Default):** 1/4 to 1/2 Kelly, for most bettors and bankrolls <$5000
**Growth (Advanced):** 1/2 to full Kelly, for large bankrolls and high variance tolerance (requires 2+ years track record)
### Dynamic Sizing
Bet size scales with bankroll. Example: $1000 bankroll at 5% = $50. After wins → $1500 → bet $75. After losses → $600 → bet $30.
**Recalculate:** Daily if >20% change, weekly (active), monthly (casual).
### Withdrawal Strategy
**Recommended:** When bankroll doubles, withdraw original amount, continue with profit (break-even if lose profit).
**Conservative:** 50% profit monthly. **Aggressive:** Never withdraw (full compounding).
---
## 4. Market Efficiency
### Efficient Market Hypothesis
**Core claim:** Prices reflect all available information. **Reality:** Semi-strong efficient in liquid, mature markets.
**Market knows:** Published polls/news, historical base rates, expert commentary, obvious statistical patterns.
### Where Edges Exist
**1. Information Asymmetry:** Local knowledge, domain expertise
**2. Model Superiority:** Better statistical model, proper extremizing
**3. Lower Transaction Costs:** Market 5% fee vs your 0-1%
**4. Behavioral Biases:** Recency bias, base rate neglect, narrative following
**5. Market Immaturity:** Low liquidity, niche topics, few informed traders
**Before betting, ask:** "What information or model do I have that the market doesn't?"
- Nothing → Pass | Vague → Pass | Specific → Investigate
### Trust vs Question Market
**Trust:** Liquid, mature, objective outcome, many informed participants, low emotion
**Question:** Illiquid, new, subjective outcome, few informed participants, high emotion (politics, fandom)
---
## 5. Common Betting Mistakes
### Chasing Losses
**What:** Increasing bet size after losses. **Why:** Loss aversion, emotional arousal.
**Fix:** Never increase bet size after loss, use bankroll %, take break after 2+ losses.
### Tilt (Emotional Betting)
**Triggers:** Bad beat, streaks, external stress. **Symptoms:** No analysis, ignoring Kelly, revenge betting.
**Fix:** Pre-commit no bets when tilted. Checklist: Calm? Calculate EV? Kelly sizing? Betting for +EV not revenge?
### Overconfidence Bias
**What:** Overestimating probability accuracy (90% when true is 70%).
**Fix:** Track calibration, log predictions + outcomes, calculate curve quarterly. Do 70% predictions happen 70%?
### Ignoring Variance
**What:** Judging strategy on <30 trials. Example: "Down 15% after 20 bets, strategy sucks" (normal variance).
**Fix:** Require 50+ bets minimum, 100+ preferred, 200+ for high confidence.
### Outcome Bias
**What:** Judging by results not process. +15% EV lost = good decision (bad outcome). -10% EV won = bad decision (lucky).
**Fix:** Checklist: EV correct? Edge > threshold? Kelly fraction? Followed system? YES = good decision regardless of outcome.
### Hindsight Bias
**What:** After outcome, "I knew it would happen."
**Fix:** Pre-commit logging, write probability before event, don't revise after, accept 40% events happen 40%.
---
## 6. Integration with Kelly Criterion
### EV Drives Kelly
**Kelly derives from:** Expected value (edge), odds received, bankroll optimization (maximize log wealth).
**Key relationship:** `f* = (bp - q) / b`. Edge drives bet size: 10% edge → ~10% Kelly, 5% edge → ~5% Kelly, 0% edge → 0% bet.
### Variance Tolerance
| Fraction | Variance | Growth | Drawdown |
|----------|----------|--------|----------|
| Full (1.0) | 100% | 100% | ~40% |
| Half (0.5) | 25% | 75% | ~20% |
| Quarter (0.25) | 6% | 50% | ~10% |
### Bankruptcy Protection
Kelly never bets 100%: prevents ruin, keeps capital for next bet, scales down as bankroll shrinks. **Practical:** Stop if bankroll drops 80-90%.
---
## 7. Practical Examples for Forecasters
### Example 1: Election Prediction Market
**Scenario:** Market 55%, your forecast 65%, bankroll $2000
**Step 1: Edge**
```
Edge = 65% - 55% = +10%
Threshold: 5%
Decision: +10% > 5% → Proceed
```
**Step 2: EV**
```
Bet $100 at 1.82 odds → Win $82
EV = (0.65 × $82) - (0.35 × $100) = +$18.30 = +18.3%
```
**Step 3: Kelly**
```
Full Kelly: 22.3%
Half Kelly: 11.2%
Bet: $2000 × 11.2% = $224
```
### Example 2: Brier Score Tracking
**50 forecasts, goal: Brier < 0.15**
| Forecast | Your P | Outcome | (P-O)² |
|----------|--------|---------|--------|
| Event A | 80% | YES (1) | 0.04 |
| Event B | 30% | NO (0) | 0.09 |
| Event C | 90% | YES (1) | 0.01 |
| Event D | 60% | NO (0) | 0.36 |
| Event E | 70% | YES (1) | 0.09 |
**Brier:** 0.59 / 5 = 0.118 (Excellent)
**Analysis:** Event D large error normal (40% events happen). Don't game metric by avoiding 60% predictions.
### Example 3: Extremizing
**Forecasts:** You 72%, A 68%, B 75%, C 70%, Market 71%
**Average:** 71.2%
**Extremize:**
```
Factor: 1.3 (moderate)
Extremized = 50% + (71.2% - 50%) × 1.3 = 77.6% ≈ 78%
Edge: 78% - 71% = +7%
Half Kelly ≈ 3.5% of $5000 = $175 bet
```
### Example 4: Correlated Portfolio
**Scenario:** Democrats House (60% yours, 55% market) + Senate (55% yours, 50% market)
**Correlation:** 0.7 (high)
**Naive (WRONG):**
```
Bet A: 5% × $10k = $500
Bet B: 5% × $10k = $500
Total: $1000 (10%)
```
**Correct:**
```
Adjust for correlation: 1 - (0.7 × 0.5) = 0.65
Bet A: $500 × 0.65 = $325
Bet B: $500 × 0.65 = $325
Total: $650 (6.5%)
```
**Reasoning:** Positive correlation amplifies risk. Reduce sizing to maintain tolerance.
---
## Key Takeaways
### The 10 Commandments
1. **Expected Value is King** - Judge decisions by EV, not outcomes
2. **Variance is Inevitable** - Embrace it; don't fight it
3. **Bankroll is Sacred** - Protect it above all else
4. **Kelly is Your Guide** - But use fractional (1/4 to 1/2)
5. **Market is Usually Right** - You need edge to beat it
6. **Discipline Over Impulse** - System beats emotion
7. **Sample Size Matters** - 50+ bets before judgment
8. **Calibration is Honesty** - Track it religiously
9. **Correlations Kill** - Adjust for portfolio risk
10. **Survival Enables Profit** - Can't win if bankrupt
### Mental Models
**Betting = Business**
- Bankroll = Working capital
- EV = Profit margin
- Variance = Market volatility
- Kelly = Capital allocation
**Decision Quality ≠ Outcome Quality**
- Good decisions lose sometimes (variance)
- Bad decisions win sometimes (luck)
- Process > Results (small samples)
- Results > Process (large samples 100+)
### Integration Workflow
**Before betting:**
1. Make forecast (Bayesian, reference class)
2. Calculate edge vs market
3. Check edge > threshold (5%+)
4. Use Kelly for sizing
5. Execute and log
**After betting:**
1. Track outcome
2. Update calibration
3. Calculate Brier score
4. Don't judge single bet
5. Evaluate after 50+ bets
---
**Return to:** [Main Skill](../SKILL.md#interactive-menu)