394 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
394 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# Betting Theory Fundamentals
|
||
|
||
This resource explains the core theoretical foundations of rational betting, expected value, variance management, and market efficiency.
|
||
|
||
**Foundation for:** All betting and forecasting decisions
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Why Learn Betting Theory
|
||
|
||
**Core insight:** Betting theory separates decision quality from outcome quality. Make +EV decisions repeatedly and survive variance.
|
||
|
||
**Enables:**
|
||
- Think probabilistically (convert beliefs to quantifiable edges)
|
||
- Manage risk rationally (distinguish bad decisions from bad outcomes)
|
||
- Avoid costly mistakes (identify predictable failure modes)
|
||
- Optimize long-term growth (balance aggression with preservation)
|
||
|
||
**Research foundation:** Kelly (1956), Samuelson (1963), Thorp (1969), behavioral economics (Kahneman & Tversky), market efficiency (Fama).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Expected Value Framework
|
||
|
||
### Definition and Formula
|
||
|
||
**Expected Value (EV):** Probability-weighted average of all possible outcomes.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
EV = Σ(Probability × Outcome)
|
||
|
||
Binary bet:
|
||
EV = (P_win × Amount_won) - (P_lose × Amount_lost)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Example:**
|
||
```
|
||
Bet $100 on 60% event at even odds (+100)
|
||
EV = (0.60 × $100) - (0.40 × $100) = $20
|
||
EV% = +20% per $100 wagered
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Positive vs Negative EV
|
||
|
||
**Decision Framework:**
|
||
- **EV > +5%:** Strong bet (after fees/uncertainty)
|
||
- **EV = 0% to +5%:** Marginal (consider passing)
|
||
- **EV < 0%:** Never bet (unless hedging)
|
||
|
||
**Critical Rule:** Judge decisions by EV, not outcomes. Good decisions lose sometimes; bad decisions win sometimes. Process matters in small samples, results matter over 100+ trials.
|
||
|
||
### Converting Market Odds to EV
|
||
|
||
**Step 1: Implied probability**
|
||
```
|
||
Decimal odds: P = 1 / Odds
|
||
Example: 1.67 → 60%
|
||
|
||
American (+): P = 100 / (Odds + 100)
|
||
Example: +150 → 40%
|
||
|
||
American (-): P = |Odds| / (|Odds| + 100)
|
||
Example: -150 → 60%
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Step 2: Calculate edge**
|
||
```
|
||
Your probability: 70%
|
||
Market probability: 60%
|
||
Edge = 70% - 60% = +10%
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Step 3: Calculate EV**
|
||
```
|
||
Bet $100 at 1.67 odds:
|
||
EV = (0.70 × $67) - (0.30 × $100) = +$16.90 = +16.9%
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Law of Large Numbers
|
||
|
||
**Key principle:** Observed frequency converges to true probability as sample size increases.
|
||
|
||
**Practical thresholds:**
|
||
- 10 bets: High variance, might be down despite +EV
|
||
- 100 bets: Convergence starting, likely near EV
|
||
- 1000 bets: Results tightly centered around EV
|
||
|
||
**Application:** Don't judge strategy on <30 trials. Variance dominates small samples.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. Variance and Risk
|
||
|
||
### Standard Deviation
|
||
|
||
**Measures outcome dispersion around EV.**
|
||
|
||
**Formula:**
|
||
```
|
||
σ = √(P_win×(Win-EV)² + P_lose×(Loss-EV)²)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Example ($100 bet, 60% win, even odds):**
|
||
```
|
||
EV = $20
|
||
σ = √(0.60×(100-20)² + 0.40×(-100-20)²)
|
||
σ = √9600 = $98
|
||
|
||
Coefficient of Variation: σ/EV = $98/$20 = 4.9
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Interpretation:** Standard deviation ($98) is 5× the EV ($20). Variance dominates signal.
|
||
|
||
### Volatility Categories
|
||
|
||
**Coefficient of Variation (CV = σ/EV):**
|
||
- CV < 1: Low volatility (10-30 trials to see EV)
|
||
- CV = 1-3: Moderate (30-50 trials)
|
||
- CV = 3-10: High (50-100 trials)
|
||
- CV > 10: Extreme (100+ trials)
|
||
|
||
**Higher CV requires:** Larger bankroll, more patience, stronger discipline.
|
||
|
||
### Risk of Ruin
|
||
|
||
**Probability of losing entire bankroll before profit.**
|
||
|
||
**Practical Guidelines:**
|
||
|
||
| Bet Size | Risk of Ruin | Assessment |
|
||
|----------|--------------|------------|
|
||
| 50% of bankroll | ~40% | Reckless |
|
||
| 25% of bankroll | ~20% | Aggressive |
|
||
| 10% of bankroll | ~5% | Moderate |
|
||
| 5% of bankroll | ~1% | Conservative |
|
||
| 2% of bankroll | ~0.1% | Very conservative |
|
||
|
||
**Kelly Criterion naturally manages risk of ruin. Never bet >10% of bankroll on single bet.**
|
||
|
||
### Managing Volatility
|
||
|
||
**1. Fractional Kelly (Primary Tool):**
|
||
- Full Kelly: 100% variance, 40%+ drawdowns
|
||
- Half Kelly: 25% variance, ~20% drawdowns
|
||
- Quarter Kelly: 6% variance, ~10% drawdowns
|
||
|
||
**2. Diversification:**
|
||
- Multiple uncorrelated +EV bets
|
||
- Requires independence (correlation < 0.3)
|
||
|
||
**3. Expected Drawdown:**
|
||
- Even optimal betting experiences 20-40% drawdowns
|
||
- Mentally prepare for temporary losses
|
||
- Don't confuse drawdown with -EV strategy
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Bankroll Management
|
||
|
||
### Defining Your Bankroll
|
||
|
||
**Valid:** Money you can afford to lose entirely, separate from emergency fund, investment portfolio, daily expenses. **Starting:** $500-$5000 recreational, $10,000+ serious.
|
||
|
||
**NOT valid:** Money needed for bills, emergency fund, retirement, money you'd be devastated to lose.
|
||
|
||
### Separation Principle
|
||
|
||
**Why:** Prevents scared money and revenge betting. Clear accounting, tax clarity, risk containment.
|
||
|
||
**Implementation:** Separate betting account, never add money mid-downswing, withdraw profits periodically, stop if bankroll → $0.
|
||
|
||
### Growth vs Preservation
|
||
|
||
**Preservation (Default):** 1/4 to 1/2 Kelly, for most bettors and bankrolls <$5000
|
||
**Growth (Advanced):** 1/2 to full Kelly, for large bankrolls and high variance tolerance (requires 2+ years track record)
|
||
|
||
### Dynamic Sizing
|
||
|
||
Bet size scales with bankroll. Example: $1000 bankroll at 5% = $50. After wins → $1500 → bet $75. After losses → $600 → bet $30.
|
||
|
||
**Recalculate:** Daily if >20% change, weekly (active), monthly (casual).
|
||
|
||
### Withdrawal Strategy
|
||
|
||
**Recommended:** When bankroll doubles, withdraw original amount, continue with profit (break-even if lose profit).
|
||
**Conservative:** 50% profit monthly. **Aggressive:** Never withdraw (full compounding).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Market Efficiency
|
||
|
||
### Efficient Market Hypothesis
|
||
|
||
**Core claim:** Prices reflect all available information. **Reality:** Semi-strong efficient in liquid, mature markets.
|
||
|
||
**Market knows:** Published polls/news, historical base rates, expert commentary, obvious statistical patterns.
|
||
|
||
### Where Edges Exist
|
||
|
||
**1. Information Asymmetry:** Local knowledge, domain expertise
|
||
**2. Model Superiority:** Better statistical model, proper extremizing
|
||
**3. Lower Transaction Costs:** Market 5% fee vs your 0-1%
|
||
**4. Behavioral Biases:** Recency bias, base rate neglect, narrative following
|
||
**5. Market Immaturity:** Low liquidity, niche topics, few informed traders
|
||
|
||
**Before betting, ask:** "What information or model do I have that the market doesn't?"
|
||
- Nothing → Pass | Vague → Pass | Specific → Investigate
|
||
|
||
### Trust vs Question Market
|
||
|
||
**Trust:** Liquid, mature, objective outcome, many informed participants, low emotion
|
||
**Question:** Illiquid, new, subjective outcome, few informed participants, high emotion (politics, fandom)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Common Betting Mistakes
|
||
|
||
### Chasing Losses
|
||
**What:** Increasing bet size after losses. **Why:** Loss aversion, emotional arousal.
|
||
**Fix:** Never increase bet size after loss, use bankroll %, take break after 2+ losses.
|
||
|
||
### Tilt (Emotional Betting)
|
||
**Triggers:** Bad beat, streaks, external stress. **Symptoms:** No analysis, ignoring Kelly, revenge betting.
|
||
**Fix:** Pre-commit no bets when tilted. Checklist: Calm? Calculate EV? Kelly sizing? Betting for +EV not revenge?
|
||
|
||
### Overconfidence Bias
|
||
**What:** Overestimating probability accuracy (90% when true is 70%).
|
||
**Fix:** Track calibration, log predictions + outcomes, calculate curve quarterly. Do 70% predictions happen 70%?
|
||
|
||
### Ignoring Variance
|
||
**What:** Judging strategy on <30 trials. Example: "Down 15% after 20 bets, strategy sucks" (normal variance).
|
||
**Fix:** Require 50+ bets minimum, 100+ preferred, 200+ for high confidence.
|
||
|
||
### Outcome Bias
|
||
**What:** Judging by results not process. +15% EV lost = good decision (bad outcome). -10% EV won = bad decision (lucky).
|
||
**Fix:** Checklist: EV correct? Edge > threshold? Kelly fraction? Followed system? YES = good decision regardless of outcome.
|
||
|
||
### Hindsight Bias
|
||
**What:** After outcome, "I knew it would happen."
|
||
**Fix:** Pre-commit logging, write probability before event, don't revise after, accept 40% events happen 40%.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6. Integration with Kelly Criterion
|
||
|
||
### EV Drives Kelly
|
||
|
||
**Kelly derives from:** Expected value (edge), odds received, bankroll optimization (maximize log wealth).
|
||
|
||
**Key relationship:** `f* = (bp - q) / b`. Edge drives bet size: 10% edge → ~10% Kelly, 5% edge → ~5% Kelly, 0% edge → 0% bet.
|
||
|
||
### Variance Tolerance
|
||
|
||
| Fraction | Variance | Growth | Drawdown |
|
||
|----------|----------|--------|----------|
|
||
| Full (1.0) | 100% | 100% | ~40% |
|
||
| Half (0.5) | 25% | 75% | ~20% |
|
||
| Quarter (0.25) | 6% | 50% | ~10% |
|
||
|
||
### Bankruptcy Protection
|
||
|
||
Kelly never bets 100%: prevents ruin, keeps capital for next bet, scales down as bankroll shrinks. **Practical:** Stop if bankroll drops 80-90%.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7. Practical Examples for Forecasters
|
||
|
||
### Example 1: Election Prediction Market
|
||
|
||
**Scenario:** Market 55%, your forecast 65%, bankroll $2000
|
||
|
||
**Step 1: Edge**
|
||
```
|
||
Edge = 65% - 55% = +10%
|
||
Threshold: 5%
|
||
Decision: +10% > 5% → Proceed
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Step 2: EV**
|
||
```
|
||
Bet $100 at 1.82 odds → Win $82
|
||
EV = (0.65 × $82) - (0.35 × $100) = +$18.30 = +18.3%
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Step 3: Kelly**
|
||
```
|
||
Full Kelly: 22.3%
|
||
Half Kelly: 11.2%
|
||
Bet: $2000 × 11.2% = $224
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Example 2: Brier Score Tracking
|
||
|
||
**50 forecasts, goal: Brier < 0.15**
|
||
|
||
| Forecast | Your P | Outcome | (P-O)² |
|
||
|----------|--------|---------|--------|
|
||
| Event A | 80% | YES (1) | 0.04 |
|
||
| Event B | 30% | NO (0) | 0.09 |
|
||
| Event C | 90% | YES (1) | 0.01 |
|
||
| Event D | 60% | NO (0) | 0.36 |
|
||
| Event E | 70% | YES (1) | 0.09 |
|
||
|
||
**Brier:** 0.59 / 5 = 0.118 (Excellent)
|
||
|
||
**Analysis:** Event D large error normal (40% events happen). Don't game metric by avoiding 60% predictions.
|
||
|
||
### Example 3: Extremizing
|
||
|
||
**Forecasts:** You 72%, A 68%, B 75%, C 70%, Market 71%
|
||
**Average:** 71.2%
|
||
|
||
**Extremize:**
|
||
```
|
||
Factor: 1.3 (moderate)
|
||
Extremized = 50% + (71.2% - 50%) × 1.3 = 77.6% ≈ 78%
|
||
|
||
Edge: 78% - 71% = +7%
|
||
Half Kelly ≈ 3.5% of $5000 = $175 bet
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Example 4: Correlated Portfolio
|
||
|
||
**Scenario:** Democrats House (60% yours, 55% market) + Senate (55% yours, 50% market)
|
||
**Correlation:** 0.7 (high)
|
||
|
||
**Naive (WRONG):**
|
||
```
|
||
Bet A: 5% × $10k = $500
|
||
Bet B: 5% × $10k = $500
|
||
Total: $1000 (10%)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Correct:**
|
||
```
|
||
Adjust for correlation: 1 - (0.7 × 0.5) = 0.65
|
||
Bet A: $500 × 0.65 = $325
|
||
Bet B: $500 × 0.65 = $325
|
||
Total: $650 (6.5%)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Reasoning:** Positive correlation amplifies risk. Reduce sizing to maintain tolerance.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Key Takeaways
|
||
|
||
### The 10 Commandments
|
||
|
||
1. **Expected Value is King** - Judge decisions by EV, not outcomes
|
||
2. **Variance is Inevitable** - Embrace it; don't fight it
|
||
3. **Bankroll is Sacred** - Protect it above all else
|
||
4. **Kelly is Your Guide** - But use fractional (1/4 to 1/2)
|
||
5. **Market is Usually Right** - You need edge to beat it
|
||
6. **Discipline Over Impulse** - System beats emotion
|
||
7. **Sample Size Matters** - 50+ bets before judgment
|
||
8. **Calibration is Honesty** - Track it religiously
|
||
9. **Correlations Kill** - Adjust for portfolio risk
|
||
10. **Survival Enables Profit** - Can't win if bankrupt
|
||
|
||
### Mental Models
|
||
|
||
**Betting = Business**
|
||
- Bankroll = Working capital
|
||
- EV = Profit margin
|
||
- Variance = Market volatility
|
||
- Kelly = Capital allocation
|
||
|
||
**Decision Quality ≠ Outcome Quality**
|
||
- Good decisions lose sometimes (variance)
|
||
- Bad decisions win sometimes (luck)
|
||
- Process > Results (small samples)
|
||
- Results > Process (large samples 100+)
|
||
|
||
### Integration Workflow
|
||
|
||
**Before betting:**
|
||
1. Make forecast (Bayesian, reference class)
|
||
2. Calculate edge vs market
|
||
3. Check edge > threshold (5%+)
|
||
4. Use Kelly for sizing
|
||
5. Execute and log
|
||
|
||
**After betting:**
|
||
1. Track outcome
|
||
2. Update calibration
|
||
3. Calculate Brier score
|
||
4. Don't judge single bet
|
||
5. Evaluate after 50+ bets
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Return to:** [Main Skill](../SKILL.md#interactive-menu)
|