11 KiB
Financial Unit Economics Templates
Quick-start templates for calculating CAC, LTV, contribution margin, and cohort analysis.
Unit Definition Template
Business model: [Subscription / Transactional / Marketplace / Freemium / Enterprise]
Unit of analysis: [What are you measuring?]
- Customer (entire relationship)
- Subscription (per subscription period)
- Transaction (per purchase)
- Product SKU (per product sold)
- User (active user)
Time period: [Monthly / Quarterly / Annual cohorts]
Segments (if analyzing by segment):
- Acquisition channel (paid search, organic, referral, etc.)
- Customer type (B2B vs B2C, SMB vs Enterprise)
- Geography (US, EU, APAC)
- Product tier (Free, Pro, Enterprise)
CAC Calculation Template
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) = Total acquisition costs ÷ New customers acquired
Fully-Loaded CAC
Sales & Marketing Costs (period: [Month/Quarter/Year])
| Cost Category | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing spend | $[X] | Paid ads, content marketing, events, tools |
| Sales team salaries | $[X] | Base + commission + benefits |
| Sales tools & software | $[X] | CRM, sales engagement, analytics |
| Marketing team salaries | $[X] | Marketers, designers, contractors |
| Overhead allocation | $[X] | % of office, admin costs attributable to S&M |
| Other | $[X] | [Specify] |
| Total S&M Cost | $[X] | Sum of above |
New customers acquired (same period): [N]
CAC = $[Total Cost] ÷ [N customers] = $[CAC per customer]
CAC by Channel
Break down CAC by acquisition channel to identify most/least efficient channels.
| Channel | S&M Spend | New Customers | CAC | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid Search | $[X] | [N] | $[X/N] | [Google Ads, Bing] |
| Paid Social | $[X] | [N] | $[X/N] | [Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.] |
| Content/SEO | $[X] | [N] | $[X/N] | [Organic, blog, SEO tools] |
| Referral | $[X] | [N] | $[X/N] | [Referral program costs] |
| Direct | $[X] | [N] | $[X/N] | [Type-in, brand awareness] |
| Other | $[X] | [N] | $[X/N] | [Specify] |
| Total | $[X] | [N] | $[Blended CAC] | Fully-loaded blended CAC |
Insight: [Which channels are most/least efficient? Where to increase/decrease spend?]
LTV Calculation Template
Lifetime Value (LTV) = Revenue over customer lifetime × Gross margin %
Choose calculation method based on business model:
LTV (Subscription Model)
LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
Inputs:
- ARPU (Average Revenue Per User): $[X]/month
- Gross Margin %: [X]% (Revenue - COGS) ÷ Revenue
- Monthly Churn Rate: [X]% (customers lost ÷ starting customers)
Calculation:
- Customer Lifetime = 1 ÷ Churn Rate = 1 ÷ [X]% = [Y] months
- LTV = $[ARPU] × [Y months] × [Gross Margin %] = $[LTV]
LTV (Transactional Model)
LTV = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Customer Lifetime (years)
Inputs:
- AOV (Average Order Value): $[X] per transaction
- Purchase Frequency: [Y] purchases/year
- Gross Margin %: [Z]%
- Customer Lifetime: [N] years
Calculation:
- Annual Revenue per Customer = $[AOV] × [Frequency] = $[X]/year
- LTV = $[Annual Revenue] × [Lifetime years] × [Gross Margin %] = $[LTV]
LTV (Marketplace / Platform)
LTV = GMV per user × Take Rate × Gross Margin % ÷ Churn Rate
Inputs:
- GMV per user (monthly): $[X]
- Take Rate: [Y]% (platform's % of GMV)
- Gross Margin %: [Z]% (after variable costs)
- Monthly Churn Rate: [C]%
Calculation:
- Monthly Revenue per User = $[GMV] × [Take Rate] = $[X]/month
- Customer Lifetime = 1 ÷ [Churn] = [Y] months
- LTV = $[Monthly Rev] × [Lifetime] × [Gross Margin %] = $[LTV]
LTV by Cohort (Observed Retention)
More accurate: Use actual retention data from cohorts.
Example Cohort Retention Table (% of customers remaining):
| Month | Cohort Jan | Cohort Feb | Cohort Mar | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1 | 95% | 94% | 96% | 95% |
| 2 | 88% | 86% | 89% | 88% |
| 3 | 80% | 78% | 82% | 80% |
| 6 | 65% | 62% | - | 64% |
| 12 | 45% | - | - | 45% |
LTV Calculation:
- Sum: Month 0 revenue + (Month 1 retention × revenue) + (Month 2 retention × revenue) + ...
- LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin × Σ(retention %) = $[X]
Contribution Margin Template
Contribution Margin % = (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue
Revenue & Variable Costs
| Item | Per Unit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $[X] | Subscription fee / Sale price / Transaction value |
| Variable Costs: | (costs that scale with each unit) | |
| - COGS | $[X] | Product cost, manufacturing |
| - Hosting / Infrastructure | $[X] | Per-user server costs |
| - Payment processing | $[X] | Stripe/PayPal fees (~2-3%) |
| - Support | $[X] | Per-customer support time |
| - Shipping | $[X] | Fulfillment, delivery |
| - Other variable | $[X] | [Specify] |
| Total Variable Costs | $[Y] | Sum |
| Contribution Margin | $[X - Y] | Revenue - Variable Costs |
| Contribution Margin % | [(X-Y)/X]% | Margin as % |
Interpretation:
- High margin (>60%): Strong unit economics, room for high CAC
- Medium margin (40-60%): Acceptable, need disciplined CAC management
- Low margin (<40%): Challenging, requires very efficient acquisition or high LTV
Levers to improve margin:
- Increase pricing (improve revenue per unit)
- Reduce COGS (negotiate supplier costs, economies of scale)
- Optimize infrastructure (reduce hosting costs per user)
- Automate support (reduce manual support time)
- Negotiate payment fees (lower processing costs)
Cohort Analysis Template
Track retention, LTV, and payback by customer acquisition cohort (month, channel, segment).
Retention Cohort Table
| Cohort (Month Acquired) | M0 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M6 | M12 | LTV | CAC | LTV/CAC | Payback (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 100% | 92% | 84% | 78% | 62% | 42% | $1,200 | $300 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Feb 2024 | 100% | 90% | 81% | 75% | 60% | - | $1,150 | $320 | 3.6 | 5.0 |
| Mar 2024 | 100% | 93% | 86% | 80% | 65% | - | $1,300 | $280 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Apr 2024 | 100% | 91% | 83% | 77% | - | - | $1,100 | $350 | 3.1 | 5.5 |
| Average | 100% | 91.5% | 83.5% | 77.5% | 62.3% | 42% | $1,188 | $313 | 3.8 | 4.8 |
Insights:
- [Are newer cohorts performing better or worse than older cohorts?]
- [Which cohorts have best/worst retention?]
- [Is LTV improving over time?]
- [Is CAC increasing or decreasing?]
Cohort by Channel
| Channel | # Customers | Avg LTV | Avg CAC | LTV/CAC | 12M Retention | Payback (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid Search | 500 | $800 | $250 | 3.2 | 35% | 6.0 |
| Organic | 300 | $1,500 | $150 | 10.0 | 55% | 3.0 |
| Referral | 200 | $1,800 | $100 | 18.0 | 60% | 2.5 |
| Paid Social | 400 | $700 | $300 | 2.3 | 30% | 7.0 |
| Total | 1,400 | $1,050 | $225 | 4.7 | 42% | 5.0 |
Insights:
- [Best channels: Referral (high LTV, low CAC, fast payback, high retention)]
- [Worst channels: Paid Social (low LTV, high CAC, slow payback, low retention)]
- [Action: Increase referral investment, reduce or pause paid social]
Interpretation Template
LTV/CAC Ratio Analysis
Your LTV/CAC: [X:1]
| Range | Assessment | Action |
|---|---|---|
| <1:1 | Unsustainable: Losing money on every customer | Stop growth, fix model or pivot |
| 1:1 - 2:1 | Marginal: Barely profitable | Don't scale yet, improve retention or reduce CAC |
| 2:1 - 3:1 | Acceptable: Unit economics work | Optimize before scaling |
| 3:1 - 5:1 | Good: Can profitably grow | Scale marketing spend |
| >5:1 | Excellent: Strong economics | Aggressive scale, raise capital |
Your assessment: [Based on ratio above]
Payback Period Analysis
Your Payback Period: [X] months
| Range | Assessment | Cash Impact |
|---|---|---|
| <6 months | Excellent: Fast capital recovery | Can reinvest quickly, fuel growth |
| 6-12 months | Good: Reasonable payback | Manageable cash needs |
| 12-18 months | Acceptable: Slower recovery | Need patient capital |
| >18 months | Challenging: Long payback | High cash burn, risky |
Your assessment: [Based on payback above]
Combined Decision Framework
| Your Metrics | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| LTV/CAC: [X:1] | [Assessment from table above] |
| Payback: [Y] months | [Assessment from table above] |
| Gross Margin: [Z]% | [Good ≥60% (SaaS) / ≥40% (ecommerce), or needs improvement] |
| Overall | [Stop / Optimize / Scale / Aggressive Scale] |
Recommendations
Pricing:
- [Increase price to improve margin and LTV]
- [Add premium tier for upsell]
- [Reduce price to increase conversion]
- [No change needed]
Channels:
- [Increase spend on: [channels with best LTV/CAC]]
- [Reduce or pause spend on: [channels with poor LTV/CAC]]
- [Test new channels: [suggestions]]
Retention:
- [Improve onboarding to reduce early churn]
- [Add features to increase engagement]
- [Customer success program for high-value customers]
- [Loyalty/referral program to increase repeat]
Growth:
- [Scale aggressively: Economics support growth]
- [Optimize first: Improve metrics before scaling]
- [Pause growth: Fix unit economics]
Cash & Fundraising:
- [Raise funding to fuel growth (if LTV/CAC >3:1 and payback <12 months)]
- [Focus on profitability (if LTV/CAC 2-3:1 and payback 12-18 months)]
- [Reduce burn (if LTV/CAC <2:1)]
Quick Example: SaaS Startup
Unit: Customer (subscription)
CAC: $20k marketing, 100 customers → $200 CAC
LTV:
- ARPU: $100/month
- Gross Margin: 80%
- Monthly Churn: 5% → Lifetime = 1/0.05 = 20 months
- LTV = $100 × 20 × 80% = $1,600
Metrics:
- LTV/CAC: $1,600 / $200 = 8:1 ✓ Excellent
- Payback: $200 ÷ ($100 × 80%) = 2.5 months ✓ Excellent
- Gross Margin: 80% ✓ Strong
Recommendation: Aggressive scale. Economics are excellent (8:1 LTV/CAC, 2.5 month payback). Raise capital, increase marketing spend 2-3×, hire sales team, expand to new channels.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Not using cohort data: Don't average retention across all time periods. Recent cohorts may behave differently.
- Excluding costs: Don't forget sales salaries, support, payment fees, refunds.
- Vanity LTV: Don't project 5-year LTV with 1 month of data. Use observed retention only.
- Ignoring channels: Don't blend CAC across all channels. Analyze each separately.
- Fixed vs variable costs: Don't include fixed costs (engineering, rent) in contribution margin. Only variable costs that scale with units.
- Not updating: Re-calculate quarterly. Unit economics change as you scale, market shifts, competition intensifies.