Initial commit

skills/cognitive-design/resources/educational-design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,424 @@
+# Educational Design
+
+This resource provides cognitive design principles for instructional materials, e-learning courses, and educational software.
+
+**Covered topics:**
+1. Multimedia learning principles (Mayer's principles)
+2. Dual coding theory
+3. Worked examples for skill acquisition
+4. Retrieval practice for retention
+5. Segmenting and coherence
+
+---
+
+## Why Educational Design Needs Cognitive Principles
+
+### WHY This Matters
+
+**Core insight:** Human learning is constrained by working memory limits and processing channels - instructional design must align with these cognitive realities.
+
+**Common problems:**
+- Dense slides with text paragraphs + complex diagrams (split attention)
+- Passive reading/watching (weak memory traces)
+- Decorative graphics competing with instructional content
+- Information overload (exceeds working memory)
+- No active recall opportunities (retrieval practice missing)
+
+**How cognitive principles help:**
+- **Dual coding:** Combine relevant visuals + words (two memory traces)
+- **Modalities principle:** Audio narration + visuals (splits load across channels)
+- **Coherence:** Remove extraneous content (frees working memory)
+- **Segmenting:** Break into chunks (fits working memory)
+- **Retrieval practice:** Active recall strengthens retention
+
+**Research foundation:** Richard Mayer's multimedia learning principles, John Sweller's cognitive load theory, Paivio's dual coding theory
+
+---
+
+## What You'll Learn
+
+**Five key areas:**
+
+1. **Multimedia Principles:** How to combine words, pictures, and audio effectively
+2. **Dual Coding:** Leveraging visual and verbal processing channels
+3. **Worked Examples:** Teaching complex procedures efficiently
+4. **Retrieval Practice:** Active recall for long-term retention
+5. **Segmenting & Coherence:** Chunking content and removing noise
+
+---
+
+## Why Multimedia Principles Matter
+
+### WHY This Matters
+
+**Core insight:** People have separate processing channels for visual and verbal information (Baddeley's working memory model) - proper multimedia design leverages both without overloading either.
+
+**Baddeley's Model:**
+- **Phonological loop:** Processes spoken/written words
+- **Visuospatial sketchpad:** Processes images/spatial information
+- **Central executive:** Coordinates both channels
+
+**Implication:** You can split cognitive load across channels, but wrong combinations cause interference.
+
+---
+
+### WHAT to Apply
+
+#### Multimedia Principle
+
+**Principle:** People learn better from words + pictures than words alone
+
+**Evidence:** Dual coding creates two memory traces instead of one (Paivio 1971, Mayer 2001)
+
+**Application:**
+```
+❌ Text-only explanation of process
+✓ Diagram showing process + text labels
+✓ Video demonstrating concept + verbal explanation
+
+Example: Teaching how heart pumps blood
+❌ Text description only
+✓ Animated diagram of heart + narration
+Result: 50-100% better retention with multimedia
+```
+
+**Caution:** Pictures must be RELEVANT to content
+```
+❌ Decorative stock photo of "learning" (generic student at desk)
+✓ Annotated diagram directly supporting concept
+```
+
+---
+
+#### Modality Principle
+
+**Principle:** Audio narration + visuals better than on-screen text + visuals
+
+**Why:** On-screen text + complex visual both compete for visual channel (overload)
+
+**Application:**
+```
+For animations or complex diagrams:
+❌ Dense on-screen text + diagram (visual channel overloaded)
+✓ Audio narration + diagram (splits load across channels)
+
+Example: Explaining software interface
+❌ Screenshot with text callouts explaining every feature
+✓ Screenshot + voiceover explaining each feature
+Result: Reduces cognitive load, improves comprehension
+```
+
+**Exception:** For static text-heavy content (articles, code), on-screen text is fine
+- Reader controls pace
+- Can re-read as needed
+- Narration unnecessary
+
+---
+
+#### Spatial Contiguity Principle
+
+**Principle:** Place text near corresponding graphics, not separated
+
+**Why:** Prevents holding one in memory while searching for the other (split attention)
+
+**Application:**
+```
+Diagram with labels:
+❌ Diagram on left, labels in legend/list on right (requires visual search + memory)
+✓ Labels directly ON or immediately adjacent to diagram parts
+
+Example: Anatomy diagram
+❌ Numbered diagram + separate key (1. Heart, 2. Lungs...)
+✓ Direct labels on organs + leader lines
+Result: Instant association, no memory burden
+```
+
+---
+
+#### Temporal Contiguity Principle
+
+**Principle:** Present corresponding narration and animation simultaneously, not sequentially
+
+**Why:** Holding one in memory while waiting for the other adds cognitive load
+
+**Application:**
+```
+Video lesson:
+❌ Show full animation, then explain what happened (requires remembering animation)
+✓ Narrate while animation plays (synchronized)
+
+Example: Chemistry reaction
+❌ Play full reaction animation → then explain
+✓ Narrate each step as it's happening
+Result: Immediate connection between visual and explanation
+```
+
+---
+
+#### Coherence Principle
+
+**Principle:** Exclude extraneous material - every element should support learning goal
+
+**What to remove:**
+```
+❌ Decorative graphics unrelated to content
+❌ Background music during instruction
+❌ Tangential interesting stories (if they don't support main point)
+❌ Excessive detail beyond learning objective
+
+✓ Keep: Relevant diagrams, supporting examples, meaningful practice
+```
+
+**Application:**
+```
+Slide design:
+Before (violates coherence):
+- Stock photo of "teamwork" (decorative)
+- Background music playing
+- Tangent about company history
+- Dense paragraph with extra details
+→ Cognitive overload from extraneous content
+
+After (coherent):
+- Diagram directly illustrating concept
+- No background music
+- Focus only on learning objective
+- Concise explanation
+→ All working memory devoted to learning
+```
+
+**Evidence:** Extraneous content can reduce learning by 30-50% (Mayer)
+
+---
+
+#### Signaling Principle
+
+**Principle:** Highlight essential material to guide attention
+
+**Application:**
+```
+✓ Bold key terms first time introduced
+✓ Headings/subheadings show structure
+✓ Arrows/circles on diagrams highlighting key elements
+✓ Verbal cues: "The most important point is..."
+✓ Color highlighting for critical information (use sparingly)
+
+Example: Complex diagram
+Without signaling: User must determine what's important
+With signaling: Arrows point to key mechanism, key part highlighted
+Result: Attention directed to essentials
+```
+
+---
+
+#### Segmenting Principle
+
+**Principle:** Break lessons into user-paced segments rather than continuous presentation
+
+**Why:** Fits working memory limits, allows consolidation before next chunk
+
+**Application:**
+```
+❌ 30-minute continuous lecture video (cognitive overload)
+✓ 6 segments × 5 minutes each, user clicks "Next" to continue
+
+Benefits:
+- Fits attention span
+- User controls pace (can pause/replay)
+- Breaks between segments allow consolidation
+- Can skip ahead if already know topic
+```
+
+**Optimal segment length:** 3-7 minutes per concept
+
+---
+
+## Why Dual Coding Matters
+
+### WHY This Matters
+
+**Dual Coding Theory (Paivio):** Humans process visual and verbal information through separate channels that can reinforce each other.
+
+**Benefits:**
+- Two memory traces instead of one (redundancy aids recall)
+- Visual channel good for spatial/concrete concepts
+- Verbal channel good for abstract/sequential concepts
+- Combined = stronger encoding
+
+---
+
+### WHAT to Apply
+
+**Application patterns:**
+
+**Text + Diagram:**
+```
+Example: Explaining data structure
+✓ Code snippet (verbal) + visual diagram of structure
+Result: Can recall via either channel
+```
+
+**Narration + Illustration:**
+```
+Example: Historical event
+✓ Illustrated timeline + audio story
+Result: Visual spatial memory + verbal narrative memory
+```
+
+**Caution - Avoid Redundant Text:**
+```
+❌ On-screen text identical to audio narration (doesn't add channel, just duplicates)
+✓ On-screen keywords/outline + audio detailed explanation
+```
+
+---
+
+## Why Worked Examples Matter
+
+### WHY This Matters
+
+**Core insight:** For novices learning procedures, worked examples reduce extraneous cognitive load and allow focus on solution patterns.
+
+**Problem-solving (novice):**
+- High cognitive load (exploring solution space)
+- Many wrong paths taken
+- Limited capacity for noticing patterns
+
+**Worked example (novice):**
+- Low extraneous load (no exploring)
+- All capacity devoted to understanding steps
+- Can study solution pattern
+
+**Application:** Transition from worked examples → partially completed examples → full problems
+
+---
+
+### WHAT to Apply
+
+**Worked Example Structure:**
+
+```
+Step 1: Problem statement
+Step 2: Solution shown with explanation of each step
+Step 3: Principle highlighted: "Notice how we..."
+
+Example: Math problem
+Instead of: "Solve this equation: 3x + 7 = 19"
+Better:
+  Problem: 3x + 7 = 19
+  Solution:
+    3x + 7 = 19
+    3x = 12       (subtract 7 from both sides - inverse operation)
+    x = 4         (divide both sides by 3 - inverse operation)
+  Principle: Use inverse operations to isolate variable
+```
+
+**Fading:**
+```
+Start: Full worked example
+Next: Partially worked (complete last step)
+Then: Start provided, learner completes middle + end
+Finally: Full problem-solving
+```
+
+---
+
+## Why Retrieval Practice Matters
+
+### WHY This Matters
+
+**Testing effect:** Practicing retrieval (active recall) creates stronger memory traces than passive re-reading.
+
+**Evidence:** Retrieval practice improves long-term retention by 30-50% vs passive study (Roediger & Karpicke)
+
+**Why it works:**
+- Active recall strengthens memory pathways
+- Identifies gaps in knowledge (metacognitive benefit)
+- Desirable difficulty (requires effort = better encoding)
+
+---
+
+### WHAT to Apply
+
+**Application patterns:**
+
+**Embedded quizzes:**
+```
+After each segment: 2-3 questions testing key concepts
+✓ Multiple choice (forces retrieval)
+✓ Short answer (even better - must generate answer)
+✓ Immediate explanatory feedback (not just "correct/incorrect")
+
+Example:
+After video on Gestalt principles:
+Q: "Which principle explains why we see related items as grouped when they're placed close together?"
+A: Proximity principle
+Feedback: "Correct! Proximity is the tendency to group nearby elements. This is why we use whitespace to separate unrelated content."
+```
+
+**Spaced repetition:**
+```
+Immediate: Quiz at end of lesson
+1 day later: Review quiz
+1 week later: Cumulative quiz
+1 month later: Final assessment
+
+Spacing effect: Distributed practice beats massed practice
+```
+
+**Low-stakes practice:**
+```
+✓ Formative quizzes don't count toward grade (reduces anxiety)
+✓ Unlimited attempts (learning goal, not evaluation)
+✓ Explanatory feedback (teaching moment)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Why Segmenting & Coherence Matter
+
+### WHY This Matters
+
+**Segmenting:** Prevents cognitive overload by chunking within working memory limits
+
+**Coherence:** Eliminates extraneous load so all capacity devoted to learning
+
+**Together:** Essential for managing cognitive load in complex material
+
+---
+
+### WHAT to Apply
+
+**Segmenting strategies:**
+
+```
+30-minute topic divided into:
+- Segment 1 (5 min): Concept introduction + first example
+- Pause (user clicks next)
+- Segment 2 (5 min): Second example + principle
+- Pause
+- Segment 3 (5 min): Practice problem
+- Pause
+- Segment 4 (5 min): Application to real scenario
+- Pause
+- Segment 5 (5 min): Summary + quiz
+
+Benefits: Working memory not overloaded, consolidation between segments
+```
+
+**Coherence strategies:**
+
+```
+Remove:
+❌ Decorative stock photos
+❌ Background music
+❌ Tangential fun facts (if they don't support learning objective)
+❌ Overly detailed explanations beyond scope
+
+Keep:
+✓ Relevant diagrams supporting concept
+✓ Concrete examples illustrating principle
+✓ Practice problems applying knowledge
+✓ Summaries reinforcing key points
+```
+