361 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
361 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
# Experiment Types and Workflows
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Adaptyv provides multiple experimental assay types for comprehensive protein characterization. Each experiment type has specific applications, workflows, and data outputs.
|
|
|
|
## Binding Assays
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
Measure protein-target interactions using biolayer interferometry (BLI), a label-free technique that monitors biomolecular binding in real-time.
|
|
|
|
### Use Cases
|
|
|
|
- Antibody-antigen binding characterization
|
|
- Receptor-ligand interaction analysis
|
|
- Protein-protein interaction studies
|
|
- Affinity maturation screening
|
|
- Epitope binning experiments
|
|
|
|
### Technology: Biolayer Interferometry (BLI)
|
|
|
|
BLI measures the interference pattern of reflected light from two surfaces:
|
|
- **Reference layer** - Biosensor tip surface
|
|
- **Biological layer** - Accumulated bound molecules
|
|
|
|
As molecules bind, the optical thickness increases, causing a wavelength shift proportional to binding.
|
|
|
|
**Advantages:**
|
|
- Label-free detection
|
|
- Real-time kinetics
|
|
- High-throughput compatible
|
|
- Works in crude samples
|
|
- Minimal sample consumption
|
|
|
|
### Measured Parameters
|
|
|
|
**Kinetic constants:**
|
|
- **KD** - Equilibrium dissociation constant (binding affinity)
|
|
- **kon** - Association rate constant (binding speed)
|
|
- **koff** - Dissociation rate constant (unbinding speed)
|
|
|
|
**Typical ranges:**
|
|
- Strong binders: KD < 1 nM
|
|
- Moderate binders: KD = 1-100 nM
|
|
- Weak binders: KD > 100 nM
|
|
|
|
### Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. **Sequence submission** - Provide protein sequences in FASTA format
|
|
2. **Expression** - Proteins expressed in appropriate host system
|
|
3. **Purification** - Automated purification protocols
|
|
4. **BLI assay** - Real-time binding measurements against specified targets
|
|
5. **Analysis** - Kinetic curve fitting and quality assessment
|
|
6. **Results delivery** - Binding parameters with confidence metrics
|
|
|
|
### Sample Requirements
|
|
|
|
- Protein sequence (standard amino acid codes)
|
|
- Target specification (from catalog or custom request)
|
|
- Buffer conditions (standard or custom)
|
|
- Expected concentration range (optional, improves assay design)
|
|
|
|
### Results Format
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"sequence_id": "antibody_variant_1",
|
|
"target": "Human PD-L1",
|
|
"measurements": {
|
|
"kd": 2.5e-9,
|
|
"kd_error": 0.3e-9,
|
|
"kon": 1.8e5,
|
|
"kon_error": 0.2e5,
|
|
"koff": 4.5e-4,
|
|
"koff_error": 0.5e-4
|
|
},
|
|
"quality_metrics": {
|
|
"confidence": "high|medium|low",
|
|
"r_squared": 0.97,
|
|
"chi_squared": 0.02,
|
|
"flags": []
|
|
},
|
|
"raw_data_url": "https://..."
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Expression Testing
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
Quantify protein expression levels in various host systems to assess producibility and optimize sequences for manufacturing.
|
|
|
|
### Use Cases
|
|
|
|
- Screening variants for high expression
|
|
- Optimizing codon usage
|
|
- Identifying expression bottlenecks
|
|
- Selecting candidates for scale-up
|
|
- Comparing expression systems
|
|
|
|
### Host Systems
|
|
|
|
Available expression platforms:
|
|
- **E. coli** - Rapid, cost-effective, prokaryotic system
|
|
- **Mammalian cells** - Native post-translational modifications
|
|
- **Yeast** - Eukaryotic system with simpler growth requirements
|
|
- **Insect cells** - Alternative eukaryotic platform
|
|
|
|
### Measured Parameters
|
|
|
|
- **Total protein yield** (mg/L culture)
|
|
- **Soluble fraction** (percentage)
|
|
- **Purity** (after initial purification)
|
|
- **Expression time course** (optional)
|
|
|
|
### Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. **Sequence submission** - Provide protein sequences
|
|
2. **Construct generation** - Cloning into expression vectors
|
|
3. **Expression** - Culture in specified host system
|
|
4. **Quantification** - Protein measurement via multiple methods
|
|
5. **Analysis** - Expression level comparison and ranking
|
|
6. **Results delivery** - Yield data and recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Results Format
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"sequence_id": "variant_1",
|
|
"host_system": "E. coli",
|
|
"measurements": {
|
|
"total_yield_mg_per_l": 25.5,
|
|
"soluble_fraction_percent": 78,
|
|
"purity_percent": 92
|
|
},
|
|
"ranking": {
|
|
"percentile": 85,
|
|
"notes": "High expression, good solubility"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Thermostability Testing
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
Measure protein thermal stability to assess structural integrity, predict shelf-life, and identify stabilizing mutations.
|
|
|
|
### Use Cases
|
|
|
|
- Selecting thermally stable variants
|
|
- Formulation development
|
|
- Shelf-life prediction
|
|
- Stability-driven protein engineering
|
|
- Quality control screening
|
|
|
|
### Measurement Techniques
|
|
|
|
**Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF):**
|
|
- Monitors protein unfolding via fluorescent dye binding
|
|
- Determines melting temperature (Tm)
|
|
- High-throughput capable
|
|
|
|
**Circular Dichroism (CD):**
|
|
- Secondary structure analysis
|
|
- Thermal unfolding curves
|
|
- Reversibility assessment
|
|
|
|
### Measured Parameters
|
|
|
|
- **Tm** - Melting temperature (midpoint of unfolding)
|
|
- **ΔH** - Enthalpy of unfolding
|
|
- **Aggregation temperature** (Tagg)
|
|
- **Reversibility** - Refolding after heating
|
|
|
|
### Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. **Sequence submission** - Provide protein sequences
|
|
2. **Expression and purification** - Standard protocols
|
|
3. **Thermostability assay** - Temperature gradient analysis
|
|
4. **Data analysis** - Curve fitting and parameter extraction
|
|
5. **Results delivery** - Stability metrics with ranking
|
|
|
|
### Results Format
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"sequence_id": "variant_1",
|
|
"measurements": {
|
|
"tm_celsius": 68.5,
|
|
"tm_error": 0.5,
|
|
"tagg_celsius": 72.0,
|
|
"reversibility_percent": 85
|
|
},
|
|
"quality_metrics": {
|
|
"curve_quality": "excellent",
|
|
"cooperativity": "two-state"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Enzyme Activity Assays
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
Measure enzymatic function including substrate turnover, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor sensitivity.
|
|
|
|
### Use Cases
|
|
|
|
- Screening enzyme variants for improved activity
|
|
- Substrate specificity profiling
|
|
- Inhibitor testing
|
|
- pH and temperature optimization
|
|
- Mechanistic studies
|
|
|
|
### Assay Types
|
|
|
|
**Continuous assays:**
|
|
- Chromogenic substrates
|
|
- Fluorogenic substrates
|
|
- Real-time monitoring
|
|
|
|
**Endpoint assays:**
|
|
- HPLC quantification
|
|
- Mass spectrometry
|
|
- Colorimetric detection
|
|
|
|
### Measured Parameters
|
|
|
|
**Kinetic parameters:**
|
|
- **kcat** - Turnover number (catalytic rate constant)
|
|
- **KM** - Michaelis constant (substrate affinity)
|
|
- **kcat/KM** - Catalytic efficiency
|
|
- **IC50** - Inhibitor concentration for 50% inhibition
|
|
|
|
**Activity metrics:**
|
|
- Specific activity (units/mg protein)
|
|
- Relative activity vs. reference
|
|
- Substrate specificity profile
|
|
|
|
### Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. **Sequence submission** - Provide enzyme sequences
|
|
2. **Expression and purification** - Optimized for activity retention
|
|
3. **Activity assay** - Substrate turnover measurements
|
|
4. **Kinetic analysis** - Michaelis-Menten fitting
|
|
5. **Results delivery** - Kinetic parameters and rankings
|
|
|
|
### Results Format
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"sequence_id": "enzyme_variant_1",
|
|
"substrate": "substrate_name",
|
|
"measurements": {
|
|
"kcat_per_second": 125,
|
|
"km_micromolar": 45,
|
|
"kcat_km": 2.8,
|
|
"specific_activity": 180
|
|
},
|
|
"quality_metrics": {
|
|
"confidence": "high",
|
|
"r_squared": 0.99
|
|
},
|
|
"ranking": {
|
|
"relative_activity": 1.8,
|
|
"improvement_vs_wildtype": "80%"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Experiment Design Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### Sequence Submission
|
|
|
|
1. **Use clear identifiers** - Name sequences descriptively
|
|
2. **Include controls** - Submit wild-type or reference sequences
|
|
3. **Batch similar variants** - Group related sequences in single submission
|
|
4. **Validate sequences** - Check for errors before submission
|
|
|
|
### Sample Size
|
|
|
|
- **Pilot studies** - 5-10 sequences to test feasibility
|
|
- **Library screening** - 50-500 sequences for variant exploration
|
|
- **Focused optimization** - 10-50 sequences for fine-tuning
|
|
- **Large-scale campaigns** - 500+ sequences for ML-driven design
|
|
|
|
### Quality Control
|
|
|
|
Adaptyv includes automated QC steps:
|
|
- Expression verification before assay
|
|
- Replicate measurements for reliability
|
|
- Positive/negative controls in each batch
|
|
- Statistical validation of results
|
|
|
|
### Timeline Expectations
|
|
|
|
**Standard turnaround:** ~21 days from submission to results
|
|
|
|
**Timeline breakdown:**
|
|
- Construct generation: 3-5 days
|
|
- Expression: 5-7 days
|
|
- Purification: 2-3 days
|
|
- Assay execution: 3-5 days
|
|
- Analysis and QC: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
**Factors affecting timeline:**
|
|
- Custom targets (add 1-2 weeks)
|
|
- Novel assay development (add 2-4 weeks)
|
|
- Large batch sizes (may add 1 week)
|
|
|
|
### Cost Optimization
|
|
|
|
1. **Batch submissions** - Lower per-sequence cost
|
|
2. **Standard targets** - Catalog antigens are faster/cheaper
|
|
3. **Standard conditions** - Custom buffers add cost
|
|
4. **Computational pre-filtering** - Submit only promising candidates
|
|
|
|
## Combining Experiment Types
|
|
|
|
For comprehensive protein characterization, combine multiple assays:
|
|
|
|
**Therapeutic antibody development:**
|
|
1. Binding assay → Identify high-affinity binders
|
|
2. Expression testing → Select manufacturable candidates
|
|
3. Thermostability → Ensure formulation stability
|
|
|
|
**Enzyme engineering:**
|
|
1. Activity assay → Screen for improved catalysis
|
|
2. Expression testing → Ensure producibility
|
|
3. Thermostability → Validate industrial robustness
|
|
|
|
**Sequential vs. Parallel:**
|
|
- **Sequential** - Use results from early assays to filter candidates
|
|
- **Parallel** - Run all assays simultaneously for faster results
|
|
|
|
## Data Integration
|
|
|
|
Results integrate with computational workflows:
|
|
|
|
1. **Download raw data** via API
|
|
2. **Parse results** into standardized format
|
|
3. **Feed into ML models** for next-round design
|
|
4. **Track experiments** with metadata tags
|
|
5. **Visualize trends** across design iterations
|
|
|
|
## Support and Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
**Common issues:**
|
|
- Low expression → Consider sequence optimization (see protein_optimization.md)
|
|
- Poor binding → Verify target specification and expected range
|
|
- Variable results → Check sequence quality and controls
|
|
- Incomplete data → Contact support with experiment ID
|
|
|
|
**Getting help:**
|
|
- Email: support@adaptyvbio.com
|
|
- Include experiment ID and specific question
|
|
- Provide context (design goals, expected results)
|
|
- Response time: <24 hours for active experiments
|