920 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
920 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
# Prompt Patterns & Templates
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This guide provides reusable prompt patterns and templates for common tasks. Each pattern includes the template, usage guidelines, and examples.
|
|
|
|
## Pattern Categories
|
|
|
|
1. **Code Generation** - Creating code from specifications
|
|
2. **Analysis & Review** - Evaluating code, documents, data
|
|
3. **Content Creation** - Writing documentation, articles, etc.
|
|
4. **Data Processing** - Transforming, extracting, analyzing data
|
|
5. **Decision Support** - Helping make informed choices
|
|
6. **Learning & Teaching** - Explaining concepts, tutoring
|
|
7. **Debugging & Troubleshooting** - Finding and fixing problems
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Code Generation Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Feature Implementation
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Building a new feature or component
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Expert [language] developer following [style guide/framework]
|
|
|
|
FEATURE REQUEST:
|
|
[Description of feature to implement]
|
|
|
|
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
- Language/Framework: [specific versions]
|
|
- Architecture: [pattern to follow]
|
|
- Dependencies: [what you can use]
|
|
- Constraints: [limitations]
|
|
|
|
CODE STANDARDS:
|
|
- [Naming conventions]
|
|
- [Documentation requirements]
|
|
- [Error handling approach]
|
|
- [Testing requirements]
|
|
|
|
DELIVERABLES:
|
|
1. Main implementation
|
|
2. Unit tests
|
|
3. Integration tests (if applicable)
|
|
4. Usage example
|
|
5. Brief documentation
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT STRUCTURE:
|
|
[Specify files, organization]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Example:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Expert TypeScript developer following Airbnb style guide
|
|
|
|
FEATURE REQUEST:
|
|
Implement a caching service with TTL support and LRU eviction
|
|
|
|
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
- Language/Framework: TypeScript 5.0+, Node.js
|
|
- Architecture: Service class with dependency injection
|
|
- Dependencies: Only Node.js built-ins
|
|
- Constraints: Must be memory-efficient, thread-safe
|
|
|
|
CODE STANDARDS:
|
|
- Use strict TypeScript types
|
|
- JSDoc comments for public methods
|
|
- Explicit error handling with custom exceptions
|
|
- 80%+ code coverage
|
|
|
|
DELIVERABLES:
|
|
1. CacheService class implementation
|
|
2. Comprehensive unit tests
|
|
3. Usage examples
|
|
4. Performance considerations doc
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT STRUCTURE:
|
|
- src/services/CacheService.ts
|
|
- src/services/__tests__/CacheService.test.ts
|
|
- examples/cache-usage.ts
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Code Refactoring
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Improving existing code
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Senior developer performing code refactoring
|
|
|
|
CURRENT CODE:
|
|
[Code to refactor]
|
|
|
|
REFACTORING GOALS:
|
|
1. [Goal 1 - e.g., reduce complexity]
|
|
2. [Goal 2 - e.g., improve testability]
|
|
3. [Goal 3 - e.g., enhance performance]
|
|
|
|
CONSTRAINTS:
|
|
- Maintain backward compatibility: [yes/no]
|
|
- Keep same API surface: [yes/no]
|
|
- Preserve functionality exactly: [yes/no]
|
|
|
|
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
|
|
- Cyclomatic complexity < [number]
|
|
- No functions > [number] lines
|
|
- [Other measurable improvements]
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
1. Refactored code
|
|
2. Explanation of changes
|
|
3. Before/after comparison
|
|
4. Test plan for validation
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Bug Fix
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Diagnosing and fixing bugs
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Senior debugger and problem solver
|
|
|
|
BUG REPORT:
|
|
Symptoms: [What's happening]
|
|
Expected: [What should happen]
|
|
Steps to reproduce: [How to trigger]
|
|
|
|
CODE:
|
|
[Relevant code sections]
|
|
|
|
CONTEXT:
|
|
- Environment: [runtime, versions]
|
|
- Recent changes: [what changed recently]
|
|
- Error messages: [any errors]
|
|
|
|
DEBUGGING APPROACH:
|
|
1. Analyze code for potential issues
|
|
2. Identify root cause
|
|
3. Propose fix
|
|
4. Suggest tests to prevent regression
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
## Root Cause
|
|
[Explanation]
|
|
|
|
## Proposed Fix
|
|
[Code changes]
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
[How to verify fix]
|
|
|
|
## Prevention
|
|
[How to avoid similar bugs]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Analysis & Review Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Code Review
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Reviewing pull requests or code changes
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Senior engineer conducting code review
|
|
|
|
CODE TO REVIEW:
|
|
[Code or diff]
|
|
|
|
REVIEW FOCUS:
|
|
1. Security vulnerabilities
|
|
2. Performance issues
|
|
3. Code quality and maintainability
|
|
4. Best practices adherence
|
|
5. Test coverage
|
|
6. Documentation
|
|
|
|
SEVERITY LEVELS:
|
|
- Critical: Must fix before merge
|
|
- High: Should fix before merge
|
|
- Medium: Should fix soon
|
|
- Low: Nice to have
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT FORMAT:
|
|
For each issue:
|
|
### [Issue Title]
|
|
- **Severity**: [Level]
|
|
- **Category**: [Security/Performance/Quality/Tests/Docs]
|
|
- **Location**: `[file]:[line]`
|
|
- **Issue**: [What's wrong]
|
|
- **Why**: [Why it matters]
|
|
- **Fix**: [How to fix it]
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY:
|
|
- Overall assessment: Approve / Request Changes / Comment
|
|
- Critical/High issues: [count]
|
|
- Recommendation: [merge or not]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Architecture Review
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Evaluating system design decisions
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Solutions architect reviewing system design
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE:
|
|
[Architecture description, diagrams, specs]
|
|
|
|
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK:
|
|
1. **Scalability**: Can it handle growth?
|
|
2. **Reliability**: Single points of failure?
|
|
3. **Performance**: Will it meet SLAs?
|
|
4. **Security**: Threat model coverage?
|
|
5. **Maintainability**: Easy to change/debug?
|
|
6. **Cost**: Resource efficiency?
|
|
|
|
CONTEXT:
|
|
- Expected scale: [users, requests, data]
|
|
- Team size: [developers]
|
|
- Timeline: [when needed]
|
|
- Constraints: [technical, business]
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
For each dimension:
|
|
## [Dimension]
|
|
- Assessment: [Good/Concerns/Critical Issues]
|
|
- Analysis: [Detailed evaluation]
|
|
- Risks: [What could go wrong]
|
|
- Recommendations: [Improvements]
|
|
|
|
FINAL RECOMMENDATION:
|
|
[Approve / Modify / Redesign] with reasoning
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Security Audit
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Checking for security vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Security engineer performing audit
|
|
|
|
TARGET:
|
|
[Code, system, or architecture to audit]
|
|
|
|
SECURITY FRAMEWORK:
|
|
- OWASP Top 10
|
|
- Authentication/Authorization
|
|
- Data protection
|
|
- Input validation
|
|
- Cryptography
|
|
- API security
|
|
- Dependency security
|
|
|
|
THREAT MODEL:
|
|
- Assets: [What needs protection]
|
|
- Threat actors: [Who might attack]
|
|
- Attack vectors: [How they might attack]
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
For each vulnerability:
|
|
### [Vulnerability Name]
|
|
- **CVSS Score**: [0-10]
|
|
- **Category**: [OWASP category]
|
|
- **Location**: [Where found]
|
|
- **Description**: [What's vulnerable]
|
|
- **Exploit scenario**: [How to exploit]
|
|
- **Impact**: [Damage if exploited]
|
|
- **Remediation**: [How to fix]
|
|
- **References**: [CVE, CWE numbers]
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
|
|
- Critical vulnerabilities: [count]
|
|
- Overall risk: [High/Medium/Low]
|
|
- Priority fixes: [top 3]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Content Creation Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Technical Documentation
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Writing docs for APIs, libraries, tools
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Technical writer with [domain] expertise
|
|
|
|
DOCUMENTATION TARGET:
|
|
[What you're documenting]
|
|
|
|
AUDIENCE:
|
|
- Experience level: [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced]
|
|
- Background: [Assumed knowledge]
|
|
- Goals: [What they want to achieve]
|
|
|
|
DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
- Tone: [Professional/Friendly/Formal]
|
|
- Detail level: [High-level/Detailed/Comprehensive]
|
|
- Include: [Examples/Diagrams/Code samples]
|
|
|
|
STRUCTURE:
|
|
# [Title]
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
[One paragraph - what is it]
|
|
|
|
## Quick Start
|
|
[Minimal example to get started]
|
|
|
|
## Installation
|
|
[How to install/setup]
|
|
|
|
## Core Concepts
|
|
[Key ideas to understand]
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
### [Feature 1]
|
|
[Description + example]
|
|
|
|
### [Feature 2]
|
|
[Description + example]
|
|
|
|
## API Reference
|
|
[Detailed API docs]
|
|
|
|
## Advanced Usage
|
|
[Complex scenarios]
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
[Common issues and solutions]
|
|
|
|
## FAQ
|
|
[Frequently asked questions]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Tutorial Creation
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Teaching how to do something step-by-step
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Expert teacher creating a tutorial
|
|
|
|
TUTORIAL GOAL:
|
|
Teach [audience] how to [accomplish task]
|
|
|
|
AUDIENCE:
|
|
- Current knowledge: [What they know]
|
|
- Learning goal: [What they'll learn]
|
|
- Preferred style: [Hands-on/Conceptual/Both]
|
|
|
|
TUTORIAL STRUCTURE:
|
|
## Introduction
|
|
- What you'll build
|
|
- What you'll learn
|
|
- Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
## Concepts
|
|
[Key ideas explained simply]
|
|
|
|
## Step-by-Step Instructions
|
|
### Step 1: [First step]
|
|
- Explanation: [Why this step]
|
|
- Code: [What to write]
|
|
- Result: [What happens]
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: [Next step]
|
|
[Same format]
|
|
|
|
## Challenges
|
|
[Optional exercises]
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
[Where to go from here]
|
|
|
|
REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
- Clear explanations for each step
|
|
- Working code at each checkpoint
|
|
- Expected output shown
|
|
- Common mistakes highlighted
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Blog Post/Article
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Writing technical articles or posts
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Technical blogger writing for [audience]
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE TOPIC:
|
|
[What you're writing about]
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE GOALS:
|
|
- Educate about: [Topic]
|
|
- Show how to: [Practical application]
|
|
- Inspire to: [Action reader should take]
|
|
|
|
REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
- Length: [Word count]
|
|
- Tone: [Conversational/Professional/Academic]
|
|
- Include: [Code examples/Diagrams/Screenshots]
|
|
- SEO keywords: [Primary and secondary]
|
|
|
|
STRUCTURE:
|
|
# [Compelling Title with Keyword]
|
|
|
|
## Introduction (Hook)
|
|
- Problem statement
|
|
- Why it matters
|
|
- What you'll learn
|
|
|
|
## Background/Context
|
|
[Necessary foundation]
|
|
|
|
## Main Content
|
|
### [Section 1]
|
|
[Content with examples]
|
|
|
|
### [Section 2]
|
|
[Content with examples]
|
|
|
|
### [Section 3]
|
|
[Content with examples]
|
|
|
|
## Practical Example
|
|
[Working code or demo]
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
- Summary of key points
|
|
- Call to action
|
|
- Further reading
|
|
|
|
STYLE GUIDELINES:
|
|
- Use "you" (second person)
|
|
- Active voice
|
|
- Short paragraphs (3-4 sentences)
|
|
- Subheadings every 300 words
|
|
- Code examples well-commented
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Data Processing Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Data Extraction
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Pulling structured data from unstructured sources
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Data engineer extracting information
|
|
|
|
SOURCE DATA:
|
|
[Unstructured text, logs, documents]
|
|
|
|
EXTRACTION SCHEMA:
|
|
{
|
|
"field1": "type (description)",
|
|
"field2": "type (description)",
|
|
"nested": {
|
|
"field3": "type"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXTRACTION RULES:
|
|
- If field not found: [default value or null]
|
|
- Date format: [ISO 8601 / custom]
|
|
- Number format: [decimal places, units]
|
|
- Validation: [rules for valid data]
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT FORMAT:
|
|
Return JSON array of objects matching schema
|
|
|
|
HANDLING AMBIGUITY:
|
|
- Multiple possible values: [take first / all / ask]
|
|
- Unclear data: [skip / estimate / flag]
|
|
- Missing data: [null / default / omit]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Data Transformation
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Converting data from one format to another
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Data transformation specialist
|
|
|
|
INPUT DATA:
|
|
[Current format]
|
|
|
|
INPUT SCHEMA:
|
|
[Structure of input]
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT SCHEMA:
|
|
[Desired structure]
|
|
|
|
TRANSFORMATION RULES:
|
|
1. [Field mapping]
|
|
2. [Calculations]
|
|
3. [Aggregations]
|
|
4. [Filtering]
|
|
|
|
EDGE CASES:
|
|
- Missing values: [How to handle]
|
|
- Invalid data: [How to handle]
|
|
- Duplicates: [Keep / remove / aggregate]
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
Transformed data in target format
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Data Analysis
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Analyzing datasets for insights
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Data analyst
|
|
|
|
DATASET:
|
|
[Data to analyze]
|
|
|
|
ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES:
|
|
1. [What to discover - trends]
|
|
2. [What to measure - metrics]
|
|
3. [What to compare - segments]
|
|
|
|
ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK:
|
|
- Descriptive statistics (mean, median, distribution)
|
|
- Trend analysis (over time)
|
|
- Comparative analysis (between groups)
|
|
- Correlation analysis (relationships)
|
|
- Anomaly detection (outliers)
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT STRUCTURE:
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
[2-3 sentences of key findings]
|
|
|
|
## Key Metrics
|
|
| Metric | Value | Change | Trend |
|
|
|
|
## Detailed Analysis
|
|
### [Finding 1]
|
|
- Data: [Numbers]
|
|
- Insight: [What it means]
|
|
- Implication: [Why it matters]
|
|
|
|
### [Finding 2]
|
|
[Same structure]
|
|
|
|
## Recommendations
|
|
1. [Action based on findings]
|
|
2. [Action based on findings]
|
|
|
|
## Methodology
|
|
[How analysis was performed]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Decision Support Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Technology Selection
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Choosing between technology options
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Technical architect evaluating options
|
|
|
|
DECISION CONTEXT:
|
|
[What you're building, constraints, goals]
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS:
|
|
1. [Option A]
|
|
2. [Option B]
|
|
3. [Option C]
|
|
|
|
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
|
|
- Technical fit (how well it solves problem)
|
|
- Team expertise (learning curve)
|
|
- Community/support (help available)
|
|
- Maturity/stability (production-ready?)
|
|
- Performance (speed, efficiency)
|
|
- Cost (licensing, infrastructure)
|
|
- Maintenance (ongoing effort)
|
|
- Scalability (future growth)
|
|
|
|
ANALYSIS:
|
|
For each option, evaluate against each criterion
|
|
|
|
COMPARISON MATRIX:
|
|
| Criterion | Weight | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|
|
|-----------|--------|----------|----------|----------|
|
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
|
|
- First choice: [Option] because [reasoning]
|
|
- Alternative: [Option] if [conditions]
|
|
- Avoid: [Option] because [reasoning]
|
|
|
|
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN:
|
|
[Next steps if recommendation accepted]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Problem Solving
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Working through complex problems
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Problem-solving expert
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM STATEMENT:
|
|
[Clear description of the problem]
|
|
|
|
CONTEXT:
|
|
- Current situation: [What exists now]
|
|
- Constraints: [Limitations]
|
|
- Success criteria: [What good looks like]
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH:
|
|
1. **Understand**: Restate problem, identify root cause
|
|
2. **Analyze**: Break down into components
|
|
3. **Generate**: Brainstorm possible solutions
|
|
4. **Evaluate**: Assess each solution
|
|
5. **Decide**: Choose best approach
|
|
6. **Plan**: Create action plan
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
## Problem Analysis
|
|
[Root cause, contributing factors]
|
|
|
|
## Possible Solutions
|
|
1. [Solution A]
|
|
- Pros: [Benefits]
|
|
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
|
|
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
|
|
|
|
2. [Solution B]
|
|
[Same format]
|
|
|
|
## Recommended Solution
|
|
[Which one and why]
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Plan
|
|
1. [Step 1]
|
|
2. [Step 2]
|
|
3. [Step 3]
|
|
|
|
## Risk Mitigation
|
|
[What could go wrong and how to handle]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Learning & Teaching Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Concept Explanation
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Explaining technical concepts
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Expert teacher explaining [topic]
|
|
|
|
CONCEPT TO EXPLAIN:
|
|
[Technical concept]
|
|
|
|
AUDIENCE:
|
|
- Background: [What they know]
|
|
- Learning goal: [What they need to understand]
|
|
- Preferred learning style: [Visual/Hands-on/Theoretical]
|
|
|
|
EXPLANATION STRUCTURE:
|
|
## Simple Definition
|
|
[One sentence explanation]
|
|
|
|
## Why It Matters
|
|
[Real-world relevance]
|
|
|
|
## How It Works
|
|
[Step-by-step breakdown]
|
|
|
|
## Analogy
|
|
[Relate to familiar concept]
|
|
|
|
## Example
|
|
[Concrete, runnable example]
|
|
|
|
## Common Misconceptions
|
|
[What people get wrong]
|
|
|
|
## When to Use
|
|
[Practical guidelines]
|
|
|
|
## Further Learning
|
|
[Next topics to explore]
|
|
|
|
REQUIREMENTS:
|
|
- No jargon without explanation
|
|
- Build from simple to complex
|
|
- Multiple examples
|
|
- Visual aids if helpful
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Code Explanation
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Explaining how code works
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Code teacher explaining implementation
|
|
|
|
CODE TO EXPLAIN:
|
|
[Code snippet or file]
|
|
|
|
EXPLANATION LEVEL:
|
|
- Audience: [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced]
|
|
- Focus: [High-level/Detailed/Both]
|
|
- Goal: [Understanding/Implementation/Both]
|
|
|
|
EXPLANATION STRUCTURE:
|
|
## Overview
|
|
[What this code does in one sentence]
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
[Why this code exists, problem it solves]
|
|
|
|
## How It Works
|
|
[Step through the logic]
|
|
|
|
## Line-by-Line Breakdown
|
|
Line X: [What it does, why it's there]
|
|
Line Y: [What it does, why it's there]
|
|
|
|
## Key Concepts Used
|
|
- [Concept 1]: [Brief explanation]
|
|
- [Concept 2]: [Brief explanation]
|
|
|
|
## Example Usage
|
|
[How to use this code]
|
|
|
|
## Edge Cases
|
|
[Special scenarios handled]
|
|
|
|
## Improvements
|
|
[How it could be better]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Debugging & Troubleshooting Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Error Diagnosis
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Figuring out what's wrong
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Expert debugger
|
|
|
|
ERROR REPORT:
|
|
- Error message: [Exact error]
|
|
- When it occurs: [Circumstances]
|
|
- Expected behavior: [What should happen]
|
|
- Actual behavior: [What actually happens]
|
|
|
|
CODE:
|
|
[Relevant code]
|
|
|
|
ENVIRONMENT:
|
|
- Language/Runtime: [Version]
|
|
- Dependencies: [Versions]
|
|
- OS/Platform: [Details]
|
|
- Recent changes: [What changed]
|
|
|
|
DEBUGGING PROCESS:
|
|
1. **Understand**: Interpret error message
|
|
2. **Locate**: Find where error originates
|
|
3. **Analyze**: Determine root cause
|
|
4. **Verify**: Confirm diagnosis
|
|
5. **Solve**: Propose fix
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
## Error Analysis
|
|
[What the error means]
|
|
|
|
## Root Cause
|
|
[Why it's happening]
|
|
|
|
## Location
|
|
[Where in code]
|
|
|
|
## Fix
|
|
[Code changes needed]
|
|
|
|
## Verification
|
|
[How to test the fix]
|
|
|
|
## Prevention
|
|
[How to avoid in future]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern: Performance Optimization
|
|
|
|
**Use when:** Making code faster or more efficient
|
|
|
|
**Template:**
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE: Performance optimization expert
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE ISSUE:
|
|
[What's slow or inefficient]
|
|
|
|
CURRENT METRICS:
|
|
- Response time: [Current]
|
|
- Throughput: [Current]
|
|
- Resource usage: [CPU/Memory]
|
|
- Target: [What you need]
|
|
|
|
CODE/SYSTEM:
|
|
[Code or architecture to optimize]
|
|
|
|
PROFILING DATA:
|
|
[Measurements, bottlenecks identified]
|
|
|
|
OPTIMIZATION APPROACH:
|
|
1. Identify hotspots
|
|
2. Analyze algorithmic complexity
|
|
3. Propose optimizations
|
|
4. Estimate improvements
|
|
5. Consider trade-offs
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT:
|
|
## Bottleneck Analysis
|
|
[What's causing slowness]
|
|
|
|
## Optimization Opportunities
|
|
1. [Optimization 1]
|
|
- Current: O(n²)
|
|
- Proposed: O(n log n)
|
|
- Expected improvement: [X% faster]
|
|
- Trade-off: [Any downsides]
|
|
- Implementation: [Code changes]
|
|
|
|
2. [Optimization 2]
|
|
[Same format]
|
|
|
|
## Recommended Approach
|
|
[Which optimizations to do, in what order]
|
|
|
|
## Expected Results
|
|
[Performance after optimization]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Pattern Combination
|
|
|
|
### Multi-Pattern Workflow
|
|
|
|
Often, you'll combine patterns:
|
|
|
|
**Example: Full Feature Development**
|
|
1. Use **Technology Selection** to choose stack
|
|
2. Use **Feature Implementation** to build it
|
|
3. Use **Code Review** to verify quality
|
|
4. Use **Technical Documentation** to document it
|
|
5. Use **Tutorial Creation** to teach others
|
|
|
|
**Example: Problem Resolution**
|
|
1. Use **Error Diagnosis** to find the issue
|
|
2. Use **Problem Solving** to explore solutions
|
|
3. Use **Bug Fix** to implement the fix
|
|
4. Use **Code Explanation** to document the solution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Quick Reference
|
|
|
|
### Choosing a Pattern
|
|
|
|
| Task | Pattern |
|
|
|------|---------|
|
|
| Building new code | Feature Implementation |
|
|
| Improving code | Code Refactoring |
|
|
| Fixing bugs | Bug Fix, Error Diagnosis |
|
|
| Reviewing code | Code Review |
|
|
| Evaluating design | Architecture Review |
|
|
| Security check | Security Audit |
|
|
| Writing docs | Technical Documentation |
|
|
| Teaching concept | Concept Explanation, Tutorial |
|
|
| Making decisions | Technology Selection, Problem Solving |
|
|
| Analyzing data | Data Analysis |
|
|
| Transforming data | Data Extraction, Data Transformation |
|
|
| Speeding up code | Performance Optimization |
|
|
|
|
### Customizing Patterns
|
|
|
|
All patterns are templates. Customize by:
|
|
- Adjusting sections for your needs
|
|
- Adding domain-specific criteria
|
|
- Changing output format
|
|
- Combining multiple patterns
|
|
- Simplifying for simpler tasks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Remember:** These patterns are starting points. Adapt them to your specific needs, combine them creatively, and iterate based on results.
|