Files
gh-glittercowboy-taches-cc-…/skills/create-agent-skills/workflows/audit-skill.md
2025-11-29 18:28:37 +08:00

139 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

# Workflow: Audit a Skill
<required_reading>
**Read these reference files NOW:**
1. references/recommended-structure.md
2. references/skill-structure.md
3. references/use-xml-tags.md
</required_reading>
<process>
## Step 1: List Available Skills
**DO NOT use AskUserQuestion** - there may be many skills.
Enumerate skills in chat as numbered list:
```bash
ls ~/.claude/skills/
```
Present as:
```
Available skills:
1. create-agent-skills
2. build-macos-apps
3. manage-stripe
...
```
Ask: "Which skill would you like to audit? (enter number or name)"
## Step 2: Read the Skill
After user selects, read the full skill structure:
```bash
# Read main file
cat ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md
# Check for workflows and references
ls ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/
ls ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/workflows/ 2>/dev/null
ls ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/references/ 2>/dev/null
```
## Step 3: Run Audit Checklist
Evaluate against each criterion:
### YAML Frontmatter
- [ ] Has `name:` field (lowercase-with-hyphens)
- [ ] Name matches directory name
- [ ] Has `description:` field
- [ ] Description says what it does AND when to use it
- [ ] Description is third person ("Use when...")
### Structure
- [ ] SKILL.md under 500 lines
- [ ] Pure XML structure (no markdown headings # in body)
- [ ] All XML tags properly closed
- [ ] Has required tags: objective OR essential_principles
- [ ] Has success_criteria
### Router Pattern (if complex skill)
- [ ] Essential principles inline in SKILL.md (not in separate file)
- [ ] Has intake question
- [ ] Has routing table
- [ ] All referenced workflow files exist
- [ ] All referenced reference files exist
### Workflows (if present)
- [ ] Each has required_reading section
- [ ] Each has process section
- [ ] Each has success_criteria section
- [ ] Required reading references exist
### Content Quality
- [ ] Principles are actionable (not vague platitudes)
- [ ] Steps are specific (not "do the thing")
- [ ] Success criteria are verifiable
- [ ] No redundant content across files
## Step 4: Generate Report
Present findings as:
```
## Audit Report: {skill-name}
### ✅ Passing
- [list passing items]
### ⚠️ Issues Found
1. **[Issue name]**: [Description]
→ Fix: [Specific action]
2. **[Issue name]**: [Description]
→ Fix: [Specific action]
### 📊 Score: X/Y criteria passing
```
## Step 5: Offer Fixes
If issues found, ask:
"Would you like me to fix these issues?"
Options:
1. **Fix all** - Apply all recommended fixes
2. **Fix one by one** - Review each fix before applying
3. **Just the report** - No changes needed
If fixing:
- Make each change
- Verify file validity after each change
- Report what was fixed
</process>
<audit_anti_patterns>
## Common Anti-Patterns to Flag
**Skippable principles**: Essential principles in separate file instead of inline
**Monolithic skill**: Single file over 500 lines
**Mixed concerns**: Procedures and knowledge in same file
**Vague steps**: "Handle the error appropriately"
**Untestable criteria**: "User is satisfied"
**Markdown headings in body**: Using # instead of XML tags
**Missing routing**: Complex skill without intake/routing
**Broken references**: Files mentioned but don't exist
**Redundant content**: Same information in multiple places
</audit_anti_patterns>
<success_criteria>
Audit is complete when:
- [ ] Skill fully read and analyzed
- [ ] All checklist items evaluated
- [ ] Report presented to user
- [ ] Fixes applied (if requested)
- [ ] User has clear picture of skill health
</success_criteria>