49 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Evaluate decisions across three time horizons
|
|
argument-hint: [decision or leave blank for current context]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<objective>
|
|
Apply the 10/10/10 rule to $ARGUMENTS (or the current discussion if no arguments provided).
|
|
|
|
Ask: "How will I feel about this decision in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years?"
|
|
</objective>
|
|
|
|
<process>
|
|
1. State the decision clearly with options
|
|
2. For each option, evaluate emotional and practical impact at:
|
|
- 10 minutes (immediate reaction)
|
|
- 10 months (medium-term consequences)
|
|
- 10 years (long-term life impact)
|
|
3. Identify where short-term and long-term conflict
|
|
4. Make recommendation based on time-weighted analysis
|
|
</process>
|
|
|
|
<output_format>
|
|
**Decision:** [what you're choosing between]
|
|
|
|
**Option A:**
|
|
- 10 minutes: [immediate feeling/consequence]
|
|
- 10 months: [medium-term reality]
|
|
- 10 years: [long-term impact on life]
|
|
|
|
**Option B:**
|
|
- 10 minutes: [immediate feeling/consequence]
|
|
- 10 months: [medium-term reality]
|
|
- 10 years: [long-term impact on life]
|
|
|
|
**Time Conflicts:**
|
|
[Where short-term pain leads to long-term gain, or vice versa]
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:**
|
|
[Which option, weighted toward longer time horizons]
|
|
</output_format>
|
|
|
|
<success_criteria>
|
|
- Distinguishes temporary discomfort from lasting regret
|
|
- Reveals when short-term thinking hijacks decisions
|
|
- Makes long-term consequences visceral and real
|
|
- Helps overcome present bias
|
|
- Clarifies what actually matters over time
|
|
</success_criteria>
|