4.4 KiB
model, allowed-tools, argument-hint, description
| model | allowed-tools | argument-hint | description |
|---|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-4-0 | Task | <problem-or-question> [complexity-level] [perspective-count] | Multi-persona analysis using split-team framework with cognitive harmonics and productive disagreement |
Multi-Persona Analysis Command
Orchestrate sophisticated multi-perspective analysis of problems using the split-team framework. Assemble optimal persona teams, facilitate cognitive harmonics, and synthesize insights through productive disagreement.
How It Works
This command invokes the persona-coordinator agent to:
- Analyze your problem and determine required perspectives
- Assemble an optimal team of 3-7 persona agents
- Orchestrate divergent analysis from each perspective
- Facilitate productive disagreement and assumption challenging
- Synthesize insights into coherent, actionable recommendations
Arguments
$1 (Required): Problem statement or question to analyze
$2 (Optional): Complexity level
simple: 3-4 personas, straightforward analysismoderate: 5-6 personas, balanced trade-offs (default)complex: 7+ personas, multifaceted challenges
$3 (Optional): Number of personas (3-10)
- Overrides complexity-based team size
- Must be between 3 and 10
Examples
Simple Analysis
/analyze "Should we use REST or GraphQL for our API?" simple
Assembles: Analytical Thinker + Pragmatic Realist + Systems Architect
Moderate Analysis (Default)
/analyze "Design an authentication system for our platform"
Assembles: Systems Architect + Risk Analyst + User Advocate + Pragmatic Realist + Constructive Critic
Complex Analysis
/analyze "Should we migrate from monolith to microservices?" complex
Assembles: Systems Architect + Risk Analyst + Pragmatic Realist + Creative Innovator + Constructive Critic + User Advocate + Analytical Thinker
Custom Team Size
/analyze "Evaluate our tech stack choices" moderate 6
Assembles: 6 most relevant personas for the problem
Use Cases
Architecture Decisions
- Technology selection
- System design choices
- Migration strategies
- Scaling approaches
Product Strategy
- Feature prioritization
- User experience design
- Market positioning
- Competitive analysis
Technical Challenges
- Performance optimization
- Security hardening
- Debugging complex issues
- Code architecture review
Strategic Planning
- Long-term technology roadmap
- Resource allocation
- Risk assessment
- Innovation opportunities
What You Get
- Diverse Perspectives: Each persona contributes unique insights through their specialized lens
- Productive Disagreement: Constructive challenge of assumptions and alternatives
- Cognitive Harmonics: Emergent insights from persona interactions
- Synthesis: Coherent integration of perspectives with clear recommendations
- Trade-off Clarity: Explicit acknowledgment of competing concerns and balanced choices
Split-Team Framework Principles
Voice Differentiation: Each persona maintains unique vocabulary, questions, and analytical approach
Cognitive Harmonics: Multiple perspectives create constructive interference for emergent insights
Productive Disagreement: Systematic challenge strengthens solutions and prevents groupthink
Integration Synthesis: Coordinator weaves perspectives into coherent, actionable guidance
Tips for Best Results
- Be Specific: Provide context and constraints in your problem statement
- State Goals: Mention success criteria or what you're optimizing for
- Match Complexity: Use simple for straightforward questions, complex for critical decisions
- Trust the Process: Persona disagreement is valuable, not problematic
- Implementation Focus: Include practical constraints for realistic recommendations
Example Session
/analyze "We need to choose between PostgreSQL and MongoDB for user data storage. We have 10M users, need strong consistency, but want flexibility for future features." moderate
Result: Assembles 5 personas who examine through data/performance (Analytical Thinker), implementation reality (Pragmatic Realist), system architecture (Systems Architect), risk factors (Risk Analyst), and challenges assumptions (Constructive Critic). Synthesis provides clear recommendation with rationale and acknowledged trade-offs.
Invoke the persona-coordinator agent with: $ARGUMENTS