219 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
219 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
model: claude-opus-4-1
|
|
allowed-tools: Task, Read, Write, Bash(*), Glob, Grep
|
|
argument-hint: <complex-problem> [--domain=<expertise>] [--challenge-level=<intensity>]
|
|
description: Maximum cognitive diversity orchestrator with guest expert persona capabilities
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Ultra-Cognitive Analysis Engine
|
|
|
|
Execute maximum cognitive diversity analysis by assuming multiple expert personas simultaneously and orchestrating complex problem-solving with constructive disagreement protocols. Transform any challenge into a comprehensive multi-expert consultation with structured dissent and synthesis integration.
|
|
|
|
## Operational Parameters
|
|
|
|
### Challenge Intensity Levels
|
|
- **foundation**: 3-4 perspectives, basic questioning, gentle challenge
|
|
- **advanced**: 5-7 perspectives, systematic disagreement, assumption testing
|
|
- **maximum**: 8-12 perspectives, assumption deconstruction, paradigm questioning
|
|
- **research**: 10+ perspectives, fundamental premise challenging, breakthrough thinking
|
|
|
|
### Domain Expertise Categories
|
|
- **technical**: Systems architecture, performance optimization, security analysis, implementation strategy
|
|
- **strategic**: Business positioning, market analysis, competitive intelligence, growth planning
|
|
- **creative**: Innovation pathways, design thinking, user experience optimization, possibility exploration
|
|
- **analytical**: Data interpretation, research methodology, evidence evaluation, statistical reasoning
|
|
- **operational**: Process optimization, workflow design, efficiency analysis, resource management
|
|
|
|
## Ultra-Cognitive Protocol
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Problem Space Deconstruction
|
|
[Extended thinking: Analyze the challenge across multiple dimensions to understand complexity, stakeholder impact, constraint boundaries, and success criteria. Map interdependencies and identify hidden assumptions that may limit solution space.]
|
|
|
|
**Analysis Framework:**
|
|
- Stakeholder impact mapping and priority assessment
|
|
- Constraint identification with flexibility evaluation
|
|
- Success criteria definition with measurement methodology
|
|
- Risk landscape mapping with mitigation pathways
|
|
- Resource requirement analysis with optimization opportunities
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Expert Persona Assembly
|
|
[Extended thinking: Dynamically generate expert personalities with authentic voices, distinct analytical approaches, and specialized vocabularies. Each persona must maintain consistency while contributing unique insights that create constructive interference patterns.]
|
|
|
|
**Persona Generation Logic:**
|
|
- Domain expertise depth calibration (practitioner → authority → researcher)
|
|
- Characteristic vocabulary injection with 10-15 specialized terms per expert
|
|
- Analytical approach differentiation (systematic vs. intuitive vs. experimental)
|
|
- Question pattern establishment with perspective-specific inquiry methods
|
|
- Interaction protocol definition for productive collaboration
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Parallel Perspective Generation
|
|
[Extended thinking: Execute simultaneous multi-expert analysis where each persona examines the problem through their specialized lens. Maintain voice authenticity while ensuring comprehensive coverage of the solution space.]
|
|
|
|
**Perspective Coordination:**
|
|
- Simultaneous analysis execution with voice differentiation maintenance
|
|
- Cross-perspective insight recognition and amplification opportunities
|
|
- Blind spot identification through perspective gap analysis
|
|
- Solution space expansion through alternative approach generation
|
|
- Evidence evaluation through multiple methodological lenses
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Constructive Disagreement Orchestration
|
|
[Extended thinking: Structure productive dissent that strengthens solutions rather than creating conflict. Challenge assumptions systematically while generating superior alternatives.]
|
|
|
|
**Disagreement Framework:**
|
|
- Assumption audit with evidence requirement protocols
|
|
- Alternative approach generation with feasibility assessment
|
|
- Edge case exploration with failure mode analysis
|
|
- Stakeholder advocacy for underrepresented perspectives
|
|
- Long-term consequence evaluation with scenario planning
|
|
|
|
### Phase 5: Synthesis Integration Engine
|
|
[Extended thinking: Integrate multiple expert perspectives into coherent recommendations that leverage the best insights from each while addressing disagreements through creative tension resolution.]
|
|
|
|
**Integration Methodology:**
|
|
- Common ground identification with shared principle extraction
|
|
- Creative tension resolution through innovative approach synthesis
|
|
- Trade-off analysis with optimization pathway recommendations
|
|
- Implementation roadmap creation with risk mitigation strategies
|
|
- Success metrics definition with progress tracking frameworks
|
|
|
|
## Guest Expert Persona System
|
|
|
|
### Expertise Depth Calibration
|
|
**Practitioner Level (5-10 years experience)**
|
|
- Hands-on implementation focus with practical constraint awareness
|
|
- Tool and methodology fluency with best practice knowledge
|
|
- Problem pattern recognition with solution template application
|
|
- Risk awareness through experience-based intuition
|
|
|
|
**Authority Level (15+ years experience)**
|
|
- Strategic thinking with long-term perspective integration
|
|
- Industry trend awareness with competitive landscape knowledge
|
|
- Innovation capability with creative solution generation
|
|
- Mentorship perspective with knowledge transfer optimization
|
|
|
|
**Researcher Level (cutting-edge expertise)**
|
|
- Paradigm-questioning capability with fundamental assumption challenging
|
|
- Experimental methodology with hypothesis-driven exploration
|
|
- Cross-domain knowledge integration with pattern transfer ability
|
|
- Future-state visioning with possibility space expansion
|
|
|
|
### Voice Differentiation Protocols
|
|
**Vocabulary Specialization**
|
|
- Domain-specific terminology injection with natural usage patterns
|
|
- Metaphor family consistency with conceptual bridge creation
|
|
- Question pattern establishment with inquiry style differentiation
|
|
- Communication style calibration with audience adaptation capability
|
|
|
|
**Analytical Approach Variation**
|
|
- Evidence evaluation methodology with different validation criteria
|
|
- Problem decomposition strategy with unique structural approaches
|
|
- Solution generation process with distinct creative methodologies
|
|
- Risk assessment framework with specialized threat model application
|
|
|
|
## Execution Examples
|
|
|
|
### Example 1: Technical Architecture Decision
|
|
```bash
|
|
ultrathink "Should we migrate from monolith to microservices?" --domain=technical --challenge-level=maximum
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Expected Expert Assembly (12 perspectives):**
|
|
- **System Architect**: Overall design patterns and structural implications
|
|
- **Performance Engineer**: Latency, throughput, and scalability considerations
|
|
- **Security Specialist**: Attack surface changes and security boundary implications
|
|
- **DevOps Engineer**: Deployment complexity and operational overhead analysis
|
|
- **Database Architect**: Data consistency and transaction boundary management
|
|
- **Frontend Developer**: Client-side integration and API design implications
|
|
- **Cost Analyst**: Infrastructure and development cost implications
|
|
- **Risk Manager**: Migration risks and rollback strategy evaluation
|
|
- **Team Lead**: Development team impact and skill requirement assessment
|
|
- **Customer Advocate**: User experience impact during migration process
|
|
- **Legacy Modernization Expert**: Migration strategy and transition planning
|
|
- **Devil's Advocate**: Alternative approaches and contrarian perspectives
|
|
|
|
**Structured Disagreement Topics:**
|
|
- Migration timing and phased vs. big-bang approaches
|
|
- Service boundary definition and granularity optimization
|
|
- Data consistency vs. performance trade-offs
|
|
- Development complexity vs. operational flexibility
|
|
- Short-term disruption vs. long-term architectural benefits
|
|
|
|
### Example 2: Strategic Business Decision
|
|
```bash
|
|
ultrathink "Enter the AI automation market with our SaaS platform" --domain=strategic --challenge-level=advanced
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Expected Expert Assembly (7 perspectives):**
|
|
- **Market Analyst**: Market size, growth trends, and competitive landscape
|
|
- **Product Strategist**: Product-market fit and differentiation opportunities
|
|
- **Technology Evaluator**: Technical feasibility and development requirements
|
|
- **Financial Planner**: Investment requirements and revenue projections
|
|
- **Risk Manager**: Market risks and competitive response scenarios
|
|
- **Customer Development**: Target customer validation and adoption barriers
|
|
- **Competitive Intelligence**: Competitor analysis and positioning strategy
|
|
|
|
### Example 3: Creative Problem Solving
|
|
```bash
|
|
ultrathink "Improve user onboarding experience" --domain=creative --challenge-level=foundation
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Expected Expert Assembly (4 perspectives):**
|
|
- **UX Designer**: User journey optimization and interface design principles
|
|
- **Behavioral Psychologist**: User motivation and engagement psychology
|
|
- **Product Manager**: Business objectives and success metrics alignment
|
|
- **Frontend Developer**: Implementation feasibility and technical constraints
|
|
|
|
## Advanced Orchestration Features
|
|
|
|
### Dynamic Persona Switching
|
|
The orchestrator can assume any expert persona mid-analysis for deep-dive questioning:
|
|
```
|
|
"Switching to Security Specialist persona to examine this authentication approach..."
|
|
"Assuming Database Architect role to evaluate this data consistency strategy..."
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Meta-Cognitive Monitoring
|
|
Track and optimize the analysis process itself:
|
|
- **Perspective Coverage Assessment**: Ensure comprehensive viewpoint representation
|
|
- **Insight Quality Evaluation**: Identify breakthrough vs. incremental insights
|
|
- **Disagreement Productivity**: Measure constructive vs. destructive tension
|
|
- **Synthesis Effectiveness**: Evaluate integration quality and actionability
|
|
|
|
### Adaptive Complexity Management
|
|
Automatically adjust analysis depth based on:
|
|
- Problem complexity detection through multi-dimensional assessment
|
|
- User sophistication recognition through interaction pattern analysis
|
|
- Time constraint accommodation with priority-based perspective selection
|
|
- Resource availability with optimal expert allocation
|
|
|
|
## Success Metrics
|
|
|
|
### Analysis Quality Indicators
|
|
- **Perspective Diversity**: 8+ distinct viewpoints with minimal overlap
|
|
- **Insight Novelty**: 3+ breakthrough insights not obvious from single perspectives
|
|
- **Disagreement Productivity**: Structured dissent leading to solution improvements
|
|
- **Synthesis Coherence**: Integrated recommendations addressing multiple expert concerns
|
|
- **Actionability**: Clear implementation pathways with success criteria
|
|
|
|
### User Experience Measures
|
|
- **Comprehension**: Complex concepts made accessible through expert explanation
|
|
- **Confidence**: Increased decision-making confidence through comprehensive analysis
|
|
- **Learning**: User understanding enhancement through expert knowledge transfer
|
|
- **Efficiency**: Faster problem resolution through parallel expert consultation
|
|
|
|
## Usage Guidelines
|
|
|
|
### When to Use Ultrathink
|
|
- **Complex Decisions**: Multi-dimensional challenges requiring diverse expertise
|
|
- **Strategic Planning**: Long-term decisions with significant implications
|
|
- **Innovation Challenges**: Breaking through conventional thinking limitations
|
|
- **Conflict Resolution**: Structured disagreement for optimal solution finding
|
|
- **Learning Goals**: Understanding complex topics through expert perspectives
|
|
|
|
### Optimization Strategies
|
|
- **Challenge Level Calibration**: Start with foundation level, escalate as needed
|
|
- **Domain Focus**: Specify primary expertise area for relevant expert selection
|
|
- **Time Management**: Higher challenge levels require more processing time
|
|
- **Follow-up Exploration**: Use insights for deeper investigation with specialized tools
|
|
|
|
The ultrathink command represents the pinnacle of AI-assisted cognitive diversity, transforming complex challenges into comprehensive multi-expert consultations with structured analysis and actionable synthesis. |