127 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
127 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
# Codebase Remediation Plan
|
||
|
||
**Generated**: 2024-10-21 14:30:00
|
||
**Codebase**: `/Users/connor/projects/example-app`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Priority 0: Critical Issues (Fix Immediately ⚡)
|
||
|
||
**Timeline**: Within 24 hours
|
||
**Impact**: Security vulnerabilities, production-breaking bugs, data loss risks
|
||
|
||
### 1. Potential API key found in code
|
||
**Category**: Security
|
||
**Location**: `src/utils/api.ts`
|
||
**Effort**: LOW
|
||
|
||
**Issue**: Found potential secret on line 12
|
||
|
||
**Impact**: Exposed secrets can lead to unauthorized access and data breaches
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Remove secret from code and use environment variables or secret management tools
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 2. Use of eval() is dangerous
|
||
**Category**: Security
|
||
**Location**: `src/legacy/parser.js`
|
||
**Effort**: MEDIUM
|
||
|
||
**Issue**: Found on line 45
|
||
|
||
**Impact**: eval() can execute arbitrary code and is a security risk
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Refactor to avoid eval(), use safer alternatives like Function constructor with specific scope
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Priority 1: High Issues (Fix This Sprint 📅)
|
||
|
||
**Timeline**: Within current sprint (2 weeks)
|
||
**Impact**: Significant quality, security, or user experience issues
|
||
|
||
### 1. High cyclomatic complexity (28)
|
||
**Category**: Code Quality
|
||
**Effort**: HIGH
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Refactor into smaller functions, extract complex conditions
|
||
|
||
### 2. Line coverage below target (65.3%)
|
||
**Category**: Testing
|
||
**Effort**: HIGH
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Add tests to increase coverage by 14.7%
|
||
|
||
### 3. Long function (127 lines)
|
||
**Category**: Code Quality
|
||
**Effort**: MEDIUM
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Extract smaller functions for distinct responsibilities
|
||
|
||
### 4. Console statement in production code
|
||
**Category**: Code Quality
|
||
**Effort**: LOW
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Remove console statement or replace with proper logging framework
|
||
|
||
### 5. Large file (843 lines)
|
||
**Category**: Code Quality
|
||
**Effort**: HIGH
|
||
|
||
**Action**: Split into multiple smaller, focused modules
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Priority 2: Medium Issues (Fix Next Quarter 📆)
|
||
|
||
**Timeline**: Within 3 months
|
||
**Impact**: Code maintainability, developer productivity
|
||
|
||
**Total Issues**: 25
|
||
|
||
**Grouped by Type**:
|
||
- Typescript Strict Mode: 8 issues
|
||
- Modern Javascript: 5 issues
|
||
- Code Smell: 7 issues
|
||
- Function Length: 5 issues
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Priority 3: Low Issues (Backlog 📋)
|
||
|
||
**Timeline**: When time permits
|
||
**Impact**: Minor improvements, stylistic issues
|
||
|
||
**Total Issues**: 12
|
||
|
||
*Address during dedicated tech debt sprints or slow periods*
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Suggested Timeline
|
||
|
||
- **2024-10-22**: All P0 issues resolved
|
||
- **2024-11-04**: P1 issues addressed (end of sprint)
|
||
- **2025-01-20**: P2 issues resolved (end of quarter)
|
||
|
||
## Effort Summary
|
||
|
||
**Total Estimated Effort**: 32.5 person-days
|
||
- Critical/High: 18.5 days
|
||
- Medium: 10.0 days
|
||
- Low: 4.0 days
|
||
|
||
## Team Assignment Suggestions
|
||
|
||
- **Security Team**: All P0 security issues, P1 vulnerabilities
|
||
- **QA/Testing**: Test coverage improvements, test quality issues
|
||
- **Infrastructure**: CI/CD improvements, build performance
|
||
- **Development Team**: Code quality refactoring, complexity reduction
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
*Remediation plan generated by Codebase Auditor Skill*
|
||
|
||
*Priority scoring based on: Impact × 10 + Frequency × 5 - Effort × 2*
|