Files
gh-cskiro-claudex-analysis-…/skills/codebase-auditor/examples/remediation_plan.md
2025-11-29 18:16:43 +08:00

3.0 KiB
Raw Blame History

Codebase Remediation Plan

Generated: 2024-10-21 14:30:00 Codebase: /Users/connor/projects/example-app


Priority 0: Critical Issues (Fix Immediately )

Timeline: Within 24 hours Impact: Security vulnerabilities, production-breaking bugs, data loss risks

1. Potential API key found in code

Category: Security Location: src/utils/api.ts Effort: LOW

Issue: Found potential secret on line 12

Impact: Exposed secrets can lead to unauthorized access and data breaches

Action: Remove secret from code and use environment variables or secret management tools


2. Use of eval() is dangerous

Category: Security Location: src/legacy/parser.js Effort: MEDIUM

Issue: Found on line 45

Impact: eval() can execute arbitrary code and is a security risk

Action: Refactor to avoid eval(), use safer alternatives like Function constructor with specific scope


Priority 1: High Issues (Fix This Sprint 📅)

Timeline: Within current sprint (2 weeks) Impact: Significant quality, security, or user experience issues

1. High cyclomatic complexity (28)

Category: Code Quality Effort: HIGH

Action: Refactor into smaller functions, extract complex conditions

2. Line coverage below target (65.3%)

Category: Testing Effort: HIGH

Action: Add tests to increase coverage by 14.7%

3. Long function (127 lines)

Category: Code Quality Effort: MEDIUM

Action: Extract smaller functions for distinct responsibilities

4. Console statement in production code

Category: Code Quality Effort: LOW

Action: Remove console statement or replace with proper logging framework

5. Large file (843 lines)

Category: Code Quality Effort: HIGH

Action: Split into multiple smaller, focused modules


Priority 2: Medium Issues (Fix Next Quarter 📆)

Timeline: Within 3 months Impact: Code maintainability, developer productivity

Total Issues: 25

Grouped by Type:

  • Typescript Strict Mode: 8 issues
  • Modern Javascript: 5 issues
  • Code Smell: 7 issues
  • Function Length: 5 issues

Priority 3: Low Issues (Backlog 📋)

Timeline: When time permits Impact: Minor improvements, stylistic issues

Total Issues: 12

Address during dedicated tech debt sprints or slow periods


Suggested Timeline

  • 2024-10-22: All P0 issues resolved
  • 2024-11-04: P1 issues addressed (end of sprint)
  • 2025-01-20: P2 issues resolved (end of quarter)

Effort Summary

Total Estimated Effort: 32.5 person-days

  • Critical/High: 18.5 days
  • Medium: 10.0 days
  • Low: 4.0 days

Team Assignment Suggestions

  • Security Team: All P0 security issues, P1 vulnerabilities
  • QA/Testing: Test coverage improvements, test quality issues
  • Infrastructure: CI/CD improvements, build performance
  • Development Team: Code quality refactoring, complexity reduction

Remediation plan generated by Codebase Auditor Skill

Priority scoring based on: Impact × 10 + Frequency × 5 - Effort × 2