66 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Decisions
|
|
|
|
This document captures explicit human choices on unclear aspects of the implementation. Each decision includes the context, options considered, and the chosen approach with rationale.
|
|
|
|
## Decision Template
|
|
|
|
Use this format for each decision:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## [Decision Topic]
|
|
|
|
**Context:** [Why does this decision need to be made?]
|
|
|
|
**Options Considered:**
|
|
1. [Option A] - [Brief description]
|
|
2. [Option B] - [Brief description]
|
|
|
|
**Decision:** [Chosen option]
|
|
|
|
**Rationale:** [Why this choice was made]
|
|
|
|
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example Decisions
|
|
|
|
### Language Choice
|
|
|
|
**Context:** Need to choose implementation language for the new service.
|
|
|
|
**Options Considered:**
|
|
1. Python - Good for rapid development, rich ecosystem
|
|
2. Go - Better performance, strong concurrency support
|
|
3. Rust - Maximum performance and safety
|
|
|
|
**Decision:** Python
|
|
|
|
**Rationale:** Team is most familiar with Python, and performance requirements don't justify the learning curve of Go or Rust. We can optimize later if needed.
|
|
|
|
**Date:** 2025-11-24
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Database Storage
|
|
|
|
**Context:** Need to store user session data.
|
|
|
|
**Options Considered:**
|
|
1. PostgreSQL - Relational, ACID guarantees
|
|
2. Redis - In-memory, fast but volatile
|
|
3. DynamoDB - Managed NoSQL, scalable
|
|
|
|
**Decision:** Redis with PostgreSQL backup
|
|
|
|
**Rationale:** Redis for fast session access, PostgreSQL for persistence. Hybrid approach gives us speed and durability.
|
|
|
|
**Date:** 2025-11-24
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Current Decisions
|
|
|
|
[Add decisions here as they are made during the development session]
|