Initial commit

2025-11-30 09:06:46 +08:00
commit 867df4fed0
20 changed files with 4979 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/commands/review.md
+++ b/commands/review.md
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+description: Trigger comprehensive code review with quality checks
+---
+
+Activate the `code-quality` skill to perform systematic code review using comprehensive checklist covering code structure, error handling, security, performance, and testing.
+
+## Review Process
+
+1. **Ask What to Review**
+   Present options:
+   - Current staged changes (`git diff --cached`)
+   - Current unstaged changes (`git diff`)
+   - Specific file or directory
+   - Entire feature (all changes in current branch)
+   - Recent commits
+
+2. **Run Appropriate Command**
+   ```bash
+   # For staged changes
+   git diff --cached
+
+   # For unstaged changes
+   git diff
+
+   # For specific file
+   # Read the file directly
+
+   # For entire feature
+   git diff main...HEAD
+   ```
+
+3. **Perform Comprehensive Review**
+   Use checklist from `code-quality` skill:
+   - Code Structure (SRP, DRY, function length, naming, magic numbers)
+   - Error Handling (all errors caught, no silent failures, logging, edge cases)
+   - Security (input validation, SQL injection, XSS, sensitive data, secrets)
+   - Performance (N+1 queries, caching, indexes, unnecessary computations, memory leaks)
+   - Testing (tests exist, edge cases tested, happy path tested, error conditions, maintainability)
+
+4. **Generate Review Report**
+   Format:
+   ```markdown
+   ## Code Review: [File/Feature Name]
+
+   ### ✅ Strengths
+   [What's done well]
+
+   ### ⚠️ Issues Found
+
+   #### Priority: High - Must Fix Before Merge
+   [Critical issues with location, problem, risk, and fix]
+
+   #### Priority: Medium - Should Address
+   [Important improvements]
+
+   #### Priority: Low - Consider Improving
+   [Optional enhancements]
+
+   ### 💡 Refactoring Suggestions
+   [Specific improvements with before/after code examples]
+
+   ### 📊 Code Metrics
+   - Complexity: [Low/Medium/High]
+   - Test Coverage: [X%]
+   - Maintainability: [A/B/C/D/F]
+
+   ### 🎯 Action Items
+   - [ ] Fix high-priority issues
+   - [ ] Address medium-priority items
+   - [ ] Consider refactoring suggestions
+
+   **Overall Assessment:** [Summary]
+   **Recommendation:** [Approve/Request Changes/Reject]
+
+   [Confidence: X.X]
+   ```
+
+5. **Suggest Next Steps**
+   - If critical issues: Must fix before commit
+   - If medium issues: Should address before merge
+   - If low issues: Optional improvements
+   - If clean: Ready to commit/merge
+
+## Argument Handling
+
+**If user provides file path as argument:**
+```
+/dev-workflow:review src/auth/login.js
+```
+→ Review that specific file directly
+
+**If user provides directory as argument:**
+```
+/dev-workflow:review src/auth/
+```
+→ Review all files in that directory
+
+**If user provides "." as argument:**
+```
+/dev-workflow:review .
+```
+→ Review all changes in current directory (recursive)
+
+**If no argument provided:**
+```
+/dev-workflow:review
+```
+→ Ask user what to review (staged, unstaged, specific file, etc.)
+
+## Examples
+
+**Example 1: Review staged changes**
+```
+User: /dev-workflow:review