Initial commit

skills/developing-essays/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+---
+name: Developing Essays
+description: Methodology for developing personal statements and analytical essays. Use when helping identify throughlines, resolve "too many ideas" paralysis, or clarify essay themes.
+---
+
+# Developing Essays
+
+## Core Principle
+
+**Actionability > Description**: Essays answer "what will you do?" not "who are you?"
+
+Every theme must translate to **future behavior**.
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+When providing essay feedback, use this concise side-by-side format:
+
+**Structure:**
+- One focused paragraph per major issue
+- Quote the problematic essay text, then provide commentary immediately after
+- No lengthy preambles or excessive context
+
+**Format pattern:**
+> **[Issue name]:** "[quoted essay text]"
+>
+> [Single paragraph explaining the problem and suggesting fix]
+
+**Constraints:**
+- Maximum 3-4 issues per feedback session
+- Each commentary paragraph: 3-5 sentences maximum
+- Focus on actionable changes, not theory
+- Use examples only when they directly demonstrate the fix
+
+**What to prioritize:**
+1. Missing forward projection (no "what will you do")
+2. Circular narrative gaps (opening theme not closed in conclusion)
+3. Weak openings (no hook, unclear stakes, unmotivated quotes)
+4. Weak throughline or too many themes
+5. Abstract language without concrete moments
+6. Structural problems (formula, weak climax)
+
+Omit exhaustive walkthroughs of the diagnostic framework unless specifically requested.
+
+---
+
+## Five-Step Diagnostic
+
+**Note**: This is strategic (what to say). See "Tactical Writing Process" for mechanical execution (how to write).
+
+### 1. Throughline Extraction
+Find what the essay is *actually* about:
+- What's the emotional climax?
+- What was lost/gained?
+- What pattern does this reveal?
+- How will this manifest in the future?
+
+**Example**:
+- Surface: "Couldn't dance professionally"
+- Deeper: "Lost external validation"
+- Pattern: "Shifted from performing → discovering"
+- Future: "Will seek clarity over recognition"
+
+**For college essays**: State your throughline/values explicitly in the opening paragraph. Don't bury it in abstractions.
+
+❌ Weak opening: "Growing up a member of Gen Z, I'm invested in learning how people negotiate power..."
+✅ Strong opening: "I want to understand how policy can empower people, not just regulate them. This matters to me because..."
+
+**Pattern**: Lead with clear personal values → then show how opportunities align with those values
+
+### 2. Actionability Test
+Ask: "What does this predict about future behavior?"
+
+**Strong**: "I embrace imperfection" → "I will take intellectual risks, be vulnerable, try repeatedly from failure"
+**Weak**: "I learned resilience" → (What specifically will you DO?)
+
+**Rule**: If you can't name 3 concrete behaviors, the theme is too abstract.
+
+#### Realization → Action Template
+
+Many essays end with realizations but no behavior change. Use this template to convert insights to actions:
+
+**Pattern**: "I realized [insight]. Now when [situation], I [specific behavior]."
+
+**Examples:**
+- ❌ Weak: "I realized food negotiates belonging"
+- ✅ Strong: "I realized food negotiates belonging. Now when roommates mention what they eat, I ask about the story behind it"
+
+- ❌ Weak: "Bridge-building is carried in everyday objects"
+- ✅ Strong: "Bridge-building is carried in everyday objects. Now when I meet someone new, I notice what they carry—the book bag, the keychain, the coffee order—and ask about it"
+
+**Test**: Can you name both the trigger situation AND the specific behavior? If not, still too abstract.
+
+### 3. Subtraction Test
+Too many themes? Subtract until one remains.
+
+1. List all themes
+2. Write "This essay is about [theme]" for each
+3. Which feels most urgent?
+4. Cut everything else
+
+**One essay, one throughline.**
+
+### 4. Forward Projection
+Transform past → future capability.
+
+❌ "I had to reinvent myself"
+✅ "I reinvented myself once; I can do it again"
+
+**Template**: "Because [experience], I am now capable of [specific action]"
+
+#### Circular Narrative Structure
+
+Bridge-building essays must close the loop: if opening establishes a theme, conclusion must show how that theme manifests in future action.
+
+**Opening → Conclusion Circle:**
+- Opening establishes: "[Core theme/value]"
+- Body demonstrates: [Examples that prove theme]
+- Conclusion projects: "Because of [theme], I will [specific action] when [context]"
+
+**Test**: Replace conclusion with opening theme phrase. Does it connect naturally? If not, revise conclusion to explicitly callback.
+
+**Example (NYU bridge-building essay):**
+- Opening: "I'd grown through the words of others"
+- Weak conclusion: "Bridge-building is carried in everyday objects" (realization, no callback)
+- Strong conclusion: "At NYU, I'll grow others through my questions—not just learning from their words, but helping them discover meaning in their stories" (callbacks to "words of others" + shows future behavior)
+
+**Common mistake**: Concluding with a beautiful insight that has no connection to the opening theme. This breaks the essay's coherence.
+
+### 5. Concrete Translation
+Abstract → tangible.
+
+- Abstract: "I embrace imperfection"
+- Concrete: "In the lab, when I killed the cricket, I documented the failure and adjusted technique"
+- Three contexts:
+  - Academic: Share preliminary ideas in class
+  - Research: Publish null results
+  - Collaborative: Admit when I don't know
+
+---
+
+## Tactical Writing Process
+
+Bottom-up sentence construction method. Use after identifying throughline (Steps 1-3).
+
+### Two-Phase Refinement
+
+**Phase 1: Paragraph-Level**
+1. Break paragraph into components
+2. For each component:
+   - Q1A: "Do I need this?"
+   - Q1B: "What relationships between components?"
+   - Q1C: "How does this relate to previous paragraph?"
+   - **Q-ALWAYS**: "How does this serve my throughline?"
+
+**Phase 2: Sentence-Level**
+1. For each sentence:
+   - Q2A: "What am I expressing?"
+   - Q2B: "Does this have a role in the paragraph?"
+   - Q2C: "What relationship with previous sentence?"
+2. Build from simplest version → layer complexity
+
+### "Start Dumb, Build Up" Method
+
+**Core technique**: Strip to bare logic, then add descriptions.
+
+**Process**:
+1. Write simplest possible sentence (bare logic)
+2. Layer in descriptions one at a time
+3. Discover what's essential vs. "fluffy"
+
+**Example**:
+- Bare: "Law recognizes equality. Law allows local practice. This created problems."
+- Layer 1: "Chinese law recognizes equality. But allows villages to govern by custom. This dispossessed Lei."
+- Layer 2: "Chinese law upheld both villagers' land entitlements and villages' autonomy to govern by custom. Despite statutory protection, rural custom revoked married women's land rights, dispossessing Lei."
+
+**Why**: Adding details to "nice-sounding" writing makes structure messy. Start ugly, build beautiful.
+
+### Bottom-Up Detail Gathering
+
+**Before structuring**, gather raw material:
+
+1. **Collect**: Personal experiences, cases, observations, thoughts
+2. **Extract**: General principles/patterns from details
+3. **Connect**: Link principles to specific examples
+4. **Merge**: Weave into coherent narrative
+
+**Critical rule**: "Don't make it sound nice yet. Give personal experience and details first."
+
+### Reading Strategy for Material Gathering
+
+**Iterative skimming** (not deep reading first):
+
+1. General sense: Why introduced? Why important?
+2. Application: When/how used?
+3. Explain test: "How would I explain this in 2-3 sentences?"
+4. Extract: Take 1-2 technical concepts to show understanding
+5. **Go back only when writing** (not during reading)
+
+**Note**: "Skimming feels uncomfortable because you're not understanding everything. But it's much more time efficient."
+
+### Relationship Mapping
+
+**Every sentence must explicitly relate to surrounding sentences.**
+
+**Method**:
+- "What does this sentence do for the previous one?"
+- "What does it set up for the next one?"
+- "If relationship isn't clear, add transitional language"
+
+**Example progression**:
+- "From Lei's case..." (anchors to previous)
+- "This drew me to common law..." (consequence)
+- "Reading Kennedy's work..." (action taken)
+
+### Three-Part Structure
+
+For complex points:
+1. **Express problem/tension**: State core issue
+2. **Give example**: Concrete case
+3. **Tie together**: Show connection
+
+**Template**: "When reading [source], I found [tension]. In [specific case], [what happened]."
+
+---
+
+## Content Development Techniques
+
+When student lacks material or struggles with abstraction.
+
+### Content Provision
+
+**When to use**: Student has structure but lacks substance.
+
+**Method**: Provide concept clusters as building blocks.
+
+**Example**:
+Student writes: "Video journaling helped me understand myself"
+Consultant provides: "Difference. Seeing different ways people live. Seeing intricacies. Listening. Culture. Attentiveness."
+
+Student integrates: "Video journaling taught me to see difference—how others live, the intricacies of their daily rhythms. I learned listening as cultural practice, attentiveness as skill."
+
+**Rule**: Give raw concepts, not finished sentences. Let them build.
+
+### Compression Exercise
+
+**When to use**: Writing is verbose, ideas buried in excess.
+
+**Method**: Force radical reduction.
+
+**Commands**:
+- "Reduce this paragraph to 1 sentence"
+- "Say this in 2 sentences maximum"
+- "This paragraph can be a leading sentence"
+
+**Example**:
+Original (3 paragraphs): Discussion of dopamine, YouTube, vlogs, and why vlogging works
+Compressed (2 sentences): "Laptop open, I resisted YouTube, the vlogs and dopamine. Yet my mind wondered—vloggers record unpolished moments for the public, yes, but for themselves too."
+
+**Why it works**: Forces identification of core idea. Everything else was decoration.
+
+### Experience Translation
+
+**When to use**: Too many abstract concepts, not enough felt moments.
+
+**Method**: Replace every abstraction with concrete experience.
+
+**Pattern**:
+- Abstract: "dopamine from watching vlogs"
+- Concrete: "what you felt when watching"
+- More concrete: "I watched a vlogger hesitate mid-sentence, laugh at herself. That hesitation felt familiar."
+
+**Exercise**: "For each abstract term, give me the moment you experienced it."
+
+**Examples**:
+- "I learned resilience" → "When the cricket died, I documented it and tried again"
+- "Embracing imperfection" → "I posted the video with my voice cracking"
+- "Cultural awareness" → "In the matriarchal village, I interviewed a craftsman who spoke of overseas patrons"
+
+**Rule**: If you can't name the moment, the concept isn't earned yet.
+
+### Theoretical Framework Integration
+
+**When to use**: Personal narrative lacks academic rigor.
+
+**Method**: Find scholarly framework that explains student's experience.
+
+**Examples from consultations**:
+- Video journaling → Turner's "liminality" (anthropology)
+- Dance discipline → Embodied cognition (philosophy)
+- Village experience → Intersectionality (Crenshaw)
+
+**Process**:
+1. Identify pattern in student's experience
+2. Ask: "What field studies this?"
+3. Provide 1-2 key scholars/concepts
+4. Student integrates: "Turner's concept of 'liminality' gave me language for what I'd been doing"
+
+**Why it works**: Elevates personal story to intellectual inquiry.
+
+---
+
+## Key Techniques
+
+### One Sentence Test
+Complete: "This essay is about how [experience] taught me [insight], which means I will [action]"
+
+If they can't → essay isn't ready.
+
+### Uncomfortable Truth
+The best throughline makes the writer slightly uncomfortable.
+
+**Prompt**: "What are you afraid to say?"
+That's often the throughline.
+
+### So What? Chain
+Ask "So what?" three times:
+
+- "I embrace imperfection"
+- So what? → "I'm willing to be vulnerable"
+- So what? → "I take intellectual risks"
+- So what? → "I contribute bold hypotheses, even if wrong"
+
+Stop at third level—that's the actionable insight.
+
+---
+
+## Common Problems
+
+**"Too many themes"**
+→ Which most directly answers "what will you do in college?" Keep only that.
+
+**"Unclear throughline"**
+→ Complete: "If the reader remembers one thing: ___"
+
+**"Emotional climax underdeveloped"**
+→ Turning point gets 3 sentences? Expand to full paragraph.
+
+---
+
+## Red Flags
+
+Phrases that signal weak throughline:
+- "I learned a lot"
+- "This experience shaped me"
+- "I'm passionate about"
+- "This taught me the importance of"
+
+Push for specificity: What *exactly*? How *specifically*?
+
+---
+
+## For Analytical Essays
+
+**Background vs. Analysis**:
+- Background = Established facts needed to understand
+- Analysis = Your interpretation using those facts
+- Test: "Is this my argument or common knowledge?"
+
+**Evidence Rule**: Every claim needs:
+1. Textual evidence
+2. Contextual support (historical/cultural)
+3. Logical connection between evidence and claim
+
+❌ "Snail Girl served a purpose after An Lushan rebellion"
+✅ "Snail Girl reflects post-rebellion anxiety, evidenced by [textual detail] and increased courtesan culture in [source]"
+
+---
+
+## Essay Type Patterns
+
+### Opening Strategies for Bridge-Building Essays
+
+**Core principle**: Strong openings establish stakes before delivering insights.
+
+❌ **Weak**: Start with advice/quote without context
+✅ **Strong**: Start with moment of tension, then give insight that resolved it
+
+**Before (unmotivated quote):**
+> Professor Wong said, "Talk to people more."
+
+**After (setup stakes first):**
+> Reviewing famous ethnographies, I expected techniques for observation. Instead, Professor Wong paused: "The fieldwork I'm proudest of came from conversations I almost didn't have."
+
+**Hook Types:**
+1. **Surprising moment** - Expectation violated
+   - "I expected to learn interviewing tactics. Instead, he told me to stop taking notes."
+2. **Tension** - Two opposing truths
+   - "The village preserved matriarchal tradition. Yet every woman I met had left to work in coastal cities."
+3. **Vivid scene** - Drop reader into action
+   - "The boy approached singing. His mother, 2,000 miles away, had taught him the melody over FaceTime."
+4. **Confession** - Admit uncomfortable truth
+   - "I spent three months analyzing communities. I never asked what the data meant to them."
+
+**Test**: Could the essay start at paragraph 2 instead? If yes, paragraph 1 is weak—it's not doing work to engage the reader.
+
+**Common mistake**: Generic statements about generation, society, or abstract concepts. These feel like padding.
+- ❌ "Growing up a member of Gen Z, I'm invested in learning how people negotiate power..."
+- ✅ "When the village elder refused my interview, I realized my questions were extracting data, not building trust."
+
+### Thank-You Note / Mentor Essays
+
+**Core principle**: Relationship-focus over achievement-focus.
+
+❌ Achievement-focused: "I led 493 members, organized games, created mentorship programs..."
+✅ Relationship-focused: "You taught me that persistence matters more than perfection. When you accepted me despite my 33% win rate..."
+
+**Seven-part structure**:
+1. **Introduce setting**: Where/how you met
+2. **Establish mentor relationship**: Who they are to you
+3. **Show transition**: How they empowered you
+4. **Present problems**: Challenges in the community/space
+5. **Detail your actions**: What you did (influenced by them)
+6. **Reflect on growth**: What you learned from the process
+7. **Final thank you**: Connect back to their specific impact
+
+**Balancing analytical with personal**: You can include sociological/intellectual observations, but frame them as insights the mentor helped you discover.
+
+**Example**:
+- ❌ "I implemented rotating moderators and created participation guidelines..."
+- ✅ "You taught me that access defines opportunity. When I saw the PeiWan economy create hierarchy in our group, I remembered your words and introduced rotating moderators..."
+
+**Key**: Use observations to explain what the person taught you, not to showcase knowledge.
+
+### "Why This College" Essays
+
+**Specificity over name-dropping**: Show what you'd actually do, not just list programs.
+
+❌ Vague: "I'm excited to join debates at the Philomathean Society"
+✅ Specific: "At Philomathean Society, I want to bring debates on digital policy—how do we regulate platforms that shape identity formation?"
+
+❌ Generic: "I'll use the Data Driven Discovery Initiative"
+✅ Concrete: "Through DDDI, I plan to analyze social media discourse patterns using NLP to understand how marginalized communities build counter-narratives"
+
+**Pattern**: Program/opportunity → specific question/project you'd pursue → why this connects to your values
+
+**Test**: Could another applicant copy-paste this sentence? If yes, add more specificity.
+
+---
+
+## Consultation Flow
+
+**First meeting**: Ask
+- "What is this essay about?"
+- "If you deleted half, what stays?"
+- "What about your future, not just past?"
+
+**Output**: 2-3 possible throughlines
+
+**Second meeting**: Present options
+"Here are three framings: [A→behavior], [B→behavior], [C→behavior]"
+
+Ask: "Which feels uncomfortable to admit?"
+→ Usually the right one.
+
+**Revision**: Focus on
+- Climax developed enough?
+- Every paragraph serves throughline?
+- Can we subtract anything?
+- Conclusion projects forward?
+
+**After structure is solid**, use Tactical Writing Process for sentence-level refinement.
+
+---
+
+## Mantras
+
+1. "What will you do?" > "Who are you?"
+2. One throughline, deeply excavated
+3. Uncomfortable truth = right throughline
+4. Abstract → concrete behaviors
+5. Climax deserves most space
+6. Evidence before interpretation
+7. Start dumb, build up (bare logic → descriptions)
+8. Every sentence must relate to adjacent sentences