Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
115
skills/knowledge-capture/examples/example-meeting-summary.md
Normal file
115
skills/knowledge-capture/examples/example-meeting-summary.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
# Example: Meeting Summary Capture
|
||||
|
||||
## Before (Raw Input)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Had a good meeting today with the product and design teams about authentication.
|
||||
We talked about moving to passwordless auth using passkeys. Sarah brought up
|
||||
that we need to support legacy systems, so we can't go all-in yet. Mike showed
|
||||
designs for the new flow - looks great. We decided to do a phased rollout:
|
||||
Phase 1 is passkeys in web, Phase 2 is mobile, Phase 3 is legacy support.
|
||||
Sarah will write the spec, Mike will handle design across all phases, and I'll
|
||||
coordinate engineering. We also talked about the performance issues with the
|
||||
current auth - not a blocker but something we should keep an eye on. The new
|
||||
architecture should fix that anyway. Need to talk to infra about deployment,
|
||||
and we'll need a migration plan for existing users.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## After (Captured in Notion)
|
||||
|
||||
### Meeting Summary: Passwordless Authentication Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** November 9, 2025
|
||||
**Attendees:** Sarah (Product), Mike (Design), Engineering Lead
|
||||
**Duration:** 1 hour
|
||||
**Status:** Decisions Made
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 1: Implement Passwordless Authentication via Passkeys
|
||||
- **Decision:** Migrate to passkey-based authentication
|
||||
- **Rationale:** Improved security and user experience
|
||||
- **Phase Approach:** Phased rollout required due to legacy system constraints
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 2: Phased Rollout Strategy
|
||||
- **Phase 1:** Passkeys in web applications
|
||||
- **Phase 2:** Mobile app support
|
||||
- **Phase 3:** Legacy system support and migration
|
||||
- **Rationale:** Allows gradual adoption while maintaining backward compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Owner | Task | Deadline | Status |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| Sarah (Product) | Write passwordless auth specification with phase requirements | This week | Not Started |
|
||||
| Mike (Design) | Create design mockups for all authentication flows across phases | End of week | In Progress |
|
||||
| Engineering Lead | Coordinate engineering effort and infrastructure planning | Next sprint | Not Started |
|
||||
| Infrastructure | Plan deployment strategy and production rollout approach | TBD | Not Started |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Discussion Topics
|
||||
|
||||
### Passwordless Authentication
|
||||
- Passkeys provide strong security posture
|
||||
- User experience benefits over traditional passwords
|
||||
- Industry standard approach (WebAuthn/FIDO2)
|
||||
|
||||
### Legacy System Constraints
|
||||
- Cannot immediately deprecate password authentication
|
||||
- Existing systems require continued support
|
||||
- Migration path needed for users on legacy platforms
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Considerations
|
||||
- Current auth system has performance overhead
|
||||
- New architecture should resolve existing performance issues
|
||||
- Not a blocker for implementation but important improvement
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration Planning
|
||||
- Need clear plan for existing user migration
|
||||
- Gradual rollout reduces risk
|
||||
- Each phase builds on previous phase
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **This Week:** Sarah delivers detailed specification
|
||||
2. **End of Week:** Design mockups finalized for review
|
||||
3. **Next Sprint:** Engineering begins Phase 1 (web) implementation
|
||||
4. **Parallel:** Infrastructure team plans deployment and migration strategy
|
||||
5. **TBD:** User communication plan for authentication transition
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Documents
|
||||
|
||||
- [Authentication Architecture Decision Record](notion://decision-record-url)
|
||||
- [Security Requirements Specification](notion://spec-url)
|
||||
- [Q4 Product Roadmap](notion://roadmap-url)
|
||||
- [Infrastructure Planning](notion://infra-url)
|
||||
|
||||
## Tags
|
||||
|
||||
`authentication` `security` `product-initiative` `phased-rollout` `decision-record`
|
||||
|
||||
## Follow-up Items
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Schedule follow-up meeting after specs are written
|
||||
- [ ] Plan QA testing strategy for each phase
|
||||
- [ ] Create user communication plan
|
||||
- [ ] Schedule infrastructure review of deployment plan
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Performance improvement** is a nice-to-have benefit of new architecture
|
||||
- **Backward compatibility** is critical for adoption success
|
||||
- **Phasing** reduces implementation risk and allows for feedback cycles
|
||||
|
||||
**Owner:** Sarah (Product) | **Last Updated:** November 9, 2025 | **Next Review:** November 23, 2025
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user