Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-30 09:00:21 +08:00
commit f5496428cd
50 changed files with 10011 additions and 0 deletions

162
commands/sync-progress.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
---
tags: ["workflow", "manual-changes", "planning"]
description: "Sync project state after manual changes via git diff analysis"
argument-hint: ""
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Glob", "Grep", "TodoWrite"]
model: claude-sonnet-4-5
references_guidelines:
- docs/development/workflows/pm-workflows.md # Plan structure and phase management
- docs/development/workflows/worklog-format.md # WORKLOG entry formats
- docs/development/workflows/git-workflow.md # Git diff analysis
---
# /sync-progress Command
**WHAT**: Automatically sync project state when user makes manual changes.
**WHY**: Analyzes git diff, updates plan to reflect progress, and documents changes in WORKLOG without manual explanation.
**HOW**: See pm-guide.md for plan/phase management, worklog-format.md for entry structure, git-workflow.md for git analysis.
---
## Workflow
### 1. Analyze Changes
Run these commands to understand what changed:
```bash
# Check for uncommitted changes
git diff
# Check staged changes
git diff --staged
# Get summary of changed files
git status --short
```
### 2. Read Current State
Read the following files if they exist:
- `pm/active/PLAN.md` - Current task plan
- `pm/active/WORKLOG.md` - Work history
- `pm/active/spec.md` - Feature specification (if applicable)
### 3. Analyze and Update
**For each changed file in git diff**:
1. **Determine intent** - What was the user trying to accomplish?
- New feature implementation
- Bug fix
- Refactoring
- Configuration change
- Documentation update
2. **Compare to PLAN.md**:
- Which phase/task does this relate to?
- Is this planned work or new direction?
- Should any phases be marked complete?
- Are there new tasks to add?
3. **Update PLAN.md**:
- If there is ANY ambiguity clarify with user
- Mark completed phases as `[x] COMPLETED`
- Update phase descriptions if approach changed
- Add new phases if user took different direction
- Add notes about implementation decisions made
### 4. Document in WORKLOG
Write a WORKLOG entry with:
```markdown
## YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM - Manual Changes Synced
**Files Changed**: [list of changed files]
**Changes Made**:
- [Brief description of each major change]
- [Why it was done - inferred from code]
- [Any patterns or decisions observed]
**Plan Updates**:
- [Which phases marked complete]
- [Any new phases added]
- [Any direction changes noted]
**Status**: [Current project state after these changes]
**Next Steps**: [Suggested next actions based on plan]
```
### 5. Summary Report
Provide user with:
- **Changes detected**: Count and summary of modified files
- **Plan updates**: Which phases completed, which added
- **WORKLOG entry**: Confirmation of documentation
- **Next suggested action**: Based on remaining plan items
---
## Key Principles
1. **Infer intent from code** - Don't ask user to explain, analyze the diff
2. **Be accurate** - Only mark phases complete if truly done
3. **Preserve context** - Keep plan structure, don't overwrite unnecessarily
4. **Document decisions** - Note any technical choices made in code
5. **Suggest next steps** - Help user know what to work on next
---
## Example Usage
**Scenario**: User manually implemented authentication while AI was offline
**Command**: `/sync-progress`
**AI Actions**:
1. Runs `git diff` - sees new files: `auth/login.ts`, `auth/middleware.ts`, `db/users.sql`
2. Reads `pm/active/PLAN.md` - finds Phase 2: "Implement authentication system"
3. Updates PLAN.md:
- Marks Phase 2 as `[x] COMPLETED`
- Adds notes: "Used JWT tokens, bcrypt for passwords, PostgreSQL for users table"
4. Writes WORKLOG entry documenting authentication implementation
5. Reports: "Detected authentication implementation complete. Phase 2 marked done. Next: Phase 3 - API endpoint protection"
---
## Edge Cases
**No PLAN.md exists**:
- Create one based on git changes
- Infer project structure and goals
- Add phases for observed work
**Changes conflict with plan**:
- Note the deviation in WORKLOG
- Ask user if plan should be updated or reverted
- Suggest reconciliation approach
**Changes are exploratory/experimental**:
- Don't mark plan phases complete
- Add note to PLAN.md: "Exploration: [description]"
- Document in WORKLOG as research/spike
**Multiple unrelated changes**:
- Group by functional area
- Update multiple plan phases if applicable
- Create clear sections in WORKLOG entry
---
## Success Criteria
✅ All git changes analyzed and understood
✅ PLAN.md accurately reflects current state
✅ Completed work properly marked
✅ WORKLOG entry is clear and comprehensive
✅ User knows what to do next