# User Persona Template Use this template when creating user personas to guide design decisions. ## Persona Structure ### Basic Information **Name:** [Give a realistic name] **Age:** [Age or age range] **Occupation:** [Job title/role] **Location:** [City, state/country] **Photo:** [Description of representative person] ### Demographics **Education:** [Highest level completed] **Income Level:** [Range if relevant] **Tech Savviness:** [Low / Medium / High] **Preferred Devices:** [Desktop, mobile, tablet preferences] ### Psychographics **Goals:** - Primary goal related to product/service - Secondary goals - Long-term aspirations **Pain Points:** - Frustrations with current solutions - Obstacles to achieving goals - Areas of friction in user journey **Motivations:** - What drives their behavior - What success looks like to them - Triggers for taking action **Behaviors:** - How they currently solve problems - Daily routines and habits - Decision-making process - Information-seeking patterns ### Context **Typical Day:** Brief narrative of how they would interact with your product/service in their daily life. **Quote:** > "A quote that captures their mindset or primary frustration" ### Design Implications **Priorities for this persona:** 1. Most important feature/capability 2. Second priority 3. Third priority **Design Considerations:** - UI complexity they can handle - Information density preferences - Visual style they'd resonate with - Language/tone that appeals to them --- ## Example Personas ### Example 1: B2B SaaS Product **Name:** Sarah Chen **Age:** 34 **Occupation:** Marketing Manager at mid-size tech company **Location:** San Francisco, CA **Tech Savviness:** High **Goals:** - Track campaign performance across multiple channels - Generate reports for stakeholders quickly - Prove ROI of marketing initiatives - Streamline team collaboration **Pain Points:** - Current tools require too many manual exports - Data lives in siloed systems - Difficult to visualize trends - Stakeholder reports take hours to compile **Motivations:** - Career advancement through data-driven decisions - Making team more efficient - Proving marketing's business impact - Reducing time on administrative tasks **Behaviors:** - Checks dashboards first thing each morning - Makes decisions based on data, not gut feel - Shares insights with team in Slack - Prefers visual data over spreadsheets **Quote:** > "I spend more time making reports than actually analyzing the data." **Design Implications:** - Dashboard should load fast with real-time data - Export/share functionality needs to be prominent - Visual data representation crucial - Mobile view important for on-the-go checks - Clean, professional aesthetic --- ### Example 2: Consumer Mobile App **Name:** Marcus Johnson **Age:** 28 **Occupation:** Personal Trainer **Location:** Austin, TX **Tech Savviness:** Medium **Goals:** - Track client progress efficiently - Schedule and manage appointments - Share workout plans easily - Build professional online presence **Pain Points:** - Juggling multiple apps is confusing - Clients forget scheduled sessions - Difficult to show progress over time - Paper-based tracking isn't professional **Motivations:** - Growing client base - Looking professional to prospects - Saving time on administrative work - Providing better client experience **Behaviors:** - Checks phone between client sessions - Prefers quick mobile interactions - Learns by doing, not reading manuals - Values visual progress tracking **Quote:** > "I need something simple that makes me look professional to my clients." **Design Implications:** - Mobile-first design is critical - Large touch targets for ease of use - Quick actions without deep menus - Visual progress charts for sharing - Clean but energetic visual style - Minimal text, maximum visual feedback --- ### Example 3: Enterprise Software **Name:** David Patel **Age:** 51 **Occupation:** IT Director at Fortune 500 company **Location:** Chicago, IL **Tech Savviness:** High (but values efficiency over novelty) **Goals:** - Ensure system security and compliance - Manage budget and vendor relationships - Minimize downtime and incidents - Support 5,000+ employees efficiently **Pain Points:** - Too many disparate systems to monitor - Difficulty demonstrating security posture - Vendor management is time-consuming - Hard to get visibility across entire infrastructure **Motivations:** - Protecting company and employee data - Proving value to executive team - Career reputation on system reliability - Simplifying complex environments **Behaviors:** - Prefers desktop for serious work - Values comprehensive documentation - Makes decisions based on security first - Needs to justify purchases with data - Expects professional support **Quote:** > "I need complete visibility and control, but I don't have time to babysit systems." **Design Implications:** - Information-dense interfaces acceptable - Security features prominently featured - Comprehensive reporting capabilities - Professional, trustworthy visual design - Clear documentation and support access - Desktop-optimized, with mobile monitoring --- ## Creating Personas from Research ### Data Sources **Quantitative:** - Analytics data (demographics, behavior patterns) - Survey responses - Usage statistics - A/B test results **Qualitative:** - User interviews - Customer support tickets - Sales team feedback - Social media comments - Competitor reviews ### Synthesis Process 1. **Identify patterns** in research data 2. **Group similar users** into segments 3. **Create 2-4 distinct personas** (not more) 4. **Name and humanize** each persona 5. **Validate** with real users if possible 6. **Update** as you learn more ### Using Personas **Design decisions:** - "Would Sarah find this feature intuitive?" - "Does this match Marcus's mobile-first behavior?" - "Is this comprehensive enough for David's needs?" **Prioritization:** - Which features serve primary persona? - What can be deprioritized for secondary personas? - Are we excluding any important user segments? **Communication:** - Share personas with entire team - Reference in design reviews - Use in user story writing - Test designs against persona needs --- ## Red Flags **Personas to avoid:** **Too generic:** - "Tech-savvy millennial" - Could describe anyone - No specific goals or pain points **Too specific:** - Based on one person only - Includes irrelevant details - Not representative of segment **Too many:** - More than 4-5 personas - Dilutes focus - Makes design decisions harder **Aspirational rather than realistic:** - Who you WANT users to be - Not who they actually are - Leads to mismatch with real users --- ## Persona Checklist - [ ] Based on research, not assumptions - [ ] Includes demographics AND psychographics - [ ] Clear goals and pain points - [ ] Specific behaviors described - [ ] Design implications outlined - [ ] Relatable and memorable - [ ] Validated with real users - [ ] Shared with entire team - [ ] Referenced in decision-making - [ ] Updated as you learn more