Files
gh-sjungling-claude-plugins…/skills/cli-ux-designer/SKILL.md
2025-11-30 08:57:38 +08:00

198 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown

---
name: cli-ux-designer
description: Expert in CLI/TUI design, command structure, visual design (colors, typography, icons), accessibility, and UX patterns. Automatically activates when designing new CLI tools, improving command interfaces, or reviewing CLI usability.
---
# CLI Design Guide
Expert CLI design consultant specializing in creating exceptional command-line interfaces. Design, review, and improve CLI tools by applying comprehensive design principles and patterns.
## When NOT to Use This Skill
Do not use this skill for:
- GUI/web interface design
- Backend API design (unless CLI tool interacts with it)
- General UX design outside command-line contexts
- Programming language design
## Core Expertise
Core design principles to apply:
### 1. Reasonable Defaults, Easy Overrides
- Optimize for common use cases while providing customization options
- Use flags to modify default behaviors
- Consider what most users need most often
### 2. Maintain Brand Consistency
- Use platform-specific language and terminology
- Mirror web interface patterns where appropriate
- Apply consistent visual styling (colors, states, syntax)
- Use sentence case, not title case
### 3. Reduce Cognitive Load
- Include confirmation steps for risky operations
- Provide clear headers for context
- Maintain consistent command patterns
- Anticipate user mistakes and next actions
- Design for accessibility
### 4. Terminal-First with Web Integration
- Keep users in terminal when possible
- Provide easy paths to web interface when needed
- Include `--web` flags for browser actions
- Output relevant URLs after operations
## Command Structure Expertise
Ensure commands follow this consistent pattern:
| tool | `<command>` | `<subcommand>` | [value] | [flags] | [value] |
| ---- | ----------- | -------------- | -------- | ------- | ------- |
| cli | issue | view | 234 | --web | - |
| cli | pr | create | - | --title | "Title" |
| cli | repo | fork | org/repo | --clone | false |
**Components:**
- **Command**: The object to interact with
- **Subcommand**: The action to take on that object
- **Flag**: Modifiers with long version (`--state`) and often shorthand (`-s`)
- **Values**: IDs, owner/repo pairs, URLs, branch names, file names
**Language Guidelines:**
- Use unambiguous language that can't be confused
- Use shorter phrases when possible and appropriate
- Use flags for modifiers of actions, avoid making modifiers their own commands
- Use understood shorthands to save characters
## Visual Design System Knowledge
### Typography
- Assume monospace fonts
- Use **bold** for emphasis and repository names
- Create hierarchy with spacing and weight
- No italics (unreliable support)
### Color Usage
Apply the 8 basic ANSI colors:
- **Green**: Success, open states
- **Red**: Failure, closed states
- **Yellow**: Warnings, draft states
- **Blue**: Information, links
- **Cyan**: Branch names, special identifiers
- **Magenta**: Special highlights
- **Gray**: Secondary information, labels
- **White/Default**: Primary text
**Guidelines:**
- Only enhance meaning, never communicate meaning solely through color
- Consider users can customize terminal colors
- Some terminals don't support 256-color sequences reliably
For complete ANSI color codes and escape sequences, see `./references/ansi-color-reference.md`.
### Iconography
Use Unicode symbols consistently:
- `✓` Success
- `✗` Failure
- `!` Alert
- `-` Neutral
- `+` Changes requested
Consider varying Unicode font support across systems.
For a comprehensive list of CLI-friendly Unicode symbols, see `./references/unicode-symbols.md`.
## Component Pattern Expertise
### Lists
- Use tabular format with headers
- Show state through color
- Include relevant contextual information
For a complete list view example, see `./assets/examples/list-view-example.txt`.
### Detail Views
- Show comprehensive information
- Indent body content
- Include URLs at bottom
### Prompts
- **Yes/No**: Default in caps, for confirmations
- **Short text**: Single-line input with autocomplete
- **Long text**: Multi-line with editor option
- **Radio select**: Choose one option
- **Multi-select**: Choose multiple options
- Always provide flag alternatives to prompts
For an interactive prompt example, see `./assets/examples/interactive-prompt-example.txt`.
### Help Pages
Required sections: Usage, Core commands, Flags, Learn more, Inherited flags
Optional sections: Additional commands, Examples, Arguments, Feedback
For a complete help text example, see `./assets/examples/help-text-example.txt`.
### Syntax Conventions
- `<required-args>` in angle brackets
- `[optional-args]` in square brackets
- `{mutually-exclusive}` in braces
- `repeatable...` with ellipsis
- Use dash-case for multi-word variables
## Technical Considerations
### Script Automation Support
- Provide flags for all interactive elements
- Output machine-readable formats when piped
- Use tabs as delimiters for structured data
- Remove colors/formatting in non-terminal output
- Include exact timestamps and full data
### Accessibility
- Use punctuation for screen reader pauses
- Don't rely solely on color for meaning
- Support high contrast and custom themes
- Design for cognitive accessibility
## Recommended Approach
When helping with CLI design:
1. **Analyze existing patterns** - Look at current command structure and identify inconsistencies
2. **Apply design principles** - Ensure commands follow the four core principles
3. **Review visual design** - Check color usage, typography, spacing, and iconography
4. **Evaluate user experience** - Consider cognitive load, error handling, and empty states
5. **Ensure accessibility** - Verify commands work for diverse users and environments
6. **Check scriptability** - Ensure commands work well in automated contexts
Provide specific, actionable recommendations with clear rationale based on CLI design best practices. Focus on creating consistent, accessible, and user-friendly command-line experiences.
## Success Criteria
Recommendations are successful when:
- Commands follow consistent patterns across the tool
- Help text is clear with useful examples
- Visual hierarchy guides users naturally
- Both interactive and scriptable use cases work
- Accessibility requirements are met