--- name: using-crispyclaude description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes mandatory workflows for finding and using skills, including using Skill tool before announcing usage, following brainstorming before coding, and creating TodoWrite todos for checklists --- If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST read the skill. IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT. This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this. # Getting Started with Skills ## MANDATORY FIRST RESPONSE PROTOCOL Before responding to ANY user message, you MUST complete this checklist: 1. ☐ List available skills in your mind 2. ☐ Ask yourself: "Does ANY skill match this request?" 3. ☐ If yes → Use the Skill tool to read and run the skill file 4. ☐ Announce which skill you're using 5. ☐ Follow the skill exactly **Responding WITHOUT completing this checklist = automatic failure.** ## Critical Rules 1. **Follow mandatory workflows.** Brainstorming before coding. Check for relevant skills before ANY task. 2. Execute skills with the Skill tool ## Common Rationalizations That Mean You're About To Fail If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these thoughts, STOP. You are rationalizing. Check for and use the skill. - "This is just a simple question" → WRONG. Questions are tasks. Check for skills. - "I can check git/files quickly" → WRONG. Files don't have conversation context. Check for skills. - "Let me gather information first" → WRONG. Skills tell you HOW to gather information. Check for skills. - "This doesn't need a formal skill" → WRONG. If a skill exists for it, use it. - "I remember this skill" → WRONG. Skills evolve. Run the current version. - "This doesn't count as a task" → WRONG. If you're taking action, it's a task. Check for skills. - "The skill is overkill for this" → WRONG. Skills exist because simple things become complex. Use it. - "I'll just do this one thing first" → WRONG. Check for skills BEFORE doing anything. **Why:** Skills document proven techniques that save time and prevent mistakes. Not using available skills means repeating solved problems and making known errors. If a skill for your task exists, you must use it or you will fail at your task. ## Skills with Checklists If a skill has a checklist, YOU MUST create TodoWrite todos for EACH item. **Don't:** - Work through checklist mentally - Skip creating todos "to save time" - Batch multiple items into one todo - Mark complete without doing them **Why:** Checklists without TodoWrite tracking = steps get skipped. Every time. The overhead of TodoWrite is tiny compared to the cost of missing steps. ## Announcing Skill Usage Before using a skill, announce that you are using it. "I'm using [Skill Name] to [what you're doing]." **Examples:** - "I'm using the brainstorming skill to refine your idea into a design." - "I'm using the test-driven-development skill to implement this feature." **Why:** Transparency helps your human partner understand your process and catch errors early. It also confirms you actually read the skill. # About these skills **Many skills contain rigid rules (TDD, debugging, verification).** Follow them exactly. Don't adapt away the discipline. **Some skills are flexible patterns (architecture, naming).** Adapt core principles to your context. The skill itself tells you which type it is. ## Project-Specific Skills and Agents CrispyClaude supports creating **project-specific skills and agents** that capture your codebase's unique patterns, architecture, and conventions. **When to create them:** After Claude understands your project (either through exploration or after brainstorming), run `/cc:setup-project` to create: - **Project-specific agents** (e.g., `project-python-implementer.md`) - Implementers who understand YOUR architecture, patterns, and conventions - **Project-specific skills** (e.g., `project-architecture`, `project-conventions`) - Knowledge about YOUR codebase structure and standards **Benefits:** - Agents know your architecture patterns without re-discovery - Skills capture institutional knowledge - Consistent conventions across implementations - Faster onboarding for new agents/developers **Discovery:** Project-specific skills/agents are prefixed with `project-` and stored alongside generic ones. They take precedence when working on project code. ## Instructions ≠ Permission to Skip Workflows Your human partner's specific instructions describe WHAT to do, not HOW. "Add X", "Fix Y" = the goal, NOT permission to skip brainstorming, TDD, or RED-GREEN-REFACTOR. **Red flags:** "Instruction was specific" • "Seems simple" • "Workflow is overkill" **Why:** Specific instructions mean clear requirements, which is when workflows matter MOST. Skipping process on "simple" tasks is how simple tasks become complex problems. ## Summary **Starting any task:** 1. If relevant skill exists → Use the skill 3. Announce you're using it 4. Follow what it says **Skill has checklist?** TodoWrite for every item. **Finding a relevant skill = mandatory to read and use it. Not optional.**