115 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
115 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
created: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
source_url: [URL or citation]
|
|
source_type: [academic/industry/community/expert/case-study/documentation]
|
|
research_focus: [the specific research angle this source addresses]
|
|
tags: [research-topic, relevant-tags]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# [Source Title]
|
|
|
|
**Source:** [source_url]
|
|
|
|
## Citation
|
|
|
|
[Full citation information - include authors, date, publication, DOI/URL]
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
[2-3 paragraph overview of what this source is about, its main contribution, and why it matters to the research. Should be comprehensive enough to understand the source's value without reading further.]
|
|
|
|
## Key Concepts & Definitions
|
|
|
|
[Define important terms, frameworks, or concepts introduced or used by this source. Be specific and thorough.]
|
|
|
|
- **[Concept 1]**: [Definition and explanation]
|
|
- **[Concept 2]**: [Definition and explanation]
|
|
- **[Concept 3]**: [Definition and explanation]
|
|
|
|
## Main Arguments / Insights / Features
|
|
|
|
[Break down the source's central arguments, insights, or technical features in detail. Use hierarchical structure if there are multiple levels.]
|
|
|
|
### Primary Argument / Insight / Feature 1
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
### Primary Argument / Insight / Feature 2
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
### Primary Argument / Insight / Feature 3
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
## Methodology / Approach
|
|
|
|
[Detailed description of methods, technical approaches, research design, or execution strategies used]
|
|
|
|
## Specific Examples & Case Studies
|
|
|
|
[Concrete examples, case studies, scenarios, or demonstrations provided in the source. Include specific details, numbers, and context.]
|
|
|
|
## Notable Quotes
|
|
|
|
[Include verbatim quotes that capture key ideas, unique insights, or particularly well-articulated points. Be generous with quotes - they're valuable for synthesis.]
|
|
|
|
## Evidence Quality Assessment
|
|
|
|
**Strength of Evidence**: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]
|
|
|
|
**Evidence Types Present**:
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Empirical data / statistics
|
|
- [ ] Case studies / real-world examples
|
|
- [ ] Expert testimony / citations
|
|
- [ ] Theoretical reasoning
|
|
- [ ] Anecdotal evidence
|
|
|
|
**Credibility Indicators**:
|
|
|
|
- **Author/Source Authority**: [Assessment of author expertise and source reputation]
|
|
- **Currency**: [How recent/up-to-date is this information?]
|
|
- **Transparency**: [Are methods, sources, and limitations clearly stated?]
|
|
- **Peer Review/Validation**: [Has this been peer-reviewed or validated by others?]
|
|
|
|
## Critical Evaluation
|
|
|
|
**Strengths**:
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
**Limitations**:
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
**Potential Biases**:
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
## Relevance to Research Focus
|
|
|
|
**Primary Research Angle(s) Addressed**: [Which specific research angle(s) from the plan does this inform?]
|
|
|
|
**Specific Contributions to Research**:
|
|
|
|
[How specifically does this advance understanding of each angle 1?]
|
|
[What unique perspective or information does this provide?]
|
|
|
|
**Gaps This Source Fills**: [What questions does this answer that other sources haven't?]
|
|
|
|
**Gaps Still Remaining**: [What questions does this source raise but not answer?]
|
|
|
|
## Practical Implications
|
|
|
|
[What are the practical takeaways, recommendations, or applications discussed?]
|
|
|
|
- [Implication 1]
|
|
- [Implication 2]
|
|
- [Implication 3]
|
|
|
|
## Open Questions & Further Research Directions
|
|
|
|
[What questions does this source raise? What further research does it suggest?]
|
|
|
|
1. [Question/direction 1]
|
|
2. [Question/direction 2]
|
|
3. [Question/direction 3]
|