Initial commit

skills/analyzing-source/templates/article-summary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+created: YYYY-MM-DD
+source_url: [URL or citation]
+source_type: [academic/industry/community/expert/case-study/documentation]
+research_focus: [the specific research angle this source addresses]
+tags: [research-topic, relevant-tags]
+---
+
+# [Source Title]
+
+**Source:** [source_url]
+
+## Citation
+
+[Full citation information - include authors, date, publication, DOI/URL]
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+[2-3 paragraph overview of what this source is about, its main contribution, and why it matters to the research. Should be comprehensive enough to understand the source's value without reading further.]
+
+## Key Concepts & Definitions
+
+[Define important terms, frameworks, or concepts introduced or used by this source. Be specific and thorough.]
+
+- **[Concept 1]**: [Definition and explanation]
+- **[Concept 2]**: [Definition and explanation]
+- **[Concept 3]**: [Definition and explanation]
+
+## Main Arguments / Insights / Features
+
+[Break down the source's central arguments, insights, or technical features in detail. Use hierarchical structure if there are multiple levels.]
+
+### Primary Argument / Insight / Feature 1
+
+...
+
+### Primary Argument / Insight / Feature 2
+
+...
+
+### Primary Argument / Insight / Feature 3
+
+...
+
+## Methodology / Approach
+
+[Detailed description of methods, technical approaches, research design, or execution strategies used]
+
+## Specific Examples & Case Studies
+
+[Concrete examples, case studies, scenarios, or demonstrations provided in the source. Include specific details, numbers, and context.]
+
+## Notable Quotes
+
+[Include verbatim quotes that capture key ideas, unique insights, or particularly well-articulated points. Be generous with quotes - they're valuable for synthesis.]
+
+## Evidence Quality Assessment
+
+**Strength of Evidence**: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]
+
+**Evidence Types Present**:
+
+- [ ] Empirical data / statistics
+- [ ] Case studies / real-world examples
+- [ ] Expert testimony / citations
+- [ ] Theoretical reasoning
+- [ ] Anecdotal evidence
+
+**Credibility Indicators**:
+
+- **Author/Source Authority**: [Assessment of author expertise and source reputation]
+- **Currency**: [How recent/up-to-date is this information?]
+- **Transparency**: [Are methods, sources, and limitations clearly stated?]
+- **Peer Review/Validation**: [Has this been peer-reviewed or validated by others?]
+
+## Critical Evaluation
+
+**Strengths**:
+...
+
+**Limitations**:
+...
+
+**Potential Biases**:
+...
+
+## Relevance to Research Focus
+
+**Primary Research Angle(s) Addressed**: [Which specific research angle(s) from the plan does this inform?]
+
+**Specific Contributions to Research**:
+
+[How specifically does this advance understanding of each angle 1?]
+[What unique perspective or information does this provide?]
+
+**Gaps This Source Fills**: [What questions does this answer that other sources haven't?]
+
+**Gaps Still Remaining**: [What questions does this source raise but not answer?]
+
+## Practical Implications
+
+[What are the practical takeaways, recommendations, or applications discussed?]
+
+- [Implication 1]
+- [Implication 2]
+- [Implication 3]
+
+## Open Questions & Further Research Directions
+
+[What questions does this source raise? What further research does it suggest?]
+
+1. [Question/direction 1]
+2. [Question/direction 2]
+3. [Question/direction 3]