Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
157
commands/content-generate-drafts.md
Normal file
157
commands/content-generate-drafts.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: "Generate 5 content variations for a theme using parallel multi-agent approach"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate Content Drafts
|
||||
|
||||
## Arguments
|
||||
|
||||
`$ARGUMENTS` - Theme name from themes-memory.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission
|
||||
|
||||
Generate 5 unique content variations for the specified theme by spawning 5 parallel sub-agents, each targeting different cognitive bias combinations and content structures.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the Draft Generator agent instructions (`agents/draft-generator.md`) to:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Read theme details** from themes-memory.md
|
||||
2. **Spawn 5 parallel sub-agents** (CRITICAL: simultaneous, not sequential)
|
||||
3. **Collect sub-agent outputs** (5 variations)
|
||||
4. **Write to content-drafts.md** with proper formatting
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Read Theme from themes-memory.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Target Theme**: $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract**:
|
||||
- Theme name and problem statement
|
||||
- Emotional hook and key insight
|
||||
- All 5 content angles
|
||||
- Source story excerpts
|
||||
|
||||
**If theme not found**: List available themes and ask user to retry with correct name.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Spawn 5 Parallel Sub-Agents
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL**: Use single message with 5 Task tool calls to spawn all sub-agents simultaneously.
|
||||
|
||||
Each sub-agent receives self-contained prompt with:
|
||||
- Full theme details
|
||||
- Specific bias activation strategy
|
||||
- Content structure requirements
|
||||
- Hook-Content-CTA framework
|
||||
- Character limits (280 single or 4-6 tweet thread)
|
||||
|
||||
**Sub-Agent Assignments**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Bold Statement Generator**
|
||||
- Biases: Contrast-Misreaction + Authority-Misinfluence
|
||||
- Structure: Shocking opening → Contrast → Authority evidence → CTA
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Story Hook Generator**
|
||||
- Biases: Curiosity Tendency + Liking/Loving Tendency
|
||||
- Structure: Open-loop question → Personal story → Vulnerability → Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Problem-Solution Generator**
|
||||
- Biases: Social-Proof + Reciprocation + Reward/Punishment
|
||||
- Structure: Problem statement → Social proof → Solution value → Free insight
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Data-Driven Generator**
|
||||
- Biases: Authority + Reason-Respecting + Availability-Misweighing
|
||||
- Structure: Surprising stat → Reasoning → Concrete example → Implication
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Emotional Lollapalooza Generator**
|
||||
- Biases: Liking + Stress-Influence + 5+ biases converging
|
||||
- Structure: Emotional hook → Stress creation → Relief → Multi-bias activation
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Quality Check Each Variation
|
||||
|
||||
Verify:
|
||||
- [ ] Content factually accurate (matches source stories)
|
||||
- [ ] Target biases clearly activated
|
||||
- [ ] Structure follows assigned format
|
||||
- [ ] Character limits respected
|
||||
- [ ] No meta-commentary (pure content)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Write to content-drafts.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `/home/rpiplewar/fast_dot_ai/poasting/content-drafts.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Theme: {Theme Name}
|
||||
**Source:** {Linear Task ID}
|
||||
|
||||
### Variation 1: Bold Statement
|
||||
**Content:**
|
||||
{Generated content}
|
||||
|
||||
**Biases Targeted:** Contrast-Misreaction, Authority-Misinfluence
|
||||
|
||||
**Scores:**
|
||||
[To be filled by Scorer agent]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Variation 2: Story Hook
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: APPEND to file (don't overwrite existing content from other themes)
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before marking generation complete:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All 5 variations generated
|
||||
- [ ] Each variation targets DIFFERENT bias combinations
|
||||
- [ ] All content factually accurate
|
||||
- [ ] Variations >70% structurally different
|
||||
- [ ] content-drafts.md updated successfully
|
||||
- [ ] No meta-commentary in output
|
||||
- [ ] Character limits respected
|
||||
- [ ] Hook-Content-CTA structure followed
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Output
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
✅ Draft Generation Complete
|
||||
|
||||
Theme: First Money From Code
|
||||
Variations Generated: 5
|
||||
|
||||
1. Bold Statement (Contrast + Authority)
|
||||
2. Story Hook (Curiosity + Liking)
|
||||
3. Problem-Solution (Social Proof + Reciprocation)
|
||||
4. Data-Driven (Authority + Reason-Respecting)
|
||||
5. Emotional Lollapalooza (6 biases)
|
||||
|
||||
Output File: content-drafts.md
|
||||
|
||||
Next Step: Run /content-score-all to apply framework scoring
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
**If theme not found**:
|
||||
- List available themes from themes-memory.md
|
||||
- Ask user to specify correct theme name
|
||||
|
||||
**If sub-agent fails**:
|
||||
- Retry that specific sub-agent only
|
||||
- Don't re-run all 5
|
||||
|
||||
**If variations too similar**:
|
||||
- Regenerate similar variation with stronger bias differentiation
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
After successful generation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review variations in content-drafts.md
|
||||
2. Run `/content-score-all` to apply automated scoring
|
||||
3. Or continue with full pipeline if running `/content-full-pipeline`
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user