Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
112
commands/pr-review.md
Normal file
112
commands/pr-review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
||||
# PR Review
|
||||
|
||||
**PR Link/Number**: $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
> **Instructions**: Execute each task in the order given to conduct a thorough
|
||||
> code review. Update GitHub with this review. **Important**: The future is
|
||||
> now—any improvements or “future” recommendations must be addressed
|
||||
> **immediately**. If you implemented changes, commit and push them to the PR
|
||||
> branch. Do NOT add Claude co-authorship footer to commits.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 1: Product Manager Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Assess from a product management perspective, focusing on:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Business Value**: Does this PR clearly advance our core product goals and
|
||||
deliver immediate ROI?
|
||||
- **User Experience**: Is the change intuitive and delightful for users right
|
||||
now? If not, make fixes immediately.
|
||||
- **Strategic Alignment**: Does the PR align with current (and long-term, i.e.,
|
||||
now) strategic objectives?
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Provide clear directives on how to ensure maximum user and business
|
||||
impact. All “future” suggestions must be implemented now.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 2: Developer Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Evaluate the code thoroughly from a senior lead engineer
|
||||
perspective:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Quality & Maintainability**: Is the code structured for readability
|
||||
and easy maintenance? If not, refactor now.
|
||||
2. **Performance & Scalability**: Will these changes operate efficiently at
|
||||
scale? If not, optimize immediately.
|
||||
3. **Best Practices & Standards**: Note any deviation from coding standards and
|
||||
correct it now.
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Leave a concise yet complete review comment, ensuring all
|
||||
improvements happen immediately—no deferrals.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 3: Quality Engineer Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Verify the overall quality, testing strategy, and reliability of
|
||||
the solution:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Test Coverage**: Are there sufficient tests (unit, integration, E2E)? If
|
||||
not, add them now.
|
||||
2. **Potential Bugs & Edge Cases**: Have all edge cases been considered? If not,
|
||||
address them immediately.
|
||||
3. **Regression Risk**: Confirm changes don’t undermine existing functionality.
|
||||
If risk is identified, mitigate now with additional checks or tests.
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Provide a detailed QA assessment, insisting any “future”
|
||||
improvements be completed right away.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 4: Security Engineer Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Ensure robust security practices and compliance:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Vulnerabilities**: Could these changes introduce security vulnerabilities?
|
||||
If so, fix them right away.
|
||||
2. **Data Handling**: Are we properly protecting sensitive data (e.g.,
|
||||
encryption, sanitization)? Address all gaps now.
|
||||
3. **Compliance**: Confirm alignment with any relevant security or privacy
|
||||
standards (e.g., OWASP, GDPR, HIPAA). Implement missing requirements
|
||||
immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Provide a security assessment. Any recommended fixes typically
|
||||
scheduled for “later” must be addressed now.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 5: DevOps Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Evaluate build, deployment, and monitoring considerations:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **CI/CD Pipeline**: Validate that the PR integrates smoothly with existing
|
||||
build/test/deploy processes. If not, fix it now.
|
||||
2. **Infrastructure & Configuration**: Check whether the code changes require
|
||||
immediate updates to infrastructure or configs.
|
||||
3. **Monitoring & Alerts**: Identify new monitoring needs or potential
|
||||
improvements and implement them immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Provide a DevOps-centric review, insisting that any improvements or
|
||||
tweaks be executed now.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task 6: UI/UX Designer Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Ensure optimal user-centric design:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Visual Consistency**: Confirm adherence to brand/design guidelines. If not,
|
||||
adjust now.
|
||||
2. **Usability & Accessibility**: Validate that the UI is intuitive and
|
||||
compliant with accessibility standards. Make any corrections immediately.
|
||||
3. **Interaction Flow**: Assess whether the user flow is seamless. If friction
|
||||
exists, refine now.
|
||||
|
||||
**Action**: Provide a detailed UI/UX evaluation. Any enhancements typically set
|
||||
for “later” must be done immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**End of PR Review**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user