gh-ninthspace-claude-code-marketplace-sdd/commands/story-patterns.md

/sdd:story-patterns

Meta

• Version: 2.0
• Category: story-analysis
• Complexity: high
• Purpose: Identify recurring patterns in completed stories to extract reusable knowledge and improve processes

Definition

Purpose: Analyze completed stories to discover technical patterns, common problems, success strategies, code reusability opportunities, and anti-patterns.

Syntax: /sdd:story-patterns [category]

Parameters

Parameter	Type	Required	Default	Description	Validation
category	string	No	"all"	Pattern category to analyze (technical, problems, success, code, process, all)	One of: technical, problems, success, code, process, all

INSTRUCTION: Analyze Story Patterns

INPUTS

• category: Optional pattern category filter (defaults to all)
• Completed story files from /docs/stories/completed/
• Optional: Stories from other stages for trend analysis

PROCESS

Phase 1: Story Data Collection

1. SCAN /docs/stories/completed/ directory for all .md files

2. PARSE each story file to extract:

   • Implementation approach (from Technical Notes)
   • Technologies used (from Stack)
   • Problems encountered (from Progress Log)
   • Solutions applied (from Progress Log)
   • Success criteria and outcomes
   • Test cases and results
   • Code patterns (from Implementation Checklist)
   • Dependencies and integrations
   • Lessons learned

3. CATEGORIZE extracted data by type:

   • Technical implementations
   • Problem/solution pairs
   • Success factors
   • Code structures
   • Process workflows

4. FILTER by category if specified

Phase 2: Technical Pattern Analysis

1. IDENTIFY common implementation approaches:

   • Group stories by similar technical solutions
   • Count frequency of each approach
   • Extract specific examples

2. DETECT recurring architectures:

   • Design patterns (MVC, Repository, etc.)
   • Integration patterns (API, Queue, Event)
   • Data patterns (Migration, Seeding, etc.)

3. ANALYZE technology combinations:

   • Frequently paired technologies
   • Successful tech stack patterns

4. DISPLAY technical patterns:

   🔧 TECHNICAL PATTERNS FOUND
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Common Implementations:
   
   Pattern: JWT Authentication with Refresh Tokens
   - Used in: [X] stories ([STORY-IDs])
   - Success rate: [X]%
   - Avg implementation time: [X] days
   - Reusability: High
   - Action: Extract as auth module
   
   Pattern: Queue-based Background Processing
   - Used in: [X] stories ([STORY-IDs])
   - Success rate: [X]%
   - Technologies: Laravel Queue, Redis
   - Action: Create template
   
   Recurring Architectures:
   - Service Layer Pattern: [X] stories
   - Repository Pattern: [X] stories
   - Event-Driven: [X] stories
   
   Technology Combinations:
   - Livewire + Alpine.js: [X] stories
   - Pest + Browser Tests: [X] stories
   

Phase 3: Problem Pattern Analysis

1. EXTRACT problems from progress logs

2. CATEGORIZE problems by type:

   • Technical issues
   • Integration challenges
   • Performance problems
   • Testing difficulties
   • Deployment issues

3. COUNT frequency of each problem type

4. LINK problems to solutions

5. IDENTIFY root causes

6. DISPLAY problem patterns:

   ⚠️  RECURRING CHALLENGES
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Common Problems:
   
   Problem: N+1 Query Performance Issues
   - Occurred: [X] times
   - Stories: [STORY-IDs]
   - Root cause: Missing eager loading
   - Solution pattern: Add `with()` to queries
   - Prevention: Code review checklist item
   
   Problem: CORS Issues in API Integration
   - Occurred: [X] times
   - Stories: [STORY-IDs]
   - Root cause: Middleware configuration
   - Solution pattern: Configure cors.php
   - Prevention: API setup template
   
   Frequent Blockers:
   - Third-party API rate limits: [X] occurrences
     Mitigation: Implement caching layer
   - Test environment setup: [X] occurrences
     Mitigation: Docker compose template
   

Phase 4: Success Pattern Analysis

1. IDENTIFY high-performing stories:

   • Fast completion times
   • Zero bugs in QA
   • First-time pass in review

2. EXTRACT success factors:

   • Common approaches
   • Best practices applied
   • Tools and techniques used

3. CALCULATE success rates by pattern

4. DETERMINE velocity impact

5. DISPLAY success patterns:

   ✅ SUCCESS PATTERNS
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   High-Velocity Patterns:
   
   Approach: TDD with Feature Tests First
   - Used in: [X] stories
   - Success rate: [X]%
   - Avg completion: [X] days faster
   - Key factors:
     • Clear test cases upfront
     • Fewer bugs in QA
     • Confident refactoring
   - Recommendation: Adopt as standard
   
   Approach: Component-First UI Development
   - Used in: [X] stories
   - Success rate: [X]%
   - Benefits:
     • Reusable components
     • Consistent design
     • Faster iterations
   - Best for: UI-heavy features
   
   High-Quality Patterns:
   - Livewire component testing: [X]% fewer bugs
   - Browser E2E tests: [X]% fewer production issues
   - Code review with checklist: [X]% first-time pass
   

Phase 5: Code Pattern Analysis

1. SCAN for reusable code structures:

   • Component types
   • Utility functions
   • Service classes
   • Middleware patterns
   • Test helpers

2. COUNT instances of each pattern

3. EVALUATE reusability potential

4. SUGGEST extraction opportunities

5. DISPLAY code patterns:

   💻 CODE PATTERNS
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Reusable Components Identified:
   
   Pattern: Form Validation Request Classes
   - Instances: [X] similar implementations
   - Stories: [STORY-IDs]
   - Commonality: [X]% code overlap
   - Candidate for: Base FormRequest class
   - Estimated savings: [X] hours per story
   
   Pattern: Livewire CRUD Components
   - Instances: [X] similar implementations
   - Stories: [STORY-IDs]
   - Commonality: [X]% code overlap
   - Candidate for: CRUD trait or base class
   - Estimated savings: [X] hours per story
   
   Pattern: API Response Formatters
   - Instances: [X] similar implementations
   - Candidate for: Shared utility package
   - Extraction priority: High
   
   Common Integrations:
   - External API clients: [X] instances
     Standard approach: Guzzle + DTO pattern
     Template available: No
     Action: Create API client template
   

Phase 6: Process Pattern Analysis

1. ANALYZE workflow patterns:

   • Story progression times
   • Review process effectiveness
   • Testing strategies
   • Deployment approaches

2. IDENTIFY effective practices:

   • Time-of-day patterns
   • Day-of-week patterns
   • Story size sweet spots
   • Review timing

3. CALCULATE process effectiveness metrics

4. DISPLAY process patterns:

   📋 PROCESS PATTERNS
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Effective Workflows:
   
   Workflow: Same-day Review
   - Stories: [X] with review within 24h
   - Success rate: [X]%
   - Avg cycle time: [X] days faster
   - Recommendation: Target same-day reviews
   
   Practice: Incremental Commits
   - Stories: [X] with frequent commits
   - Impact: [X]% easier code review
   - Recommendation: Commit every feature increment
   
   Timing Patterns:
   - Stories started Monday: [X]% completion rate
   - Stories started Friday: [X]% completion rate
   - Optimal story size: [X] days
   
   Risk Factors:
   - Stories > 5 days: [X]% higher bug rate
   - Stories with > 3 dependencies: [X]% longer cycle
   

Phase 7: Pattern Recommendations

1. ANALYZE all discovered patterns

2. PRIORITIZE by impact and effort:

   • High impact, low effort: Quick wins
   • High impact, high effort: Strategic initiatives
   • Low impact, low effort: Nice to haves

3. GENERATE specific, actionable recommendations:

   • Template creation
   • Library extraction
   • Process standardization
   • Documentation needs

4. DISPLAY recommendations:

   💡 PATTERN-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   CREATE TEMPLATES FOR:
   Priority: High
   1. Authentication flow template
      - Used in: [X] stories
      - Estimated savings: [X] hours per story
      - Template location: /templates/auth-flow.md
   
   2. API integration template
      - Used in: [X] stories
      - Estimated savings: [X] hours per story
      - Template location: /templates/api-integration.md
   
   EXTRACT LIBRARIES FOR:
   Priority: High
   1. Form validation utilities
      - Instances: [X] similar implementations
      - Estimated savings: [X] hours per story
      - Package name: app/Utils/FormValidation
   
   2. API response formatters
      - Instances: [X] similar implementations
      - Estimated savings: [X] hours per story
      - Package name: app/Http/Responses
   
   STANDARDIZE PROCESSES:
   Priority: Medium
   1. Code review checklist
      - Include: Performance checks, test coverage
      - Expected impact: [X]% fewer QA bugs
   
   2. Story sizing guidelines
      - Optimal size: [X] days
      - Expected impact: [X]% faster velocity
   
   DOCUMENT PATTERNS:
   Priority: Medium
   1. JWT authentication pattern
      - Location: /patterns/auth-jwt.md
      - Include: Setup, usage, edge cases
   

Phase 8: Pattern Library Generation

1. COMPILE patterns into structured library

2. CATEGORIZE by domain:

   • Authentication
   • Data Processing
   • API Integration
   • UI Components
   • Testing

3. TRACK usage and availability:

   • Times used
   • Template exists (yes/no)
   • Documentation exists (yes/no)
   • Action needed

4. DISPLAY pattern library:

   📚 PATTERN LIBRARY
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Category: Authentication
   ──────────────────────────────────
   Pattern: JWT with Refresh Tokens
   - Used in: 5 stories
   - Success rate: 100%
   - Template available: Yes (/templates/auth-jwt.md)
   - Documentation: Yes (/patterns/auth-jwt.md)
   
   Pattern: Social OAuth Integration
   - Used in: 3 stories
   - Success rate: 100%
   - Template available: No
   - Action: Create template
   
   Category: Data Processing
   ──────────────────────────────────
   Pattern: Queue-based Background Jobs
   - Used in: 7 stories
   - Success rate: 95%
   - Template available: Yes (/templates/queue-job.md)
   - Documentation: Yes (/patterns/queue-jobs.md)
   
   Pattern: Batch Processing with Progress
   - Used in: 3 stories
   - Template available: No
   - Action: Create template
   
   Category: UI Components
   ──────────────────────────────────
   Pattern: Livewire CRUD Components
   - Used in: 12 stories
   - Template available: No
   - Action: Create base component trait
   
   [Additional categories...]
   

Phase 9: Anti-Pattern Detection

1. IDENTIFY problematic patterns:

   • Code smells that appear multiple times
   • Approaches with low success rates
   • Solutions that caused later problems

2. ANALYZE negative impact:

   • Increased bug rates
   • Longer cycle times
   • Technical debt creation

3. SUGGEST better alternatives

4. DISPLAY anti-patterns:

   ❌ ANTI-PATTERNS TO AVOID
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Anti-pattern: Direct DB Queries in Controllers
   - Found in: [X] stories
   - Problems caused:
     • Difficult to test
     • No reusability
     • N+1 query issues
   - Better approach: Use Repository or Query Builder
   - Stories affected: [STORY-IDs]
   
   Anti-pattern: Missing Validation in Livewire
   - Found in: [X] stories
   - Problems caused:
     • Security vulnerabilities
     • Data integrity issues
     • Poor UX
   - Better approach: Use #[Validate] attributes
   - Stories affected: [STORY-IDs]
   
   Anti-pattern: Monolithic Livewire Components
   - Found in: [X] stories
   - Problems caused:
     • Hard to maintain
     • Difficult to test
     • Poor reusability
   - Better approach: Break into smaller components
   

Phase 10: Pattern Export

1. OFFER to export patterns to structured files

2. CREATE pattern directory structure:

   /patterns/
   ├── technical-patterns.md
   ├── success-patterns.md
   ├── anti-patterns.md
   └── templates/
       ├── auth-flow.md
       ├── api-integration.md
       └── queue-job.md
   

3. GENERATE markdown files with:

   • Pattern descriptions
   • Usage examples
   • Code snippets
   • Best practices
   • Related stories

4. DISPLAY export summary:

   💾 EXPORT PATTERNS
   ══════════════════════════════════
   
   Files created:
   ✓ /patterns/technical-patterns.md (15 patterns)
   ✓ /patterns/success-patterns.md (8 patterns)
   ✓ /patterns/anti-patterns.md (5 patterns)
   ✓ /patterns/process-patterns.md (6 patterns)
   
   Templates needed:
   → /templates/auth-jwt.md (create)
   → /templates/api-integration.md (create)
   
   Next steps:
   1. Review exported patterns
   2. Create missing templates
   3. Update coding standards
   4. Share with team
   

OUTPUTS

• Console display of all pattern analysis sections
• Optional: Pattern markdown files in /patterns/ directory
• Optional: Template files in /templates/ directory

RULES

• MUST analyze only completed stories (read from /docs/stories/completed/)
• MUST identify patterns with 2+ occurrences (single instance not a pattern)
• MUST calculate accurate frequency and success metrics
• SHOULD provide specific story IDs as evidence
• SHOULD prioritize recommendations by impact
• SHOULD generate actionable insights
• NEVER modify story files (read-only operation)
• ALWAYS show pattern sources (which stories)
• ALWAYS suggest concrete next steps
• MUST handle missing data gracefully

Pattern Categories

Technical Patterns

• Implementation approaches (authentication, API, data processing)
• Architecture patterns (MVC, Repository, Event-Driven)
• Technology combinations (framework + library pairs)
• Integration patterns (external services, databases)

Problem Patterns

• Recurring technical issues
• Common blockers
• Integration challenges
• Performance problems
• Root cause analysis

Success Patterns

• High-velocity approaches
• High-quality techniques
• Effective workflows
• Best practices

Code Patterns

• Reusable components
• Utility functions
• Service classes
• Test helpers
• Common structures

Process Patterns

• Workflow effectiveness
• Timing patterns
• Story sizing
• Review practices
• Testing strategies

Examples

Example 1: All Patterns

INPUT:
/sdd:story-patterns

OUTPUT:
→ Scanning completed stories...
→ Found 42 completed stories
→ Analyzing patterns across all categories...

🔧 TECHNICAL PATTERNS FOUND
══════════════════════════════════

Pattern: JWT Authentication with Refresh Tokens
- Used in: 5 stories (STORY-2025-001, 012, 023, 034, 041)
- Success rate: 100%
- Avg implementation time: 2.4 days
- Reusability: High
- Action: Template available at /templates/auth-jwt.md

[Additional sections...]

💡 PATTERN-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS
══════════════════════════════════

CREATE TEMPLATES FOR:
1. API integration with retry logic (used in 8 stories)
2. Livewire form with validation (used in 15 stories)

[Additional recommendations...]

💾 Export patterns to /patterns/ directory? (y/n)

Example 2: Technical Patterns Only

INPUT:
/sdd:story-patterns technical

OUTPUT:
→ Scanning completed stories...
→ Analyzing technical patterns only...

🔧 TECHNICAL PATTERNS FOUND
══════════════════════════════════

Common Implementations:

Pattern: Livewire Component with Alpine.js Enhancement
- Used in: 18 stories
- Technologies: Livewire 3, Alpine.js 3
- Success rate: 95%
- Common structure:
  • Server-side state management
  • Client-side UX enhancements
  • Device-responsive behavior

[Additional technical patterns...]

Example 3: No Patterns Found

INPUT:
/sdd:story-patterns

OUTPUT:
→ Scanning completed stories...
→ Found 3 completed stories
→ Analyzing patterns...

⚠️  INSUFFICIENT DATA
══════════════════════════════════

Not enough completed stories to identify patterns.
Patterns require at least 2 occurrences across multiple stories.

Current completed stories: 3
Minimum recommended: 10

Suggestions:
- Complete more stories to build pattern data
- Run /sdd:story-metrics to see development progress
- Check if stories are in /docs/stories/completed/

Edge Cases

Few Completed Stories

• DETECT insufficient story count (< 5)
• DISPLAY warning about pattern reliability
• SHOW limited patterns found
• SUGGEST completing more stories

No Common Patterns

• DETECT when stories are highly unique
• DISPLAY "no recurring patterns" message
• SHOW individual story characteristics
• SUGGEST areas for potential standardization

Inconsistent Story Format

• PARSE flexibly with fallbacks
• EXTRACT patterns from available data
• LOG warnings about incomplete data
• CONTINUE with best-effort analysis

Missing Technical Notes

• SKIP pattern extraction from incomplete stories
• LOG which stories lack necessary sections
• CALCULATE patterns from complete data only
• SUGGEST standardizing story format

Error Handling

• No completed stories: Inform user, suggest completing stories first
• Permission errors: Report specific file access issues
• Malformed story files: Skip problematic files, log warnings
• Invalid category parameter: Show valid options, use default
• Export directory exists: Ask to overwrite or merge

Performance Considerations

• Efficient file scanning (single pass per directory)
• Lazy parsing (only parse when needed)
• Pattern matching with hash maps for speed
• Streaming output for large datasets
• Typical completion time: < 3 seconds for 50 stories

Related Commands

• /sdd:story-metrics - Calculate velocity and quality metrics
• /sdd:story-tech-debt - Analyze technical debt
• /sdd:project-status - View current story statuses
• /sdd:story-list - List and filter stories

Constraints

• ✅ MUST be read-only (no story modifications)
• ✅ MUST identify patterns with 2+ occurrences
• ✅ MUST provide evidence (story IDs)
• ⚠️ SHOULD prioritize by impact and frequency
• 📊 SHOULD include success rates
• 💡 SHOULD generate actionable recommendations
• 🔍 MUST show pattern sources
• ⏱️ MUST complete analysis in reasonable time (< 5s)
• 📁 SHOULD offer to export findings