# Validate Specification Quality

## Spec File: $ARGUMENTS

Review a feature specification for completeness and implementation readiness.

## Validation Checklist

### Requirements Clarity

- [ ] Feature purpose and goals clearly defined
- [ ] Target users and use cases identified
- [ ] Success criteria measurable and specific
- [ ] Core functionality well-described

### User Experience

- [ ] User stories cover main workflows
- [ ] Edge cases and error states considered
- [ ] User interface requirements specified
- [ ] Accessibility considerations included

### Technical Specifications

- [ ] Data requirements clearly defined
- [ ] Integration points with existing systems identified
- [ ] Performance and scalability requirements specified
- [ ] Security and authentication needs addressed

### Implementation Readiness

- [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
- [ ] Technical constraints documented
- [ ] Dependencies and external services noted
- [ ] Out-of-scope items clearly defined

### Project Management

- [ ] MVP vs future enhancements distinguished
- [ ] Relative priority/importance indicated
- [ ] Potential risks or challenges flagged
- [ ] Scope is reasonable for single implementation

## Analysis Process

1. **Completeness Check**
   - Scan for missing critical sections
   - Identify vague or ambiguous requirements
   - Flag areas needing more detail

2. **Feasibility Assessment**
   - Check against existing codebase patterns
   - Identify potential technical challenges
   - Estimate implementation complexity

3. **Quality Review**
   - Ensure requirements are specific and measurable
   - Verify user stories follow good practices
   - Check that acceptance criteria are testable

## Output

### Quality Score (1-10)

Rate the specification's readiness for implementation:

- **1-3**: Major gaps, needs significant work
- **4-6**: Good foundation, some areas need clarification
- **7-8**: Well-defined, minor improvements possible
- **9-10**: Comprehensive and implementation-ready

### Feedback Report

- **Strengths**: What the spec does well
- **Missing Elements**: Critical gaps to address
- **Clarification Needed**: Vague or ambiguous areas
- **Suggestions**: Ways to improve the specification
- **Risk Assessment**: Potential implementation challenges

### Recommended Actions

- **Ready to implement**: Proceed with `/execute-spec`
- **Needs revision**: Specific areas to improve first
- **Requires research**: External factors to investigate
- **Scope adjustment**: Recommendations for MVP vs full feature