From a60fbd63367920e731be38054ae02990413c36f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhongwei Li <lizhongwei.nkcs@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 08:44:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Initial commit

---
 .claude-plugin/plugin.json |  12 ++
 README.md                  |   3 +
 commands/check-prp.md      |  77 ++++++++++
 commands/check-spec.md     |  85 +++++++++++
 commands/execute-prp.md    | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 commands/execute-spec.md   | 304 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 commands/generate-prp.md   |  74 +++++++++
 commands/generate-spec.md  | 277 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 plugin.lock.json           |  65 ++++++++
 9 files changed, 1087 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 .claude-plugin/plugin.json
 create mode 100644 README.md
 create mode 100644 commands/check-prp.md
 create mode 100644 commands/check-spec.md
 create mode 100644 commands/execute-prp.md
 create mode 100644 commands/execute-spec.md
 create mode 100644 commands/generate-prp.md
 create mode 100644 commands/generate-spec.md
 create mode 100644 plugin.lock.json

diff --git a/.claude-plugin/plugin.json b/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..175cbf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "name": "spec-driven",
+  "description": "Transform specifications into executable code with automated analysis, validation checkpoints, and incremental delivery",
+  "version": "0.1.0",
+  "author": {
+    "name": "Nick Nisi",
+    "email": "nick@nisi.org"
+  },
+  "commands": [
+    "./commands"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1fd5c64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# spec-driven
+
+Transform specifications into executable code with automated analysis, validation checkpoints, and incremental delivery
diff --git a/commands/check-prp.md b/commands/check-prp.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..173371f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/check-prp.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# Validate PRP Quality
+
+## PRP File: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Review a PRP (Pre-Requirements Plan) file for completeness and implementation readiness.
+
+## Validation Checklist
+
+### Research and Context
+
+- [ ] All research context included with URLs
+- [ ] Tech stack properly identified (framework, build tools, testing)
+- [ ] External documentation links provided
+- [ ] Code examples from codebase referenced
+
+### Implementation Planning
+
+- [ ] Implementation phases clearly defined
+- [ ] Each phase has specific deliverables
+- [ ] Validation commands match project setup
+- [ ] Manual testing steps provided for each phase
+
+### Technical Details
+
+- [ ] Error handling strategy documented
+- [ ] Existing patterns properly referenced
+- [ ] Incremental milestones defined
+- [ ] Edge cases considered
+
+### Execution Readiness
+
+- [ ] All TODOs and placeholders resolved
+- [ ] Dependencies clearly listed
+- [ ] Environment setup documented
+- [ ] Success criteria measurable
+
+## Analysis Process
+
+1. **Structural Review**
+   - Check for all required PRP sections
+   - Verify phase breakdown is logical
+   - Ensure validation points are clear
+
+2. **Technical Assessment**
+   - Validate that tech stack matches project
+   - Check if referenced patterns exist in codebase
+   - Confirm validation commands will work
+
+3. **Completeness Check**
+   - Scan for missing implementation details
+   - Identify any ambiguous requirements
+   - Flag incomplete research areas
+
+## Output
+
+### Quality Score (1-10)
+
+Rate the PRP's readiness for execution:
+
+- **1-3**: Major gaps, needs significant work
+- **4-6**: Good foundation, some areas need completion
+- **7-8**: Well-defined, minor improvements possible
+- **9-10**: Comprehensive and execution-ready
+
+### Feedback Report
+
+- **Strengths**: What the PRP does well
+- **Missing Elements**: Critical gaps to address
+- **Research Gaps**: Areas needing more documentation
+- **Implementation Concerns**: Potential execution challenges
+
+### Recommended Actions
+
+- **Ready to execute**: Proceed with `/execute-prp`
+- **Needs completion**: Specific sections to enhance
+- **Requires validation**: Commands to verify first
+- **Research needed**: External resources to gather
diff --git a/commands/check-spec.md b/commands/check-spec.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0767158
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/check-spec.md
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# Validate Specification Quality
+
+## Spec File: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Review a feature specification for completeness and implementation readiness.
+
+## Validation Checklist
+
+### Requirements Clarity
+
+- [ ] Feature purpose and goals clearly defined
+- [ ] Target users and use cases identified
+- [ ] Success criteria measurable and specific
+- [ ] Core functionality well-described
+
+### User Experience
+
+- [ ] User stories cover main workflows
+- [ ] Edge cases and error states considered
+- [ ] User interface requirements specified
+- [ ] Accessibility considerations included
+
+### Technical Specifications
+
+- [ ] Data requirements clearly defined
+- [ ] Integration points with existing systems identified
+- [ ] Performance and scalability requirements specified
+- [ ] Security and authentication needs addressed
+
+### Implementation Readiness
+
+- [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
+- [ ] Technical constraints documented
+- [ ] Dependencies and external services noted
+- [ ] Out-of-scope items clearly defined
+
+### Project Management
+
+- [ ] MVP vs future enhancements distinguished
+- [ ] Relative priority/importance indicated
+- [ ] Potential risks or challenges flagged
+- [ ] Scope is reasonable for single implementation
+
+## Analysis Process
+
+1. **Completeness Check**
+   - Scan for missing critical sections
+   - Identify vague or ambiguous requirements
+   - Flag areas needing more detail
+
+2. **Feasibility Assessment**
+   - Check against existing codebase patterns
+   - Identify potential technical challenges
+   - Estimate implementation complexity
+
+3. **Quality Review**
+   - Ensure requirements are specific and measurable
+   - Verify user stories follow good practices
+   - Check that acceptance criteria are testable
+
+## Output
+
+### Quality Score (1-10)
+
+Rate the specification's readiness for implementation:
+
+- **1-3**: Major gaps, needs significant work
+- **4-6**: Good foundation, some areas need clarification
+- **7-8**: Well-defined, minor improvements possible
+- **9-10**: Comprehensive and implementation-ready
+
+### Feedback Report
+
+- **Strengths**: What the spec does well
+- **Missing Elements**: Critical gaps to address
+- **Clarification Needed**: Vague or ambiguous areas
+- **Suggestions**: Ways to improve the specification
+- **Risk Assessment**: Potential implementation challenges
+
+### Recommended Actions
+
+- **Ready to implement**: Proceed with `/execute-spec`
+- **Needs revision**: Specific areas to improve first
+- **Requires research**: External factors to investigate
+- **Scope adjustment**: Recommendations for MVP vs full feature
diff --git a/commands/execute-prp.md b/commands/execute-prp.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c0dabbc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/execute-prp.md
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+# Execute PRP with Incremental Validation
+
+## PRP File: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Execute a PRP (Pre-Requirements Plan) in phases with validation points between each step for controlled, incremental implementation.
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### 1. Load and Plan
+
+- Read the PRP file completely to understand all requirements
+- Extract research context, tech stack, and validation commands
+- Create implementation plan using TodoWrite tool
+- Identify the phases and validation points from the PRP
+
+### 2. Phase-by-Phase Execution
+
+For each phase in the PRP:
+
+1. **Announce Phase Start**
+   - Clear statement of which phase is beginning
+   - List the specific deliverables for this phase
+   - Estimate time/complexity for the phase
+
+2. **Implement Phase Requirements**
+   - Follow the PRP's instructions for this phase
+   - Use referenced patterns from the codebase
+   - Apply the documented error handling strategy
+   - Create only the code specified for this phase
+
+3. **Run Validation**
+   - Execute phase-specific validation commands from PRP
+   - Run any automated tests defined
+   - Check for compilation/syntax errors
+   - Verify the phase deliverables are complete
+
+4. **User Checkpoint**
+   - Show what was implemented with file paths
+   - Provide manual testing steps from PRP
+   - Report validation results clearly
+   - Wait for user feedback before proceeding
+
+### 3. Phase Structure
+
+Standard progression (from PRP template):
+
+- **Setup Phase**: File structure, types, interfaces, configuration
+- **Core Phase**: Main functionality implementation
+- **Integration Phase**: Connect with existing systems
+- **Testing Phase**: Unit and integration tests
+- **Polish Phase**: Error handling, edge cases, documentation
+
+Each phase should:
+
+- Output working, testable code
+- Have clear success criteria
+- Include manual testing instructions
+- Build incrementally on previous phases
+
+### 4. Validation Protocol
+
+```bash
+# Run validation commands from PRP
+npm run type-check  # or project-specific command
+npm run lint
+npm run test
+
+# Report results clearly
+echo "✓ Type checking passed"
+echo "✓ Linting passed"
+echo "⚠ 2 tests pending implementation"
+
+# Fix any failures before proceeding
+# If validation fails, stop and fix before continuing
+```
+
+### 5. User Checkpoints
+
+After completing each phase:
+
+- **Implementation Summary**: List all files created/modified
+- **Validation Results**: Show output from validation commands
+- **Manual Testing**: Provide specific steps for user to test
+- **Next Phase Preview**: Brief description of what comes next
+
+Wait for user response:
+
+- "continue" → Proceed to next phase
+- "fix [issue]" → Address specific problem
+- Other feedback → Incorporate before continuing
+
+## Control Commands During Execution
+
+### Navigation Commands
+
+- `continue` - Proceed to next phase
+- `pause` - Stop for manual intervention
+- `status` - Show current phase and progress
+- `restart phase` - Redo current phase from beginning
+- `skip to [phase]` - Jump to specific phase (with warning)
+
+### Correction Commands
+
+- `fix [issue]` - Address specific problem
+- `rollback` - Undo current phase changes
+- `validate` - Re-run validation commands
+- `debug` - Show detailed error information
+
+### Information Commands
+
+- `show plan` - Display full implementation plan
+- `show prp` - Display relevant PRP section
+- `progress` - Show overall completion status
+- `help` - Show available commands
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Standard Mode (Default)
+
+- Stop at each checkpoint for user confirmation
+- Show all validation results
+- Require explicit "continue" to proceed
+
+### Auto Mode (When specified)
+
+- Continue automatically if validation passes
+- Stop only on errors or warnings
+- Still show progress updates
+
+### Debug Mode
+
+- Extra verbose output
+- Show all command executions
+- Detailed error traces
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Validation Failures
+
+1. Stop execution immediately
+2. Show clear error message
+3. Suggest fix if possible
+4. Wait for user instruction
+
+### Missing Dependencies
+
+1. Identify what's missing
+2. Suggest installation command
+3. Pause for user to install
+4. Retry after installation
+
+### Ambiguous Requirements
+
+1. Flag the ambiguity
+2. Show PRP section in question
+3. Ask for clarification
+4. Update understanding and proceed
+
+## Completion
+
+### Final Validation
+
+- Run complete test suite
+- Verify all PRP requirements met
+- Check success criteria achieved
+- Generate coverage report if applicable
+
+### Deliverables
+
+- Summary of all changes made
+- Documentation updates completed
+- Usage examples created
+- Any remaining TODOs noted
+
+### Handoff
+
+- Provide clear usage documentation
+- List any manual steps needed
+- Note any deferred items
+- Suggest next steps
+
+## Important Notes
+
+- **Always wait for user confirmation between phases** unless explicitly told to continue automatically
+- **Never skip validation** even if it seems unnecessary
+- **Document any deviations** from the PRP with clear reasoning
+- **Preserve existing code** unless PRP specifically says to modify
+- **Test incrementally** rather than waiting until the end
+
+The goal is controlled, validated, incremental delivery that builds confidence at each step.
diff --git a/commands/execute-spec.md b/commands/execute-spec.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f3ec584
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/execute-spec.md
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+# Execute Feature Specification
+
+## Spec File: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Execute feature specifications with intelligent automation, comprehensive validation, and progress tracking.
+
+## Pre-Execution Setup
+
+### 1. Load and Validate Specification
+
+```bash
+# Load specification
+SPEC_FILE="$ARGUMENTS"
+SPEC_NAME=$(basename "$SPEC_FILE" .md)
+PRP_FILE="PRPs/${SPEC_NAME}.md"
+
+# Auto-generate or update PRP if needed
+if [ ! -f "$PRP_FILE" ] || [ "$SPEC_FILE" -nt "$PRP_FILE" ]; then
+  echo "Generating PRP from spec..."
+  /generate-prp "$SPEC_FILE"
+fi
+
+# Extract metadata from spec
+COMPLEXITY_SCORE=$(grep "Complexity Score:" "$SPEC_FILE" | cut -d: -f2)
+ESTIMATED_EFFORT=$(grep "Estimated Effort:" "$SPEC_FILE" | cut -d: -f2)
+```
+
+### 2. Project Context Discovery
+
+```bash
+# Discover project structure and conventions
+find . -maxdepth 3 -name "*.config.*" -o -name "*rc.*" -o -name "Makefile"
+
+# Identify test patterns
+find . -type f -name "*test*" -o -name "*spec*" | head -5
+
+# Check for existing similar features
+grep -r "similar_pattern" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py"
+```
+
+### 3. Execution Plan Generation
+
+Based on spec complexity score:
+
+- **1-3 (Simple)**: Direct implementation with minimal checkpoints
+- **4-6 (Medium)**: Phased approach with validation points
+- **7-10 (Complex)**: Incremental delivery with extensive validation
+
+## Spec-Driven Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Foundation
+
+**From Spec Section: Technical Architecture**
+
+1. **Database Changes** (if specified in spec)
+   - Create/modify schema as defined
+   - Add migrations if project uses them
+   - Update models/entities
+
+2. **API Structure** (if specified in spec)
+   - Create endpoint definitions
+   - Add request/response types
+   - Set up routing
+
+3. **Core Data Structures**
+   - Implement interfaces from spec
+   - Create types/classes as defined
+   - Set up state management
+
+**Validation Checkpoint:**
+
+- Verify all foundation elements exist
+- Check that types/interfaces compile
+- Confirm database changes applied
+
+### Phase 2: Core Implementation
+
+**From Spec Section: Implementation Checklist**
+
+Work through each item in the spec's implementation checklist:
+
+1. Read the specific requirement
+2. Implement exactly as specified
+3. Validate implementation works
+4. Mark item complete in tracking
+
+**Continuous Validation:**
+
+- After each file modification
+- Check for syntax errors
+- Verify imports resolve
+- Ensure no breaking changes
+
+### Phase 3: Integration
+
+**From Spec Section: Dependencies and Integration**
+
+1. **Connect Components**
+   - Wire up services as specified
+   - Integrate with existing systems
+   - Add configuration as needed
+
+2. **Data Flow**
+   - Implement data pipelines
+   - Connect frontend to backend
+   - Set up event handlers
+
+**Validation Checkpoint:**
+
+- Test integration points work
+- Verify data flows correctly
+- Check error handling
+
+### Phase 4: Testing & Validation
+
+**From Spec Section: Testing Strategy**
+
+Execute test plan from specification:
+
+1. Create tests for acceptance criteria
+2. Implement test scenarios from spec
+3. Validate success metrics
+
+**Coverage Areas:**
+
+- Unit tests for new functions
+- Integration tests for workflows
+- Manual testing checklist items
+
+### Phase 5: Documentation & Polish
+
+**From Spec Section: User Stories**
+
+1. **Code Documentation**
+   - Add comments for complex logic
+   - Document public APIs
+   - Update type definitions
+
+2. **User Documentation**
+   - Create usage examples
+   - Document configuration options
+   - Add troubleshooting notes
+
+## Progress Tracking
+
+### Implementation Checklist Tracking
+
+Track progress through spec requirements:
+
+```
+[✓] Database schema created
+[✓] API endpoints defined
+[⏳] Frontend components built
+[ ] Integration complete
+[ ] Tests passing
+[ ] Documentation updated
+```
+
+### Execution Report Template
+
+```markdown
+## Implementation Progress
+
+### Completed
+
+- [List completed spec requirements]
+
+### In Progress
+
+- [Current work items]
+
+### Remaining
+
+- [Outstanding spec requirements]
+
+### Issues & Blockers
+
+- [Any problems encountered]
+
+### Validation Results
+
+- [Test results if available]
+- [Manual testing outcomes]
+```
+
+## Control Commands
+
+### During Execution
+
+- `continue` - Proceed to next phase
+- `status` - Show current progress
+- `validate` - Run validation checks
+- `pause` - Stop for manual work
+- `skip` - Skip current item (with warning)
+- `retry` - Retry failed operation
+
+### Validation Commands
+
+- `check-spec` - Verify against specification
+- `test` - Run relevant tests
+- `lint` - Check code quality
+
+### Reporting
+
+- `report` - Generate progress report
+- `checklist` - Show implementation checklist
+- `metrics` - Display execution metrics
+
+## Smart Checkpoints
+
+### Automatic Progression
+
+Continue automatically when:
+
+- Current phase implementation complete
+- No errors detected
+- Spec requirements met for phase
+
+### Manual Checkpoint Required
+
+Pause for confirmation when:
+
+- Complexity score > 7
+- Errors or warnings detected
+- Spec has explicit "manual review" notes
+- Major architectural changes made
+
+## Error Recovery
+
+### Common Recovery Actions
+
+1. **Missing Dependencies**: Note what's needed
+2. **Type/Syntax Errors**: Attempt fixes
+3. **Test Failures**: Isolate and document
+4. **Integration Issues**: Rollback and retry
+
+### Manual Intervention
+
+Required for:
+
+- Spec ambiguities
+- Architectural decisions
+- Security concerns
+- Performance issues
+
+## Spec Compliance Validation
+
+### Continuous Checks
+
+- Are we following the spec's Technical Architecture?
+- Have we completed Implementation Checklist items?
+- Do changes match the API Design?
+- Are Success Metrics being met?
+
+### Final Validation
+
+1. **Spec Requirements**: Check all requirements implemented
+2. **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify all criteria met
+3. **Test Coverage**: Ensure test scenarios covered
+4. **Documentation**: Confirm docs updated
+
+## Configuration
+
+### Project-Specific Settings
+
+The command adapts to project conventions:
+
+- Reads existing config files
+- Follows established patterns
+- Uses project's test framework
+- Respects code style rules
+
+### Execution Modes
+
+- **Guided**: Step-by-step with confirmations
+- **Auto**: Automatic progression where safe
+- **Review**: Implementation with detailed review points
+- **Fast**: Minimal checkpoints for simple features
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Execute a specification
+/execute-spec specs/user-auth-spec.md
+
+# Execute with auto-progression
+/execute-spec specs/feature-spec.md --auto
+
+# Execute specific phase
+/execute-spec specs/api-spec.md --phase=3
+
+# Dry run to preview changes
+/execute-spec specs/new-feature.md --dry-run
+```
+
+## Key Principles
+
+1. **Follow the Spec Literally**: Implement exactly what's specified
+2. **Validate Continuously**: Check work at each step
+3. **Track Progress**: Maintain clear status of implementation
+4. **Adapt to Project**: Use project's patterns and conventions
+5. **Fail Safely**: Pause when uncertain rather than guess
+
+The execution is driven entirely by the specification document, ensuring that implementation matches requirements exactly while adapting to each project's unique structure and conventions.
diff --git a/commands/generate-prp.md b/commands/generate-prp.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c327e1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/generate-prp.md
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Create PRP
+
+## Feature file: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Generate a complete PRP for feature implementation with thorough research. Read the feature file first to understand requirements and context.
+
+## Research Process
+
+1. **Codebase Analysis**
+   - Search for similar patterns in the codebase
+   - Identify TypeScript/JavaScript conventions
+   - Check existing test patterns (Jest, Vitest, etc.)
+   - Note build tools and package manager (npm, yarn, pnpm)
+
+2. **External Research**
+   - Library documentation with specific URLs
+   - TypeScript implementation examples
+   - Best practices for the tech stack
+   - Common integration patterns
+
+3. **Project Context**
+   - Framework being used (React, Next.js, Node.js, etc.)
+   - Testing strategy and tools
+   - Build and deployment processes
+
+## PRP Generation
+
+Using PRPs/templates/prp_base.md as template:
+
+### Critical Context
+
+- **Documentation URLs**: Specific sections for libraries/frameworks
+- **Code Examples**: Real patterns from the codebase
+- **Tech Stack**: Framework, build tools, testing setup
+- **Patterns**: Existing approaches to mirror
+
+### Implementation Blueprint
+
+- Pseudocode showing the approach
+- Reference files for patterns to follow
+- Error handling strategy
+- **Incremental milestones** for step-by-step validation
+
+### Validation Gates (Tech Stack Specific)
+
+```bash
+# TypeScript/Build validation
+npm run type-check
+npm run lint
+npm run build
+
+# Testing
+npm run test
+
+# Custom validation commands based on project
+Implementation Phases
+Break implementation into phases:
+
+Setup Phase: File structure, types, interfaces
+Core Phase: Main functionality implementation
+Integration Phase: Connect with existing systems
+Testing Phase: Unit and integration tests
+Polish Phase: Error handling, edge cases
+
+Each phase should have:
+
+Clear deliverables
+Validation commands
+Manual testing instructions
+
+Output
+Save as: PRPs/{feature-name}.md
+Score the PRP on confidence level (1-10) for successful incremental implementation.
+```
diff --git a/commands/generate-spec.md b/commands/generate-spec.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0f13cd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/generate-spec.md
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+# Generate Feature Specification
+
+## Feature description: $ARGUMENTS
+
+Create a comprehensive, actionable feature specification with automated codebase analysis.
+
+## Phase 1: Automated Discovery
+
+### Codebase Pattern Analysis
+
+```bash
+# Find similar features
+rg -l "similar_feature_keywords" --type ts --type tsx
+# Identify existing patterns
+find . -name "*.spec.ts" -path "*/features/*" | head -5
+# Check authentication patterns
+rg "useAuth|requireAuth|withAuth" --type ts -A 2
+# Database schema patterns
+find . -name "*.prisma" -o -name "*.sql" -o -name "*migration*"
+```
+
+### Dependency Mapping
+
+- Search for related imports: `rg "import.*{feature_related}" --type ts`
+- Check existing API endpoints: `rg "router\.(get|post|put|delete)" --type ts`
+- Find UI components: `find ./src/components -name "*.tsx" | grep -i feature_area`
+
+## Phase 2: Requirements Analysis
+
+### User Story Mining
+
+**Format**: As a [user_type], I want [capability] so that [business_value]
+
+**Required Classifications**:
+
+- Critical path (blocks other features)
+- Core functionality (MVP)
+- Enhancement (can ship without)
+- Future consideration (v2)
+
+### Technical Complexity Scoring
+
+Calculate automatically:
+
+- Files to modify: `git ls-files | xargs grep -l "pattern" | wc -l`
+- New dependencies: Check against package.json
+- Database changes: Schema modifications needed
+- API surface: New endpoints required
+
+**Complexity Score**:
+
+- 1-3: Simple (< 5 files, no deps, no DB)
+- 4-6: Medium (5-15 files, deps OR DB)
+- 7-10: Complex (> 15 files, deps AND DB)
+
+## Phase 3: Specification Generation
+
+### 1. Executive Summary
+
+- **Feature Name**: [Descriptive, searchable name]
+- **Business Value**: [Specific metric improvement expected]
+- **Complexity Score**: [Auto-calculated from above]
+- **Estimated Effort**: [Based on complexity and similar features]
+
+### 2. Technical Architecture
+
+#### Database Schema
+
+```sql
+-- Required changes
+ALTER TABLE existing_table ADD COLUMN new_field TYPE;
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS new_table (...);
+```
+
+#### API Design
+
+```typescript
+// New endpoints
+POST /api/feature
+GET /api/feature/:id
+PUT /api/feature/:id
+DELETE /api/feature/:id
+
+// Request/Response types
+interface FeatureRequest { ... }
+interface FeatureResponse { ... }
+```
+
+#### Frontend Components
+
+```typescript
+// Component hierarchy
+<FeatureContainer>
+  <FeatureList />
+  <FeatureDetail />
+  <FeatureForm />
+</FeatureContainer>
+```
+
+### 3. Implementation Checklist
+
+#### Pre-Implementation
+
+- [ ] Review existing patterns in: [list similar files]
+- [ ] Confirm database migrations approach
+- [ ] Validate API design with team
+- [ ] Check accessibility requirements
+
+#### Core Implementation
+
+- [ ] Database schema and migrations
+- [ ] API endpoints with validation
+- [ ] Frontend components with tests
+- [ ] Integration with existing auth/permissions
+- [ ] Error handling and logging
+
+#### Validation
+
+- [ ] Unit tests (minimum 80% coverage)
+- [ ] Integration tests for API
+- [ ] E2E tests for critical paths
+- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
+- [ ] Security review completed
+
+### 4. Risk Analysis
+
+#### Technical Risks
+
+- **Breaking Changes**: [List any backward compatibility issues]
+- **Performance Impact**: [Database queries, API load]
+- **Security Concerns**: [Data exposure, permission gaps]
+
+#### Mitigation Strategies
+
+- Feature flags for gradual rollout
+- Database indexes for performance
+- Rate limiting for API endpoints
+- Audit logging for sensitive operations
+
+### 5. Dependencies and Integration
+
+#### External Dependencies
+
+```json
+{
+  "new-package": "^1.0.0",
+  "existing-upgrade": "^2.0.0 -> ^3.0.0"
+}
+```
+
+#### Internal Dependencies
+
+- Services: [List services that need updates]
+- Shared components: [List reusable components]
+- Configuration: [Environment variables needed]
+
+### 6. Testing Strategy
+
+#### Unit Tests
+
+```typescript
+describe('Feature', () => {
+  test('core functionality', () => { ... });
+  test('edge cases', () => { ... });
+  test('error handling', () => { ... });
+});
+```
+
+#### Integration Tests
+
+- API endpoint testing with supertest
+- Database transaction testing
+- Authentication/authorization flows
+
+#### Manual Testing Checklist
+
+- [ ] Happy path user flow
+- [ ] Error state handling
+- [ ] Mobile responsiveness
+- [ ] Accessibility (keyboard nav, screen readers)
+- [ ] Performance under load
+
+### 7. Rollout Plan
+
+#### Phase 1: Internal Testing
+
+- Deploy behind feature flag
+- Limited access to internal users
+- Monitor error rates and performance
+
+#### Phase 2: Beta Release
+
+- Enable for % of users
+- Gather feedback and metrics
+- Fix critical issues
+
+#### Phase 3: General Availability
+
+- Full rollout
+- Documentation updates
+- Support team training
+
+### 8. Success Metrics
+
+#### Quantitative
+
+- Feature adoption rate: [target %]
+- Performance metrics: [response time targets]
+- Error rate: [< threshold]
+
+#### Qualitative
+
+- User satisfaction score
+- Support ticket reduction
+- Developer experience feedback
+
+## Phase 4: PRP Preparation
+
+### Research Links
+
+Collect during analysis:
+
+- API documentation: [urls]
+- Library docs: [urls]
+- Design patterns: [urls]
+- Security best practices: [urls]
+
+### Code References
+
+- Similar implementations: `path/to/file.ts:line`
+- Pattern examples: `path/to/example.ts:line`
+- Test examples: `path/to/test.spec.ts:line`
+
+### Outstanding Questions
+
+- [ ] Technical decisions needed
+- [ ] Architecture review required
+- [ ] Performance optimization approach
+
+## Output
+
+### Primary Spec
+
+Save to: `docs/specs/{feature-name}-spec.md`
+
+### Supporting Artifacts
+
+- `docs/specs/{feature-name}-api.yaml` - OpenAPI spec
+- `docs/specs/{feature-name}-db.sql` - Database changes
+- `docs/specs/{feature-name}-tests.md` - Test plan
+
+### Validation
+
+Run after generation:
+
+```bash
+# Validate spec completeness
+grep -c "TODO\|TBD\|FIXME" docs/specs/{feature-name}-spec.md
+# Check for broken references
+grep -o "path/to/.*\.ts:[0-9]*" docs/specs/{feature-name}-spec.md | while read ref; do
+  file=$(echo $ref | cut -d: -f1)
+  [ -f "$file" ] || echo "Missing: $file"
+done
+```
+
+## Usage Notes
+
+This command now:
+
+1. Automatically analyzes your codebase for patterns
+2. Calculates complexity scores
+3. Generates actionable, specific specifications
+4. Prepares for PRP generation
+5. Includes validation and rollout planning
+6. Provides testable success criteria
+
+The spec is no longer just documentation - it's a blueprint for implementation.
diff --git a/plugin.lock.json b/plugin.lock.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..77dae96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plugin.lock.json
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "internal://schemas/plugin.lock.v1.json",
+  "pluginId": "gh:nicknisi/claude-plugins:plugins/spec-driven",
+  "normalized": {
+    "repo": null,
+    "ref": "refs/tags/v20251128.0",
+    "commit": "5685647d61e429f9a4d7abf2007bf08e858dc09c",
+    "treeHash": "f976c3ae1afab870c59b4cfda58f98d4de77eb5ef11c7929323568f0daa52de1",
+    "generatedAt": "2025-11-28T10:27:22.508738Z",
+    "toolVersion": "publish_plugins.py@0.2.0"
+  },
+  "origin": {
+    "remote": "git@github.com:zhongweili/42plugin-data.git",
+    "branch": "master",
+    "commit": "aa1497ed0949fd50e99e70d6324a29c5b34f9390",
+    "repoRoot": "/Users/zhongweili/projects/openmind/42plugin-data"
+  },
+  "manifest": {
+    "name": "spec-driven",
+    "description": "Transform specifications into executable code with automated analysis, validation checkpoints, and incremental delivery",
+    "version": "0.1.0"
+  },
+  "content": {
+    "files": [
+      {
+        "path": "README.md",
+        "sha256": "cf423ea00090d7a285ce66f0cd571bd935e95f136185bb09d81fcd1f8a02f05a"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": ".claude-plugin/plugin.json",
+        "sha256": "bcd7c00f52656fa9571188319e91fb58b7c41fa9de767238f3afc791a5f60e63"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/execute-spec.md",
+        "sha256": "89f2ef13ef5c140efd5adbaa4698c39c06bad8a033e7fb983bcf2b264bfab5be"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/generate-prp.md",
+        "sha256": "d26a61573521db79a7952fb9af70aa8f78c69e7de454878d67a37ee0f9817409"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/execute-prp.md",
+        "sha256": "0fcf06c5d84da87b8d6dcfb774ae8ca3622a4e90c66966cd4d2dbe017df96fb6"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/generate-spec.md",
+        "sha256": "f5f33293560e6f39855f2e2f9cff4d6c9c29fdb82ad913c79e9fb2e69d6b1014"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/check-prp.md",
+        "sha256": "5e5a5ab1088b922946786a37652a4b4d61a24c373412172ada7ee70b61a23fda"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/check-spec.md",
+        "sha256": "da0ade906ab9f011dde4506657419528d8dd9f2ab01707b701b5a91109b0aa39"
+      }
+    ],
+    "dirSha256": "f976c3ae1afab870c59b4cfda58f98d4de77eb5ef11c7929323568f0daa52de1"
+  },
+  "security": {
+    "scannedAt": null,
+    "scannerVersion": null,
+    "flags": []
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file