commit 58dbf931d55f75f17ca6167b1e103ec23b39c35f
Author: Zhongwei Li <lizhongwei.nkcs@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Nov 30 08:42:20 2025 +0800

    Initial commit

diff --git a/.claude-plugin/plugin.json b/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d09a4e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "name": "code-review-standards",
+  "description": "Standardized code review checklist and guidelines for team consistency",
+  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "author": {
+    "name": "natifridman"
+  },
+  "commands": [
+    "./commands"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c5efba8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# code-review-standards
+
+Standardized code review checklist and guidelines for team consistency
diff --git a/commands/code-review.md b/commands/code-review.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..de9f335
--- /dev/null
+++ b/commands/code-review.md
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+---
+description: Provides a comprehensive code review checklist following team standards
+---
+
+# Code Review Standards
+
+You are conducting a code review following our team's established standards and best practices. Provide a thorough review covering the following areas:
+
+## Code Quality
+- Is the code readable and well-structured?
+- Are variable and function names clear and descriptive?
+- Is the code following DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles?
+- Are there any code smells or anti-patterns?
+- Is the complexity appropriate? Are there overly complex functions that should be broken down?
+
+## Functionality
+- Does the code accomplish what it's supposed to do?
+- Are edge cases handled properly?
+- Is error handling comprehensive and appropriate?
+- Are there any potential bugs or logical errors?
+
+## Testing
+- Are there adequate unit tests covering the new/changed code?
+- Do the tests cover edge cases and error conditions?
+- Are integration tests needed and present?
+- Do all tests pass?
+
+## Documentation
+- Is there clear inline documentation for complex logic?
+- Are public APIs/functions properly documented?
+- Has the README been updated if needed?
+- Are there any breaking changes that need to be documented?
+
+## Security
+- Are there any security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, etc.)?
+- Is user input properly validated and sanitized?
+- Are secrets or sensitive data properly handled?
+- Are authentication and authorization checks in place where needed?
+
+## Performance
+- Are there any obvious performance bottlenecks?
+- Is the code efficient in terms of time and space complexity?
+- Are there unnecessary database queries or API calls?
+- Is caching used appropriately?
+
+## Team Standards
+- Does the code follow our style guide and formatting conventions?
+- Are dependencies properly managed and documented?
+- Is the commit message clear and follows our convention?
+- Has the PR description adequately explained the changes?
+
+After reviewing, provide:
+1. A summary of findings organized by severity (critical, major, minor)
+2. Specific line-by-line feedback where improvements are needed
+3. Positive feedback on well-implemented aspects
+4. Overall recommendation: Approve, Request Changes, or Comment
+
diff --git a/plugin.lock.json b/plugin.lock.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3f353c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plugin.lock.json
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "internal://schemas/plugin.lock.v1.json",
+  "pluginId": "gh:natifridman/claude-plugins:plugins/code-review-standards",
+  "normalized": {
+    "repo": null,
+    "ref": "refs/tags/v20251128.0",
+    "commit": "286834d540fc7a0f5b57222b35371f84dd204411",
+    "treeHash": "54104d7a195fbe9e3ce89727d3faacb7a01bfc00aa02e7b07a4424060cad3df4",
+    "generatedAt": "2025-11-28T10:27:16.753249Z",
+    "toolVersion": "publish_plugins.py@0.2.0"
+  },
+  "origin": {
+    "remote": "git@github.com:zhongweili/42plugin-data.git",
+    "branch": "master",
+    "commit": "aa1497ed0949fd50e99e70d6324a29c5b34f9390",
+    "repoRoot": "/Users/zhongweili/projects/openmind/42plugin-data"
+  },
+  "manifest": {
+    "name": "code-review-standards",
+    "description": "Standardized code review checklist and guidelines for team consistency",
+    "version": "1.0.0"
+  },
+  "content": {
+    "files": [
+      {
+        "path": "README.md",
+        "sha256": "3bde6cb50498fdeb21af426400f533fc9e61f8558d3c72a5689ab580d096d715"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": ".claude-plugin/plugin.json",
+        "sha256": "6d8af561ca02fcc3e59f6c69d9d6c6389811cb95f5af036d0a1b361dd82ab239"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "commands/code-review.md",
+        "sha256": "3a914f9355c12cae7b4c5e7575636fb98f419c5cc8637d7020bf0b11838a3c59"
+      }
+    ],
+    "dirSha256": "54104d7a195fbe9e3ce89727d3faacb7a01bfc00aa02e7b07a4424060cad3df4"
+  },
+  "security": {
+    "scannedAt": null,
+    "scannerVersion": null,
+    "flags": []
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file