zhongwei/gh-martybonacci-specswarm
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
7e16d8a2a10d27a5fb9b2e2e6275bca351703bf1
gh-martybonacci-specswarm/commands/implement.md
Zhongwei Li 7e16d8a2a1 Initial commit
2025-11-30 08:39:24 +08:00

38 KiB
Raw Blame History

description
description
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Outline

  1. Discover Feature Context:

    YOU MUST NOW discover the feature context using the Bash tool:

    a. Get repository root by executing:

    git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd

    Store the result as REPO_ROOT.

    b. Get current branch name by executing:

    git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null

    Store the result as BRANCH.

    c. Extract feature number from branch name by executing:

    echo "$BRANCH" | grep -oE '^[0-9]{3}'

    Store the result as FEATURE_NUM.

    d. Initialize features directory and find feature:

    # Source features location helper
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
PLUGIN_DIR="$(dirname "$SCRIPT_DIR")"
source "$PLUGIN_DIR/lib/features-location.sh"

# Initialize features directory
get_features_dir "$REPO_ROOT"

# If feature number is empty, find latest feature
if [ -z "$FEATURE_NUM" ]; then
  FEATURE_NUM=$(list_features "$REPO_ROOT" | grep -oE '^[0-9]{3}' | sort -nr | head -1)
fi

# Find feature directory
find_feature_dir "$FEATURE_NUM" "$REPO_ROOT"
# FEATURE_DIR is now set by find_feature_dir

    f. Display to user:

    📁 Feature Context
✓ Repository: {REPO_ROOT}
✓ Branch: {BRANCH}
✓ Feature: {FEATURE_NUM}
✓ Directory: {FEATURE_DIR}

  2. Check checklists status (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):

    • Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory

    • For each checklist, count:

      • Total items: All lines matching - [ ] or - [X] or - [x]
      • Completed items: Lines matching - [X] or - [x]
      • Incomplete items: Lines matching - [ ]

    • Create a status table:

      | Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status |
|-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------|
| ux.md     | 12    | 12        | 0          | ✓ PASS |
| test.md   | 8     | 5         | 3          | ✗ FAIL |
| security.md | 6   | 6         | 0          | ✓ PASS |

    • Calculate overall status:

      • PASS: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
      • FAIL: One or more checklists have incomplete items

    • If any checklist is incomplete:

      • Display the table with incomplete item counts
      • STOP and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
      • Wait for user response before continuing
      • If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
      • If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3

    • If all checklists are complete:

      • Display the table showing all checklists passed
      • Automatically proceed to step 3

  3. Load and analyze the implementation context:

    • REQUIRED: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
    • REQUIRED: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
    • IF EXISTS: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
    • IF EXISTS: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
    • IF EXISTS: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
    • IF EXISTS: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
    • IF EXISTS: Read .specswarm/tech-stack.md for runtime validation (SpecSwarm)

3b. Pre-Implementation Tech Stack Validation (if tech-stack.md exists):

Purpose: Runtime validation before writing any code or imports

YOU MUST NOW perform tech stack validation using these steps:

  1. Check if tech-stack.md exists using the Read tool:

    • Try to read .specswarm/tech-stack.md
    • If file doesn't exist: Skip this entire section (3b)
    • If file exists: Continue with validation

  2. Load Tech Stack Compliance Report from plan.md using the Read tool:

    • Read ${FEATURE_DIR}/plan.md
    • Search for "Tech Stack Compliance Report" section
    • If section does NOT exist: Skip validation (plan created before SpecSwarm)
    • If section DOES exist: Continue to step 3

  3. Verify All Conflicts Resolved using the Grep tool:

    a. Search for conflicts:

    grep -q "⚠️ Conflicting Technologies" "${FEATURE_DIR}/plan.md"

    b. If conflicts found, check if unresolved:

    grep -q "**Your choice**: _\[" "${FEATURE_DIR}/plan.md"

    c. If unresolved choices found:

    • HALT implementation
    • Display error: "❌ Tech stack conflicts still unresolved"
    • Display message: "Cannot implement until all conflicts in plan.md are resolved"
    • Stop execution

  4. Verify No Prohibited Technologies in Plan using the Grep tool:

    a. Search for prohibited techs:

    grep -q "❌ Prohibited Technologies" "${FEATURE_DIR}/plan.md"

    b. If found, check if blocking:

    grep -q "**Cannot proceed**" "${FEATURE_DIR}/plan.md"

    c. If blocking issues found:

    • HALT implementation
    • Display error: "❌ Prohibited technologies still present in plan.md"
    • Display message: "Remove or replace prohibited technologies before implementing"
    • Stop execution

  5. Load Prohibited Technologies List:

    # Extract all prohibited technologies from tech-stack.md
PROHIBITED_TECHS=()
APPROVED_ALTERNATIVES=()

while IFS= read -r line; do
  if [[ $line =~ ^-\ ❌\ (.*)\ \(use\ (.*)\ instead\) ]]; then
    PROHIBITED_TECHS+=("${BASH_REMATCH[1]}")
    APPROVED_ALTERNATIVES+=("${BASH_REMATCH[2]}")
  fi
done < <(grep "❌" "${REPO_ROOT}.specswarm/tech-stack.md")

  6. Runtime Import/Dependency Validation:

    BEFORE writing ANY file that contains imports or dependencies:

    # For each import statement or dependency about to be written:
check_technology_compliance() {
  local TECH_NAME="$1"
  local FILE_PATH="$2"
  local LINE_CONTENT="$3"

  # Check if technology is prohibited
  for i in "${!PROHIBITED_TECHS[@]}"; do
    PROHIBITED="${PROHIBITED_TECHS[$i]}"
    APPROVED="${APPROVED_ALTERNATIVES[$i]}"

    if echo "$TECH_NAME" | grep -qi "$PROHIBITED"; then
      ERROR "Prohibited technology detected: $PROHIBITED"
      MESSAGE "File: $FILE_PATH"
      MESSAGE "Line: $LINE_CONTENT"
      MESSAGE "❌ Cannot use: $PROHIBITED"
      MESSAGE "✅ Must use: $APPROVED"
      MESSAGE "See .specswarm/tech-stack.md for details"
      HALT
    fi
  done

  # Check if technology is unapproved (warn but allow)
  if ! grep -qi "$TECH_NAME" "${REPO_ROOT}.specswarm/tech-stack.md" 2>/dev/null; then
    WARNING "Unapproved technology: $TECH_NAME"
    MESSAGE "File: $FILE_PATH"
    MESSAGE "This library is not in tech-stack.md"
    PROMPT "Continue anyway? (yes/no)"
    read -r RESPONSE
    if [[ ! "$RESPONSE" =~ ^[Yy] ]]; then
      MESSAGE "Halting. Please add $TECH_NAME to tech-stack.md or choose approved alternative"
      HALT
    fi
  fi
}

  7. Validation Triggers:

    JavaScript/TypeScript:

    • Before writing: import ... from '...'
    • Before writing: require('...')
    • Before writing: npm install ... or yarn add ...
    • Extract library name and validate

    Python:

    • Before writing: import ... or from ... import ...
    • Before writing: pip install ...
    • Extract module name and validate

    Go:

    • Before writing: import "..."
    • Before executing: go get ...
    • Extract package name and validate

    General:

    • Before writing any package.json dependencies
    • Before writing any requirements.txt entries
    • Before writing any go.mod require statements
    • Before writing any composer.json dependencies

  8. Pattern Validation:

    Check for prohibited patterns (not just libraries):

    validate_code_pattern() {
  local FILE_CONTENT="$1"
  local FILE_PATH="$2"

  # Check for prohibited patterns from tech-stack.md
  # Example: "Class components" prohibited
  if echo "$FILE_CONTENT" | grep -q "class.*extends React.Component"; then
    ERROR "Prohibited pattern: Class components"
    MESSAGE "File: $FILE_PATH"
    MESSAGE "Use functional components instead"
    HALT
  fi

  # Example: "Redux" prohibited
  if echo "$FILE_CONTENT" | grep -qi "createStore\|configureStore.*@reduxjs"; then
    ERROR "Prohibited library: Redux"
    MESSAGE "File: $FILE_PATH"
    MESSAGE "Use React Router loaders/actions instead"
    HALT
  fi
}

  9. Continuous Validation:

    • Run validation before EVERY file write operation
    • Run validation before EVERY package manager command
    • Run validation before EVERY import statement
    • Accumulate violations and report at end if in batch mode

  1. Project Setup Verification:

    • REQUIRED: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:

    Detection & Creation Logic:

    • Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):

      git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null

    • Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore

    • Check if .eslintrc* or eslint.config.* exists → create/verify .eslintignore

    • Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore

    • Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)

    • Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore

    • Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore

    If ignore file already exists: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only If ignore file missing: Create with full pattern set for detected technology

    Common Patterns by Technology (from plan.md tech stack):

    • Node.js/JavaScript: node_modules/, dist/, build/, *.log, .env*
    • Python: __pycache__/, *.pyc, .venv/, venv/, dist/, *.egg-info/
    • Java: target/, *.class, *.jar, .gradle/, build/
    • C#/.NET: bin/, obj/, *.user, *.suo, packages/
    • Go: *.exe, *.test, vendor/, *.out
    • Universal: .DS_Store, Thumbs.db, *.tmp, *.swp, .vscode/, .idea/

    Tool-Specific Patterns:

    • Docker: node_modules/, .git/, Dockerfile*, .dockerignore, *.log*, .env*, coverage/
    • ESLint: node_modules/, dist/, build/, coverage/, *.min.js
    • Prettier: node_modules/, dist/, build/, coverage/, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml
    • Terraform: .terraform/, *.tfstate*, *.tfvars, .terraform.lock.hcl

  2. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:

    • Task phases: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
    • Task dependencies: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
    • Task details: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
    • Execution flow: Order and dependency requirements

  3. Execute implementation following the task plan:

    • Phase-by-phase execution: Complete each phase before moving to the next
    • Respect dependencies: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
    • Follow TDD approach: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
    • File-based coordination: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
    • Validation checkpoints: Verify each phase completion before proceeding

  4. Implementation execution rules:

    • Setup first: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
    • Tests before code: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
    • Core development: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
    • Integration work: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
    • Polish and validation: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation

  5. Progress tracking and error handling:

    • Report progress after each completed task
    • Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
    • For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
    • Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
    • Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
    • IMPORTANT For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.

  6. Completion validation:

    • Verify all required tasks are completed
    • Check that implemented features match the original specification
    • Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
    • Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
    • Report final status with summary of completed work

9b. SSR Architecture Validation - Prevent Bug 913-type issues:

Purpose: Detect hardcoded URLs and relative URLs in server-side rendering contexts

YOU MUST NOW run SSR pattern validation using the Bash tool:

  1. Execute SSR validator:

    cd ${REPO_ROOT} && bash ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/specswarm/lib/ssr-validator.sh

  2. Parse validation results:

    • Exit code 0: No issues found (✓ PASS)
    • Exit code 1: Issues detected (⚠️ FAIL)

  3. If issues detected:

    a. Display issue summary from validator output

    b. Ask user for action:

    ⚠️  SSR Pattern Issues Detected
================================

Would you like me to:
1. Auto-fix common issues (create getApiUrl helper, update imports)
2. Show detailed issues and fix manually
3. Skip (continue anyway - NOT RECOMMENDED)

Choose (1/2/3):

    c. If user chooses option 1 (Auto-fix):

    • Check if app/utils/api.ts exists
    • If not, create it with getApiUrl() helper: 
      export function getApiUrl(path: string): string {
  const base = typeof window !== 'undefined'
    ? ''
    : process.env.API_BASE_URL || 'http://localhost:3000';
  return `${base}${path}`;
}
    • Scan all files with hardcoded URLs using Grep tool
    • For each file:
      • Add import: import { getApiUrl } from '../utils/api';
      • Replace fetch('http://localhost:3000/api/...') with fetch(getApiUrl('/api/...'))
      • Replace fetch('/api/...') in loaders/actions with fetch(getApiUrl('/api/...'))
    • Re-run SSR validator to confirm fixes
    • Display: "✅ Auto-fix complete. All SSR patterns corrected."

    d. If user chooses option 2 (Manual fix):

    • Display detailed issue list from validator
    • Display recommendations
    • Wait for user to fix manually
    • Offer to re-run validator: "Type 'validate' to re-check or 'continue' to proceed"

    e. If user chooses option 3 (Skip):

    • Display warning: "⚠️ Skipping SSR validation. Production deployment may fail."
    • Continue to next step

  4. If no issues found:

    • Display: "✅ SSR patterns validated - No architectural issues detected"
    • Continue to next step

IMPORTANT: This validation prevents production failures from Bug 913-type issues (relative URLs in SSR contexts).

  1. Quality Validation - CRITICAL STEP, MUST EXECUTE:

Purpose: Automated quality assurance before merge

YOU MUST NOW CHECK FOR AND RUN QUALITY VALIDATION:

  1. First, check if quality standards file exists by reading the file at ${REPO_ROOT}.specswarm/quality-standards.md using the Read tool.

  2. If the file does NOT exist:

    • Display this message to the user: 
      ℹ️  Quality Validation
====================

No quality standards defined. Skipping automated validation.

To enable quality gates:
  1. Create .specswarm/quality-standards.md
  2. Define minimum coverage and quality score
  3. Configure test requirements

See: plugins/specswarm/templates/quality-standards-template.md
    • Then proceed directly to Step 11 (Git Workflow)

  3. If the file EXISTS, you MUST execute the full quality validation workflow using the Bash tool:

    a. Display header by outputting directly to the user:

    🧪 Running Quality Validation
=============================

    b. Detect test frameworks using the Bash tool:

    cd ${REPO_ROOT} && bash ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/specswarm/lib/test-framework-detector.sh

    Parse the JSON output to extract:

    • List of all detected frameworks
    • Primary framework (highest priority)
    • Framework count Store primary framework for use in tests.

    c. Run unit tests using the detected framework:

    YOU MUST NOW run tests using the Bash tool:

    1. Source the test detector library:

      source ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/specswarm/lib/test-framework-detector.sh

    2. Run tests for primary framework:

      run_tests "{PRIMARY_FRAMEWORK}" ${REPO_ROOT}

    3. Parse test results:

      parse_test_results "{PRIMARY_FRAMEWORK}" "{TEST_OUTPUT}"

      Extract: total, passed, failed, skipped counts

    4. Display results to user:

      1. Unit Tests ({FRAMEWORK_NAME})
✓ Total: {TOTAL}
✓ Passed: {PASSED} ({PASS_RATE}%)
✗ Failed: {FAILED}
⊘ Skipped: {SKIPPED}

    d. Measure code coverage (if coverage tool available):

    YOU MUST NOW measure coverage using the Bash tool:

    1. Check for coverage tool:

      source ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/specswarm/lib/test-framework-detector.sh
detect_coverage_tool "{PRIMARY_FRAMEWORK}" ${REPO_ROOT}

    2. If coverage tool detected, run coverage:

      run_coverage "{PRIMARY_FRAMEWORK}" ${REPO_ROOT}

      Parse coverage percentage from output.

    3. Calculate proportional coverage score (Phase 2 Enhancement):

      • Read min_coverage from quality-standards.md (default 80%)
      • Calculate score using proportional formula:
        • Coverage >= 90%: 25 points (full credit)
        • Coverage 80-89%: 20-24 points (proportional)
        • Coverage 70-79%: 15-19 points (proportional)
        • Coverage 60-69%: 10-14 points (proportional)
        • Coverage 50-59%: 5-9 points (proportional)
        • Coverage < 50%: 0-4 points (proportional)

      Formula: score = min(25, (coverage / 90) * 25)

    4. Display results to user:

      3. Code Coverage
Coverage: {COVERAGE}%
Target: {TARGET}%
Score: {SCORE}/25 points
Status: {EXCELLENT/GOOD/ACCEPTABLE/NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/INSUFFICIENT}

    5. If no coverage tool:

      • Display: "Coverage measurement not configured (0 points)"
      • Score: 0 points

    e. Detect browser test framework:

    cd ${REPO_ROOT} && source ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/specswarm/lib/quality-gates.sh && detect_browser_test_framework

    f. Run browser tests (if Playwright/Cypress detected):

    • For Playwright: npx playwright test 2>&1 | tail -30
    • For Cypress: npx cypress run 2>&1 | tail -30
    • Parse results (passed/failed/total)
    • Display with "4. Browser Tests" header
    • If no browser framework: Display "No browser test framework detected - Skipping"

    f2. Analyze bundle sizes (Phase 3 Enhancement):

    YOU MUST NOW analyze bundle sizes using the Bash tool:

    1. Run bundle size monitor:

      cd ${REPO_ROOT} && bash ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/speclabs/lib/bundle-size-monitor.sh

    2. Parse bundle analysis results:

      • Exit code 0: All bundles within budget (✓ PASS)
      • Exit code 1: Large bundles detected (⚠️ WARNING)
      • Exit code 2: Critical bundle size exceeded (🔴 CRITICAL)

    3. Extract bundle metrics:

      • Total bundle size (in KB)
      • Number of large bundles (>500KB)
      • Number of critical bundles (>1MB)
      • List of top 5 largest bundles

    4. Calculate bundle size score:

      • < 500KB total: 20 points (excellent)
      • 500-750KB: 15 points (good)
      • 750-1000KB: 10 points (acceptable)
      • 1000-2000KB: 5 points (poor)

      • 2000KB: 0 points (critical)

    5. Display results to user:

      5. Bundle Size Performance
Total Size: {TOTAL_SIZE}
Largest Bundle: {LARGEST_BUNDLE}
Score: {SCORE}/20 points
Status: {EXCELLENT/GOOD/ACCEPTABLE/POOR/CRITICAL}

    6. If no build directory found:

      • Display: "No build artifacts found - Run build first (0 points)"
      • Score: 0 points
      • Note: Bundle size analysis requires a production build

    7. Track bundle size in metrics:

      • Add bundle_size_kb to metrics.json
      • Enables bundle size tracking over time

    f3. Enforce performance budgets (Phase 3 Enhancement - Optional):

    YOU MUST NOW check if performance budgets are defined:

    1. Check for budget configuration:

      • Read quality-standards.md using Read tool
      • Look for budget settings:
        • max_bundle_size (KB)
        • max_initial_load (KB)
        • enforce_budgets (true/false)

    2. If enforce_budgets is true, run enforcement:

      cd ${REPO_ROOT} && bash ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/specswarm-marketplace/plugins/speclabs/lib/performance-budget-enforcer.sh

    3. Parse enforcement results:

      • Exit code 0: All budgets met (✓ PASS)
      • Exit code 1: Budgets violated (❌ FAIL)

    4. If budgets violated: a. Display violations from enforcer output b. Check block_merge setting:

      • If block_merge_on_budget_violation is true: HALT
      • If false: Warn and ask user "Continue anyway? (yes/no)"

    5. Display budget status:

      ⚡ Performance Budget Status
- Bundle Size: {PASS/FAIL}
- Initial Load: {PASS/FAIL}
Overall: {PASS/FAIL}

    6. If no budgets configured:

      • Skip enforcement
      • Note: "Performance budgets not configured (optional)"

    g. Calculate quality score using proportional scoring (Phase 2 & 3 Enhancement):

    YOU MUST NOW calculate scores for each component:

    1. Unit Tests (0-25 points - proportional by pass rate):

      • 100% passing: 25 points
      • 90-99% passing: 20-24 points (proportional)
      • 80-89% passing: 15-19 points (proportional)
      • 70-79% passing: 10-14 points (proportional)
      • 60-69% passing: 5-9 points (proportional)
      • <60% passing: 0-4 points (proportional)

      Formula: score = min(25, (pass_rate / 100) * 25)

    2. Code Coverage (0-25 points - proportional by coverage %):

      • =90% coverage: 25 points

      • 80-89% coverage: 20-24 points (proportional)
      • 70-79% coverage: 15-19 points (proportional)
      • 60-69% coverage: 10-14 points (proportional)
      • 50-59% coverage: 5-9 points (proportional)
      • <50% coverage: 0-4 points (proportional)

      Formula: score = min(25, (coverage / 90) * 25)

    3. Integration Tests (0-15 points - proportional):

      • 100% passing: 15 points
      • Proportional for <100%
      • 0 points if not detected

      Formula: score = min(15, (pass_rate / 100) * 15)

    4. Browser Tests (0-15 points - proportional):

      • 100% passing: 15 points
      • Proportional for <100%
      • 0 points if not detected

      Formula: score = min(15, (pass_rate / 100) * 15)

    5. Bundle Size (0-20 points - Phase 3 feature):

      • < 500KB total: 20 points
      • 500-750KB: 15 points
      • 750-1000KB: 10 points
      • 1000-2000KB: 5 points

      • 2000KB: 0 points

      • No build found: 0 points

    6. Visual Alignment (0-15 points - Phase 3 future):

      • Set to 0 for now (screenshot analysis not yet implemented)

    Total possible: 115 points (but scaled to 100 for display)

    Scoring Note: When Visual Alignment is implemented, adjust other components to maintain 100-point scale.

    Example Calculation:

    • Unit Tests: 106/119 passing (89%) → 22.25 points
    • Coverage: 75% → 20.83 points
    • Integration Tests: Not detected → 0 points
    • Browser Tests: Not configured → 0 points
    • Bundle Size: 450KB → 20 points
    • Visual Alignment: Not implemented → 0 points
    • Total: 63.08/115 points (scaled to ~55/100)

    h. Display quality report with proportional scoring details:

    Quality Validation Results
==========================

1. Unit Tests ({FRAMEWORK}): {SCORE}/25 points
   ✓ Passed: {PASSED}/{TOTAL} ({PASS_RATE}%)
   ✗ Failed: {FAILED}
   Status: {EXCELLENT/GOOD/ACCEPTABLE/NEEDS IMPROVEMENT}

2. Code Coverage: {SCORE}/25 points
   Coverage: {COVERAGE}% (target: {TARGET}%)
   Status: {EXCELLENT/GOOD/ACCEPTABLE/NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/INSUFFICIENT}

3. Integration Tests: {SCORE}/15 points
   {DETAILS or "Not detected"}

4. Browser Tests: {SCORE}/15 points
   {DETAILS or "Not configured"}

5. Bundle Size: {SCORE}/20 points
   Total: {TOTAL_SIZE} | Largest: {LARGEST_BUNDLE}
   Status: {EXCELLENT/GOOD/ACCEPTABLE/POOR/CRITICAL}

6. Visual Alignment: 0/15 points
   Status: Not yet implemented (Phase 3 future)

════════════════════════════════════════
Raw Score: {RAW_SCORE}/115 points
Scaled Score: {SCALED_SCORE}/100 points
════════════════════════════════════════

Status: {PASS/FAIL} (threshold: {THRESHOLD}/100)

Score Breakdown:
████████████████░░░░░░░░ {SCALED_SCORE}% ({VISUAL_BAR})

Note: Score scaled from 115-point system to 100-point display

    i. Check quality gates from quality-standards.md:

    • Read min_quality_score (default 80)
    • Read block_merge_on_failure (default false)
    • If score < minimum:
      • If block_merge_on_failure is true: HALT and show error
      • If block_merge_on_failure is false: Show warning and ask user "Continue with merge anyway? (yes/no)"
    • If score >= minimum: Display "✅ Quality validation passed!"

    j. Save quality metrics by updating ${REPO_ROOT}.specswarm/metrics.json:

    • Add entry for current feature number
    • Include quality score, coverage, test results
    • Use Write tool to update the JSON file

IMPORTANT: You MUST execute this step if quality-standards.md exists. Do NOT skip it. Use the Bash tool to run all commands and parse the results.

  1. Proactive Quality Improvements - If quality score < 80/100:

    YOU MUST NOW offer to improve the quality score:

    a. Check for missing coverage tool:

    • If Vitest was detected but coverage measurement showed 0% or "not configured":
      • Display to user: 
        ⚡ Coverage Tool Not Installed
=============================

Installing @vitest/coverage-v8 would add +25 points to your quality score.

Current: {CURRENT_SCORE}/100
With coverage: {CURRENT_SCORE + 25}/100

Would you like me to:
1. Install coverage tool and re-run validation
2. Skip (continue without coverage)

Choose (1 or 2):
      • If user chooses 1:
        • Run: npm install --save-dev @vitest/coverage-v8
        • Check if vitest.config.ts exists using Read tool
        • If exists, update it to add coverage configuration
        • If not exists, create vitest.config.ts with coverage config
        • Re-run quality validation (step 3 above)
        • Display new score

    b. Check for missing E2E tests:

    • If Playwright was detected but no tests were found:
      • Display to user: 
        ⚡ No E2E Tests Found
=====================

Writing basic E2E tests would add +15 points to your quality score.

Current: {CURRENT_SCORE}/100
With E2E tests: {CURRENT_SCORE + 15}/100

Would you like me to:
1. Generate basic Playwright test templates
2. Skip (continue without E2E tests)

Choose (1 or 2):
      • If user chooses 1:
        • Create tests/e2e/ directory if not exists
        • Generate basic test file with:
          • Login flow test (if authentication exists)
          • Main feature flow test (based on spec.md)
          • Basic smoke test
        • Run: npx playwright test
        • Re-run quality validation
        • Display new score

    c. Display final improvement summary:

    📊 Quality Score Improvement
============================

Before improvements: {ORIGINAL_SCORE}/100
After improvements:  {FINAL_SCORE}/100
Increase: +{INCREASE} points

{STATUS_EMOJI} Quality Status: {PASS/FAIL}

Note: This proactive improvement step can increase quality scores from 25/100 to 65/100+ automatically.

  1. Git Workflow Completion (if git repository):

Purpose: Handle feature branch merge and cleanup after successful implementation

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLAUDE:

  1. Check if in a git repository using Bash tool:

    git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null

    If this fails, skip git workflow entirely.

  2. Get current and main branch names using Bash:

    git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@'

  3. Only proceed if on a feature branch (not main/master). If already on main, display "Already on main branch" and stop.

  4. Display git workflow options to the user:

    🌳 Git Workflow
===============

Current branch: {CURRENT_BRANCH}
Main branch: {MAIN_BRANCH}

Feature implementation complete! What would you like to do?

  1. Merge to {MAIN_BRANCH} and delete feature branch (recommended)
  2. Stay on {CURRENT_BRANCH} for additional work
  3. Switch to {MAIN_BRANCH} without merging (keep branch)

Choose (1/2/3):

  5. Wait for user choice and proceed based on their selection.

OPTION 1: Merge and Delete Branch

a. Check for uncommitted changes using Bash: bash git diff-index --quiet HEAD -- If exit code is non-zero, there are uncommitted changes.

b. If there are uncommitted changes: - Display: git status --short to show changes - Ask user: "Commit these changes first? (yes/no)"

c. If user wants to commit, intelligently stage ONLY source files:

  **CRITICAL - Smart Git Staging (Project-Aware):**

  **YOU MUST NOW perform smart file staging using these steps:**

  1. **Detect project type** by checking for files:
     - Read package.json using Read tool
     - Check for framework indicators:
       * Vite: `vite.config.ts` or `"vite"` in package.json
       * Next.js: `next.config.js` or `"next"` in package.json
       * Remix: `remix.config.js` or `"@remix-run"` in package.json
       * Create React App: `react-scripts` in package.json
       * Node.js generic: package.json exists but no specific framework
     - Store detected type for use in exclusions

  2. **Build exclusion patterns based on project type:**

     a. **Base exclusions (all projects):**
        ```
        ':!node_modules/' ':!.pnpm-store/' ':!.yarn/'
        ':!*.log' ':!coverage/' ':!.nyc_output/'
        ```

     b. **Project-specific exclusions:**
        - Vite: `':!dist/' ':!build/'`
        - Next.js: `':!.next/' ':!out/'`
        - Remix: `':!build/' ':!public/build/'`
        - CRA: `':!build/'`

     c. **Parse .gitignore** using Read tool:
        - Read .gitignore if it exists
        - Extract patterns (lines not starting with #)
        - Convert to pathspec format: `:!{pattern}`
        - Add to exclusion list

  3. **Check for large files** using Bash:
     ```bash
     git status --porcelain | cut -c4- | while read file; do
       if [ -f "$file" ] && [ $(stat -f%z "$file" 2>/dev/null || stat -c%s "$file" 2>/dev/null) -gt 1048576 ]; then
         echo "$file ($(du -h "$file" | cut -f1))"
       fi
     done
     ```

     a. **If large files found:**
        - Display warning:
          ```
          ⚠️ Large Files Detected
          ======================

          The following files are >1MB:
          - {file1} ({size1})
          - {file2} ({size2})

          These may not belong in git. Add to .gitignore?
          1. Add to .gitignore and skip
          2. Commit anyway
          3. Cancel commit

          Choose (1/2/3):
          ```

        - If option 1: Append to .gitignore, exclude from staging
        - If option 2: Include in staging
        - If option 3: Cancel commit, return to main flow

  4. **Stage files with exclusions** using Bash:
     ```bash
     git add . {BASE_EXCLUSIONS} {PROJECT_EXCLUSIONS} {GITIGNORE_EXCLUSIONS}
     ```

     Example for Vite project:
     ```bash
     git add . ':!node_modules/' ':!dist/' ':!build/' ':!*.log' ':!coverage/'
     ```

  5. **Verify staging** using Bash:
     ```bash
     git diff --cached --name-only
     ```

     a. **Check if any excluded patterns appear:**
        - If `dist/`, `build/`, `.next/`, etc. appear in staged files
        - Display error: "❌ Build artifacts detected in staging"
        - Ask user: "Unstage and retry? (yes/no)"
        - If yes: `git reset` and retry with stricter patterns

  6. **Commit with message** using Bash:
     ```bash
     git commit -m "{USER_PROVIDED_MESSAGE}"
     ```

  **IMPORTANT**: This project-aware staging prevents build artifacts and large files from being committed.

d. Merge to main branch: - Test merge first (dry run): git merge --no-commit --no-ff {CURRENT_BRANCH} - If successful: abort test, do real merge with message - If conflicts: abort, show manual resolution steps, stay on feature branch

e. Delete feature branch if merge succeeded: bash git branch -d {CURRENT_BRANCH}

OPTION 2: Stay on Current Branch

  • Display message about when/how to merge later
  • No git commands needed

OPTION 3: Switch to Main (Keep Branch)

  • Switch to main: git checkout {MAIN_BRANCH}
  • Keep feature branch for later

IMPORTANT: When staging files for commit, NEVER use git add . - always filter out build artifacts!

Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running /tasks first to regenerate the task list.

Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink