15 KiB
description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| description | argument-hint | allowed-tools |
|---|---|---|
| Implement feature from flexible input (story file, task ID, brief, or issue) | <input> | Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Task, Glob, Grep |
Code Command: Flexible Feature Implementation
Transform any input into working code with intelligent orchestration.
Core Philosophy
Accept anything, infer everything, build intelligently.
No flags, no ceremony - just provide context and get code.
Usage Examples
# Quick feature from brief
/lazy code "add logout button to header"
# From user story file
/lazy code @US-3.4.md
/lazy code US-3.4.md
# From task ID (auto-finds story)
/lazy code TASK-003
# From GitHub issue
/lazy code #456
/lazy code 456
Input Detection Logic
Phase 0: Parse Input
Detect input type:
input = "$ARGUMENTS".strip()
if input.startswith("@") or input.endswith(".md"):
# User story file reference
input_type = "story_file"
story_file = input.lstrip("@")
elif input.startswith("TASK-") or input.startswith("task-"):
# Task ID - need to find story
input_type = "task_id"
task_id = input.upper()
elif input.startswith("#") or input.isdigit():
# GitHub issue
input_type = "github_issue"
issue_number = input.lstrip("#")
else:
# Brief description
input_type = "brief"
feature_brief = input
Phase 1: Load Context
From User Story File:
# If input is @US-3.4.md or US-3.4.md
story_path="./project-management/US-STORY/*/US-story.md"
story_path=$(find ./project-management/US-STORY -name "*${story_id}*" -type d -exec find {} -name "US-story.md" \; | head -1)
# Read full story content
story_content=$(cat "$story_path")
# Find next pending task or use all tasks
next_task=$(grep -E "^### TASK-[0-9]+" "$story_path" | head -1)
From Task ID:
# If input is TASK-003
# Find which story contains this task
story_path=$(grep -r "### ${task_id}:" ./project-management/US-STORY --include="US-story.md" -l | head -1)
# Extract story content
story_content=$(cat "$story_path")
# Extract specific task section
task_section=$(sed -n "/^### ${task_id}:/,/^### TASK-/p" "$story_path" | sed '$d')
From GitHub Issue:
# If input is #456 or 456
issue_content=$(gh issue view ${issue_number} --json title,body,labels --jq '{title, body, labels: [.labels[].name]}')
# Parse as story or task
# If issue has "user-story" label, treat as story
# Otherwise treat as single task
From Brief Description:
# If input is "add logout button to header"
# Create minimal context
feature_brief="$input"
# Generate inline task
task_section="
### TASK-1: ${feature_brief}
**Description:**
${feature_brief}
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Implementation works as described
- Code follows project conventions
- Basic error handling included
"
Smart Orchestration Logic
Auto-Detection Rules
1. Test Detection:
# Check if project uses tests
has_tests = any([
exists("pytest.ini"),
exists("tests/"),
exists("__tests__/"),
exists("*.test.js"),
exists("*_test.py"),
])
# Check if TDD mentioned in docs
tdd_required = any([
"TDD" in read("README.md"),
"test-driven" in read("CLAUDE.md"),
"LAZYDEV_ENFORCE_TDD" in env,
])
# Decision
run_tests = has_tests or tdd_required or "test" in task_section.lower()
2. Complexity Detection:
# Analyze task complexity
complexity_indicators = [
"security", "authentication", "auth", "payment",
"database", "migration", "critical", "api",
]
# Check task content
is_complex = any(keyword in task_section.lower() for keyword in complexity_indicators)
# Check estimate
if "Estimate:" in task_section:
estimate = extract_estimate(task_section)
is_complex = is_complex or estimate in ["L", "Large"]
# Default to simple
complexity = "complex" if is_complex else "simple"
3. Review Detection:
# Always review complex tasks
needs_review = is_complex
# Review if multi-file changes expected
if not needs_review:
# Check if task mentions multiple files/modules
multi_file_keywords = [
"refactor", "restructure", "multiple files",
"across", "integration", "system-wide"
]
needs_review = any(kw in task_section.lower() for kw in multi_file_keywords)
# Can skip for simple single-file changes
skip_review = not needs_review and complexity == "simple"
4. User Story Detection:
# Check if we have a full story or single task
if input_type == "story_file":
has_story = True
# Work through tasks sequentially
elif input_type == "task_id":
has_story = True
# Story was found, implement specific task
elif input_type == "github_issue":
# Check if issue is tagged as story
has_story = "user-story" in issue_labels
else: # brief
has_story = False
# Single task, quick implementation
Execution Workflow
Phase 2: Git Branch Setup
# Only create branch if working from story
if [ "$has_story" = true ]; then
# Extract story ID from path or content
story_id=$(extract_story_id)
branch_name="feat/${story_id}-$(slugify_story_title)"
# Create or checkout branch
if git show-ref --verify --quiet "refs/heads/$branch_name"; then
git checkout "$branch_name"
else
git checkout -b "$branch_name"
fi
else
# Work on current branch for quick tasks
current_branch=$(git branch --show-current)
echo "Working on current branch: $current_branch"
fi
Phase 3: Implementation
Delegate to coder agent:
Task(
prompt=f"""
You are the Coder Agent for LAZY-DEV-FRAMEWORK.
## Context Provided
{story_content if has_story else ""}
## Task to Implement
{task_section}
## Implementation Guidelines
1. **Read existing code first:**
- Check README.md for project structure and conventions
- Look for similar implementations in codebase
- Identify existing patterns and styles
2. **Write clean, maintainable code:**
- Type hints on all functions (if Python/TypeScript)
- Docstrings for public APIs
- Clear variable names
- Error handling with specific exceptions
3. **Follow project conventions:**
- Check for .editorconfig, .prettierrc, pyproject.toml
- Match existing code style
- Use project's logging/error patterns
4. **Tests (if required):**
- TDD required: {run_tests}
- Write tests if TDD enabled or "test" mentioned in task
- Follow existing test patterns in repo
- Aim for edge case coverage
5. **Security considerations:**
- Input validation
- No hardcoded secrets
- Proper error messages (no sensitive data leaks)
- Follow OWASP guidelines for web/API code
## Quality Standards
Code will be automatically checked by PostToolUse hook:
- Formatting (Black/Ruff/Prettier if configured)
- Linting (Ruff/ESLint if configured)
- Type checking (Mypy/TSC if configured)
- Tests (Pytest/Jest if TDD enabled)
Write quality code to pass these checks on first run.
## Output
Provide:
1. Implementation files (with full paths)
2. Test files (if TDD enabled)
3. Updated documentation (if API changes)
4. Brief summary of changes
DO NOT create a commit - that happens after review.
"""
)
Phase 4: Quality Checks (Automatic)
PostToolUse hook handles this automatically after Write/Edit operations:
- Format: Auto-applied (Black/Ruff/Prettier)
- Lint: Auto-checked, warns if issues
- Type: Auto-checked, warns if issues
- Tests: Auto-run if TDD required
No manual action needed - hook runs after coder agent completes.
Phase 5: Code Review (Conditional)
Review decision:
if needs_review:
# Invoke reviewer agent for complex/critical tasks
Task(
prompt=f"""
You are the Reviewer Agent for LAZY-DEV-FRAMEWORK.
## Task Being Reviewed
{task_section}
## Changes Made
{git_diff_output}
## Review Checklist
**Code Quality:**
- Readability and maintainability
- Follows project conventions
- Appropriate abstractions
- Clear naming
**Correctness:**
- Meets acceptance criteria
- Edge cases handled
- Error handling appropriate
**Security (if applicable):**
- Input validation
- No hardcoded secrets
- Proper authentication/authorization
- No SQL injection / XSS vulnerabilities
**Tests (if TDD required):**
- Tests cover main functionality
- Edge cases tested
- Tests are clear and maintainable
## Output
Return ONE of:
- **APPROVED**: Changes look good, ready to commit
- **REQUEST_CHANGES**: List specific issues to fix
Keep feedback concise and actionable.
"""
)
else:
echo "Review skipped: Simple task, single-file change"
fi
Phase 6: Commit
Only commit if approved or review skipped:
# Prepare commit message
if [ "$has_story" = true ]; then
commit_msg="feat(${task_id}): $(extract_task_title)
Implements ${task_id} from ${story_id}
$(summarize_changes)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"
else
commit_msg="feat: ${feature_brief}
Quick implementation from brief description.
$(summarize_changes)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"
fi
# Create commit
git add .
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
$commit_msg
EOF
)"
# Tag if task completion
if [ "$input_type" = "task_id" ]; then
git tag "task/${task_id}-done"
fi
Phase 7: Output Summary
Task Complete
=============
Input: {input}
Type: {input_type}
{Story: {story_id}}
{Task: {task_id}}
Branch: {branch_name}
Complexity: {complexity}
Review: {skipped|passed}
Tests: {passed|skipped} {(n/n)}
Commit: {commit_hash}
Files Changed:
- {file1}
- {file2}
Next Steps:
{- Continue with next task: /lazy code TASK-{next}}
{- Review story and create PR: /lazy review {story_id}}
{- Work on new feature: /lazy code "description"}
Intelligence Matrix
| Input | Detection | Story Lookup | Tests | Review | Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "brief" | Brief text | No | Auto | Simple=No | Current |
| @US-3.4.md | File reference | Yes (read file) | Auto | Smart | feat/US-3.4-* |
| TASK-003 | Task ID pattern | Yes (grep) | Auto | Smart | feat/US-* |
| #456 | Issue number | Yes (gh) | Auto | Smart | feat/issue-456 |
Auto = Check project for test framework and TDD requirement Smart = Complex/multi-file/security = Yes, Simple/single-file = No
Decision Trees
Test Execution Decision
Has test framework in repo? ────No───→ Skip tests
│
Yes
│
TDD in docs or LAZYDEV_ENFORCE_TDD? ──Yes──→ Run tests (required)
│
No
│
"test" mentioned in task? ────Yes───→ Run tests (requested)
│
No
│
Skip tests
Review Decision
Task complexity = complex? ───Yes───→ Review required
│
No
│
Security/auth/payment related? ──Yes──→ Review required
│
No
│
Multi-file refactor? ────Yes────→ Review required
│
No
│
Skip review (simple task)
Branch Strategy
Input has story context? ───Yes───→ Create/use feat/{story-id}-* branch
│
No
│
Work on current branch
Examples in Action
Example 1: Quick Feature
$ /lazy code "add logout button to header"
Detected: Brief description
Complexity: Simple (single feature)
Tests: Auto-detected (pytest found in repo)
Review: Skipped (simple, single-file)
Branch: Current branch
Implementing...
✓ Added logout button to src/components/Header.tsx
✓ Added test in tests/components/Header.test.tsx
✓ Quality checks passed
✓ Committed: feat: add logout button to header
Complete! (1 file changed)
Example 2: From Story File
$ /lazy code @US-3.4.md
Detected: User story file
Story: US-3.4 - OAuth2 Authentication
Next pending: TASK-002 - Implement token refresh
Complexity: Complex (auth + security)
Tests: Required (TDD in CLAUDE.md)
Review: Required (complex task)
Branch: feat/US-3.4-oauth2-authentication
Implementing...
✓ Implemented token refresh in src/auth/refresh.py
✓ Added tests in tests/auth/test_refresh.py
✓ Quality checks passed
✓ Code review: APPROVED
✓ Committed: feat(TASK-002): implement token refresh
Complete! Continue with: /lazy code TASK-003
Example 3: From Task ID
$ /lazy code TASK-007
Detected: Task ID
Finding story... Found in US-2.1-payment-processing
Task: TASK-007 - Add retry logic to payment API
Complexity: Complex (payment + API)
Tests: Required (pytest found)
Review: Required (payment-related)
Branch: feat/US-2.1-payment-processing
Implementing...
✓ Added retry logic to src/payment/api.py
✓ Added retry tests in tests/payment/test_api.py
✓ Quality checks passed
✓ Code review: APPROVED
✓ Committed: feat(TASK-007): add retry logic to payment API
✓ Tagged: task/TASK-007-done
Complete! Continue with: /lazy code TASK-008
Example 4: From GitHub Issue
$ /lazy code #456
Detected: GitHub issue
Fetching issue #456...
Issue: "Fix validation error in user signup form"
Labels: bug, frontend
Complexity: Simple (bug fix)
Tests: Required (jest found in repo)
Review: Skipped (simple bug fix)
Branch: Current branch
Implementing...
✓ Fixed validation in src/components/SignupForm.tsx
✓ Added regression test in tests/components/SignupForm.test.tsx
✓ Quality checks passed
✓ Committed: fix: validation error in user signup form (closes #456)
Complete! Issue #456 will be closed on PR merge.
Key Principles
- Zero Configuration: No flags, no setup - just provide input
- Smart Defaults: Infer tests, review, complexity from context
- Flexible Input: Accept stories, tasks, briefs, issues
- Auto Quality: PostToolUse hook handles formatting/linting/tests
- Contextual Branching: Stories get branches, briefs work on current
- Progressive Enhancement: More context = smarter orchestration
Integration Points
With plan command:
/lazy plan "feature description" # Creates US-story.md
/lazy code @US-story.md # Implements first task
/lazy code TASK-002 # Continues with next task
With review command:
/lazy code TASK-001 # Commit 1
/lazy code TASK-002 # Commit 2
/lazy code TASK-003 # Commit 3
/lazy review US-3.4 # Review all tasks, create PR
With fix command:
/lazy code TASK-001 # Implementation
/lazy review US-3.4 # Generates review-report.md
/lazy fix review-report.md # Apply fixes
Environment Variables
# Force TDD for all tasks
export LAZYDEV_ENFORCE_TDD=1
# Minimum test count
export LAZYDEV_MIN_TESTS=3
# Skip review for all tasks (not recommended)
export LAZYDEV_SKIP_REVIEW=1
Troubleshooting
Issue: Task ID not found
# Check story files exist
ls -la ./project-management/US-STORY/*/US-story.md
# Search for task manually
grep -r "TASK-003" ./project-management/US-STORY
Issue: Tests not running
# Check test framework installed
pytest --version # or: npm test
# Check TDD configuration
cat CLAUDE.md | grep -i tdd
echo $LAZYDEV_ENFORCE_TDD
Issue: Review not triggering
# Reviews trigger automatically for:
# - Complex tasks (security/auth/database)
# - Multi-file changes
# - Large estimates
# To force review, set in task:
### TASK-X: ... [REVIEW_REQUIRED]
Version: 2.2.0 Status: Production-Ready Philosophy: Accept anything, infer everything, build intelligently.