Initial commit

2025-11-30 08:38:26 +08:00
commit 41d9f6b189
304 changed files with 98322 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/skills/negative-contrastive-framing/resources/template.md
+++ b/skills/negative-contrastive-framing/resources/template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+# Negative Contrastive Framing Template
+
+## Quick Start
+
+**Purpose:** Define concepts by showing what they're NOT—use anti-goals, near-misses, and failure patterns to clarify fuzzy boundaries.
+
+**When to use:** Positive definition exists but edges are unclear, multiple interpretations cause confusion, or need to distinguish similar concepts.
+
+---
+
+## Part 1: Positive Definition
+
+**Concept/Goal:** [What you're trying to define]
+
+**Initial Positive Definition:**
+[Your current definition using positive attributes]
+
+**Why It's Ambiguous:**
+- [Interpretation 1 vs Interpretation 2]
+- [Edge cases unclear]
+- [Confusion point]
+
+**Purpose:**
+- [ ] Teaching/training
+- [ ] Decision criteria
+- [ ] Quality control
+- [ ] Requirements clarification
+- [ ] Other: [Specify]
+
+---
+
+## Part 2: Anti-Goals
+
+**What This is NOT:** (Opposite of desired outcome)
+
+**Anti-Goal 1:** [Opposite extreme]
+- **Description:** [What it looks like]
+- **Why it fails:** [Violates which criterion]
+- **Example:** [Concrete instance]
+
+**Anti-Goal 2:** [Another opposite]
+- **Description:**
+- **Why it fails:**
+- **Example:**
+
+**Anti-Goal 3:** [Third opposite]
+- **Description:**
+- **Why it fails:**
+- **Example:**
+
+[Add 2-5 anti-goals total]
+
+---
+
+## Part 3: Near-Miss Examples
+
+**Close Calls That FAIL:** (Examples that almost qualify but fail on key dimension)
+
+**Near-Miss 1:** [Example]
+- **What it gets right:** [Positive aspects]
+- **Where it fails:** [Specific dimension that disqualifies]
+- **Why it's instructive:** [What it reveals about criteria]
+- **Boundary lesson:** [Insight about where line is drawn]
+
+**Near-Miss 2:** [Example]
+- **What it gets right:**
+- **Where it fails:**
+- **Why it's instructive:**
+- **Boundary lesson:**
+
+**Near-Miss 3:** [Example]
+- **What it gets right:**
+- **Where it fails:**
+- **Why it's instructive:**
+- **Boundary lesson:**
+
+[Continue for 5-10 near-misses—these are most valuable]
+
+---
+
+## Part 4: Common Failure Patterns
+
+**Failure Pattern 1:** [Pattern name]
+- **Description:** [What the pattern looks like]
+- **Why it fails:** [Criterion violated]
+- **How to spot:** [Detection heuristic]
+- **How to avoid:** [Prevention guard]
+- **Example:** [Instance]
+
+**Failure Pattern 2:** [Pattern name]
+- **Description:**
+- **Why it fails:**
+- **How to spot:**
+- **How to avoid:**
+- **Example:**
+
+**Failure Pattern 3:** [Pattern name]
+- **Description:**
+- **Why it fails:**
+- **How to spot:**
+- **How to avoid:**
+- **Example:**
+
+[List 3-7 common failure patterns]
+
+---
+
+## Part 5: Contrast Matrix
+
+| Example | Dimension 1 | Dimension 2 | Dimension 3 | Passes? | Why/Why Not |
+|---------|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------|-------------|
+| [Positive example] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ PASS | All criteria met |
+| [Near-miss 1] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ FAIL | Fails Dimension 3 |
+| [Near-miss 2] | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ FAIL | Fails Dimension 2 |
+| [Negative example] | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ FAIL | Fails all dimensions |
+
+**Key Dimensions:**
+- **Dimension 1:** [Name] - [What it measures]
+- **Dimension 2:** [Name] - [What it measures]
+- **Dimension 3:** [Name] - [What it measures]
+
+---
+
+## Part 6: Sharpened Definition
+
+**Revised Positive Definition:**
+[Updated definition informed by negative contrasts]
+
+**Decision Criteria:**
+
+✓ **Passes if:**
+- [ ] [Criterion 1 operationalized]
+- [ ] [Criterion 2 operationalized]
+- [ ] [Criterion 3 operationalized]
+
+✗ **Fails if ANY of:**
+- [ ] [Disqualifier 1]
+- [ ] [Disqualifier 2]
+- [ ] [Disqualifier 3]
+
+⚠️ **Ambiguous middle ground:**
+- [Case 1]: Consider context [X]
+- [Case 2]: Requires judgment call on [Y]
+
+---
+
+## Part 7: Actionable Guards
+
+**Prevention Checklist:**
+- [ ] [Guard against failure pattern 1]
+- [ ] [Guard against failure pattern 2]
+- [ ] [Guard against failure pattern 3]
+- [ ] [Check for near-miss condition 1]
+- [ ] [Check for near-miss condition 2]
+
+**Detection Heuristics:**
+1. **Red flag:** [Signal that example might fail]
+   - **Check:** [What to verify]
+2. **Yellow flag:** [Warning sign]
+   - **Check:** [What to verify]
+3. **Green light:** [Positive signal]
+   - **Confirm:** [What to validate]
+
+---
+
+## Part 8: Examples Across Spectrum
+
+**Clear PASS:** [Unambiguous positive example]
+- [Why it clearly meets all criteria]
+
+**Borderline PASS:** [Barely qualifies]
+- [Why it passes despite weakness in dimension X]
+
+**Borderline FAIL:** [Almost qualifies]
+- [Why it fails despite strength in dimensions Y and Z]
+
+**Clear FAIL:** [Unambiguous negative example]
+- [Why it clearly violates criteria]
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+Create `negative-contrastive-framing.md`:
+
+```markdown
+# [Concept]: Negative Contrastive Framing
+
+**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
+
+## Positive Definition
+[Sharpened definition]
+
+## Anti-Goals
+1. [Anti-goal] - [Why it's opposite]
+2. [Anti-goal] - [Why it's opposite]
+
+## Near-Miss Examples (Most Instructive)
+1. **[Example]**: Almost passes but fails because [key dimension]
+2. **[Example]**: Gets [X] right but fails on [Y]
+3. **[Example]**: Looks like success but is actually [failure mode]
+
+## Common Failure Patterns
+1. **[Pattern]**: [Description] - Guard: [Prevention]
+2. **[Pattern]**: [Description] - Guard: [Prevention]
+
+## Decision Criteria
+
+✓ **Passes if:**
+- [Operationalized criterion 1]
+- [Operationalized criterion 2]
+
+✗ **Fails if:**
+- [Disqualifier 1]
+- [Disqualifier 2]
+
+## Contrast Matrix
+[Table showing examples across key dimensions]
+
+## Key Insights
+- [What negative examples revealed about boundaries]
+- [Subtle criteria made explicit through near-misses]
+- [Actionable guards to prevent common failures]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before finalizing:
+- [ ] Anti-goals represent true opposites (not just bad versions)
+- [ ] Near-misses are genuinely close calls (not obviously bad)
+- [ ] Each failure has clear explanation of *why* it fails
+- [ ] Failure patterns are common/realistic (not strawmen)
+- [ ] Decision criteria are operationalized (testable)
+- [ ] Guards are actionable (can be implemented)
+- [ ] Covers spectrum from clear pass to clear fail
+- [ ] Ambiguous cases acknowledged and addressed
+- [ ] Insights reveal something not obvious from positive definition alone
+
+---
+
+## Common Applications
+
+**Code Review:**
+- Anti-goal: Unreadable code
+- Near-miss: Well-commented but poorly structured code
+- Pattern: "Documentation hides design problems"
+
+**UX Design:**
+- Anti-goal: Unusable interface
+- Near-miss: Beautiful but non-intuitive design
+- Pattern: "Form over function"
+
+**Hiring:**
+- Anti-goal: Wrong culture fit
+- Near-miss: Strong skills but misaligned values
+- Pattern: "Optimizing for résumé over team dynamics"
+
+**Product Strategy:**
+- Anti-goal: Feature bloat
+- Near-miss: Useful feature that distracts from core value
+- Pattern: "Saying yes to everything"
+
+**Communication:**
+- Anti-goal: Incomprehensible writing
+- Near-miss: Technically accurate but inaccessible
+- Pattern: "Correctness without clarity"
+
+---
+
+## Tips
+
+**For Near-Misses:**
+- Look for examples that fool initial judgment
+- Find cases where single dimension tips the balance
+- Use real examples from experience
+
+**For Failure Patterns:**
+- Name patterns memorably
+- Make detection criteria specific
+- Provide concrete prevention guards
+
+**For Decision Criteria:**
+- Test against edge cases
+- Make falsifiable/testable
+- Handle ambiguous middle ground explicitly
+
+**For Teaching:**
+- Start with near-misses (most engaging)
+- Build pattern recognition through repetition
+- Have learners generate their own negative examples