Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
655
skills/regulatory-templates/SKILL.md
Normal file
655
skills/regulatory-templates/SKILL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,655 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: regulatory-templates
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
3-gate regulatory template orchestrator - manages setup, Gate 1 (analysis),
|
||||
Gate 2 (validation), Gate 3 (generation) for BACEN/RFB compliance.
|
||||
|
||||
trigger: |
|
||||
- Creating BACEN CADOCs (4010, 4016, 4111)
|
||||
- Mapping e-Financeira, DIMP, APIX templates
|
||||
- Full automation from analysis to template creation
|
||||
|
||||
skip_when: |
|
||||
- Non-Brazilian regulations → not applicable
|
||||
- Analysis-only without template → use finops-analyzer directly
|
||||
- Template already exists, just needs updates → modify directly
|
||||
|
||||
sequence:
|
||||
before: [regulatory-templates-setup]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Regulatory Templates - Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**This skill orchestrates the regulatory template creation workflow through modular sub-skills, managing a 3-gate sequential validation process with dynamic context passing between gates.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture:** Modular design with dedicated sub-skills for each phase:
|
||||
- `regulatory-templates-setup` - Initial configuration and selection
|
||||
- `regulatory-templates-gate1` - Regulatory compliance analysis and field mapping
|
||||
- `regulatory-templates-gate2` - Technical validation of mappings
|
||||
- `regulatory-templates-gate3` - Template file generation (.tpl)
|
||||
|
||||
**Template Specifications:** All template specifications are dynamically loaded within gates from centralized configurations. Templates are organized by regulatory authority with cascading selection:
|
||||
|
||||
**BACEN (Banco Central):**
|
||||
- **CADOC:** 4010 (Cadastro), 4016 (Crédito), 4111 (Câmbio)
|
||||
- **APIX:** 001 (Dados Cadastrais), 002 (Contas e Transações)
|
||||
|
||||
**RFB (Receita Federal):**
|
||||
- **e-Financeira:** evtCadDeclarante, evtAberturaeFinanceira, evtFechamentoeFinanceira, evtMovOpFin, evtMovPP, evtMovOpFinAnual
|
||||
- **DIMP:** v10 (Movimentação Patrimonial)
|
||||
|
||||
**REQUIRED AGENTS:** The sub-skills dispatch specialized agents:
|
||||
- `finops-analyzer` - For Gates 1-2 and Discussion (regulatory analysis and validation)
|
||||
- `finops-automation` - For Gate 3 (template file generation)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Foundational Principle
|
||||
|
||||
**Brazilian regulatory compliance (BACEN, RFB) has zero margin for error.**
|
||||
|
||||
This isn't hyperbole:
|
||||
- BACEN penalties for incorrect submissions: R$10,000 - R$500,000 + license sanctions
|
||||
- RFB penalties for e-Financeira errors: Criminal liability for false declarations
|
||||
- Template errors are discovered during audits, often months after submission
|
||||
- "We'll fix it later" is impossible - submissions are final
|
||||
|
||||
**This workflow exists because:**
|
||||
1. Human confidence without validation = optimism bias (proven by TDD research)
|
||||
2. "Mostly correct" regulatory submissions = rejected submissions + penalties
|
||||
3. Shortcuts under pressure = exactly when errors are most likely
|
||||
4. Each gate prevents specific failure modes discovered in production
|
||||
|
||||
**The 3-gate architecture is not bureaucracy - it's risk management.**
|
||||
|
||||
Every section that seems "rigid" or "redundant" exists because someone, somewhere, cut that corner and caused a regulatory incident.
|
||||
|
||||
**Follow this workflow exactly. Your professional reputation depends on it.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
**Use this skill when:**
|
||||
- User requests mapping and creation of Brazilian regulatory templates
|
||||
- BACEN CADOCs (4010, 4016, 4111), e-Financeira, DIMP, APIX
|
||||
- Full automation from analysis to template creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Symptoms triggering this skill:**
|
||||
- "Create CADOC 4010 template"
|
||||
- "Map e-Financeira to Midaz and set up in Reporter"
|
||||
- "Automate DIMP template creation"
|
||||
|
||||
**When NOT to use:**
|
||||
- Non-Brazilian regulations
|
||||
- Analysis-only without template creation
|
||||
- Templates already exist and just need updates
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## NO EXCEPTIONS - Read This First
|
||||
|
||||
**This workflow has ZERO exceptions.** Brazilian regulatory compliance (BACEN, RFB) has zero margin for error.
|
||||
|
||||
### Common Pressures You Must Resist
|
||||
|
||||
| Pressure | Your Thought | Reality |
|
||||
|----------|--------------|---------|
|
||||
| **Deadline** | "Skip Gate 2, we're confident" | Gate 1 analysis ≠ Gate 2 validation. Confidence without verification = optimism bias |
|
||||
| **Authority** | "Manager says skip it" | Manager authority doesn't override regulatory requirements. Workflow protects both of you |
|
||||
| **Fatigue** | "Manual creation is faster" | Fatigue makes errors MORE likely. Automation doesn't get tired |
|
||||
| **Economic** | "Optional fields have no fines" | Template is reusable. Skipping fields = technical debt + future rework |
|
||||
| **Sunk Cost** | "Reuse existing template" | 70% overlap = 30% different. Regulatory work doesn't tolerate "mostly correct" |
|
||||
| **Pragmatism** | "Setup is ceremony" | Setup initializes context. Skipping = silent assumptions |
|
||||
| **Efficiency** | "Fix critical only" | Gate 2 PASS criteria: ALL uncertainties resolved, not just critical |
|
||||
|
||||
### Emergency Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
**"Production is down, need template NOW"**
|
||||
→ Production issues don't override regulatory compliance. Fix production differently.
|
||||
|
||||
**"CEO directive to ship immediately"**
|
||||
→ CEO authority doesn't override BACEN requirements. Escalate risk in writing.
|
||||
|
||||
**"Client contract requires delivery today"**
|
||||
→ Contract penalties < regulatory penalties. Renegotiate delivery, don't skip validation.
|
||||
|
||||
**"Tool/agent is unavailable"**
|
||||
→ Wait for tools or escalate. Manual workarounds bypass validation layers.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Bottom Line
|
||||
|
||||
**Shortcuts in regulatory templates = career-ending mistakes.**
|
||||
|
||||
BACEN and RFB submissions are final. You cannot "patch next sprint." Every gate exists because regulatory compliance has zero tolerance for "mostly correct."
|
||||
|
||||
**If you're tempted to skip ANY part of this workflow, stop and ask yourself: Am I willing to stake my professional reputation on this shortcut?**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationalization Table - Know the Excuses
|
||||
|
||||
Every rationalization below has been used to justify skipping workflow steps. **ALL are invalid.**
|
||||
|
||||
| Excuse | Why It's Wrong | Correct Response |
|
||||
|--------|---------------|------------------|
|
||||
| "Gate 2 is redundant when Gate 1 is complete" | Gate 1 = analysis, Gate 2 = validation. Different purposes. Validation catches analysis errors | Run Gate 2 completely |
|
||||
| "Manual creation is pragmatic" | Manual bypasses validation layer. Gate 3 agent validates against Gate 2 report | Use automation agent |
|
||||
| "Optional fields don't affect compliance" | Overall confidence includes all fields. Skipping 36% fails PASS criteria | Map all fields |
|
||||
| "70% overlap means we can copy" | 30% difference contains critical regulatory fields. Similarity ≠ simplicity | Run full workflow |
|
||||
| "Setup is bureaucratic ceremony" | Setup initializes context for Gates 1-3. Skipping creates silent assumptions | Run setup completely |
|
||||
| "Fix critical issues only" | Gate 2 PASS: ALL uncertainties resolved. Medium/low issues cascade to mandatory failures | Resolve all uncertainties |
|
||||
| "We're experienced, simplified workflow" | Experience doesn't exempt you from validation. Regulatory work requires process | Follow full workflow |
|
||||
| "Following spirit not letter" | Regulatory compliance requires BOTH. Skipping steps violates spirit AND letter | Process IS the spirit |
|
||||
| "Being pragmatic vs dogmatic" | Process exists because pragmatism failed. Brazilian regulatory penalties are severe | Rigor is pragmatism |
|
||||
| "Tool is too rigid for real-world" | Rigidity prevents errors. Real-world includes regulatory audits and penalties | Rigidity is protection |
|
||||
|
||||
### If You Find Yourself Making These Excuses
|
||||
|
||||
**STOP. You are rationalizing.**
|
||||
|
||||
The workflow exists specifically to prevent these exact thoughts from leading to errors. If the workflow seems "too rigid," that's evidence it's working - preventing you from shortcuts that seem reasonable but create risk.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Overview
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ ORCHESTRATOR │
|
||||
│ (this skill) │
|
||||
└──────┬──────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ SETUP SUB-SKILL │────▶│ • Template Selection │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Context Initialization │
|
||||
└──────┬──────────────┘ └──────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼ context
|
||||
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ GATE 1 SUB-SKILL │────▶│ • Regulatory Analysis │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Field Mapping │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Identify Data Sources │
|
||||
└──────┬──────────────┘ └──────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼ context + gate1
|
||||
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ GATE 2 SUB-SKILL │────▶│ • Validate Mappings │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Test Transformations │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Define Validation Rules │
|
||||
└──────┬──────────────┘ │ • Resolve Uncertainties │
|
||||
│ └──────────────────────────┘
|
||||
▼ context + gate1 + gate2
|
||||
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ GATE 3 SUB-SKILL │────▶│ • Generate Template File │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Apply Transformations │
|
||||
│ │ │ • Create .tpl File │
|
||||
└──────┬──────────────┘ │ • Django/Jinja2 Format │
|
||||
│ └──────────────────────────┘
|
||||
▼
|
||||
┌─────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ TEMPLATE CREATED ✅ │
|
||||
│ Ready for BACEN │
|
||||
└─────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Orchestration Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Initialize TodoWrite Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
TodoWrite({
|
||||
todos: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
content: "Select regulatory template",
|
||||
status: "in_progress",
|
||||
activeForm: "Running setup configuration"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
content: "Gate 1: Regulatory compliance analysis and field mapping",
|
||||
status: "pending",
|
||||
activeForm: "Running Gate 1: Regulatory analysis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
content: "Gate 2: Technical validation of field mappings",
|
||||
status: "pending",
|
||||
activeForm: "Running Gate 2: Technical validation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
content: "Gate 3: Template file generation",
|
||||
status: "pending",
|
||||
activeForm: "Running Gate 3: Template generation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
content: "Verify template creation and functionality",
|
||||
status: "pending",
|
||||
activeForm: "Verifying template"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Execute Setup Sub-skill
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the Skill tool to execute the setup sub-skill:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call the Skill tool with:
|
||||
- `skill`: "regulatory-templates-setup"
|
||||
|
||||
2. Capture the returned context from the setup skill
|
||||
|
||||
3. Update TodoWrite to mark setup as completed and Gate 1 as in_progress
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Note:** Context is maintained in memory only - no files are created
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Execute Gate 1 Sub-skill
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the Skill tool to execute Gate 1:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call the Skill tool with:
|
||||
- `skill`: "regulatory-templates-gate1"
|
||||
|
||||
2. The Gate 1 skill will dispatch the finops-analyzer agent to:
|
||||
- **READ the regulatory specification** from `/docs/regulatory/templates/`
|
||||
- **ANALYZE the specification requirements**
|
||||
- **GENERATE a SPECIFICATION REPORT**
|
||||
|
||||
3. Capture the report output containing:
|
||||
- Template structure and format
|
||||
- Mandatory and optional fields
|
||||
- Transformation rules
|
||||
- Validation requirements
|
||||
- Business rules
|
||||
- Compliance checklist
|
||||
|
||||
4. Check if gate1_passed is true:
|
||||
- If PASSED: Store the specification report in context, update TodoWrite, proceed to Gate 2
|
||||
- If FAILED: Handle Gate 1 failure, address critical gaps before retry
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Execute Gate 2 Sub-skill
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the Skill tool to execute Gate 2:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call the Skill tool with:
|
||||
- `skill`: "regulatory-templates-gate2"
|
||||
- Context includes the **specification report** from Gate 1
|
||||
|
||||
2. The Gate 2 skill will dispatch the finops-analyzer agent to:
|
||||
- **VALIDATE the specification report completeness**
|
||||
- **RESOLVE any uncertainties or gaps**
|
||||
- **CONFIRM all transformation rules**
|
||||
- **FINALIZE the specification report**
|
||||
|
||||
3. Check if gate2_passed is true:
|
||||
- **CRITICAL:** Verify mandatory fields validation = 100%
|
||||
- If validation < 100%: FAIL with mandatory fields incomplete error
|
||||
- If PASSED: Store the **FINALIZED REPORT** in context, update TodoWrite, proceed to Gate 3
|
||||
- If FAILED: Handle unresolved uncertainties
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Execute Gate 3 Sub-skill
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the Skill tool to execute Gate 3:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call the Skill tool with:
|
||||
- `skill`: "regulatory-templates-gate3"
|
||||
- Context includes the **FINALIZED SPECIFICATION REPORT** from Gate 2
|
||||
|
||||
2. The Gate 3 skill will dispatch the finops-automation agent (using sonnet model) to:
|
||||
- **USE THE SPECIFICATION REPORT as input**
|
||||
- **GENERATE the .tpl template based on report**
|
||||
- **VALIDATE template against report requirements**
|
||||
- **CREATE production-ready template file**
|
||||
|
||||
3. Check if gate3_passed is true:
|
||||
- If PASSED: Template created successfully, update TodoWrite, verify output
|
||||
- If FAILED: Handle Gate 3 failure with retry logic (401 = token refresh, 500/503 = wait and retry)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Sub-skill Execution Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
**Each sub-skill is executed using the Skill tool:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **To execute a sub-skill:**
|
||||
- Use the Skill tool with parameter `skill: "skill-name"`
|
||||
- The sub-skill will handle agent dispatch internally
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Example invocations:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Skill tool with skill: "regulatory-templates-setup"
|
||||
Skill tool with skill: "regulatory-templates-gate1"
|
||||
Skill tool with skill: "regulatory-templates-gate2"
|
||||
Skill tool with skill: "regulatory-templates-gate3"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Context flows automatically** through the orchestrator's memory
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context Management - Report-Driven Flow
|
||||
|
||||
### Context Structure Evolution
|
||||
|
||||
**After Setup:**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
template_selected: "CADOC 4010",
|
||||
template_code: "4010",
|
||||
authority: "BACEN",
|
||||
deadline: "2025-12-31"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After Gate 1 - SPECIFICATION REPORT GENERATED:**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
// ... setup context +
|
||||
specification_report: {
|
||||
template_info: {
|
||||
name: "CADOC 4010",
|
||||
format: "XML",
|
||||
version: "1.0"
|
||||
},
|
||||
fields: {
|
||||
mandatory: [/* field definitions */],
|
||||
optional: [/* field definitions */]
|
||||
},
|
||||
transformations: [/* transformation rules */],
|
||||
validations: [/* validation rules */],
|
||||
structure: {/* document structure */}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After Gate 2 - FINALIZED REPORT:**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
// ... setup + gate1 context +
|
||||
finalized_report: {
|
||||
// Enhanced specification report with:
|
||||
validated: true,
|
||||
uncertainties_resolved: true,
|
||||
all_fields_mapped: true,
|
||||
transformations_confirmed: true,
|
||||
ready_for_implementation: true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After Gate 3 - TEMPLATE GENERATED:**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
// ... setup + gate1 + gate2 context +
|
||||
gate3: {
|
||||
template_file: {
|
||||
filename: "cadoc4010_20251119_preview.tpl",
|
||||
path: "/path/to/file",
|
||||
generated_from_report: true,
|
||||
validation_passed: true
|
||||
},
|
||||
ready_for_use: true,
|
||||
report_compliance: "100%"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Template Specifications Management
|
||||
|
||||
### How Gates Load Template Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
**Each gate dynamically loads template specifications from centralized configurations:**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Pattern used by all gates
|
||||
const templateCode = context.template_selected.split(' ')[1]; // e.g., "4010"
|
||||
const templateName = context.template_selected.toLowerCase().replace(' ', ''); // e.g., "cadoc4010"
|
||||
|
||||
// Load specifications from centralized config
|
||||
const templateSpecs = loadTemplateSpecifications(templateName);
|
||||
// Gate 1: Use field mappings from specifications
|
||||
// Gate 2: Apply validation rules from specifications
|
||||
// Gate 3: Use template structure from specifications
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Benefits of Centralized Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Simplicity:** Single source of truth for all templates
|
||||
2. **Maintainability:** Update specs without changing gate logic
|
||||
3. **Scalability:** Add new templates by adding specifications only
|
||||
4. **Consistency:** All templates follow same processing logic
|
||||
5. **Evolution:** Template updates require only spec changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Adding New Template Support
|
||||
|
||||
When adding support for a new regulatory template:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Add template specifications** to centralized configuration
|
||||
2. **No new skills required** - Gates handle all templates
|
||||
3. **Content:** Field mappings, validation rules, format specifications
|
||||
4. **Testing:** Run through 3-gate process with new specs
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## State Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
**Output state tracking comment after EACH sub-skill execution:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
SKILL: regulatory-templates (orchestrator)
|
||||
PHASE: {current_phase}
|
||||
TEMPLATE: {context.template_selected}
|
||||
GATES_COMPLETED: {completed_gates}/3
|
||||
CURRENT: {current_action}
|
||||
NEXT: {next_action}
|
||||
EVIDENCE: {last_result}
|
||||
BLOCKERS: {blockers or "None"}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate Failure Handling
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function handleGateFailure(gateNumber, issues) {
|
||||
// Log failure
|
||||
console.log(`Gate ${gateNumber} FAILED`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Determine if retriable
|
||||
if (isRetriable(issues)) {
|
||||
// Fix issues
|
||||
fixIssues(issues);
|
||||
|
||||
// Retry gate
|
||||
retryGate(gateNumber);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Escalate to user
|
||||
askUserForHelp(gateNumber, issues);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate 3 Special Retry Logic
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function handleGate3Failure(result) {
|
||||
if (result.error_code === 401) {
|
||||
// Token expired - refresh and retry
|
||||
refreshToken();
|
||||
retryGate3();
|
||||
} else if ([500, 503].includes(result.error_code)) {
|
||||
// Server error - wait and retry
|
||||
wait(120000); // 2 minutes
|
||||
retryGate3();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Non-retriable error
|
||||
escalateToUser(result.error);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Output
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
✅ TEMPLATE CREATED SUCCESSFULLY
|
||||
|
||||
Template: {context.template_name}
|
||||
Template ID: {gate3_result.template_id}
|
||||
Fields Configured: {gate3_result.fields_configured}/{context.total_fields}
|
||||
Validation Rules: {gate3_result.validation_rules_applied}
|
||||
Test Status: PASSED ✅
|
||||
|
||||
Gates Summary:
|
||||
- Setup: ✅ Template selected
|
||||
- Gate 1: ✅ Regulatory analysis complete
|
||||
- Gate 2: ✅ Technical validation complete
|
||||
- Gate 3: ✅ Template created and verified
|
||||
|
||||
Ready for production use!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Coordination Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Sequential Execution:** Gates must execute in order (1→2→3)
|
||||
2. **Context Accumulation:** Each gate adds to context, never overwrites
|
||||
3. **Failure Stops Progress:** Cannot proceed to next gate if current fails
|
||||
4. **State Tracking Required:** Output state after each sub-skill
|
||||
5. **TodoWrite Updates:** Mark complete immediately after each phase
|
||||
6. **NO INTERMEDIATE FILES:** Context flows in memory only - no .md files between gates
|
||||
7. **SINGLE OUTPUT FILE:** Only create final .tpl template file in Gate 3
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags - STOP Immediately
|
||||
|
||||
If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these, STOP and re-read the NO EXCEPTIONS section:
|
||||
|
||||
### Skip Patterns
|
||||
- "Skip Gate X" (any variation)
|
||||
- "Run Gates out of order"
|
||||
- "Parallel gates for speed"
|
||||
- "Simplified workflow for experienced teams"
|
||||
- "Emergency override protocol"
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual Workarounds
|
||||
- "Create template manually"
|
||||
- "Copy existing template"
|
||||
- "Manual validation is sufficient"
|
||||
- "I'll verify it myself"
|
||||
|
||||
### Partial Compliance
|
||||
- "Fix critical only"
|
||||
- "Map mandatory fields only"
|
||||
- "Skip setup, we already know"
|
||||
- "Lower pass threshold"
|
||||
|
||||
### Justification Language
|
||||
- "Being pragmatic"
|
||||
- "Following spirit not letter"
|
||||
- "Real-world flexibility"
|
||||
- "Process over outcome"
|
||||
- "Dogmatic adherence"
|
||||
- "We're confident"
|
||||
- "Manager approved"
|
||||
|
||||
### If You See These Red Flags
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Acknowledge the rationalization** ("I'm trying to skip Gate 2")
|
||||
2. **Read the NO EXCEPTIONS section** (understand why it's required)
|
||||
3. **Follow the workflow completely** (no modifications)
|
||||
4. **Document the pressure** (for future skill improvement)
|
||||
|
||||
**The workflow is non-negotiable. Regulatory compliance doesn't have "reasonable exceptions."**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits of Modular Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Maintainability:** Each sub-skill can be updated independently
|
||||
2. **Reusability:** Sub-skills can be used in other workflows
|
||||
3. **Testing:** Each gate can be tested in isolation
|
||||
4. **Debugging:** Easier to identify which gate failed
|
||||
5. **Scalability:** New gates can be added as sub-skills
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Calling Sub-skills
|
||||
|
||||
**Use the Skill tool to invoke sub-skills:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Call Skill tool with skill: "regulatory-templates-gate1"
|
||||
2. Sub-skill will handle agent dispatch internally
|
||||
3. Context is maintained in orchestrator memory
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Checking Gate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**After each gate execution:**
|
||||
- If gate_passed = true: Merge results into context, proceed to next gate
|
||||
- If gate_passed = false: Handle failure, address issues before retry
|
||||
|
||||
### Updating Progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Use TodoWrite tool after each gate:**
|
||||
- Mark current gate as "completed"
|
||||
- Mark next gate as "in_progress"
|
||||
- Keep user informed of progress
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Remember
|
||||
|
||||
1. **This is an orchestrator** - Delegates work to sub-skills
|
||||
2. **Context flows forward** - Each gate builds on previous
|
||||
3. **Sub-skills are independent** - Can be tested/updated separately
|
||||
4. **State tracking is mandatory** - After each sub-skill execution
|
||||
5. **All behavior preserved** - Same functionality, modular structure
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
| Sub-skill | Purpose | Input | Output |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| regulatory-templates-setup | Initial configuration | User selections | Base context |
|
||||
| regulatory-templates-gate1 | Regulatory analysis | Base context | Field mappings, uncertainties |
|
||||
| regulatory-templates-gate2 | Technical validation | Context + Gate 1 | Validated mappings, rules |
|
||||
| regulatory-templates-gate3 | API readiness | Context + Gates 1-2 | Authentication, endpoints |
|
||||
| regulatory-templates-gate4 | Template creation | Complete context | Template ID, verification |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Master Assertion Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before executing workflow:
|
||||
- [ ] All sub-skills exist in skills directory
|
||||
- [ ] Agents finops-analyzer and finops-automation available
|
||||
- [ ] User has selected template type
|
||||
- [ ] Environment URLs configured
|
||||
|
||||
After each gate:
|
||||
- [ ] Gate result captured
|
||||
- [ ] Context updated with gate output
|
||||
- [ ] TodoWrite updated
|
||||
- [ ] State tracking comment output
|
||||
- [ ] Next action determined
|
||||
|
||||
After workflow completion:
|
||||
- [ ] Template created successfully
|
||||
- [ ] Template ID captured
|
||||
- [ ] Verification passed
|
||||
- [ ] User notified with details
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user