Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-30 08:37:11 +08:00
commit 20b36ca9b1
56 changed files with 14530 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
---
name: systematic-debugging
description: |
Four-phase debugging framework - root cause investigation, pattern analysis,
hypothesis testing, implementation. Ensures understanding before attempting fixes.
trigger: |
- Bug reported or test failure observed
- Unexpected behavior or error message
- Root cause unknown
- Previous fix attempt didn't work
skip_when: |
- Root cause already known → just fix it
- Error deep in call stack, need to trace backward → use root-cause-tracing
- Issue obviously caused by your last change → quick verification first
related:
complementary: [root-cause-tracing]
---
# Systematic Debugging
**Core principle:** NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST.
## When to Use
Use for ANY technical issue: test failures, bugs, unexpected behavior, performance problems, build failures, integration issues.
**Especially when:**
- Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting)
- "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
- Previous fix didn't work
- You don't fully understand the issue
## The Four Phases
Complete each phase before proceeding to the next.
### Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
**MUST complete ALL before Phase 2:**
```
Phase 1 Investigation:
□ Error message copied verbatim: ___________
□ Reproduction confirmed: [steps documented]
□ Recent changes reviewed: [git diff output]
□ Evidence from ALL components: [list components checked]
□ Data flow traced: [origin → error location]
```
**Copy this checklist to TodoWrite.**
1. **Read Error Messages**
- Stack traces completely
- Line numbers, file paths, error codes
- Don't skip past warnings
2. **Reproduce Consistently**
- Exact steps to trigger
- Happens every time? If not → gather more data
3. **Check Recent Changes**
- `git diff`, recent commits
- New dependencies, config changes
4. **Multi-Component Systems**
**Add diagnostic instrumentation at EACH boundary:**
```bash
# For each layer, log:
- What enters component
- What exits component
- Environment/config state
```
Run once, analyze evidence, identify failing layer.
5. **Trace Data Flow**
Error deep in stack? **Use ring-default:root-cause-tracing skill.**
Quick version:
- Where does bad value originate?
- Trace up call stack to source
- Fix at source, not symptom
**Phase 1 Summary (write before Phase 2):**
```
FINDINGS:
- Error: [exact error]
- Reproduces: [steps]
- Recent changes: [commits]
- Component evidence: [what each shows]
- Data origin: [where bad data starts]
```
### Phase 2: Pattern Analysis
1. **Find Working Examples**
- Similar working code in codebase
- What works that's similar to what's broken?
2. **Compare Against References**
- Read reference implementation COMPLETELY
- Don't skim - understand fully
3. **Identify Differences**
- List EVERY difference (working vs broken)
- Don't assume "that can't matter"
4. **Understand Dependencies**
- What components, config, environment needed?
- What assumptions does it make?
### Phase 3: Hypothesis Testing
1. **Form Single Hypothesis**
- "I think X is root cause because Y"
- Be specific
2. **Test Minimally**
- SMALLEST possible change
- One variable at a time
3. **Verify and Track**
```
Hypothesis #1: [what] → [result]
Hypothesis #2: [what] → [result]
Hypothesis #3: [what] → [STOP if fails]
```
**If 3 hypotheses fail:**
- STOP immediately
- "3 hypotheses failed, architecture review required"
- Discuss with partner before more attempts
4. **When You Don't Know**
- Say "I don't understand X"
- Ask for help
- Research more
### Phase 4: Implementation
**Fix root cause, not symptom:**
1. **Create Failing Test**
- Simplest reproduction
- **Use ring-default:test-driven-development skill**
2. **Implement Single Fix**
- Address root cause only
- ONE change at a time
- No "while I'm here" improvements
3. **Verify Fix**
- Test passes?
- No other tests broken?
- Issue resolved?
4. **If Fix Doesn't Work**
- Count fixes attempted
- If < 3: Return to Phase 1
- **If ≥ 3: STOP → Architecture review required**
5. **After Fix Verified**
- Test passes and issue resolved?
- **If non-trivial (took > 5 min):** Suggest documentation
> "The fix has been verified. Would you like to document this solution for future reference?
> Run: `/ring-default:codify`"
- **Use ring-default:codify-solution skill** to capture institutional knowledge
6. **If 3+ Fixes Failed: Question Architecture**
Pattern indicating architectural problem:
- Each fix reveals new problem elsewhere
- Fixes require massive refactoring
- Each fix creates new symptoms
**STOP and discuss:** Is architecture sound? Should we refactor vs. fix?
## Time Limits
**Debugging time boxes:**
- 30 min without root cause → Escalate
- 3 failed fixes → Architecture review
- 1 hour total → Stop, document, ask for guidance
## Red Flags
**STOP and return to Phase 1 if thinking:**
- "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
- "Just try changing X and see if it works"
- "Add multiple changes, run tests"
- "Skip the test, I'll manually verify"
- "It's probably X, let me fix that"
- "I don't fully understand but this might work"
- "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)
- "Each fix reveals new problem" (architecture issue)
**User signals you're wrong:**
- "Is that not happening?" → You assumed without verifying
- "Stop guessing" → You're proposing fixes without understanding
- "We're stuck?" → Your approach isn't working
**When you see these: STOP. Return to Phase 1.**
## Quick Reference
| Phase | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|-------|---------------|------------------|
| **1. Root Cause** | Read errors, reproduce, check changes, gather evidence, trace data flow | Understand WHAT and WHY |
| **2. Pattern** | Find working examples, compare differences, understand dependencies | Identify what's different |
| **3. Hypothesis** | Form theory, test minimally, verify one at a time | Confirmed or new hypothesis |
| **4. Implementation** | Create test, fix root cause, verify | Bug resolved, tests pass |
**Circuit breakers:**
- 3 hypotheses fail → STOP, architecture review
- 3 fixes fail → STOP, question fundamentals
- 30 min no root cause → Escalate
## Integration with Other Skills
**Required sub-skills:**
- **root-cause-tracing** - When error is deep in call stack (Phase 1, Step 5)
- **test-driven-development** - For failing test case (Phase 4, Step 1)
**Post-completion:**
- **codify-solution** - Document non-trivial fixes (Phase 4, Step 5)
**Complementary:**
- **defense-in-depth** - Add validation after finding root cause
- **verification-before-completion** - Verify fix worked before claiming success
## Required Patterns
This skill uses these universal patterns:
- **State Tracking:** See `skills/shared-patterns/state-tracking.md`
- **Failure Recovery:** See `skills/shared-patterns/failure-recovery.md`
- **Exit Criteria:** See `skills/shared-patterns/exit-criteria.md`
- **TodoWrite:** See `skills/shared-patterns/todowrite-integration.md`
Apply ALL patterns when using this skill.