# Plan Command

**Description**: Create a detailed modernization strategy and execution plan, utilizing ASSESSMENT.md if available, with phase breakdown, timeline, and resource allocation

---

# Project Modernization Planning Protocol

**Version**: 1.0
**Purpose**: Create a comprehensive, actionable modernization plan
**Input**: Optional `ASSESSMENT.md` from `/modernize-assess`
**Output**: `PLAN.md` with detailed execution strategy
**Duration**: 3-6 hours

**Note**: Time estimates are based on typical human execution times and may vary significantly based on project complexity, team experience, and AI assistance capabilities.

---

## Overview

This protocol creates a **detailed modernization execution plan** that serves as the blueprint for the `/modernize-project` command. The plan includes:
- ✅ Detailed phase breakdown with tasks
- ✅ Timeline and milestone schedule
- ✅ Resource allocation and team assignments
- ✅ Risk mitigation strategies
- ✅ Quality gates and success criteria
- ✅ Contingency plans

**Core Principle**: **Proper planning prevents poor performance - plan before you execute.**

---

## Planning Process

### Step 1: Load Assessment (if available)

```bash
# Check for ASSESSMENT.md
if [ -f "ASSESSMENT.md" ]; then
    echo "✅ Found ASSESSMENT.md - using as input"
    # Extract: scores, risks, estimates, recommendations
else
    echo "⚠️ No ASSESSMENT.md found - will create basic assessment"
    # Run abbreviated assessment inline
fi
```

**If assessment exists**:
- Use technical viability score
- Use identified risks
- Use effort estimates
- Use team capacity analysis
- Use dependency analysis

**If no assessment**:
- Create quick assessment (30 min)
- Gather basic project info
- Identify major risks
- Rough effort estimate

---

### Step 2: Define Modernization Scope (30 minutes)

#### 2.1 Objectives

**Primary Objectives** (MUST achieve):
- [ ] Upgrade to [Target Framework/Version]
- [ ] Eliminate CRITICAL/HIGH security vulnerabilities
- [ ] Achieve 100% test pass rate
- [ ] [Other must-have objective]

**Secondary Objectives** (SHOULD achieve):
- [ ] Improve code coverage to ≥85%
- [ ] Optimize performance (≥10% improvement)
- [ ] Modernize APIs and patterns
- [ ] [Other desirable objective]

**Out of Scope** (explicitly NOT doing):
- [ ] UI/UX redesign
- [ ] Feature additions
- [ ] Complete rewrite
- [ ] [Other exclusions]

#### 2.2 Success Criteria

**Technical Success**:
- Framework upgraded to [Version]
- Security score ≥45
- Zero CRITICAL/HIGH vulnerabilities
- 100% test pass rate
- Code coverage ≥85%
- No performance regression >10%

**Business Success**:
- Delivered within [X weeks]
- Cost within $[Budget] ±10%
- Zero production incidents caused by migration
- Team trained on new framework
- Documentation complete

---

### Step 3: Phase Planning (60-90 minutes)

For each of the 7 phases, define:

#### Phase 0: Discovery & Assessment

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Migration Coordinator + Security Agent + Architect Agent

**Tasks**:
1. **Project Inventory** (4 hours)
   - Map all projects/modules
   - Identify dependencies
   - Document current architecture
   - **Deliverable**: Project inventory spreadsheet

2. **Security Baseline** (4 hours)
   - Run vulnerability scan
   - Categorize vulnerabilities
   - Calculate security score
   - **Deliverable**: Security baseline report

3. **Test Baseline** (4 hours)
   - Run all existing tests
   - Capture pass rates and coverage
   - Document test infrastructure
   - **Deliverable**: Test baseline report

4. **Technology Assessment** (4 hours)
   - Research target framework
   - Document breaking changes
   - Identify obsolete APIs
   - **Deliverable**: Technology assessment document

5. **Effort Estimation** (2 hours)
   - Estimate each phase duration
   - Identify parallel opportunities
   - Calculate total timeline
   - **Deliverable**: Detailed timeline

**Exit Criteria**:
- All assessments complete
- Security score calculated
- Timeline approved
- Budget approved

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: [Mitigation]

---

#### Phase 1: Security Remediation

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Security Agent (lead) + Coder Agent + Tester Agent

**Tasks**:

1. **Fix CRITICAL Vulnerabilities** (XX hours)
   - CVE-XXXX-XXXX: [Package] → [Action]
   - CVE-YYYY-YYYY: [Package] → [Action]
   - **Deliverable**: Zero CRITICAL CVEs

2. **Fix HIGH Vulnerabilities** (YY hours)
   - CVE-ZZZZ-ZZZZ: [Package] → [Action]
   - [List all HIGH CVEs with remediation plan]
   - **Deliverable**: Zero HIGH CVEs

3. **Update Security Dependencies** (ZZ hours)
   - [Package 1]: v[Old] → v[New]
   - [Package 2]: v[Old] → v[New]
   - **Deliverable**: All security patches applied

4. **Validation Testing** (WW hours)
   - Re-run security scan
   - Run full test suite
   - Verify no regressions
   - **Deliverable**: Security score ≥45

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ Security score ≥45
- ✅ Zero CRITICAL vulnerabilities
- ✅ Zero HIGH vulnerabilities
- ✅ 100% test pass rate maintained

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]: Dependency conflicts → [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: Breaking changes → [Mitigation]

**Contingency**:
- If unable to fix all HIGH: Document exceptions, get approval
- If tests fail: Allocate +XX hours for fixes

---

#### Phase 2: Architecture & Design

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Architect Agent (lead) + Migration Coordinator

**Tasks**:

1. **Create Migration ADRs** (8 hours)
   - ADR 0001: [Target Framework Selection]
   - ADR 0002: [Dependency Strategy]
   - ADR 0003: [Migration Approach]
   - **Deliverable**: 3-5 ADRs in MADR format

2. **Dependency Migration Matrix** (6 hours)
   - Map all dependencies to target versions
   - Identify conflicts
   - Define resolution strategy
   - **Deliverable**: Dependency migration matrix

3. **Breaking Changes Analysis** (8 hours)
   - Enumerate all breaking changes
   - Estimate code impact %
   - Create remediation guide
   - **Deliverable**: Breaking changes guide

4. **Module Migration Order** (4 hours)
   - Analyze dependencies
   - Define migration sequence
   - Identify parallel opportunities
   - **Deliverable**: Module migration plan

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ All ADRs approved
- ✅ Dependency strategy defined
- ✅ Migration order established
- ✅ Team aligned on approach

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: [Mitigation]

---

#### Phase 3: Framework & Dependency Modernization

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Coder Agent (multiple) + Tester Agent

**Parallel Execution Strategy**:
```
Module A: [Dev 1] → [X days]
Module B: [Dev 2] → [Y days]
Module C: [Dev 3] → [Z days]
```

**Tasks by Module**:

**Module A: [Name]** (XX hours)
1. Update framework target
2. Update package references
3. Fix compilation errors
4. Run tests (100% pass required)
5. Code review
6. **Deliverable**: Module A migrated

**Module B: [Name]** (YY hours)
[Similar breakdown]

**Module C: [Name]** (ZZ hours)
[Similar breakdown]

**Integration** (WW hours)
1. Merge all modules
2. Resolve conflicts
3. Full solution build
4. Complete test suite
5. **Deliverable**: All modules integrated

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ All modules migrated
- ✅ Solution builds successfully
- ✅ 100% test pass rate
- ✅ Zero P0/P1 issues

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]: Merge conflicts → Daily integration
- [Risk 2]: Test failures → Dedicated tester

---

#### Phase 4: API Modernization & Code Quality

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Coder Agent + Tester Agent + Architect Agent

**Tasks**:

1. **Replace Obsolete APIs** (XX hours)
   - [Old API 1] → [New API 1] (YY instances)
   - [Old API 2] → [New API 2] (ZZ instances)
   - **Deliverable**: Zero obsolete API warnings

2. **Apply Modern Patterns** (YY hours)
   - async/await conversion
   - Pattern matching
   - Record types
   - **Deliverable**: Modern code patterns applied

3. **Enhance Test Coverage** (ZZ hours)
   - Add missing unit tests
   - Add integration tests
   - Target ≥85% coverage
   - **Deliverable**: 85% code coverage

4. **Code Quality** (WW hours)
   - Reduce complexity
   - Fix code smells
   - Improve naming
   - **Deliverable**: Quality metrics improved

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ Zero obsolete APIs
- ✅ Code coverage ≥85%
- ✅ 100% test pass rate
- ✅ Code quality score improved

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: [Mitigation]

---

#### Phase 5: Performance Optimization

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Coder Agent + Tester Agent

**Tasks**:

1. **Baseline Benchmarks** (4 hours)
   - Define performance tests
   - Capture baseline metrics
   - Set improvement targets
   - **Deliverable**: Baseline report

2. **Identify Bottlenecks** (8 hours)
   - Run profiler
   - Analyze hot paths
   - Prioritize optimizations
   - **Deliverable**: Optimization backlog

3. **Implement Optimizations** (XX hours)
   - [Optimization 1]
   - [Optimization 2]
   - [Optimization 3]
   - **Deliverable**: Performance improvements

4. **Validate Performance** (6 hours)
   - Re-run benchmarks
   - Compare vs baseline
   - Document gains
   - **Deliverable**: Performance report

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ Performance ≥baseline (no regressions)
- ✅ Target improvements achieved OR justified
- ✅ Benchmarks documented

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]: Limited improvement → Document as optimal
- [Risk 2]: Regression found → Roll back and retry

---

#### Phase 6: Comprehensive Documentation

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Documentation Agent (lead)

**Tasks**:

1. **CHANGELOG.md** (6 hours)
   - Document breaking changes
   - New features/improvements
   - Bug fixes
   - Security updates
   - **Deliverable**: Complete CHANGELOG

2. **MIGRATION-GUIDE.md** (12 hours)
   - Step-by-step upgrade guide
   - Breaking changes details
   - Before/after examples
   - Troubleshooting
   - **Deliverable**: Comprehensive migration guide (800+ lines)

3. **Update Documentation** (8 hours)
   - Update README
   - Update architecture docs
   - Update API docs
   - **Deliverable**: All docs current

4. **ADR Summaries** (4 hours)
   - Compile all ADRs
   - Create decision log
   - Link to relevant docs
   - **Deliverable**: ADR index

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ CHANGELOG complete
- ✅ Migration guide ≥800 lines
- ✅ All docs updated
- ✅ Documentation reviewed

---

#### Phase 7: Final Validation & Release

**Duration**: [X-Y days]
**Team**: [Names/Roles]
**Agent**: Tester Agent (lead) + Security Agent + Coordinator

**Tasks**:

1. **Complete Test Execution** (12 hours)
   - Unit tests (100% pass)
   - Integration tests (100% pass)
   - Component tests (100% pass)
   - E2E tests (100% pass)
   - Performance tests (validation)
   - **Deliverable**: All tests passing

2. **Final Security Scan** (4 hours)
   - Run vulnerability scan
   - Verify security score ≥45
   - Document any LOW/MEDIUM issues
   - **Deliverable**: Security approval

3. **Release Preparation** (8 hours)
   - Create release notes
   - Tag release version
   - Package artifacts
   - Deployment checklist
   - **Deliverable**: Release package

4. **GO/NO-GO Decision** (2 hours)
   - Review all quality gates
   - Production readiness assessment
   - Final approval
   - **Deliverable**: GO or NO-GO

**Exit Criteria**:
- ✅ 100% test pass rate (all types)
- ✅ Security score ≥45
- ✅ Zero CRITICAL/HIGH vulnerabilities
- ✅ All documentation complete
- ✅ Release approved

---

### Step 4: Timeline & Milestones (30 minutes)

#### Gantt Chart

```
Week 1-2:   Phase 0 (Discovery) ████████
Week 3-4:   Phase 1 (Security)  ████████████
Week 5-6:   Phase 2 (Arch)      ████████
Week 7-10:  Phase 3 (Framework) ████████████████████
            Module A            ████████
            Module B                ████████
            Module C                    ████████
Week 11-13: Phase 4 (API Mod)   ████████████
Week 14-15: Phase 5 (Perf)      ████████
Week 16-17: Phase 6 (Docs)      ████████
Week 18:    Phase 7 (Validate)  ████
```

#### Milestones

| Milestone | Date | Deliverables | Success Criteria |
|-----------|------|--------------|------------------|
| M1: Assessment Complete | Week 2 | Security baseline, test baseline, plan | All baselines captured |
| M2: Security Remediated | Week 4 | Security score ≥45, CVEs fixed | Zero CRITICAL/HIGH |
| M3: Architecture Approved | Week 6 | ADRs, migration strategy | Team aligned |
| M4: Framework Migrated | Week 10 | All modules on new framework | Builds, 100% tests |
| M5: Code Modernized | Week 13 | Modern APIs, ≥85% coverage | Quality improved |
| M6: Performance Validated | Week 15 | Benchmarks, optimizations | No regressions |
| M7: Documentation Complete | Week 17 | CHANGELOG, migration guide | All docs done |
| M8: Production Ready | Week 18 | Final validation, approval | GO decision |

---

### Step 5: Resource Allocation (30 minutes)

#### Team Assignments

**Phase 0: Discovery**
- Lead: [Name] (Architect/Coordinator)
- Support: [Name] (Security)
- Hours: XX total

**Phase 1: Security**
- Lead: [Name] (Security specialist)
- Devs: [Name1, Name2]
- Tester: [Name]
- Hours: YY total

**Phase 2: Architecture**
- Lead: [Name] (Architect)
- Support: [Coordinator]
- Hours: ZZ total

**Phase 3: Framework (PARALLEL)**
- Module A: [Dev1] (WW hours)
- Module B: [Dev2] (VV hours)
- Module C: [Dev3] (UU hours)
- Tester: [Name] (TT hours)
- Hours: XX total

**Phase 4-7**: [Similar breakdown]

#### Capacity Planning

| Week | Available Hours | Allocated Hours | Buffer | Utilization |
|------|----------------|-----------------|--------|-------------|
| 1-2  | 160 | 120 | 40 | 75% |
| 3-4  | 160 | 140 | 20 | 88% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

**Total Project**:
- Available: XX hours
- Allocated: YY hours
- Buffer (30%): ZZ hours
- **Utilization**: WW%

---

### Step 6: Risk Management (45 minutes)

#### Risk Register

| ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner |
|----|------|-------------|--------|----------|------------|-------|
| R01 | Dependency conflicts unresolvable | Medium | High | HIGH | Upfront analysis, alternatives ready | [Name] |
| R02 | Timeline overrun >30% | Medium | High | HIGH | Phased approach, weekly reviews | [Coordinator] |
| R03 | Critical bug in production | Low | Critical | HIGH | Comprehensive testing, rollback plan | [Tester] |
| R04 | Team member leaves | Low | Medium | MEDIUM | Knowledge sharing, documentation | [Manager] |
| R05 | Breaking changes missed | Medium | High | HIGH | Thorough analysis, peer review | [Architect] |

#### Mitigation Strategies

**For High-Priority Risks**:

**R01: Dependency Conflicts**
- **Prevention**: Analyze all dependencies upfront (Phase 0)
- **Detection**: Test builds daily
- **Response**: Have alternative packages researched
- **Contingency**: +2 weeks for rewrites if needed

**R02: Timeline Overrun**
- **Prevention**: 30% buffer, conservative estimates
- **Detection**: Weekly status reviews, burn-down charts
- **Response**: Descope secondary objectives
- **Contingency**: Defer Phase 4-5 to post-launch

**R03: Production Bug**
- **Prevention**: 100% test pass rate, comprehensive E2E
- **Detection**: Staged rollout, monitoring
- **Response**: Immediate rollback procedure
- **Contingency**: Rollback plan tested, backup ready

---

### Step 7: Quality Gates & Decision Points (20 minutes)

#### Gate Criteria

**Gate 1: Post-Assessment** (End of Phase 0)
- **GO if**: Assessment score ≥60/100, budget approved
- **NO-GO if**: Score <60, CRITICAL risks, no budget
- **Decision Maker**: Executive sponsor

**Gate 2: Post-Security** (End of Phase 1)
- **GO if**: Security score ≥45, zero CRITICAL/HIGH
- **NO-GO if**: Unable to remediate critical CVEs
- **Decision Maker**: Security lead + Coordinator

**Gate 3: Post-Architecture** (End of Phase 2)
- **GO if**: All ADRs approved, team aligned
- **NO-GO if**: No viable migration path
- **Decision Maker**: Tech lead + Architect

**Gate 4: Post-Framework** (End of Phase 3)
- **GO if**: 100% tests pass, builds clean
- **NO-GO if**: <100% pass rate, build issues
- **Decision Maker**: Coordinator + Tester

**Gate 5: Post-API Modernization** (End of Phase 4)
- **GO if**: Coverage ≥85%, quality improved
- **NO-GO if**: Major quality regression
- **Decision Maker**: Tech lead

**Gate 6: Post-Performance** (End of Phase 5)
- **GO if**: No regression >10%, targets met
- **NO-GO if**: Critical regression
- **Decision Maker**: Tech lead + Architect

**Gate 7: Post-Documentation** (End of Phase 6)
- **GO if**: All docs complete and reviewed
- **NO-GO if**: Major gaps in documentation
- **Decision Maker**: Documentation lead

**Gate 8: Final GO/NO-GO** (End of Phase 7)
- **GO if**: All gates passed, production ready
- **NO-GO if**: Any blocker remaining
- **Decision Maker**: Executive sponsor

---

### Step 8: Contingency Planning (30 minutes)

#### What-If Scenarios

**Scenario 1: Critical Dependency Has No Compatible Version**
- **Impact**: Cannot complete Phase 3
- **Response**:
  1. Research alternative packages
  2. Evaluate rewrite of dependent code
  3. Consider staying on current framework with security patches
- **Timeline Impact**: +2-4 weeks
- **Effort Impact**: Additional development and testing required

**Scenario 2: Test Pass Rate Drops Below 80%**
- **Impact**: Quality gate failure
- **Response**:
  1. Halt further changes
  2. Analyze all failures
  3. Dedicate team to fixes
  4. Re-run complete suite
- **Timeline Impact**: +1-2 weeks
- **Effort Impact**: Dedicated testing and bug fixing resources

**Scenario 3: Performance Regression >20%**
- **Impact**: Unacceptable for production
- **Response**:
  1. Roll back changes
  2. Profile and identify bottleneck
  3. Architect review optimization strategy
  4. Implement targeted fixes
- **Timeline Impact**: +2-3 weeks
- **Effort Impact**: Performance analysis and optimization work

**Scenario 4: Key Team Member Leaves**
- **Impact**: Knowledge loss, capacity reduction
- **Response**:
  1. Knowledge transfer session (if notice given)
  2. Redistribute work
  3. Consider contractor/consultant
  4. Extend timeline if needed
- **Timeline Impact**: +1-3 weeks
- **Effort Impact**: Onboarding and knowledge transfer overhead

---

## PLAN.md Output Template

```markdown
# Project Modernization Plan

**Project**: [Name]
**Current Version**: [Version]
**Target Version**: [Version]
**Plan Created**: [Date]
**Plan Owner**: [Name]
**Executive Sponsor**: [Name]

---

## Executive Summary

### Objectives
[Primary and secondary objectives]

### Timeline
- **Start Date**: [Date]
- **End Date**: [Date]
- **Duration**: XX weeks (YY calendar months)
- **Contingency Buffer**: 30% additional time

### Team
- **Team Size**: X developers
- **Key Roles**: [List]
- **External Resources**: [If any]

### Success Criteria
[Top 5 success criteria]

---

## Assessment Summary

[If ASSESSMENT.md exists, summarize key findings]

**Overall Assessment Score**: XX/100
**Recommendation**: [PROCEED/CAUTION/DEFER/DO NOT]

**Key Risks**:
1. [Risk 1]
2. [Risk 2]

**Mitigation Strategies**:
[Summary of how risks will be addressed]

---

## Scope

### In Scope
✅ [Item 1]
✅ [Item 2]
✅ [Item 3]

### Out of Scope
❌ [Item 1]
❌ [Item 2]

### Success Criteria
**Technical**:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]

**Business**:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]

---

## Phase Breakdown

[Include all 7 phases with tasks, durations, teams, deliverables, exit criteria]

### Phase 0: Discovery & Assessment
[Detailed breakdown as created above]

### Phase 1: Security Remediation
[Detailed breakdown]

[... Phases 2-7 ...]

---

## Timeline & Milestones

[Gantt chart and milestone table]

---

## Resource Allocation

[Team assignments and capacity planning]

---

## Risk Management

[Risk register and mitigation strategies]

---

## Quality Gates

[All 8 quality gates with criteria]

---

## Contingency Plans

[What-if scenarios and responses]

---

## Communication Plan

### Status Reporting
- **Daily**: Stand-up (15 min)
- **Weekly**: Status report to stakeholders
- **Bi-weekly**: Executive update
- **Monthly**: Board update (if applicable)

### Escalation Path
1. Team Lead
2. Tech Lead / Coordinator
3. Engineering Manager
4. CTO
5. Executive Sponsor

---

## Appendices

### A. Dependency Migration Matrix
[Detailed dependency upgrade plan]

### B. Breaking Changes Guide
[All breaking changes with remediation]

### C. Test Strategy
[Testing approach for each phase]

### D. Deployment Strategy
[How changes will be deployed]

---

**Plan Version**: 1.0
**Last Updated**: [Date]
**Next Review**: [Every 2 weeks during execution]
```

---

## Usage Examples

### Example 1: With Assessment

```
User: /modernize-plan
Claude: Checking for ASSESSMENT.md...
✅ Found ASSESSMENT.md (score: 78/100, PROCEED WITH CAUTION)

Using assessment findings:
- Technical Viability: 82/100
- Business Value: 74/100
- Risk Profile: MEDIUM (3 HIGH risks)
- Estimated Effort: 22-28 days

Creating detailed plan...

[Generates comprehensive plan based on assessment]

Phase 0: Discovery (2 days)
- Already have baseline from assessment
- Focus on detailed breaking changes
- Estimated: 2 days vs 1-2 days typical

Phase 1: Security (3-5 days)
- Assessment identified 3 CRITICAL, 12 HIGH CVEs
- [Detailed remediation plan]

[Continues through all phases]

✅ PLAN.md created (47 pages)

Summary:
- Duration: 24 weeks
- Team: 3 developers
- Milestones: 8 quality gates
- Timeline includes 30% contingency buffer
```

### Example 2: Without Assessment

```
User: /modernize-plan
Claude: No ASSESSMENT.md found.
Running quick assessment first...

[30-minute abbreviated assessment]

Quick Assessment Results:
- Project Size: Medium (~35k LOC)
- Current: .NET 6
- Target: .NET 9
- Rough Estimate: 25-35 days

⚠️ Recommendation: Run full /modernize-assess for better accuracy

Creating plan with conservative estimates...

[Generates plan with wider ranges]

✅ PLAN.md created

Note: This plan has wider time/cost ranges due to limited assessment.
Consider running /modernize-assess for refined planning.
```

---

## Best Practices

1. **Use Assessment** - Always run `/modernize-assess` first
2. **Be Realistic** - Conservative estimates prevent disappointment
3. **Include Buffer** - 30% contingency is standard
4. **Define Gates** - Clear decision points prevent drift
5. **Plan Contingencies** - Murphy's law applies
6. **Get Buy-in** - Review plan with all stakeholders before execution

---

## Integration with /modernize-project

The plan created by this command is **automatically used** by `/modernize-project`:

```
User: /modernize-project
Claude: Checking for existing plan...
✅ Found PLAN.md

Using existing plan:
- 7 phases defined
- 24 weeks timeline
- 3 developers allocated
- 8 quality gates

Proceeding with execution...
[Follows plan exactly]
```

---

**Document Owner**: Migration Coordinator
**Protocol Version**: 1.0
**Last Updated**: 2025-10-25
**Required Before**: Running `/modernize-project`

**Remember**: **Plans are worthless, but planning is essential. Create the plan, then adapt as needed.** ✅