zhongwei/gh-krishagel-geoffrey
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
master
gh-krishagel-geoffrey/skills/presentation-master/principles/story-frameworks.md
Zhongwei Li 90883a4d25 Initial commit
2025-11-30 08:35:59 +08:00

28 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Story Frameworks - Comprehensive Guide

Great presentations aren't collections of slides—they're stories. This document details proven narrative structures from the world's best presenters and storytellers, providing specific frameworks you can apply to any presentation.

Why Story Structure Matters

The Science

Cognitive Processing:

  • Stories activate more parts of the brain than facts alone
  • Narrative structure helps memory consolidation
  • Emotional engagement increases retention by 65-70%
  • Pattern recognition makes information easier to recall

Psychological Impact:

  • Stories create empathy and connection
  • Narrative arc sustains attention through tension/resolution
  • Relatable characters (even abstract ones) engage audience
  • Transformation provides satisfying conclusion

Communication Efficiency:

  • Structure eliminates "what comes next?" confusion
  • Clear framework helps presenter stay on track
  • Audience can follow complex information more easily
  • Memorable structure aids post-presentation recall

The Problem with "Information Dumps"

Why Random Facts Fail:

  • No connective tissue between points
  • Audience can't predict where you're going
  • Equal weight given to all information
  • No emotional journey
  • Forgettable within hours

What Structure Provides:

  • Predictable (but interesting) flow
  • Rising and falling action
  • Emphasis through positioning
  • Emotional engagement
  • Memorable narrative

Framework 1: Nancy Duarte's Sparkline

Overview

Nancy Duarte analyzed hundreds of successful presentations and discovered a pattern: the best presenters alternate between "what is" (current reality) and "what could be" (aspirational future), creating a sparkline that builds tension until resolving in a transformed new reality.

The Structure

What Is (Reality) ────┐
                      ↓
                   What Could Be (Aspiration)
                      ↑
What Is (Obstacle) ───┘
                      ↓
                   What Could Be (Vision)
                      ↑
What Is (Challenge) ──┘
                      ↓
                   What Could Be (Transformation)
                      ↑
                   ───┘
                New Bliss (Transformed Reality)

The Pattern:

  1. Start with current reality (what is)
  2. Contrast with what could be
  3. Return to reality to show obstacle
  4. Present vision of overcoming it
  5. Show another challenge
  6. Present bigger vision
  7. Build to crescendo
  8. End with new transformed reality

Detailed Breakdown

Act 1: What Is (Current Reality)

  • Purpose: Establish baseline, create identification
  • Duration: 10-15% of presentation
  • Content: Current state, familiar situation, status quo
  • Tone: Matter-of-fact, relatable
  • Example: "Today, students spend 6 hours in traditional classrooms..."

Act 2: What Could Be (First Aspiration)

  • Purpose: Create contrast, spark imagination
  • Duration: 5-10% of presentation
  • Content: Brief glimpse of possibility
  • Tone: Hopeful, intriguing
  • Example: "Imagine if they could learn at their own pace, exploring what they're curious about..."

Act 3: What Is (First Obstacle)

  • Purpose: Acknowledge challenges, build credibility
  • Duration: 10-15% of presentation
  • Content: Real barriers, legitimate concerns
  • Tone: Honest, not dismissive
  • Example: "But our current infrastructure doesn't support personalized learning at scale..."

Act 4: What Could Be (Expanded Vision)

  • Purpose: Show how obstacle can be overcome
  • Duration: 10-15% of presentation
  • Content: Specific solutions, evidence
  • Tone: Confident, inspiring
  • Example: "With adaptive learning platforms, each student could have a customized curriculum..."

Act 5: What Is (Deeper Challenge)

  • Purpose: Raise stakes, show full scope
  • Duration: 10-15% of presentation
  • Content: Systemic issues, harder problems
  • Tone: Serious, urgent
  • Example: "The real challenge isn't technology—it's transforming teacher mindset and assessment methods..."

Act 6: What Could Be (Ultimate Vision)

  • Purpose: Present comprehensive transformation
  • Duration: 15-20% of presentation
  • Content: Full picture of change, compelling future
  • Tone: Bold, inspiring
  • Example: "When we reimagine education entirely, students don't just learn—they discover who they are..."

Act 7: New Bliss (Transformed Reality)

  • Purpose: Land the vision, call to action
  • Duration: 10-15% of presentation
  • Content: What life looks like after transformation
  • Tone: Aspirational, actionable
  • Example: "This is the future of learning—and it starts with what we decide today."

Application Guidelines

Best Used For:

  • Keynote speeches
  • Vision presentations
  • Change management
  • Inspirational talks
  • Fundraising pitches
  • Long-form presentations (20+ minutes)

Not Recommended For:

  • Quick updates (under 10 minutes)
  • Pure data presentations
  • Training/how-to sessions
  • Time-constrained board meetings

Slide Count Implications:

  • Minimum: 12-15 slides
  • Optimal: 18-25 slides
  • Pattern: 2-3 slides per "what is," 2-3 slides per "what could be"

Example: Education Technology Pitch

Slide 1-2 (What Is): Current education system—standardized, one-size-fits-all Slide 3-4 (What Could Be): Personalized learning paths Slide 5-6 (What Is): Current technology inadequate, teacher resistance Slide 7-9 (What Could Be): Our platform + professional development Slide 10-11 (What Is): Broader systemic challenges Slide 12-15 (What Could Be): Complete transformation vision Slide 16-17 (New Bliss): Students thriving, teachers empowered, results proven Slide 18 (Call to Action): Join us in transforming education

Tips for Success

Create Real Contrast:

  • Don't make "what is" too bleak or "what could be" too unrealistic
  • Contrast should be significant but believable
  • Use specific examples, not generalities

Build Tension:

  • Each "what is" should raise slightly different challenges
  • Don't repeat same obstacle
  • Escalate the stakes progressively

Earn the Vision:

  • Don't jump to big vision too early
  • Build credibility through smaller contrasts first
  • Show you understand obstacles before presenting solutions

Visual Representation:

  • Use darker colors/images for "what is" slides
  • Use lighter/brighter for "what could be" slides
  • Visual distinction reinforces narrative contrast

Framework 2: Steve Jobs' Rule of Three

Overview

Steve Jobs structured every presentation around the number three. Three main sections. Three key features. Three supporting points. This wasn't arbitrary—it's rooted in cognitive science and storytelling tradition.

Why Three Works

Cognitive Load:

  • Two items: Too simple, lacks pattern
  • Three items: Perfect pattern recognition
  • Four+ items: Difficult to remember
  • Three balances complexity with memorability

Storytelling Tradition:

  • Three-act structure (setup, confrontation, resolution)
  • Three wishes in fairy tales
  • Three little pigs, three bears, three musketeers
  • Cultural familiarity makes it instantly recognizable

Rhetorical Power:

  • "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"
  • "Government of the people, by the people, for the people"
  • "Blood, sweat, and tears"
  • Tricolon creates rhythm and emphasis

The Structure

Level 1: Three Main Sections

ACT 1: Setup (25% of presentation)
  └─ Establish context, introduce topic

ACT 2: Confrontation (50% of presentation)
  └─ Explore depth, show features/evidence

ACT 3: Resolution (25% of presentation)
  └─ Conclusion, call to action

Level 2: Three Points Per Section

ACT 1: Setup
  ├─ Point 1: Current situation
  ├─ Point 2: Problem/opportunity
  └─ Point 3: Why now matters

ACT 2: Confrontation
  ├─ Point 1: First key feature/benefit
  ├─ Point 2: Second key feature/benefit
  └─ Point 3: Third key feature/benefit

ACT 3: Resolution
  ├─ Point 1: What this means
  ├─ Point 2: What you should do
  └─ Point 3: What the future looks like

Level 3: Three Supporting Elements Per Point

Feature 1
  ├─ What it is
  ├─ Why it matters
  └─ Proof/example

Detailed Breakdown

Act 1: Setup (Minutes 1-5 of 20-minute presentation)

Purpose: Hook attention, establish relevance

Point 1: The Hook (1-2 minutes)

  • Surprising statistic, provocative question, or bold statement
  • Creates immediate engagement
  • Example: "73% of students can't apply what they learn in school"

Point 2: The Context (1-2 minutes)

  • Why this topic matters now
  • Broader landscape or trend
  • Example: "As AI transforms the workplace, education must evolve"

Point 3: The Promise (1-2 minutes)

  • What audience will get from this presentation
  • Sets expectations
  • Example: "Today I'll show you three ways we're solving this"

Act 2: Confrontation (Minutes 6-15 of 20-minute presentation)

Purpose: Deliver core value, show evidence

Feature/Point 1 (3-4 minutes)

  • Introduction: What is this feature/point?
  • Explanation: How does it work?
  • Demo/Example: Show it in action
  • Benefit: Why does it matter?

Feature/Point 2 (3-4 minutes)

  • Same structure as Feature 1
  • Should build on or complement first point
  • Adds new dimension, doesn't repeat

Feature/Point 3 (3-4 minutes)

  • Same structure
  • Often the most powerful or surprising
  • "One more thing..." moment if applicable
  • Culmination of the three

Act 3: Resolution (Minutes 16-20 of 20-minute presentation)

Purpose: Land the message, inspire action

Summary (1-2 minutes)

  • Quickly recap the three main points
  • Reinforce core message
  • Example: "We've seen how personalization, engagement, and measurement transform learning"

Implication (1-2 minutes)

  • What this means for audience
  • Broader significance
  • Example: "This isn't just better education—it's preparing students for an unknowable future"

Call to Action (1-2 minutes)

  • Specific next steps
  • Clear ask
  • Inspiring close
  • Example: "Join us in reimagining education. Let's talk after about pilot opportunities."

Application Guidelines

Best Used For:

  • Product launches
  • Feature demonstrations
  • Persuasive presentations
  • Short-to-medium presentations (15-30 minutes)
  • When you have natural groupings of concepts

Not Recommended For:

  • Complex technical deep-dives requiring more categories
  • Highly detailed training
  • Presentations where content doesn't naturally group into threes

Slide Count Implications:

  • Minimum: 10 slides (following Kawasaki's 10/20/30 rule)
  • Typical: 12-18 slides
  • Pattern:
    • Act 1: 3-4 slides
    • Act 2: 6-9 slides (2-3 per feature)
    • Act 3: 3-4 slides

Example: Product Launch

ACT 1: Setup (Slides 1-3)

  • Slide 1 (Title): Product name and tagline
  • Slide 2 (Problem): Current pain point—"Students forget 70% within 24 hours"
  • Slide 3 (Promise): "Three breakthroughs that change everything"

ACT 2: Three Features (Slides 4-12)

  • Slides 4-6 (Feature 1): Adaptive spaced repetition
    • Slide 4: What it is
    • Slide 5: How it works (demo)
    • Slide 6: Results—"85% retention improvement"
  • Slides 7-9 (Feature 2): Real-time engagement tracking
    • Slide 7: What it is
    • Slide 8: Dashboard demo
    • Slide 9: Teacher testimonial
  • Slides 10-12 (Feature 3): AI-generated practice problems
    • Slide 10: What it is
    • Slide 11: Examples
    • Slide 12: Student success story

ACT 3: Resolution (Slides 13-15)

  • Slide 13: Quick recap—"Remember: Adapt, Track, Practice"
  • Slide 14: Vision—"This is the future of learning"
  • Slide 15: Call to action—"Available now—let's get your students started"

Jobs' Additional Techniques

The "One More Thing":

  • After seemingly concluding
  • Introduce surprise fourth element
  • Works because you've established the three pattern
  • Violates expectation in delightful way
  • Use sparingly—once per presentation maximum

The Superlative:

  • "This is the best [X] we've ever made"
  • "The most important [Y]"
  • Bold claims create memorable moments
  • Must be backed by evidence

The Human Moment:

  • Demo goes wrong → handle gracefully
  • Personal story interlude
  • Audience interaction
  • Breaks script pattern, feels authentic

Framework 3: TED Talk Structure

Overview

TED enforces strict format: 18 minutes maximum, focus on "ideas worth spreading." Thousands of talks have revealed common patterns among the most successful presentations.

The Structure

Part 1: HOOK (30-90 seconds)
  └─ Grab attention immediately

Part 2: PERSONAL CONNECTION (1-3 minutes)
  └─ Why this matters to speaker

Part 3: CORE IDEA (10-12 minutes)
  ├─ The insight/discovery
  ├─ Evidence and examples
  └─ Implications

Part 4: CALL TO ACTION (2-3 minutes)
  └─ What audience should do

Part 5: MEMORABLE CLOSE (30-60 seconds)
  └─ Full circle back to hook OR powerful statement

Detailed Breakdown

Part 1: The Hook (30-90 seconds)

Purpose: Capture attention in first 30 seconds or lose audience

Hook Types:

  1. Provocative Question

    • "What if I told you everything you know about [X] is wrong?"
    • Must be genuinely interesting, not rhetorical fluff
    • Should connect to core idea

  2. Surprising Statistic

    • "73% of teachers report..."
    • Must be truly surprising, not common knowledge
    • Contextual setup in 1-2 sentences max

  3. Personal Anecdote

    • Brief story (60 seconds max at this stage)
    • Must relate directly to topic
    • Should be unexpected or emotionally engaging

  4. Bold Declaration

    • "Everything is about to change"
    • "We've been solving the wrong problem"
    • Must be backed up—don't make claims you can't support

  5. Visual Surprise

    • Striking image with no context
    • "This is [unexpected thing]"
    • Explain connection to topic

Critical Elements:

  • Start immediately—no "thanks for having me" preamble
  • No agenda slide—jump right in
  • Create curiosity gap that demands resolution
  • Under 90 seconds total

Part 2: Personal Connection (1-3 minutes)

Purpose: Establish credibility and authentic investment

What to Share:

  • How you discovered this topic
  • Why it matters personally to you
  • Moment of realization or transformation
  • Authentic vulnerability (not staged)

What NOT to Share:

  • Full resume/credentials (boring)
  • Lengthy backstory (self-indulgent)
  • Unrelated personal details
  • False humility

Structure:

"I first encountered this problem when..."
  ↓
"It challenged everything I believed about..."
  ↓
"That's when I realized..."

Example: "Five years ago, my daughter came home from school and said, 'I'm stupid at math.' She's brilliant—but the system had convinced her otherwise. That moment launched my obsession with understanding why our brightest students lose confidence. What I discovered shocked me."

Part 3: Core Idea (10-12 minutes)

Purpose: Deliver the insight, backed by evidence

Sub-Structure:

A. State the Idea Clearly (1 minute)

  • One sentence summary
  • No jargon, plain language
  • Memorable phrasing
  • Example: "We've been teaching subjects when we should be teaching thinking"

B. Explain Why Current Understanding is Wrong/Incomplete (2-3 minutes)

  • What's the prevailing view?
  • Why does it persist?
  • What are we missing?
  • Use specific examples

C. Present Your Insight (3-4 minutes)

  • How did you discover this?
  • What's the evidence?
  • Show, don't just tell
  • Use visuals, demos, examples

D. Address Skepticism (2-3 minutes)

  • Anticipate objections
  • Provide counter-evidence
  • Show edge cases or limitations
  • Builds credibility through honesty

E. Expand Implications (2-3 minutes)

  • If this is true, what else becomes possible?
  • Connect to broader themes
  • Show systemic impact
  • Paint the bigger picture

Pacing:

  • Vary between explanation and example
  • Use visuals liberally (minimal text)
  • Build complexity gradually
  • Create "aha" moments through revelation

Part 4: Call to Action (2-3 minutes)

Purpose: Make the idea actionable

Not Generic:

  • ❌ "Think about this differently"
  • ❌ "Spread the word"
  • ❌ "Let's make a change"

Specific and Achievable:

  • ✅ "Tomorrow, ask your child what they're curious about, not what they learned"
  • ✅ "Visit this website and take the 5-minute assessment"
  • ✅ "Share one thing you're uncertain about at your next team meeting"

Scaling Calls to Action:

  1. Individual: What can one person do?
  2. Collective: What can we do together?
  3. Systemic: What policy/institutional change is needed?

Format:

"Here's what I'm asking you to do..."
  ↓
[Specific action]
  ↓
"If enough of us do this..."
  ↓
[Collective impact]

Part 5: Memorable Close (30-60 seconds)

Purpose: Leave lasting impression

Closing Techniques:

  1. Full Circle

    • Return to opening hook
    • Show how it's now understood differently
    • "Remember that question I asked? Now you know the answer."

  2. Vision of Future

    • Paint specific picture of transformed world
    • Make it tangible and emotional
    • "Imagine a world where..."

  3. Powerful Quote

    • From relevant source
    • Must genuinely add insight, not decorative
    • Brief setup, then quote

  4. Personal Commitment

    • What you're dedicating yourself to
    • Inspires through example
    • "I'm going to spend the next decade..."

  5. Direct Challenge

    • Bold ask or provocative question
    • Leaves them thinking
    • "So I ask you: what are you willing to question?"

Critical Elements:

  • NEVER end with Q&A
  • NEVER end with "Thank you"
  • NEVER trail off or rush
  • End with power and intention

Application Guidelines

Best Used For:

  • Conference keynotes
  • Inspirational talks
  • Idea-centric presentations (vs. product/sales)
  • 15-20 minute time slots
  • Presentations that will be recorded/shared

Not Recommended For:

  • Internal updates
  • Highly technical content
  • Sales pitches (too obvious)
  • Very short presentations (<10 minutes)

Slide Count Implications:

  • Minimum: 8-10 slides
  • Typical: 12-18 slides
  • Maximum: 25 slides
  • Heavy visual focus—many slides with single images

Example: Education Innovation

Hook (Slide 1): Photo of frustrated student. "What if school is making kids less curious, not more?"

Personal (Slides 2-3):

  • Slide 2: Photo of speaker's daughter
  • Slide 3: Story of her losing interest in learning

Core Idea (Slides 4-12):

  • Slide 4: "We're teaching answers. We should teach questions."
  • Slide 5-6: Research on curiosity and learning
  • Slide 7-8: Examples of question-driven classrooms
  • Slide 9: Data on outcomes
  • Slide 10: Addressing "but standards..." objection
  • Slide 11-12: Bigger implications for society

Call to Action (Slides 13-14):

  • Slide 13: "Three questions to ask tomorrow"
  • Slide 14: How to join the movement

Close (Slide 15): Back to daughter's photo. "She's asking questions again. Let's make sure every kid can."

Framework 4: Classic Three-Act Structure

Overview

The oldest storytelling structure, dating back to Aristotle. Still relevant because it mirrors natural narrative arc and audience expectations.

The Structure

ACT 1: SETUP (25% of presentation)
  ├─ Introduce "characters" (people, problems, concepts)
  ├─ Establish ordinary world/current state
  └─ Inciting incident (why this matters now)

ACT 2: CONFRONTATION (50% of presentation)
  ├─ Explore problem deeply
  ├─ Failed attempts or challenges
  ├─ Rising action and complications
  ├─ Midpoint revelation or shift
  └─ Escalation to crisis point

ACT 3: RESOLUTION (25% of presentation)
  ├─ Climax (solution or insight)
  ├─ Falling action (how it works)
  └─ Denouement (new equilibrium)

Detailed Breakdown

Act 1: Setup (25%)

Purpose: Establish context and create investment

1.1 Ordinary World (5-8% of presentation)

  • Current state of affairs
  • Familiar, relatable situation
  • Establishes baseline for measuring change
  • Example: "For 150 years, education has looked like this..."

1.2 Introduction of "Characters" (5-8%)

  • Who is affected? (students, teachers, parents)
  • What are their goals and challenges?
  • Make audience care about these people
  • Example: "Meet Sarah, a third-grade teacher who..."

1.3 Inciting Incident (10-12%)

  • The catalyst—why now?
  • What changed or was discovered?
  • Creates urgency and forward momentum
  • Example: "Then COVID-19 forced the entire system online overnight..."

Act 2: Confrontation (50%)

Purpose: Explore depth, build tension, earn the resolution

2.1 Exploring the Problem (10-15%)

  • Dig deeper into challenges
  • Show why obvious solutions don't work
  • Build complexity and nuance
  • Example: "Virtual learning exposed three fundamental flaws..."

2.2 Failed Attempts / Obstacles (10-15%)

  • What's been tried?
  • Why didn't it work?
  • Shows understanding of difficulty
  • Builds credibility
  • Example: "Districts spent millions on tablets. Engagement actually decreased..."

2.3 Midpoint Shift (5-8%)

  • New information or perspective
  • "What we discovered changed everything"
  • Turning point in understanding
  • Example: "But one school tried something different..."

2.4 Escalating Complexity (10-15%)

  • Deeper implications emerge
  • Stakes get higher
  • "It's not just about X, it's about Y"
  • Example: "This isn't a technology problem—it's an identity crisis for educators..."

2.5 Crisis Point (5-8%)

  • Moment of maximum tension
  • "We have to choose"
  • Forces decision or action
  • Example: "We can keep pretending this works, or we can reimagine education entirely"

Act 3: Resolution (25%)

Purpose: Deliver payoff, show path forward

3.1 Climax (8-10%)

  • The solution, insight, or breakthrough
  • Moment of greatest revelation
  • "Here's what actually works"
  • Example: "When we let students drive their own learning..."

3.2 How It Works (10-12%)

  • Practical implementation
  • Evidence and examples
  • Concrete details
  • Example: "Here's what it looks like in practice..."

3.3 New Equilibrium (7-8%)

  • What's different now?
  • How has world transformed?
  • Call to action
  • Future vision
  • Example: "This is education for 2025 and beyond. Here's how we get there..."

Application Guidelines

Best Used For:

  • Story-driven presentations
  • Case studies
  • Transformation narratives
  • Problem-solution structures
  • Medium to long presentations (20-45 minutes)

Not Recommended For:

  • Pure data presentations
  • Quick updates
  • Highly technical content without narrative
  • Very short presentations (<15 minutes)

Slide Count Implications:

  • Short version (20 min): 15-20 slides
    • Act 1: 4-5 slides
    • Act 2: 8-10 slides
    • Act 3: 4-5 slides
  • Long version (45 min): 25-35 slides
    • Act 1: 6-9 slides
    • Act 2: 13-18 slides
    • Act 3: 6-9 slides

Framework Comparison Matrix

Framework Duration Slide Count Best For Emotional Arc Complexity
Sparkline 20-30 min 18-25 Keynotes, vision casting High peaks and valleys High
Rule of Three 15-30 min 12-18 Product launches, demos Steady building Medium
TED Structure 15-20 min 12-18 Idea-centric, inspirational Single climactic peak Medium-High
Three-Act 20-45 min 15-35 Case studies, narratives Rising to climax, resolution High

Choosing the Right Framework

Decision Tree

Start Here: What's your primary goal?

If INSPIRE/TRANSFORM:

  • Duration 20+ minutes → Sparkline
  • Duration <20 minutes → TED Structure

If PERSUADE/SELL:

  • Product-focused → Rule of Three
  • Story-driven → Three-Act Structure

If INFORM/EDUCATE:

  • Problem-solution → Three-Act Structure
  • Feature demonstration → Rule of Three

If QUICK UPDATE:

  • None of these—use simple structure
  • Opening → Key Points → Close

Hybrid Approaches

You can combine frameworks:

Sparkline + Rule of Three:

  • Use sparkline emotional arc
  • Organize "what could be" sections into three main points
  • Example: Three visions of future, each contrasted with reality

TED + Three-Act:

  • Hook and personal connection (Act 1)
  • Core idea as confrontation (Act 2)
  • Call to action as resolution (Act 3)
  • Natural alignment

Rule of Three + Sparkline:

  • Three main features/points
  • Each point uses mini sparkline (is/could be contrast)
  • Builds to overall transformation

Common Mistakes Across All Frameworks

Structural Errors

  1. Starting with agenda slide

    • Kills momentum
    • Signals boring presentation
    • Better: Jump right into hook

  2. No clear inciting incident

    • Presentation lacks urgency
    • "Why now?" is unclear
    • Audience questions relevance

  3. Unearned climax

    • Big reveal without proper buildup
    • Audience isn't prepared to appreciate it
    • Falls flat

  4. Multiple climaxes

    • Trying to make everything important
    • Dilutes actual peak moments
    • Confuses audience

  5. Weak ending

    • Trailing off
    • "Any questions?" as close
    • Not landing the message

Content Errors

  1. Too much setup

    • Spending 40% on background
    • Audience loses patience
    • Core message gets rushed

  2. No conflict/tension

    • All smooth sailing
    • Boring, not engaging
    • No stakes

  3. Ignoring obstacles

    • Presenting solution without acknowledging challenges
    • Seems naive or dishonest
    • Reduces credibility

  4. Missing emotional beats

    • All facts, no feeling
    • Cognitively exhausting
    • Forgettable

Advanced Techniques

The Nested Story

Embed smaller stories within main framework:

Main Framework: Three-Act Structure
  Act 2 includes:
    → Customer story (mini three-act)
    → Team journey (mini three-act)
    → Product development (mini three-act)

Each nested story has own arc but serves larger narrative.

The Recurring Motif

Introduce element in opening, revisit throughout:

  • Physical object that represents theme
  • Phrase that gains new meaning
  • Image that appears multiple times
  • Question that gets progressively answered

Example: "What makes a teacher great?" asked at start, explored through presentation, answered with new depth at end.

The Parallel Structure

Tell two stories simultaneously that converge:

Story A (Problem): Traditional education path
Story B (Solution): New approach
  ↓                    ↓
Converge: Shows contrast

Slides alternate between Story A and Story B until they meet.

The Revelation Sequence

Withhold key information, reveal progressively:

Slide 1: "We tested 10 approaches"
Slide 2: "9 failed"
Slide 3: "But one..."
Slide 4: [The one that worked]

Builds suspense through controlled information release.

Testing Your Structure

Before Finalizing

The Elevator Test:

  • Can you summarize arc in 30 seconds?
  • If not, structure is too complex

The Emotional Check:

  • Map emotional intensity across slides
  • Should have valleys and peaks, not flat line
  • Highest peak should be near end (not middle)

The "So What?" Test:

  • After each major section: "So what?"
  • If you can't answer, section doesn't earn its place

The Memory Test:

  • What will audience remember 24 hours later?
  • Structure should make key points memorable
  • If everything is equally important, nothing is

After First Rehearsal

The Timing Test:

  • Does reality match planned percentages?
  • If Act 1 is taking 40% of time, rebalance

The Flow Test:

  • Do transitions feel natural?
  • Is there a clear through-line?
  • Can you feel the momentum?

The Engagement Test:

  • Present to test audience
  • Where do they lean in?
  • Where do they check out?
  • Adjust structure accordingly

This comprehensive guide to story frameworks provides the architectural foundation for presentations that aren't just informative—they're transformative. Master these structures, and you'll never wonder "what comes next?" again.

Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink