Files
2025-11-30 08:34:59 +08:00

5.2 KiB

Refactor code with confidence using comprehensive test safety net:

[Extended thinking: This tool uses the tdd-orchestrator agent (opus model) for sophisticated refactoring while maintaining all tests green. It applies design patterns, improves code quality, and optimizes performance with the safety of comprehensive test coverage.]

Usage

Use Task tool with subagent_type="tdd-orchestrator" to perform safe refactoring.

Prompt: "Refactor this code while keeping all tests green: $ARGUMENTS. Apply TDD refactor phase:

Core Process

1. Pre-Assessment

  • Run tests to establish green baseline
  • Analyze code smells and test coverage
  • Document current performance metrics
  • Create incremental refactoring plan

2. Code Smell Detection

  • Duplicated code → Extract methods/classes
  • Long methods → Decompose into focused functions
  • Large classes → Split responsibilities
  • Long parameter lists → Parameter objects
  • Feature Envy → Move methods to appropriate classes
  • Primitive Obsession → Value objects
  • Switch statements → Polymorphism
  • Dead code → Remove

3. Design Patterns

  • Apply Creational (Factory, Builder, Singleton)
  • Apply Structural (Adapter, Facade, Decorator)
  • Apply Behavioral (Strategy, Observer, Command)
  • Apply Domain (Repository, Service, Value Objects)
  • Use patterns only where they add clear value

4. SOLID Principles

  • Single Responsibility: One reason to change
  • Open/Closed: Open for extension, closed for modification
  • Liskov Substitution: Subtypes substitutable
  • Interface Segregation: Small, focused interfaces
  • Dependency Inversion: Depend on abstractions

5. Refactoring Techniques

  • Extract Method/Variable/Interface
  • Inline unnecessary indirection
  • Rename for clarity
  • Move Method/Field to appropriate classes
  • Replace Magic Numbers with constants
  • Encapsulate fields
  • Replace Conditional with Polymorphism
  • Introduce Null Object

6. Performance Optimization

  • Profile to identify bottlenecks
  • Optimize algorithms and data structures
  • Implement caching where beneficial
  • Reduce database queries (N+1 elimination)
  • Lazy loading and pagination
  • Always measure before and after

7. Incremental Steps

  • Make small, atomic changes
  • Run tests after each modification
  • Commit after each successful refactoring
  • Keep refactoring separate from behavior changes
  • Use scaffolding when needed

8. Architecture Evolution

  • Layer separation and dependency management
  • Module boundaries and interface definition
  • Event-driven patterns for decoupling
  • Database access pattern optimization

9. Safety Verification

  • Run full test suite after each change
  • Performance regression testing
  • Mutation testing for test effectiveness
  • Rollback plan for major changes

10. Advanced Patterns

  • Strangler Fig: Gradual legacy replacement
  • Branch by Abstraction: Large-scale changes
  • Parallel Change: Expand-contract pattern
  • Mikado Method: Dependency graph navigation

Output Requirements

  • Refactored code with improvements applied
  • Test results (all green)
  • Before/after metrics comparison
  • Applied refactoring techniques list
  • Performance improvement measurements
  • Remaining technical debt assessment

Safety Checklist

Before committing:

  • ✓ All tests pass (100% green)
  • ✓ No functionality regression
  • ✓ Performance metrics acceptable
  • ✓ Code coverage maintained/improved
  • ✓ Documentation updated

Recovery Protocol

If tests fail:

  • Immediately revert last change
  • Identify breaking refactoring
  • Apply smaller incremental changes
  • Use version control for safe experimentation

Example: Extract Method Pattern

Before:

class OrderProcessor {
  processOrder(order: Order): ProcessResult {
    // Validation
    if (!order.customerId || order.items.length === 0) {
      return { success: false, error: "Invalid order" };
    }

    // Calculate totals
    let subtotal = 0;
    for (const item of order.items) {
      subtotal += item.price * item.quantity;
    }
    let total = subtotal + (subtotal * 0.08) + (subtotal > 100 ? 0 : 15);

    // Process payment...
    // Update inventory...
    // Send confirmation...
  }
}

After:

class OrderProcessor {
  async processOrder(order: Order): Promise<ProcessResult> {
    const validation = this.validateOrder(order);
    if (!validation.isValid) return ProcessResult.failure(validation.error);

    const orderTotal = OrderTotal.calculate(order);
    const inventoryCheck = await this.inventoryService.checkAvailability(order.items);
    if (!inventoryCheck.available) return ProcessResult.failure(inventoryCheck.reason);

    await this.paymentService.processPayment(order.paymentMethod, orderTotal.total);
    await this.inventoryService.reserveItems(order.items);
    await this.notificationService.sendOrderConfirmation(order, orderTotal);

    return ProcessResult.success(order.id, orderTotal.total);
  }

  private validateOrder(order: Order): ValidationResult {
    if (!order.customerId) return ValidationResult.invalid("Customer ID required");
    if (order.items.length === 0) return ValidationResult.invalid("Order must contain items");
    return ValidationResult.valid();
  }
}

Applied: Extract Method, Value Objects, Dependency Injection, Async patterns

Code to refactor: $ARGUMENTS"