Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-30 08:30:14 +08:00
commit 1dd5bee3b4
335 changed files with 147360 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,900 @@
# Poster Layout and Design Guide
## Overview
Effective poster layout organizes content for maximum impact and comprehension. This guide covers grid systems, spatial organization, visual flow, and layout patterns for research posters.
## Grid Systems and Column Layouts
### Common Grid Patterns
#### 1. Two-Column Layout
**Characteristics**:
- Simple, traditional structure
- Easy to design and execute
- Clear narrative flow
- Good for text-heavy content
- Best for A1 size or smaller
**Content Organization**:
```
+-------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+-------------------------+
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
| | |
| Intro | Results |
| | |
| Methods | Discussion |
| | |
| | Conclusions |
+-------------------------+
| References/Contact |
+-------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (beamerposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}[t]
\begin{column}{.48\linewidth}
\begin{block}{Introduction}
% Content
\end{block}
\begin{block}{Methods}
% Content
\end{block}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.48\linewidth}
\begin{block}{Results}
% Content
\end{block}
\begin{block}{Conclusions}
% Content
\end{block}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
```
**Best For**:
- Small posters (A1, A2)
- Narrative-heavy content
- Simple comparisons (before/after, control/treatment)
- Linear storytelling
**Limitations**:
- Limited space for multiple results
- Can appear basic or dated
- Less visual variety
#### 2. Three-Column Layout (Most Popular)
**Characteristics**:
- Balanced, professional appearance
- Optimal for A0 posters
- Versatile content distribution
- Natural visual rhythm
- Industry standard
**Content Organization**:
```
+--------------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+--------------------------------+
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3|
| | | |
| Intro | Results | Results |
| | (Fig 1) | (Fig 2) |
| Methods | | |
| | Results | Discuss |
| Methods | (Fig 3) | |
| (cont.) | | Concl. |
+--------------------------------+
| Acknowledgments/Refs |
+--------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (tikzposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}
\column{0.33}
\block{Introduction}{...}
\block{Methods}{...}
\column{0.33}
\block{Results Part 1}{...}
\block{Results Part 2}{...}
\column{0.33}
\block{Results Part 3}{...}
\block{Discussion}{...}
\block{Conclusions}{...}
\end{columns}
```
**Best For**:
- Standard A0 conference posters
- Multiple results/figures (4-6)
- Balanced content distribution
- Professional academic presentations
**Strengths**:
- Visual balance and symmetry
- Adequate space for text and figures
- Clear section delineation
- Easy to scan left-to-right
#### 3. Four-Column Layout
**Characteristics**:
- Information-dense
- Modern, structured appearance
- Best for large posters (>A0)
- Requires careful design
- More complex to balance
**Content Organization**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+----------------------------------------+
| Col 1 | Col 2 | Col 3 | Col 4 |
| | | | |
| Intro | Method | Results | Results |
| | (Flow) | (Fig 1) | (Fig 3) |
| Motiv. | | | |
| | Method | Results | Discuss. |
| Hypoth.| (Stats)| (Fig 2) | |
| | | | Concl. |
+----------------------------------------+
| References/Contact |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (baposter)**:
```latex
\begin{poster}{columns=4, colspacing=1em, ...}
\headerbox{Intro}{name=intro, column=0, row=0}{...}
\headerbox{Methods}{name=methods, column=1, row=0}{...}
\headerbox{Results 1}{name=res1, column=2, row=0}{...}
\headerbox{Results 2}{name=res2, column=3, row=0}{...}
% Continue with below=... for stacking
\end{poster}
```
**Best For**:
- Large format posters (48×72")
- Data-heavy presentations
- Comparison studies (multiple conditions)
- Engineering/technical posters
**Challenges**:
- Can appear crowded
- Requires more white space management
- Harder to achieve visual balance
- Risk of overwhelming viewers
#### 4. Asymmetric Layouts
**Characteristics**:
- Dynamic, modern appearance
- Flexible content arrangement
- Emphasizes hierarchy
- Requires design expertise
- Best for creative fields
**Example Pattern**:
```
+--------------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+--------------------------------+
| Wide Column | Narrow Column |
| (66%) | (33%) |
| | |
| Intro + | Key |
| Methods | Figure |
| (narrative) | (emphasized) |
| | |
+--------------------------------+
| Results (spanning full width) |
+--------------------------------+
| Discussion | Conclusions |
| (50%) | (50%) |
+--------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (tikzposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}
\column{0.65}
\block{Introduction and Methods}{
% Combined narrative section
}
\column{0.35}
\block{}{
% Key figure with minimal text
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{key-figure.pdf}
}
\end{columns}
\block[width=1.0\linewidth]{Results}{
% Full-width results section
}
```
**Best For**:
- Design-oriented conferences
- Single key finding with supporting content
- Modern, non-traditional fields
- Experienced poster designers
### Grid Alignment Principles
**Baseline Grid**:
- Establish invisible horizontal lines
- Align all text blocks to grid
- Typical spacing: 5mm or 10mm increments
- Creates visual rhythm and professionalism
**Column Grid**:
- Divide width into equal units (12, 16, or 24 units common)
- Elements span multiple units
- Allows flexible but structured layouts
**Example 12-Column Grid**:
```
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |11 |12 |
|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| Block spanning 6 units| Block spanning 6 units|
| Block spanning 12 units |
| 4 units | 8 units (emphasized) |
```
**LaTeX Grid Helper**:
```latex
% Debug grid overlay (remove for final version)
\usepackage{tikz}
\AddToShipoutPictureBG{
\begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture, overlay]
\draw[help lines, step=5cm, very thin, gray!30]
(current page.south west) grid (current page.north east);
\end{tikzpicture}
}
```
## Visual Flow and Reading Patterns
### Z-Pattern (Landscape Posters)
Viewers' eyes naturally follow a Z-shape on landscape layouts:
```
START → → → → → → → → → → → → → → TOP RIGHT
↓ ↓
↓ ↓
MIDDLE LEFT → → → → → → → → → MIDDLE RIGHT
↓ ↓
↓ ↓
BOTTOM LEFT → → → → → → → → → → → → END
```
**Design Strategy**:
1. **Top-left**: Title and introduction (entry point)
2. **Top-right**: Institution logo, QR code
3. **Center**: Key result or main figure
4. **Bottom-right**: Conclusions and contact (exit point)
**Content Placement**:
- Critical information at corners and center
- Support information along diagonal paths
- Use arrows or visual cues to reinforce flow
### F-Pattern (Portrait Posters)
Portrait posters follow F-shaped eye movement:
```
TITLE → → → → → → → → → → → →
INTRO → → → →
METHODS
RESULTS → → →
RESULTS (cont.)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS → → → → → → → → →
```
**Design Strategy**:
1. Place engaging content at top-left
2. Use section headers to create horizontal scan points
3. Most important figures in upper-middle area
4. Conclusions visible without scrolling (if digital) or from distance
### Gutenberg Diagram
Classic newspaper layout principle:
```
+------------------+------------------+
| PRIMARY AREA | STRONG FALLOW |
| (most attention) | (moderate attn) |
| ↓ | ↓ |
+------------------+------------------+
| WEAK FALLOW | TERMINAL AREA |
| (least attention)| (final resting) |
| | ↑ |
+------------------+------------------+
```
**Optimization**:
- **Primary Area** (top-left): Introduction, problem statement
- **Strong Fallow** (top-right): Supporting figure, logo
- **Weak Fallow** (bottom-left): Methods details, references
- **Terminal Area** (bottom-right): Conclusions, take-home message
### Directional Cues
Guide viewers explicitly through content:
**Numerical Ordering**:
```latex
\block{❶ Introduction}{...}
\block{❷ Methods}{...}
\block{❸ Results}{...}
\block{❹ Conclusions}{...}
```
**Arrows and Lines**:
```latex
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[block] (intro) {Introduction};
\node[block, right=of intro] (methods) {Methods};
\node[block, right=of methods] (results) {Results};
\draw[->, thick, blue] (intro) -- (methods);
\draw[->, thick, blue] (methods) -- (results);
\end{tikzpicture}
```
**Color Progression**:
- Light to dark shades indicating progression
- Cool to warm colors showing importance increase
- Consistent color for related sections
## Spatial Organization Strategies
### Header/Title Area
**Typical Size**: 10-15% of total poster height
**Essential Elements**:
- **Title**: Concise, descriptive (10-15 words max)
- **Authors**: Full names, presenting author emphasized
- **Affiliations**: Institutions, departments
- **Logos**: University, funding agencies (2-4 max)
- **Conference info** (optional): Name, date, location
**Layout Options**:
**Centered**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| [Logo] POSTER TITLE HERE [Logo]|
| Authors and Affiliations |
| email@university.edu |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**Left-aligned**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| POSTER TITLE HERE [Logo] |
| Authors and Affiliations [Logo] |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**Split**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| [Logo] | Authors & Affil. |
| POSTER TITLE | email@edu |
| | [QR Code] |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Header (beamerposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}[T]
\begin{column}{.15\linewidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{logo1.pdf}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.7\linewidth}
\centering
{\VeryHuge\textbf{Your Research Title Here}}\\[0.5cm]
{\Large Author One\textsuperscript{1}, Author Two\textsuperscript{2}}\\[0.3cm]
{\normalsize \textsuperscript{1}University A, \textsuperscript{2}University B}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.15\linewidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{logo2.pdf}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
```
### Main Content Area
**Typical Size**: 70-80% of total poster
**Organization Principles**:
**1. Top-to-Bottom Flow**:
```
Introduction/Background
Methods/Approach
Results (Multiple panels)
Discussion/Conclusions
```
**2. Left-to-Right, Top-to-Bottom**:
```
[Intro] [Results 1] [Results 3]
[Methods] [Results 2] [Discussion]
```
**3. Centralized Main Figure**:
```
[Intro] [Main Figure] [Discussion]
[Methods] (center) [Conclusions]
```
**Section Sizing**:
- Introduction: 10-15% of content area
- Methods: 15-20%
- Results: 40-50% (largest section)
- Discussion/Conclusions: 15-20%
### Footer Area
**Typical Size**: 5-10% of total poster height
**Common Elements**:
- References (abbreviated, 5-10 key citations)
- Acknowledgments (funding, collaborators)
- Contact information
- QR codes (paper, code, data)
- Social media handles (optional)
- Conference hashtags
**Layout**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| References: 1. Author (2023) ... | 📱 |
| Acknowledgments: Funded by ... | QR |
| Contact: name@email.edu | Code |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Footer**:
```latex
\begin{block}{}
\footnotesize
\begin{columns}[T]
\begin{column}{0.7\linewidth}
\textbf{References}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Author A et al. (2023). Journal. doi:...
\item Author B et al. (2024). Conference.
\end{enumerate}
\textbf{Acknowledgments}
This work was supported by Grant XYZ.
\textbf{Contact}: firstname.lastname@university.edu
\end{column}
\begin{column}{0.25\linewidth}
\centering
\qrcode[height=3cm]{https://doi.org/10.1234/paper}\\
\tiny Scan for full paper
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{block}
```
## White Space Management
### Margins and Padding
**Outer Margins**:
- Minimum: 2-3cm (0.75-1 inch)
- Recommended: 3-5cm (1-2 inches)
- Prevents edge trimming issues in printing
- Provides visual breathing room
**Inner Spacing**:
- Between columns: 1-2cm
- Between blocks: 1-2cm
- Inside blocks (padding): 0.5-1.5cm
- Around figures: 0.5-1cm
**LaTeX Margin Control**:
```latex
% beamerposter
\usepackage[size=a0, scale=1.4]{beamerposter}
\setbeamersize{text margin left=3cm, text margin right=3cm}
% tikzposter
\documentclass[..., margin=30mm, innermargin=15mm]{tikzposter}
% baposter
\begin{poster}{
colspacing=1.5em, % Horizontal spacing
...
}
```
### Active White Space vs. Passive White Space
**Active White Space**: Intentionally placed for specific purpose
- Around key figures (draws attention)
- Between major sections (creates clear separation)
- Above/below titles (emphasizes hierarchy)
**Passive White Space**: Natural result of layout
- Margins and borders
- Line spacing
- Gaps between elements
**Balance**: Aim for 30-40% white space overall
### Visual Breathing Room
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Elements touching edges
- ❌ Text blocks directly adjacent
- ❌ Figures without surrounding space
- ❌ Cramped, claustrophobic feel
**Implement**:
- ✅ Clear separation between sections
- ✅ Space around focal points
- ✅ Generous padding inside boxes
- ✅ Balanced distribution of content
## Block and Box Design
### Block Types and Functions
**Title Block**: Poster header
- Full width, top position
- High visual weight
- Contains identifying information
**Content Blocks**: Main sections
- Column-based or free-floating
- Hierarchical sizing (larger = more important)
- Clear headers and structure
**Callout Blocks**: Emphasized information
- Key findings or quotes
- Different color or style
- Visually distinct
**Reference Blocks**: Supporting info
- Footer position
- Smaller, less prominent
- Informational, not critical
### Block Styling Options
**Border Styles**:
```latex
% Rounded corners (friendly, modern)
\begin{block}{Title}
% beamerposter with rounded
\setbeamertemplate{block begin}[rounded]
% Sharp corners (formal, traditional)
\setbeamertemplate{block begin}[default]
% No border (minimal, clean)
\setbeamercolor{block title}{bg=white, fg=black}
\setbeamercolor{block body}{bg=white, fg=black}
```
**Shadow and Depth**:
```latex
% tikzposter shadow
\tikzset{
block/.append style={
drop shadow={shadow xshift=2mm, shadow yshift=-2mm}
}
}
% tcolorbox drop shadow
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced, drop shadow]
Content with shadow
\end{tcolorbox}
```
**Background Shading**:
- **Solid**: Clean, professional
- **Gradient**: Modern, dynamic
- **Transparent**: Layered, sophisticated
### Relationship and Grouping
**Visual Grouping Techniques**:
**1. Proximity**: Place related items close
```
[Intro Text]
[Related Figure]
↓ grouped
[Methods Text]
[Methods Diagram]
```
**2. Color Coding**: Use color to show relationships
- All "Methods" blocks in blue
- All "Results" blocks in green
- Conclusions in orange
**3. Borders**: Enclose related elements
```latex
\begin{tcolorbox}[title=Experimental Pipeline]
\begin{enumerate}
\item Sample preparation
\item Data collection
\item Analysis
\end{enumerate}
\end{tcolorbox}
```
**4. Alignment**: Aligned elements appear related
```
[Block A Left-aligned]
[Block B Left-aligned]
vs.
[Block C Centered]
```
## Responsive and Adaptive Layouts
### Designing for Different Poster Sizes
**Scaling Strategy**:
- Design for target size (e.g., A0)
- Test at other common sizes (A1, 36×48")
- Use relative sizing (percentages, not absolute)
**Font Scaling**:
```latex
% Scale fonts proportionally
\usepackage[size=a0, scale=1.4]{beamerposter} % A0 at 140%
\usepackage[size=a1, scale=1.0]{beamerposter} % A1 at 100%
% Or define sizes relatively
\newcommand{\titlesize}{\fontsize{96}{110}\selectfont}
\newcommand{\headersize}{\fontsize{60}{72}\selectfont}
```
**Content Adaptation**:
- **A0 (full)**: All content, 5-6 figures
- **A1 (reduced)**: Condense to 3-4 main figures
- **A2 (compact)**: Key finding only, 1-2 figures
### Portrait vs. Landscape Orientation
**Portrait (Vertical)**:
- **Pros**: Traditional, more common stands, natural reading flow
- **Cons**: Less width for figures, can feel cramped
- **Best for**: Text-heavy posters, multi-section flow, conferences
**Landscape (Horizontal)**:
- **Pros**: Wide figures, natural for timelines, modern feel
- **Cons**: Harder to read from distance, less common
- **Best for**: Timelines, wide data visualizations, non-traditional venues
**LaTeX Orientation**:
```latex
% Portrait
\usepackage[size=a0, orientation=portrait]{beamerposter}
\documentclass[..., portrait]{tikzposter}
% Landscape
\usepackage[size=a0, orientation=landscape]{beamerposter}
\documentclass[..., landscape]{tikzposter}
```
## Layout Patterns by Research Type
### Experimental Research
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Background | Methods |
| Problem | (Diagram) |
+---------------------------+
| Results (Figure 1) |
| Results (Figure 2) |
+---------------------------+
| Discussion | Conclusions |
| Limitations| Future Work |
+---------------------------+
[References and Contact]
```
**Emphasis**: Visual results, clear methodology
### Computational/Modeling
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Motivation | Algorithm |
| | (Flowchart) |
+---------------------------+
| Implementation Details |
+---------------------------+
| Results | Results |
| (Benchmark)| (Comparison) |
+---------------------------+
| Conclusions| Code QR |
+---------------------------+
[GitHub, Docker, Documentation]
```
**Emphasis**: Algorithm clarity, reproducibility
### Clinical/Medical
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Background | Methods |
| Clinical | - Design |
| Need | - Population |
| | - Outcomes |
+---------------------------+
| Results | |
| (Primary Outcome) | Key|
| | Fig|
+---------------------------+
| Discussion | Clinical |
| | Implications |
+---------------------------+
[Trial Registration, Ethics, Funding]
```
**Emphasis**: Patient outcomes, clinical relevance
### Review/Meta-Analysis
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Research | Search |
| Question | Strategy |
| | (PRISMA Flow) |
+---------------------------+
| Included Studies Overview |
+---------------------------+
| Findings | Findings |
| (Theme 1) | (Theme 2) |
+---------------------------+
| Synthesis | Gaps & |
| | Future Needs |
+---------------------------+
[Systematic Review Registration]
```
**Emphasis**: Comprehensive coverage, synthesis
## Layout Testing and Iteration
### Design Iteration Process
**1. Sketch Phase**:
- Hand-draw rough layout
- Experiment with different arrangements
- Mark primary, secondary, tertiary content
**2. Digital Mockup**:
- Create low-fidelity version in LaTeX
- Use placeholder text/figures
- Test different grid systems
**3. Content Integration**:
- Replace placeholders with actual content
- Adjust spacing and sizing
- Refine visual hierarchy
**4. Refinement**:
- Fine-tune alignment
- Balance visual weight
- Optimize white space
**5. Testing**:
- Print at reduced scale (25%)
- View from distance
- Get colleague feedback
### Feedback Checklist
**Visual Balance**:
- [ ] No single area feels too heavy or too light
- [ ] Color distributed evenly across poster
- [ ] Text and figures balanced
- [ ] White space well-distributed
**Hierarchy and Flow**:
- [ ] Clear entry point (title visible)
- [ ] Logical reading path
- [ ] Section relationships clear
- [ ] Conclusions easy to find
**Technical Execution**:
- [ ] Consistent alignment
- [ ] Uniform spacing
- [ ] Professional appearance
- [ ] No awkward breaks or orphans
## Common Layout Mistakes
**1. Unbalanced Visual Weight**
- ❌ All content on left, empty right side
- ❌ Large figure dominating, tiny text elsewhere
- ✅ Distribute content evenly across poster
**2. Inconsistent Spacing**
- ❌ Random gaps between blocks
- ❌ Elements touching in some places, spaced in others
- ✅ Use consistent spacing values throughout
**3. Poor Column Width**
- ❌ Extremely narrow columns (hard to read)
- ❌ Very wide columns (eye tracking difficult)
- ✅ Optimal: 40-80 characters per line
**4. Ignoring Grid**
- ❌ Random placement of elements
- ❌ Misaligned blocks
- ✅ Align to invisible grid, consistent positioning
**5. Overcrowding**
- ❌ No white space, cramped feel
- ❌ Trying to fit too much content
- ✅ Generous margins, clear separation
## Conclusion
Effective layout design:
- Uses appropriate grid systems (2, 3, or 4 columns)
- Follows natural eye movement patterns
- Maintains visual balance and hierarchy
- Provides adequate white space
- Groups related content clearly
- Adapts to different poster sizes and orientations
Remember: Layout should support content, not compete with it. When viewers focus on your research rather than your design, you've succeeded.