Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-30 08:30:18 +08:00
commit 74bee324ab
335 changed files with 147377 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,745 @@
# LaTeX Poster Packages: Comprehensive Comparison
## Overview
Three major LaTeX packages dominate research poster creation: beamerposter, tikzposter, and baposter. Each has distinct strengths, syntax, and use cases. This guide provides detailed comparisons and practical examples.
## Package Comparison Matrix
| Feature | beamerposter | tikzposter | baposter |
|---------|--------------|------------|----------|
| **Learning Curve** | Easy (if familiar with Beamer) | Moderate | Moderate |
| **Flexibility** | Moderate | High | Moderate-High |
| **Default Aesthetics** | Traditional/Academic | Modern/Colorful | Professional/Clean |
| **Theme Support** | Extensive (Beamer themes) | Built-in + Custom | Limited built-in |
| **Customization** | Moderate effort | Easy with TikZ | Structured approach |
| **Layout System** | Frame-based | Block-based | Box-based with grid |
| **Multi-column** | Manual | Automatic | Automatic |
| **Graphics Integration** | Standard includegraphics | TikZ + includegraphics | Standard + advanced |
| **Community Support** | Large (Beamer community) | Growing | Smaller |
| **Best For** | Traditional academic, institutional branding | Creative designs, custom graphics | Structured multi-column layouts |
| **File Size** | Small | Medium-Large (TikZ overhead) | Medium |
| **Compilation Speed** | Fast | Slower (TikZ processing) | Fast-Medium |
## 1. beamerposter
### Overview
beamerposter extends the popular Beamer presentation class for poster-sized documents. It inherits all Beamer functionality, themes, and customization options.
### Advantages
- **Familiar syntax**: If you know Beamer, you know beamerposter
- **Extensive themes**: Access to all Beamer themes and color schemes
- **Institutional branding**: Easy to match university templates
- **Stable and mature**: Well-tested, extensive documentation
- **Block structure**: Clear organizational units
- **Good for traditional posters**: Academic conferences, thesis defenses
### Disadvantages
- **Less flexible layouts**: Column-based system can be restrictive
- **Manual positioning**: Requires careful spacing adjustments
- **Traditional aesthetics**: Can look dated compared to modern designs
- **Limited built-in styling**: Requires theme customization for unique looks
### Basic Template
```latex
\documentclass[final,t]{beamer}
\usepackage[size=a0,scale=1.4,orientation=portrait]{beamerposter}
\usetheme{Berlin}
\usecolortheme{beaver}
% Configure fonts
\setbeamerfont{title}{size=\VeryHuge,series=\bfseries}
\setbeamerfont{author}{size=\Large}
\setbeamerfont{block title}{size=\large,series=\bfseries}
\title{Your Research Title}
\author{Author Names}
\institute{Institution}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}[t]
% Title block
\begin{block}{}
\maketitle
\end{block}
\begin{columns}[t]
\begin{column}{.45\linewidth}
\begin{block}{Introduction}
Your introduction text here...
\end{block}
\begin{block}{Methods}
Your methods text here...
\end{block}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.45\linewidth}
\begin{block}{Results}
Your results text here...
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figure.pdf}
\end{block}
\begin{block}{Conclusions}
Your conclusions here...
\end{block}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
```
### Popular Themes
```latex
% Traditional academic
\usetheme{Berlin}
\usecolortheme{beaver}
% Modern minimal
\usetheme{Madrid}
\usecolortheme{whale}
% Blue professional
\usetheme{Singapore}
\usecolortheme{dolphin}
% Dark theme
\usetheme{Warsaw}
\usecolortheme{seahorse}
```
### Custom Colors
```latex
% Define custom colors
\definecolor{primarycolor}{RGB}{0,51,102} % Dark blue
\definecolor{secondarycolor}{RGB}{204,0,0} % Red
\definecolor{accentcolor}{RGB}{255,204,0} % Gold
% Apply to beamer elements
\setbeamercolor{structure}{fg=primarycolor}
\setbeamercolor{block title}{bg=primarycolor,fg=white}
\setbeamercolor{block body}{bg=primarycolor!10,fg=black}
```
### Advanced Customization
```latex
% Remove navigation symbols
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
% Custom title formatting
\setbeamertemplate{title page}{
\begin{center}
{\usebeamerfont{title}\usebeamercolor[fg]{title}\inserttitle}\\[1cm]
{\usebeamerfont{author}\insertauthor}\\[0.5cm]
{\usebeamerfont{institute}\insertinstitute}
\end{center}
}
% Custom block style
\setbeamertemplate{block begin}{
\par\vskip\medskipamount
\begin{beamercolorbox}[colsep*=.75ex,rounded=true]{block title}
\usebeamerfont*{block title}\insertblocktitle
\end{beamercolorbox}
{\parskip0pt\par}
\usebeamerfont{block body}
\begin{beamercolorbox}[colsep*=.75ex,vmode,rounded=true]{block body}
}
```
### Three-Column Layout
```latex
\begin{columns}[t]
\begin{column}{.3\linewidth}
% Left column content
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.3\linewidth}
% Middle column content
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.3\linewidth}
% Right column content
\end{column}
\end{columns}
```
## 2. tikzposter
### Overview
tikzposter is built on the powerful TikZ graphics package, offering modern designs with extensive customization through TikZ commands.
### Advantages
- **Modern aesthetics**: Contemporary, colorful designs out-of-the-box
- **Flexible block placement**: Easy positioning anywhere on poster
- **Beautiful themes**: Multiple professionally designed themes included
- **TikZ integration**: Seamless graphics and custom drawings
- **Color customization**: Easy to create custom color palettes
- **Automatic spacing**: Intelligent block spacing and alignment
### Disadvantages
- **Compilation time**: TikZ processing can be slow for large posters
- **File size**: PDFs can be larger due to TikZ elements
- **Learning curve**: TikZ syntax can be complex for advanced customization
- **Less institutional theme support**: Requires more work to match branding
### Basic Template
```latex
\documentclass[25pt, a0paper, portrait, margin=0mm, innermargin=15mm,
blockverticalspace=15mm, colspace=15mm, subcolspace=8mm]{tikzposter}
\title{Your Research Title}
\author{Author Names}
\institute{Institution}
% Choose theme and color style
\usetheme{Rays}
\usecolorstyle{Denmark}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
% First column
\begin{columns}
\column{0.5}
\block{Introduction}{
Your introduction text here...
}
\block{Methods}{
Your methods text here...
}
% Second column
\column{0.5}
\block{Results}{
Your results text here...
\begin{tikzfigure}
\includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{figure.pdf}
\end{tikzfigure}
}
\block{Conclusions}{
Your conclusions here...
}
\end{columns}
\end{document}
```
### Available Themes
```latex
% Modern with radiating background
\usetheme{Rays}
% Clean with decorative wave
\usetheme{Wave}
% Minimal with envelope corners
\usetheme{Envelope}
% Traditional academic
\usetheme{Basic}
% Board-style with texture
\usetheme{Board}
% Clean minimal
\usetheme{Simple}
% Professional with lines
\usetheme{Default}
% Autumn color scheme
\usetheme{Autumn}
% Desert color palette
\usetheme{Desert}
```
### Color Styles
```latex
% Professional blue
\usecolorstyle{Denmark}
% Warm colors
\usecolorstyle{Australia}
% Cool tones
\usecolorstyle{Sweden}
% Earth tones
\usecolorstyle{Britain}
% Default color scheme
\usecolorstyle{Default}
```
### Custom Color Definition
```latex
\definecolorstyle{CustomStyle}{
\definecolor{colorOne}{RGB}{0,51,102} % Dark blue
\definecolor{colorTwo}{RGB}{255,204,0} % Gold
\definecolor{colorThree}{RGB}{204,0,0} % Red
}{
% Background Colors
\colorlet{backgroundcolor}{white}
\colorlet{framecolor}{colorOne}
% Title Colors
\colorlet{titlefgcolor}{white}
\colorlet{titlebgcolor}{colorOne}
% Block Colors
\colorlet{blocktitlebgcolor}{colorOne}
\colorlet{blocktitlefgcolor}{white}
\colorlet{blockbodybgcolor}{white}
\colorlet{blockbodyfgcolor}{black}
% Innerblock Colors
\colorlet{innerblocktitlebgcolor}{colorTwo}
\colorlet{innerblocktitlefgcolor}{black}
\colorlet{innerblockbodybgcolor}{colorTwo!10}
\colorlet{innerblockbodyfgcolor}{black}
% Note colors
\colorlet{notefgcolor}{black}
\colorlet{notebgcolor}{colorThree!20}
}
\usecolorstyle{CustomStyle}
```
### Block Placement and Sizing
```latex
% Full-width block
\block{Title}{Content}
% Specify width
\block[width=0.8\linewidth]{Title}{Content}
% Position manually
\block[x=10, y=50, width=30]{Title}{Content}
% Inner blocks (nested, different styling)
\block{Outer Title}{
\innerblock{Inner Title}{
Highlighted content
}
}
% Note blocks (for emphasis)
\note[width=0.4\linewidth]{
Important note text
}
```
### Advanced Features
```latex
% QR codes with tikzposter styling
\block{Scan for More}{
\begin{center}
\qrcode[height=5cm]{https://github.com/project}\\
\vspace{0.5cm}
Visit our GitHub repository
\end{center}
}
% Multi-column within block
\block{Results}{
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{fig1.pdf} &
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{fig2.pdf}
\end{tabular}
}
% Custom TikZ graphics
\block{Methodology}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[draw, rectangle, fill=blue!20] (A) {Step 1};
\node[draw, rectangle, fill=green!20, right=of A] (B) {Step 2};
\draw[->, thick] (A) -- (B);
\end{tikzpicture}
}
```
## 3. baposter
### Overview
baposter (Box Area Poster) uses a box-based layout system with automatic positioning and spacing. Excellent for structured, professional multi-column layouts.
### Advantages
- **Automatic layout**: Intelligent box positioning and spacing
- **Professional defaults**: Clean, polished appearance out-of-the-box
- **Multi-column excellence**: Best-in-class column-based layouts
- **Header/footer boxes**: Easy institutional branding
- **Consistent spacing**: Automatic vertical and horizontal alignment
- **Print-ready**: Excellent CMYK support
### Disadvantages
- **Less flexible**: Box-based system can be constraining
- **Fewer themes**: Limited built-in theme options
- **Learning curve**: Unique syntax requires time to master
- **Less active development**: Smaller community compared to others
### Basic Template
```latex
\documentclass[a0paper,portrait]{baposter}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{multicol}
\begin{document}
\begin{poster}{
% Options
grid=false,
columns=3,
colspacing=1em,
bgColorOne=white,
bgColorTwo=white,
borderColor=blue!50,
headerColorOne=blue!80,
headerColorTwo=blue!70,
headerFontColor=white,
boxColorOne=white,
boxColorTwo=blue!10,
textborder=roundedleft,
eyecatcher=true,
headerborder=open,
headerheight=0.12\textheight,
headershape=roundedright,
headershade=plain,
headerfont=\Large\sf\bf,
linewidth=2pt
}
% Eye Catcher (Logo)
{
\includegraphics[height=6em]{logo.pdf}
}
% Title
{
Your Research Title
}
% Authors
{
Author Names\\
Institution Name
}
% University Logo
{
\includegraphics[height=6em]{university-logo.pdf}
}
% First column boxes
\headerbox{Introduction}{name=intro,column=0,row=0}{
Your introduction text here...
}
\headerbox{Methods}{name=methods,column=0,below=intro}{
Your methods text here...
}
% Second column boxes
\headerbox{Results}{name=results,column=1,row=0,span=2}{
Your results here...
\includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{results.pdf}
}
\headerbox{Analysis}{name=analysis,column=1,below=results}{
Analysis details...
}
\headerbox{Validation}{name=validation,column=2,below=results}{
Validation results...
}
% Bottom spanning box
\headerbox{Conclusions}{name=conclusions,column=0,span=3,above=bottom}{
Your conclusions here...
}
\end{poster}
\end{document}
```
### Box Positioning
```latex
% Position by column and row
\headerbox{Title}{name=box1, column=0, row=0}{Content}
% Position relative to other boxes
\headerbox{Title}{name=box2, column=0, below=box1}{Content}
% Above another box
\headerbox{Title}{name=box3, column=1, above=bottom}{Content}
% Span multiple columns
\headerbox{Title}{name=box4, column=0, span=2, row=0}{Content}
% Between two boxes vertically
\headerbox{Title}{name=box5, column=0, below=box1, above=box3}{Content}
% Aligned with another box
\headerbox{Title}{name=box6, column=1, aligned=box1}{Content}
```
### Styling Options
```latex
\begin{poster}{
% Grid and layout
grid=false, % Show layout grid (debug)
columns=3, % Number of columns
colspacing=1em, % Space between columns
% Background
background=plain, % plain, shadetb, shadelr, user
bgColorOne=white,
bgColorTwo=lightgray,
% Borders
borderColor=blue!50,
linewidth=2pt,
% Header
headerColorOne=blue!80,
headerColorTwo=blue!70,
headerFontColor=white,
headerheight=0.12\textheight,
headershape=roundedright, % rectangle, rounded, roundedright, roundedleft
headershade=plain, % plain, shadetb, shadelr
headerborder=open, % open, closed
% Boxes
boxColorOne=white,
boxColorTwo=blue!10,
boxshade=plain, % plain, shadetb, shadelr
textborder=roundedleft, % none, rectangle, rounded, roundedleft, roundedright
% Eye catcher
eyecatcher=true
}
```
### Color Schemes
```latex
% Professional blue
\begin{poster}{
headerColorOne=blue!80,
headerColorTwo=blue!70,
boxColorTwo=blue!10,
borderColor=blue!50
}
% Academic green
\begin{poster}{
headerColorOne=green!70!black,
headerColorTwo=green!60!black,
boxColorTwo=green!10,
borderColor=green!50
}
% Corporate gray
\begin{poster}{
headerColorOne=gray!60,
headerColorTwo=gray!50,
boxColorTwo=gray!10,
borderColor=gray!40
}
```
## Package Selection Guide
### Choose beamerposter if:
- ✅ You're already familiar with Beamer
- ✅ You need to match institutional Beamer themes
- ✅ You prefer traditional academic aesthetics
- ✅ You want extensive theme options
- ✅ You need fast compilation times
- ✅ You're creating posters for conservative academic conferences
### Choose tikzposter if:
- ✅ You want modern, colorful designs
- ✅ You plan to create custom graphics with TikZ
- ✅ You value aesthetic flexibility
- ✅ You want built-in professional themes
- ✅ You don't mind slightly longer compilation
- ✅ You're presenting at design-conscious or public-facing events
### Choose baposter if:
- ✅ You need structured multi-column layouts
- ✅ You want automatic box positioning
- ✅ You prefer clean, professional defaults
- ✅ You need precise control over box relationships
- ✅ You're creating posters with many sections
- ✅ You value consistent spacing and alignment
## Conversion Between Packages
### From beamerposter to tikzposter
```latex
% beamerposter
\begin{block}{Title}
Content
\end{block}
% tikzposter equivalent
\block{Title}{
Content
}
```
### From beamerposter to baposter
```latex
% beamerposter
\begin{block}{Introduction}
Content
\end{block}
% baposter equivalent
\headerbox{Introduction}{name=intro, column=0, row=0}{
Content
}
```
### From tikzposter to baposter
```latex
% tikzposter
\block{Methods}{
Content
}
% baposter equivalent
\headerbox{Methods}{name=methods, column=0, row=0}{
Content
}
```
## Compilation Tips
### Faster Compilation
```bash
# Use draft mode for initial edits
\documentclass[draft]{tikzposter}
# Compile with faster engines when possible
pdflatex -interaction=nonstopmode poster.tex
# For tikzposter, use externalization to cache TikZ graphics
\usetikzlibrary{external}
\tikzexternalize
```
### Memory Issues
```latex
% Increase TeX memory for large posters
% Add to poster preamble:
\pdfminorversion=7
\pdfobjcompresslevel=2
```
### Font Embedding
```bash
# Ensure fonts are embedded (required for printing)
pdflatex -dEmbedAllFonts=true poster.tex
# Check font embedding
pdffonts poster.pdf
```
## Hybrid Approaches
You can combine strengths of different packages:
### beamerposter with TikZ Graphics
```latex
\documentclass[final]{beamer}
\usepackage[size=a0]{beamerposter}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{block}{Flowchart}
\begin{tikzpicture}
% Custom TikZ graphics within beamerposter
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{block}
```
### tikzposter with Beamer Themes
```latex
\documentclass{tikzposter}
% Import specific Beamer color definitions
\definecolor{beamerblue}{RGB}{0,51,102}
\colorlet{blocktitlebgcolor}{beamerblue}
```
## Recommended Packages for All Systems
```latex
% Essential packages for any poster
\usepackage{graphicx} % Images
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} % Math symbols
\usepackage{booktabs} % Professional tables
\usepackage{multicol} % Multiple columns in text
\usepackage{qrcode} % QR codes
\usepackage{hyperref} % Hyperlinks
\usepackage{caption} % Caption customization
\usepackage{subcaption} % Subfigures
```
## Performance Comparison
| Package | Compile Time (A0) | PDF Size | Memory Usage |
|---------|-------------------|----------|--------------|
| beamerposter | ~5-10 seconds | 2-5 MB | Low |
| tikzposter | ~15-30 seconds | 5-15 MB | Medium-High |
| baposter | ~8-15 seconds | 3-8 MB | Medium |
*Note: Times for poster with 5 figures, typical conference content*
## Conclusion
All three packages are excellent choices for different scenarios:
- **beamerposter**: Best for traditional academic settings and Beamer users
- **tikzposter**: Best for modern, visually striking presentations
- **baposter**: Best for structured, professional multi-section posters
Choose based on your specific needs, aesthetic preferences, and time constraints. When in doubt, start with tikzposter for modern conferences or beamerposter for traditional academic venues.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,748 @@
# Research Poster Content Guide
## Overview
Content is king in research posters. This guide covers writing strategies, section-specific guidance, visual-text balance, and best practices for communicating research effectively in poster format.
## Core Content Principles
### 1. The 3-5 Minute Rule
**Reality**: Most viewers spend 3-5 minutes at your poster
- **1 minute**: Scanning from distance (title, figures)
- **2-4 minutes**: Reading key points up close
- **5+ minutes**: Engaged conversation (if interested)
**Design Implication**: Poster must work at three levels:
1. **Distance view** (6-10 feet): Title and main figure visible
2. **Browse view** (3-6 feet): Section headers and key results readable
3. **Detail view** (1-3 feet): Full content accessible
### 2. Tell a Story, Not a Paper
**Poster ≠ Condensed Paper**
**Paper approach** (❌):
- Comprehensive literature review
- Detailed methodology
- All results presented
- Lengthy discussion
- 50+ references
**Poster approach** (✅):
- One sentence background
- Visual methods diagram
- 3-5 key results
- 3-4 bullet point conclusions
- 5-10 key references
**Story Arc for Posters**:
```
Hook (Problem) → Approach → Discovery → Impact
```
**Example**:
- **Hook**: "Antibiotic resistance threatens millions of lives annually"
- **Approach**: "We developed an AI system to predict resistance patterns"
- **Discovery**: "Our model achieves 87% accuracy, 20% better than existing methods"
- **Impact**: "Could reduce treatment failures by identifying resistance earlier"
### 3. The 800-Word Maximum
**Word Count Guidelines**:
- **Ideal**: 300-500 words
- **Maximum**: 800 words
- **Hard limit**: 1000 words (beyond this, poster is unreadable)
**Word Budget by Section**:
| Section | Word Count | % of Total |
|---------|-----------|------------|
| Introduction/Background | 50-100 | 15% |
| Methods | 100-150 | 25% |
| Results (text) | 100-200 | 25% |
| Discussion/Conclusions | 100-150 | 25% |
| References/Acknowledgments | 50-100 | 10% |
**Counting Tool**:
```latex
% Add word count to poster (remove for final)
\usepackage{texcount}
% Compile with: texcount -inc poster.tex
```
### 4. Visual-to-Text Ratio
**Optimal Balance**: 40-50% visual content, 50-60% text+white space
**Visual Content Includes**:
- Figures and graphs
- Photos and images
- Diagrams and flowcharts
- Icons and symbols
- Color blocks and design elements
**Too Text-Heavy** (❌):
- Wall of text
- Small figures
- Intimidating to viewers
- Low engagement
**Well-Balanced** (✅):
- Clear figures dominate
- Text supports visuals
- Easy to scan
- Inviting appearance
## Section-Specific Content Guidance
### Title
**Purpose**: Capture attention, convey topic, establish credibility
**Characteristics of Effective Titles**:
- **Concise**: 10-15 words maximum
- **Descriptive**: Clearly states research topic
- **Active**: Uses strong verbs when possible
- **Specific**: Avoids vague terms
- **Jargon-aware**: Balances field-specific terms with accessibility
**Title Formulas**:
**1. Descriptive**:
```
[Method/Approach] for [Problem/Application]
Example: "Deep Learning for Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease"
```
**2. Question**:
```
[Research Question]?
Example: "Can Microbiome Diversity Predict Treatment Response?"
```
**3. Assertion**:
```
[Finding] in [Context]
Example: "Novel Mechanism Identified in Drug Resistance Pathways"
```
**4. Colon Format**:
```
[Topic]: [Specific Approach/Finding]
Example: "Urban Heat Islands: A Machine Learning Framework for Mitigation"
```
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Generic titles: "A Study of X"
- ❌ Overly cute or clever wordplay (confuses message)
- ❌ Excessive jargon: "Utilization of CRISPR-Cas9..."
- ❌ Unnecessarily long: "Investigation of the potential role of..."
**LaTeX Title Formatting**:
```latex
% Emphasize key words with bold
\title{Deep Learning for \textbf{Early Detection} of Alzheimer's Disease}
% Two-line titles for long names
\title{Machine Learning Framework for\\Urban Heat Island Mitigation}
% Avoid ALL CAPS (harder to read)
```
### Authors and Affiliations
**Best Practices**:
- **Presenting author**: Bold, underline, or asterisk
- **Corresponding author**: Include email
- **Affiliations**: Superscript numbers or symbols
- **Institutional logos**: 2-4 maximum
**Format Examples**:
```latex
% Simple format
\author{\textbf{Jane Smith}\textsuperscript{1}, John Doe\textsuperscript{2}}
\institute{
\textsuperscript{1}University of Example,
\textsuperscript{2}Research Institute
}
% With contact
\author{Jane Smith\textsuperscript{1,*}}
\institute{
\textsuperscript{1}Department, University\\
\textsuperscript{*}jane.smith@university.edu
}
```
### Introduction/Background
**Purpose**: Establish context, motivate research, state objective
**Structure** (50-100 words):
1. **Problem statement** (1-2 sentences): What's the issue?
2. **Knowledge gap** (1-2 sentences): What's unknown/unsolved?
3. **Research objective** (1 sentence): What did you do?
**Example** (95 words):
```
Antibiotic resistance causes 700,000 deaths annually, projected to reach
10 million by 2050. Current diagnostic methods require 48-72 hours,
delaying appropriate treatment. Machine learning offers potential for
rapid resistance prediction, but existing models lack generalizability
across bacterial species.
We developed a transformer-based deep learning model to predict antibiotic
resistance from genomic sequences across multiple pathogen species. Our
approach integrates evolutionary information and protein structure to
improve cross-species accuracy.
```
**Visual Support**:
- Conceptual diagram showing problem
- Infographic with statistics
- Image of application context
**Common Mistakes**:
- ❌ Extensive literature review
- ❌ Too much background detail
- ❌ Undefined acronyms at first use
- ❌ Missing clear objective statement
### Methods
**Purpose**: Describe approach sufficiently for understanding (not replication)
**Key Question**: "How did you do it?" not "How could someone else replicate it?"
**Content Strategy**:
- **Prioritize**: Visual methods diagram > text description
- **Include**: Study design, key procedures, analysis approach
- **Omit**: Detailed protocols, routine procedures, specific reagent details
**Visual Methods (Highly Recommended)**:
```latex
% Flowchart of study design
\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=2cm]
\node (start) [box] {Data Collection\\n=1,000 samples};
\node (process) [box, below of=start] {Preprocessing\\Quality Control};
\node (analysis) [box, below of=process] {Statistical Analysis\\Mixed Models};
\node (end) [box, below of=analysis] {Validation\\Independent Cohort};
\draw [arrow] (start) -- (process);
\draw [arrow] (process) -- (analysis);
\draw [arrow] (analysis) -- (end);
\end{tikzpicture}
```
**Text Methods** (50-150 words):
**For Experimental Studies**:
```
Methods
• Study design: Randomized controlled trial (n=200)
• Participants: Adults aged 18-65 with Type 2 diabetes
• Intervention: 12-week exercise program vs. standard care
• Outcomes: HbA1c (primary), insulin sensitivity (secondary)
• Analysis: Linear mixed models, intention-to-treat
```
**For Computational Studies**:
```
Methods
• Dataset: 10,000 labeled images from ImageNet
• Architecture: ResNet-50 with custom attention mechanism
• Training: 100 epochs, Adam optimizer, learning rate 0.001
• Validation: 5-fold cross-validation
• Comparison: Baseline CNN, VGG-16, Inception-v3
```
**Format Options**:
- **Bullet points**: Quick scanning (recommended)
- **Numbered list**: Sequential procedures
- **Diagram + brief text**: Ideal combination
- **Table**: Multiple conditions or parameters
### Results
**Purpose**: Present key findings visually and clearly
**Golden Rule**: Show, don't tell
**Content Allocation**:
- **Figures**: 70-80% of Results section
- **Text**: 20-30% (brief descriptions, statistics)
**How Many Results**:
- **Ideal**: 3-5 main findings
- **Maximum**: 6-7 distinct results
- **Focus**: Primary outcomes, most impactful findings
**Figure Selection Criteria**:
1. Does it support the main message?
2. Is it self-explanatory with caption?
3. Can it be understood in 10 seconds?
4. Does it add information beyond text?
**Figure Captions**:
- **Descriptive**: Explain what is shown
- **Standalone**: Understandable without reading full poster
- **Statistical**: Include significance indicators, sample sizes
- **Concise**: 1-3 sentences
**Example Caption**:
```latex
\caption{Treatment significantly improved outcomes.
Mean±SD shown for control (blue, n=45) and treatment (orange, n=47) groups.
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (two-tailed t-test).}
```
**Text Support for Results** (100-200 words):
- State main finding per figure
- Include key statistics
- Note trends or patterns
- Avoid detailed interpretation (save for Discussion)
**Example Results Text**:
```
Key Findings
• Model achieved 87% accuracy on test set (vs. 73% baseline)
• Performance consistent across 5 bacterial species (p<0.001)
• Prediction speed: <30 seconds per isolate
• Feature importance: protein structure (42%), sequence (35%),
evolutionary conservation (23%)
```
**Data Presentation Formats**:
**1. Bar Charts**: Comparing categories
```latex
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[
ybar,
ylabel=Accuracy (\%),
symbolic x coords={Baseline, Model A, Our Method},
xtick=data,
nodes near coords
]
\addplot coordinates {(Baseline,73) (Model A,81) (Our Method,87)};
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}
```
**2. Line Graphs**: Trends over time
**3. Scatter Plots**: Correlations
**4. Heatmaps**: Matrix data, clustering
**5. Box Plots**: Distributions, comparisons
**6. ROC Curves**: Classification performance
### Discussion/Conclusions
**Purpose**: Interpret findings, state implications, acknowledge limitations
**Structure** (100-150 words):
**1. Main Conclusions** (50-75 words):
- 3-5 bullet points
- Clear, specific takeaways
- Linked to research objectives
**Example**:
```
Conclusions
• First cross-species model for antibiotic resistance prediction
achieving >85% accuracy
• Protein structure integration critical for generalizability
(improved accuracy by 14%)
• Prediction speed enables clinical decision support within
consultation timeframe
• Potential to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use by 20-30%
```
**2. Limitations** (25-50 words, optional but recommended):
- Acknowledge key constraints
- Brief, honest
- Shows scientific rigor
**Example**:
```
Limitations
• Training data limited to 5 bacterial species
• Requires genomic sequencing (not widely available)
• Validation needed in prospective clinical trials
```
**3. Future Directions** (25-50 words, optional):
- Next steps
- Broader implications
- Call to action
**Example**:
```
Next Steps
• Expand to 20+ additional species
• Develop point-of-care sequencing integration
• Launch multi-center clinical validation study (2025)
```
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Overstating findings: "This revolutionary breakthrough..."
- ❌ Extensive comparison to other work
- ❌ New results in Discussion
- ❌ Vague conclusions: "Further research is needed"
### References
**How Many**: 5-10 key citations
**Selection Criteria**:
- Include seminal work in the field
- Recent relevant studies (last 5 years)
- Methods cited in your poster
- Controversial claims that need support
**Format**: Abbreviated, consistent style
**Examples**:
**Numbered (Vancouver)**:
```
References
1. Smith et al. (2023). Nature. 615:234-240.
2. Jones & Lee (2024). Science. 383:112-118.
3. Chen et al. (2022). Cell. 185:456-470.
```
**Author-Year (APA)**:
```
References
Smith, J. et al. (2023). Title. Nature, 615, 234-240.
Jones, A., & Lee, B. (2024). Title. Science, 383, 112-118.
```
**Minimal (For Space Constraints)**:
```
Key References: Smith (Nature 2023), Jones (Science 2024),
Chen (Cell 2022). Full bibliography: [QR Code]
```
**Alternative**: QR code linking to full reference list
### Acknowledgments
**Include**:
- Funding sources (with grant numbers)
- Major collaborators
- Core facilities used
- Dataset sources
**Format** (25-50 words):
```
Acknowledgments
Funded by NIH Grant R01-123456 and NSF Award 7890123.
We thank Dr. X for data access, the Y Core Facility for
sequencing, and Z for helpful discussions.
```
### Contact Information
**Essential Elements**:
- Name of presenting/corresponding author
- Email address
- Optional: Lab website, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, ORCID
**Format**:
```
Contact: Jane Smith, jane.smith@university.edu
Lab: smithlab.university.edu | Twitter: @smithlab
```
**QR Code Alternative**:
- Link to personal/lab website
- Link to paper preprint/publication
- Link to code repository (GitHub)
- Link to supplementary materials
## Writing Style for Posters
### Active vs. Passive Voice
**Prefer Active Voice** (more engaging, clearer):
- ✅ "We developed a model..."
- ✅ "The treatment reduced symptoms..."
**Passive Voice** (when appropriate):
- ✅ "Samples were collected from..."
- ✅ "Data were analyzed using..."
### Sentence Length
**Keep Sentences Short**:
- **Ideal**: 10-15 words per sentence
- **Maximum**: 20-25 words
- **Avoid**: >30 words (hard to follow)
**Example Revision**:
- ❌ Long: "We performed a comprehensive analysis of gene expression data from 500 patients with colorectal cancer using RNA sequencing and identified 47 differentially expressed genes associated with treatment response." (31 words)
- ✅ Short: "We analyzed RNA sequencing data from 500 colorectal cancer patients. We identified 47 genes associated with treatment response." (19 words total, two sentences)
### Bullet Points vs. Paragraphs
**Use Bullet Points For**:
- ✅ Lists of items or findings
- ✅ Key conclusions
- ✅ Methods steps
- ✅ Study characteristics
**Use Short Paragraphs For**:
- ✅ Narrative flow (Introduction)
- ✅ Complex explanations
- ✅ Connected ideas
**Bullet Point Best Practices**:
- Start with action verbs or nouns
- Parallel structure throughout list
- 3-7 bullets per list (not too many)
- Brief (1-2 lines each)
**Example**:
```
Methods
• Participants: 200 adults (18-65 years)
• Design: Double-blind RCT (12 weeks)
• Intervention: Daily 30-min exercise
• Control: Standard care
• Analysis: Mixed models (SPSS v.28)
```
### Acronyms and Jargon
**First Use Rule**: Define at first appearance
```
We used machine learning (ML) to analyze... Later, ML predicted...
```
**Common Acronyms**: May not need definition if universal to field
- DNA, RNA, MRI, CT, PCR (in biomedical context)
- AI, ML, CNN (in computer science context)
**Avoid Excessive Jargon**:
- ❌ "Utilized" → ✅ "Used"
- ❌ "Implement utilization of" → ✅ "Use"
- ❌ "A majority of" → ✅ "Most"
### Numbers and Statistics
**Present Statistics Clearly**:
- Always include measure of variability (SD, SE, CI)
- Report sample sizes: n=50
- Indicate significance: p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001
- Use symbols consistently: * for p<0.05, ** for p<0.01
**Format Numbers**:
- Round appropriately (avoid false precision)
- Use consistent decimal places
- Include units: 25 mg/dL, 37°C
- Large numbers: 1,000 or 1000 (be consistent)
**Example**:
```
Treatment increased response by 23.5% (95% CI: 18.2-28.8%, p<0.001, n=150)
```
## Visual-Text Integration
### Figure-Text Relationship
**Figure First, Text Second**:
1. Design poster around key figures
2. Add text to support and explain visuals
3. Ensure figures can stand alone
**Text Placement Relative to Figures**:
- **Above**: Context, "What you're about to see"
- **Below**: Explanation, statistics, caption
- **Beside**: Comparison, interpretation
### Callouts and Annotations
**On-Figure Annotations**:
```latex
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[inner sep=0] (img) {\includegraphics[width=10cm]{figure.pdf}};
\draw[->, thick, red] (8,5) -- (6,3) node[left] {Key region};
\draw[red, thick] (3,2) circle (1cm) node[above=1.2cm] {Anomaly};
\end{tikzpicture}
```
**Callout Boxes**:
```latex
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=yellow!10, colframe=orange!80,
title=Key Finding]
Our method reduces errors by 34\% compared to state-of-the-art.
\end{tcolorbox}
```
### Icons for Section Headers
**Visual Section Markers**:
```latex
\usepackage{fontawesome5}
\block{\faFlask~Introduction}{...}
\block{\faCog~Methods}{...}
\block{\faChartBar~Results}{...}
\block{\faLightbulb~Conclusions}{...}
```
## Content Adaptation Strategies
### From Paper to Poster
**Condensation Process**:
**1. Identify Core Message** (The Elevator Pitch):
- What's the one thing you want people to remember?
- If you had 30 seconds, what would you say?
**2. Select Key Results**:
- Choose 3-5 most impactful findings
- Omit supporting/secondary results
- Focus on figures with strong visual impact
**3. Simplify Methods**:
- Visual flowchart > text description
- Omit routine procedures
- Include only essential parameters
**4. Trim Literature Review**:
- One sentence background
- One sentence gap/motivation
- One sentence your contribution
**5. Condense Discussion**:
- Main conclusions only
- Brief limitations
- One sentence future direction
### For Different Audiences
**Specialist Audience** (Same Field):
- Can use field-specific jargon
- Less background needed
- Focus on novel methodology
- Emphasize nuanced findings
**General Scientific Audience**:
- Define key terms
- More context/background
- Broader implications
- Visual metaphors helpful
**Public/Lay Audience**:
- Minimal jargon, all defined
- Extensive context
- Real-world applications
- Analogies and simple language
**Example Adaptation**:
**Specialist**: "CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of BRCA1 induced synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors"
**General**: "We used gene editing to make cancer cells vulnerable to existing drugs"
**Public**: "We found a way to make cancer treatments work better by targeting specific genetic weaknesses"
## Quality Control Checklist
### Content Review
**Clarity**:
- [ ] Main message immediately clear
- [ ] All acronyms defined
- [ ] Sentences short and direct
- [ ] No unnecessary jargon
**Completeness**:
- [ ] Research question/objective stated
- [ ] Methods sufficiently described
- [ ] Key results presented
- [ ] Conclusions drawn
- [ ] Limitations acknowledged
**Accuracy**:
- [ ] All statistics correct
- [ ] Figure captions accurate
- [ ] References properly cited
- [ ] No overstated claims
**Engagement**:
- [ ] Compelling title
- [ ] Visual interest
- [ ] Clear take-home message
- [ ] Conversation starters
### Readability Testing
**Distance Test**:
- Print at 25% scale
- View from 2-3 feet (simulates 8-12 feet for full poster)
- Can you read: Title? Section headers? Body text?
**Scan Test**:
- Give poster to colleague for 30 seconds
- Ask: "What is this poster about?"
- They should identify: Topic, approach, main finding
**Detail Test**:
- Ask colleague to read poster thoroughly (5 min)
- Ask: "What are the key conclusions?"
- Verify understanding matches your intent
## Common Content Mistakes
**1. Too Much Text**
- ❌ >1000 words
- ❌ Long paragraphs
- ❌ Full paper condensed
- ✅ 300-800 words, bullet points, key findings only
**2. Unclear Message**
- ❌ Multiple unrelated findings
- ❌ No clear conclusion
- ❌ Vague implications
- ✅ 1-3 main points, explicit conclusions
**3. Methods Overkill**
- ❌ Detailed protocols
- ❌ All parameters listed
- ❌ Routine procedures described
- ✅ Visual flowchart, key details only
**4. Poor Figure Integration**
- ❌ Figures without context
- ❌ Unclear captions
- ❌ Text doesn't reference figures
- ✅ Figures central, well-captioned, text integrated
**5. Missing Context**
- ❌ No background
- ❌ Undefined acronyms
- ❌ Assumes expert knowledge
- ✅ Brief context, definitions, accessible to broader audience
## Conclusion
Effective poster content:
- **Concise**: 300-800 words maximum
- **Visual**: 40-50% figures and graphics
- **Clear**: One main message, 3-5 key findings
- **Engaging**: Compelling story, not just facts
- **Accessible**: Appropriate for target audience
- **Actionable**: Clear implications and next steps
Remember: Your poster is a conversation starter, not a comprehensive treatise. Design content to intrigue, engage, and invite discussion.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,806 @@
# Research Poster Design Principles
## Overview
Effective poster design balances visual appeal, readability, and scientific content. This guide covers typography, color theory, visual hierarchy, accessibility, and evidence-based design principles for research posters.
## Core Design Principles
### 1. Visual Hierarchy
Guide viewers through content in logical order using size, color, position, and contrast.
**Hierarchy Levels**:
1. **Primary (Title)**: Largest, most prominent
- Size: 72-120pt
- Position: Top center or top spanning
- Weight: Bold
- Purpose: Capture attention from 20+ feet
2. **Secondary (Section Headers)**: Organize content
- Size: 48-72pt
- Weight: Bold or semi-bold
- Purpose: Section navigation, readable from 10 feet
3. **Tertiary (Body Text)**: Main content
- Size: 24-36pt minimum
- Weight: Regular
- Purpose: Detailed information, readable from 4-6 feet
4. **Quaternary (Captions, References)**: Supporting info
- Size: 18-24pt
- Weight: Regular or light
- Purpose: Context and attribution
**Implementation**:
```latex
% Define hierarchy in LaTeX
\setbeamerfont{title}{size=\VeryHuge,series=\bfseries} % 90pt+
\setbeamerfont{block title}{size=\Huge,series=\bfseries} % 60pt
\setbeamerfont{block body}{size=\LARGE} % 30pt
\setbeamerfont{caption}{size=\large} % 24pt
```
### 2. White Space (Negative Space)
Empty space is not wasted space—it enhances readability and guides attention.
**White Space Functions**:
- **Breathing room**: Prevents overwhelming viewers
- **Grouping**: Shows which elements belong together
- **Focus**: Draws attention to important elements
- **Flow**: Creates visual pathways through content
**Guidelines**:
- Minimum 5-10% margins on all sides
- Consistent spacing between blocks (1-2cm)
- Space around figures equal to or greater than border width
- Group related items closely, separate unrelated items
- Don't fill every inch—aim for 40-60% text coverage
**LaTeX Implementation**:
```latex
% beamerposter spacing
\setbeamertemplate{block begin}{
\vskip2ex % Space before block
...
}
% tikzposter spacing
\documentclass[..., blockverticalspace=15mm, colspace=15mm]{tikzposter}
% Manual spacing
\vspace{2cm} % Vertical space
\hspace{1cm} % Horizontal space
```
### 3. Alignment and Grid Systems
Proper alignment creates professional, organized appearance.
**Alignment Types**:
- **Left-aligned text**: Most readable for body text (Western audiences)
- **Center-aligned**: Headers, titles, symmetric layouts
- **Right-aligned**: Rarely used, special cases only
- **Justified**: Avoid (creates uneven spacing)
**Grid Systems**:
- **2-column**: Simple, traditional, good for narrative flow
- **3-column**: Most common, balanced, versatile
- **4-column**: Complex, information-dense, requires careful design
- **Asymmetric**: Creative, modern, requires expertise
**Best Practices**:
- Align block edges to invisible grid lines
- Keep consistent column widths (unless intentionally asymmetric)
- Align similar elements (all figures, all text blocks)
- Use consistent margins throughout
### 4. Visual Flow and Reading Patterns
Design for natural eye movement and logical content progression.
**Common Reading Patterns**:
**Z-Pattern (Landscape posters)**:
```
Start → → → Top Right
Middle Left → → Middle
Bottom Left → → → End
```
**F-Pattern (Portrait posters)**:
```
Title → → → →
Section 1 → →
Section 2 → →
Section 3 → →
Conclusion → →
```
**Gutenberg Diagram**:
```
Primary Area Strong Fallow
(top-left) (top-right)
↓ ↓
Weak Fallow Terminal Area
(bottom-left) (bottom-right)
```
**Implementation Strategy**:
1. Place most important content in "hot zones" (top-left, center)
2. Create visual paths with arrows, lines, or color
3. Use numbering for sequential information (Methods steps)
4. Design left-to-right, top-to-bottom flow (Western audiences)
5. Position conclusions prominently (bottom-right is natural endpoint)
## Typography
### Font Selection
**Recommended Fonts**:
**Sans-Serif (Recommended for posters)**:
- **Helvetica**: Clean, professional, widely available
- **Arial**: Similar to Helvetica, universal compatibility
- **Calibri**: Modern, friendly, good readability
- **Open Sans**: Contemporary, excellent web and print
- **Roboto**: Modern, Google design, highly readable
- **Lato**: Warm, professional, works at all sizes
**Serif (Use sparingly)**:
- **Times New Roman**: Traditional, formal
- **Garamond**: Elegant, good for humanities
- **Georgia**: Designed for screens, readable
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Comic Sans (unprofessional)
- ❌ Decorative or script fonts (illegible from distance)
- ❌ Mixing more than 2-3 font families
**LaTeX Implementation**:
```latex
% Helvetica (sans-serif)
\usepackage{helvet}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
% Arial-like
\usepackage{avant}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
% Modern fonts with fontspec (requires LuaLaTeX/XeLaTeX)
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Helvetica Neue}
\setsansfont{Open Sans}
```
### Font Sizing
**Absolute Minimum Sizes** (readable from 4-6 feet):
- Title: 72pt+ (85-120pt recommended)
- Section headers: 48-72pt
- Body text: 24-36pt (30pt+ recommended)
- Captions/small text: 18-24pt
- References: 16-20pt minimum
**Testing Readability**:
- Print at 25% scale
- Read from 2-3 feet distance
- If legible, full-scale poster will be readable from 8-12 feet
**Size Conversion**:
| LaTeX Command | Approximate Size | Use Case |
|---------------|------------------|----------|
| `\tiny` | 10pt | Avoid on posters |
| `\small` | 16pt | Minimal use only |
| `\normalsize` | 20pt | References (scaled up) |
| `\large` | 24pt | Captions, small text |
| `\Large` | 28pt | Body text (minimum) |
| `\LARGE` | 32pt | Body text (recommended) |
| `\huge` | 36pt | Subheadings |
| `\Huge` | 48pt | Section headers |
| `\VeryHuge` | 72pt+ | Title |
### Text Formatting Best Practices
**Use**:
-**Bold** for emphasis and headers
- ✅ Short paragraphs (3-5 lines maximum)
- ✅ Bullet points for lists
- ✅ Adequate line spacing (1.2-1.5)
- ✅ High contrast (dark text on light background)
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Italics from distance (hard to read)
- ❌ ALL CAPS FOR LONG TEXT (SLOW TO READ)
- ❌ Underlines (old-fashioned, interferes with descenders)
- ❌ Long paragraphs (> 6 lines)
- ❌ Light text on light backgrounds
**Line Spacing**:
```latex
% Increase line spacing for readability
\usepackage{setspace}
\setstretch{1.3} % 1.3x normal spacing
% Or in specific blocks
\begin{spacing}{1.5}
Your text here with extra spacing
\end{spacing}
```
## Color Theory for Posters
### Color Psychology and Meaning
Colors convey meaning and affect viewer perception:
| Color | Associations | Use Cases |
|-------|--------------|-----------|
| **Blue** | Trust, professionalism, science | Academic, medical, technology |
| **Green** | Nature, health, growth | Environmental, biology, health |
| **Red** | Energy, urgency, passion | Attention, warnings, bold statements |
| **Orange** | Creativity, enthusiasm | Innovative research, friendly approach |
| **Purple** | Wisdom, creativity, luxury | Humanities, arts, premium research |
| **Gray** | Neutral, professional, modern | Technology, minimal designs |
| **Yellow** | Optimism, attention, caution | Highlights, energy, caution areas |
### Color Scheme Types
**1. Monochromatic**: Variations of single hue
- **Pros**: Harmonious, professional, easy to execute
- **Cons**: Can be boring, less visual interest
- **Use**: Conservative conferences, institutional branding
```latex
% Monochromatic blue scheme
\definecolor{darkblue}{RGB}{0,51,102}
\definecolor{medblue}{RGB}{51,102,153}
\definecolor{lightblue}{RGB}{204,229,255}
```
**2. Analogous**: Adjacent colors on color wheel
- **Pros**: Harmonious, visually comfortable
- **Cons**: Low contrast, may lack excitement
- **Use**: Nature/biology topics, smooth gradients
```latex
% Analogous blue-green scheme
\definecolor{blue}{RGB}{0,102,204}
\definecolor{teal}{RGB}{0,153,153}
\definecolor{green}{RGB}{51,153,102}
```
**3. Complementary**: Opposite colors on wheel
- **Pros**: High contrast, vibrant, energetic
- **Cons**: Can be overwhelming if intense
- **Use**: Drawing attention, modern designs
```latex
% Complementary blue-orange scheme
\definecolor{primary}{RGB}{0,71,171} % Blue
\definecolor{accent}{RGB}{255,127,0} % Orange
```
**4. Triadic**: Three evenly spaced colors
- **Pros**: Balanced, vibrant, visually rich
- **Cons**: Can appear busy if not balanced
- **Use**: Multi-topic posters, creative fields
```latex
% Triadic scheme
\definecolor{blue}{RGB}{0,102,204}
\definecolor{red}{RGB}{204,0,51}
\definecolor{yellow}{RGB}{255,204,0}
```
**5. Split-Complementary**: Base + two adjacent to complement
- **Pros**: High contrast but less tense than complementary
- **Cons**: Complex to balance
- **Use**: Sophisticated designs, experienced designers
### High-Contrast Combinations
Ensure readability with sufficient contrast:
**Excellent Contrast (Use these)**:
- Dark blue on white
- Black on white
- White on dark blue/green/purple
- Dark gray on light yellow
- Black on light cyan
**Poor Contrast (Avoid)**:
- ❌ Red on green (color-blind issue)
- ❌ Yellow on white
- ❌ Light gray on white
- ❌ Blue on black (hard to read)
- ❌ Any pure colors on each other
**Contrast Ratio Standards**:
- Minimum: 4.5:1 (WCAG AA)
- Recommended: 7:1 (WCAG AAA)
- Test at: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
**LaTeX Color Contrast**:
```latex
% High contrast header
\setbeamercolor{block title}{bg=black, fg=white}
% Medium contrast body
\setbeamercolor{block body}{bg=gray!10, fg=black}
% Check contrast manually or use online tools
```
### Color-Blind Friendly Palettes
~8% of males and ~0.5% of females have color vision deficiency.
**Safe Color Combinations**:
- Blue + Orange (most universally distinguishable)
- Blue + Yellow
- Blue + Red
- Purple + Green (use with caution)
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Red + Green (indistinguishable to most common color blindness)
- ❌ Green + Brown
- ❌ Blue + Purple (can be problematic)
- ❌ Light green + Yellow
**Recommended Palettes**:
**IBM Color Blind Safe** (excellent accessibility):
```latex
\definecolor{ibmblue}{RGB}{100,143,255}
\definecolor{ibmmagenta}{RGB}{254,97,0}
\definecolor{ibmpurple}{RGB}{220,38,127}
\definecolor{ibmcyan}{RGB}{33,191,115}
```
**Okabe-Ito Palette** (scientifically tested):
```latex
\definecolor{okorange}{RGB}{230,159,0}
\definecolor{okskyblue}{RGB}{86,180,233}
\definecolor{okgreen}{RGB}{0,158,115}
\definecolor{okyellow}{RGB}{240,228,66}
\definecolor{okblue}{RGB}{0,114,178}
\definecolor{okvermillion}{RGB}{213,94,0}
\definecolor{okpurple}{RGB}{204,121,167}
```
**Paul Tol's Bright Palette**:
```latex
\definecolor{tolblue}{RGB}{68,119,170}
\definecolor{tolred}{RGB}{204,102,119}
\definecolor{tolgreen}{RGB}{34,136,51}
\definecolor{tolyellow}{RGB}{238,221,136}
\definecolor{tolcyan}{RGB}{102,204,238}
```
### Institutional Branding
Match university or department colors:
```latex
% Example: Stanford colors
\definecolor{stanford-red}{RGB}{140,21,21}
\definecolor{stanford-gray}{RGB}{83,86,90}
% Example: MIT colors
\definecolor{mit-red}{RGB}{163,31,52}
\definecolor{mit-gray}{RGB}{138,139,140}
% Example: Cambridge colors
\definecolor{cambridge-blue}{RGB}{163,193,173}
\definecolor{cambridge-lblue}{RGB}{212,239,223}
```
## Accessibility Considerations
### Universal Design Principles
Design posters usable by the widest range of people:
**1. Visual Accessibility**:
- High contrast text (minimum 4.5:1 ratio)
- Large font sizes (24pt+ body text)
- Color-blind safe palettes
- Clear visual hierarchy
- Avoid relying solely on color to convey information
**2. Cognitive Accessibility**:
- Clear, simple language
- Logical organization
- Consistent layout
- Visual cues for navigation (arrows, numbers)
- Avoid clutter and information overload
**3. Physical Accessibility**:
- Position critical content at wheelchair-accessible height (3-5 feet)
- Include QR codes to digital versions
- Provide printed handouts for detail viewing
- Consider lighting and reflection in poster material choice
### Alternative Text and Descriptions
Make posters accessible to screen readers (for digital versions):
```latex
% Add alt text to figures
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figure.pdf}
% Alternative: Include detailed caption
\caption{Bar graph showing mean±SD of treatment outcomes.
Control group (blue): 45±5\%; Treatment group (orange): 78±6\%.
Asterisks indicate significance: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.}
```
### Multi-Modal Information
Don't rely on single sensory channel:
**Use Redundant Encoding**:
- Color + Shape (not just color for categories)
- Color + Pattern (hatching, stippling)
- Color + Label (text labels on graph elements)
- Text + Icons (visual + verbal)
**Example**:
```latex
% Good: Color + shape + label
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[fill=blue, circle] (0,0) circle (0.3) node[right] {Male: 45\%};
\draw[fill=red, rectangle] (0,-1) rectangle (0.6,-0.4) node[right] {Female: 55\%};
\end{tikzpicture}
```
## Layout Composition
### Rule of Thirds
Divide poster into 3×3 grid; place key elements at intersections:
```
+-----+-----+-----+
| × | | × | ← Top third (title, logos)
+-----+-----+-----+
| | × | | ← Middle third (main content)
+-----+-----+-----+
| × | | × | ← Bottom third (conclusions)
+-----+-----+-----+
↑ ↑
Left Right
```
**Power Points** (intersections):
- Top-left: Primary section start
- Top-right: Logos, QR codes
- Center: Key figure or main result
- Bottom-right: Conclusions, contact
### Balance and Symmetry
**Symmetric Layouts**:
- Formal, traditional, stable
- Easy to design
- Can appear static or boring
- Good for conservative audiences
**Asymmetric Layouts**:
- Dynamic, modern, interesting
- Harder to execute well
- More visually engaging
- Good for creative fields
**Visual Weight Balance**:
- Large elements = heavy weight
- Dark colors = heavy weight
- Dense text = heavy weight
- Distribute weight evenly across poster
### Proximity and Grouping
**Gestalt Principles**:
**Proximity**: Items close together are perceived as related
```
[Introduction] [Methods]
[Results] [Discussion]
```
**Similarity**: Similar items are perceived as grouped
- Use consistent colors for related sections
- Same border styles for similar content types
**Continuity**: Eyes follow lines and paths
- Use arrows to guide through methods
- Align elements to create invisible lines
**Closure**: Mind completes incomplete shapes
- Use partial borders to group without boxing in
## Visual Elements
### Icons and Graphics
Strategic use of icons enhances comprehension:
**Benefits**:
- Universal language (crosses linguistic barriers)
- Faster processing than text
- Adds visual interest
- Clarifies concepts
**Best Practices**:
- Use consistent style (all line, all filled, all flat)
- Appropriate size (1-3cm typical)
- Label ambiguous icons
- Source: Font Awesome, Noun Project, academic icon sets
**LaTeX Implementation**:
```latex
% Font Awesome icons
\usepackage{fontawesome5}
\faFlask{} Methods \quad \faChartBar{} Results
% Custom icons with TikZ
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[circle, draw, thick, minimum size=1cm] {\Huge \faAtom};
\end{tikzpicture}
```
### Borders and Dividers
**Use Borders To**:
- Define sections
- Group related content
- Add visual interest
- Match institutional branding
**Border Styles**:
- Solid lines: Traditional, formal
- Dashed lines: Informal, secondary info
- Rounded corners: Friendly, modern
- Drop shadows: Depth, modern (use sparingly)
**Guidelines**:
- Keep consistent width (2-5pt typical)
- Use sparingly (not every element needs a border)
- Match border color to content or theme
- Ensure sufficient padding inside borders
```latex
% tikzposter borders
\usecolorstyle{Denmark}
\tikzposterlatexaffectionproofoff % Remove bottom-right logo
% Custom border style
\defineblockstyle{CustomBlock}{
titlewidthscale=1, bodywidthscale=1, titleleft,
titleoffsetx=0pt, titleoffsety=0pt, bodyoffsetx=0pt, bodyoffsety=0pt,
bodyverticalshift=0pt, roundedcorners=10, linewidth=2pt,
titleinnersep=8mm, bodyinnersep=8mm
}{
\draw[draw=blocktitlebgcolor, fill=blockbodybgcolor,
rounded corners=\blockroundedcorners, line width=\blocklinewidth]
(blockbody.south west) rectangle (blocktitle.north east);
}
```
### Background and Texture
**Background Options**:
**Plain (Recommended)**:
- White or very light color
- Maximum readability
- Professional
- Print-friendly
**Gradient**:
- Subtle gradients acceptable
- Top-to-bottom or radial
- Avoid strong contrasts that interfere with text
**Textured**:
- Very subtle textures only
- Watermarks of logos/molecules (5-10% opacity)
- Avoid patterns that create visual noise
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Busy backgrounds
- ❌ Images behind text
- ❌ High contrast backgrounds
- ❌ Repeating patterns that cause visual artifacts
```latex
% Gradient background in tikzposter
\documentclass{tikzposter}
\definecolorstyle{GradientStyle}{
% ...color definitions...
}{
\colorlet{backgroundcolor}{white!90!blue}
\colorlet{framecolor}{white!70!blue}
}
% Watermark
\usepackage{tikz}
\AddToShipoutPictureBG{
\AtPageCenter{
\includegraphics[width=0.5\paperwidth,opacity=0.05]{university-seal.pdf}
}
}
```
## Common Design Mistakes
### Critical Errors
**1. Too Much Text** (Most common mistake)
- ❌ More than 1000 words
- ❌ Long paragraphs (>5 lines)
- ❌ Small font sizes to fit more content
- ✅ Solution: Cut ruthlessly, use bullet points, focus on key messages
**2. Poor Contrast**
- ❌ Light text on light background
- ❌ Colored text on colored background
- ✅ Solution: Dark on light or light on dark, test contrast ratio
**3. Font Size Too Small**
- ❌ Body text under 24pt
- ❌ Trying to fit full paper content
- ✅ Solution: 30pt+ body text, prioritize key findings
**4. Cluttered Layout**
- ❌ No white space
- ❌ Elements touching edges
- ❌ Random placement
- ✅ Solution: Generous margins, grid alignment, intentional white space
**5. Inconsistent Styling**
- ❌ Multiple font families
- ❌ Varying header styles
- ❌ Misaligned elements
- ✅ Solution: Define style guide, use templates, align to grid
### Moderate Issues
**6. Poor Figure Quality**
- ❌ Pixelated images (<300 DPI)
- ❌ Tiny axis labels
- ❌ Unreadable legends
- ✅ Solution: Vector graphics (PDF/SVG), large labels, clear legends
**7. Color Overload**
- ❌ Too many colors (>5 distinct hues)
- ❌ Neon or overly saturated colors
- ✅ Solution: Limit to 2-3 main colors, use tints/shades for variation
**8. Ignoring Visual Hierarchy**
- ❌ All text same size
- ❌ No clear entry point
- ✅ Solution: Vary sizes significantly, clear title, visual flow
**9. Information Overload**
- ❌ Trying to show everything
- ❌ Too many figures
- ✅ Solution: Show 3-5 key results, link to full paper via QR code
**10. Poor Typography**
- ❌ Justified text (uneven spacing)
- ❌ All caps body text
- ❌ Mixing serif and sans-serif randomly
- ✅ Solution: Left-align body, sentence case, consistent fonts
## Design Checklist
### Before Printing
- [ ] Title visible and readable from 20+ feet
- [ ] Body text minimum 24pt, ideally 30pt+
- [ ] High contrast (4.5:1 minimum) throughout
- [ ] Color-blind friendly palette
- [ ] Less than 800 words total
- [ ] White space around all elements
- [ ] Consistent alignment and spacing
- [ ] All figures high resolution (300+ DPI)
- [ ] Figure labels readable (18pt+ minimum)
- [ ] No orphaned text or awkward breaks
- [ ] Contact information included
- [ ] QR codes tested and functional
- [ ] Consistent font usage (2-3 families max)
- [ ] All acronyms defined
- [ ] Proper institutional branding/logos
- [ ] Print test at 25% scale for readability check
### Content Review
- [ ] Clear narrative arc (problem → approach → findings → impact)
- [ ] 1-3 main messages clearly communicated
- [ ] Methods concise but reproducible
- [ ] Results visually presented (not just text)
- [ ] Conclusions actionable and clear
- [ ] References cited appropriately
- [ ] No typos or grammatical errors
- [ ] Figures have descriptive captions
- [ ] Data visualizations are clear and honest
- [ ] Statistical significance properly indicated
## Evidence-Based Design Recommendations
Research on poster effectiveness shows:
**Findings from Studies**:
1. **Viewers spend 3-5 minutes average** on posters
- Design for scanning, not deep reading
- Most important info must be visible immediately
2. **Visual content processed 60,000× faster** than text
- Use figures, not paragraphs, to convey key findings
- Images attract attention first
3. **High contrast improves recall** by 40%
- Dark on light > light on dark for comprehension
- Color contrast aids memory retention
4. **White space increases comprehension** by 20%
- Don't fear empty space
- Margins and padding are essential
5. **Three-column layouts most effective** for portrait posters
- Balanced visual weight
- Natural reading flow
6. **QR codes increase engagement** by 30%
- Provide digital access to full paper
- Link to videos, code repositories, data
## Resources and Tools
### Color Tools
- **Coolors.co**: Generate color palettes
- **Adobe Color**: Color wheel and accessibility checker
- **ColorBrewer**: Scientific visualization palettes
- **WebAIM Contrast Checker**: Test contrast ratios
### Design Resources
- **Canva**: Poster mockups and inspiration
- **Figma**: Design prototypes before LaTeX
- **Noun Project**: Icons and graphics
- **Font Awesome**: Icon fonts for LaTeX
### Testing Tools
- **Coblis**: Color blindness simulator
- **Vischeck**: Another color blindness checker
- **Accessibility Checker**: WCAG compliance
### LaTeX Packages
- `xcolor`: Extended color support
- `tcolorbox`: Colored boxes and frames
- `fontawesome5`: Icon fonts
- `qrcode`: QR code generation
- `tikz`: Custom graphics
## Conclusion
Effective poster design requires balancing aesthetics, readability, and scientific content. Follow these core principles:
1. **Less is more**: Prioritize key messages over comprehensive detail
2. **Size matters**: Make text large enough to read from distance
3. **Contrast is critical**: Ensure all text is highly readable
4. **Accessibility first**: Design for diverse audiences
5. **Visual hierarchy**: Guide viewers through content logically
6. **Test early**: Print at reduced scale and gather feedback
Remember: A poster is an advertisement for your research and a conversation starter—not a substitute for reading the full paper.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,900 @@
# Poster Layout and Design Guide
## Overview
Effective poster layout organizes content for maximum impact and comprehension. This guide covers grid systems, spatial organization, visual flow, and layout patterns for research posters.
## Grid Systems and Column Layouts
### Common Grid Patterns
#### 1. Two-Column Layout
**Characteristics**:
- Simple, traditional structure
- Easy to design and execute
- Clear narrative flow
- Good for text-heavy content
- Best for A1 size or smaller
**Content Organization**:
```
+-------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+-------------------------+
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
| | |
| Intro | Results |
| | |
| Methods | Discussion |
| | |
| | Conclusions |
+-------------------------+
| References/Contact |
+-------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (beamerposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}[t]
\begin{column}{.48\linewidth}
\begin{block}{Introduction}
% Content
\end{block}
\begin{block}{Methods}
% Content
\end{block}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.48\linewidth}
\begin{block}{Results}
% Content
\end{block}
\begin{block}{Conclusions}
% Content
\end{block}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
```
**Best For**:
- Small posters (A1, A2)
- Narrative-heavy content
- Simple comparisons (before/after, control/treatment)
- Linear storytelling
**Limitations**:
- Limited space for multiple results
- Can appear basic or dated
- Less visual variety
#### 2. Three-Column Layout (Most Popular)
**Characteristics**:
- Balanced, professional appearance
- Optimal for A0 posters
- Versatile content distribution
- Natural visual rhythm
- Industry standard
**Content Organization**:
```
+--------------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+--------------------------------+
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3|
| | | |
| Intro | Results | Results |
| | (Fig 1) | (Fig 2) |
| Methods | | |
| | Results | Discuss |
| Methods | (Fig 3) | |
| (cont.) | | Concl. |
+--------------------------------+
| Acknowledgments/Refs |
+--------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (tikzposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}
\column{0.33}
\block{Introduction}{...}
\block{Methods}{...}
\column{0.33}
\block{Results Part 1}{...}
\block{Results Part 2}{...}
\column{0.33}
\block{Results Part 3}{...}
\block{Discussion}{...}
\block{Conclusions}{...}
\end{columns}
```
**Best For**:
- Standard A0 conference posters
- Multiple results/figures (4-6)
- Balanced content distribution
- Professional academic presentations
**Strengths**:
- Visual balance and symmetry
- Adequate space for text and figures
- Clear section delineation
- Easy to scan left-to-right
#### 3. Four-Column Layout
**Characteristics**:
- Information-dense
- Modern, structured appearance
- Best for large posters (>A0)
- Requires careful design
- More complex to balance
**Content Organization**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+----------------------------------------+
| Col 1 | Col 2 | Col 3 | Col 4 |
| | | | |
| Intro | Method | Results | Results |
| | (Flow) | (Fig 1) | (Fig 3) |
| Motiv. | | | |
| | Method | Results | Discuss. |
| Hypoth.| (Stats)| (Fig 2) | |
| | | | Concl. |
+----------------------------------------+
| References/Contact |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (baposter)**:
```latex
\begin{poster}{columns=4, colspacing=1em, ...}
\headerbox{Intro}{name=intro, column=0, row=0}{...}
\headerbox{Methods}{name=methods, column=1, row=0}{...}
\headerbox{Results 1}{name=res1, column=2, row=0}{...}
\headerbox{Results 2}{name=res2, column=3, row=0}{...}
% Continue with below=... for stacking
\end{poster}
```
**Best For**:
- Large format posters (48×72")
- Data-heavy presentations
- Comparison studies (multiple conditions)
- Engineering/technical posters
**Challenges**:
- Can appear crowded
- Requires more white space management
- Harder to achieve visual balance
- Risk of overwhelming viewers
#### 4. Asymmetric Layouts
**Characteristics**:
- Dynamic, modern appearance
- Flexible content arrangement
- Emphasizes hierarchy
- Requires design expertise
- Best for creative fields
**Example Pattern**:
```
+--------------------------------+
| Title/Header |
+--------------------------------+
| Wide Column | Narrow Column |
| (66%) | (33%) |
| | |
| Intro + | Key |
| Methods | Figure |
| (narrative) | (emphasized) |
| | |
+--------------------------------+
| Results (spanning full width) |
+--------------------------------+
| Discussion | Conclusions |
| (50%) | (50%) |
+--------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Implementation (tikzposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}
\column{0.65}
\block{Introduction and Methods}{
% Combined narrative section
}
\column{0.35}
\block{}{
% Key figure with minimal text
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{key-figure.pdf}
}
\end{columns}
\block[width=1.0\linewidth]{Results}{
% Full-width results section
}
```
**Best For**:
- Design-oriented conferences
- Single key finding with supporting content
- Modern, non-traditional fields
- Experienced poster designers
### Grid Alignment Principles
**Baseline Grid**:
- Establish invisible horizontal lines
- Align all text blocks to grid
- Typical spacing: 5mm or 10mm increments
- Creates visual rhythm and professionalism
**Column Grid**:
- Divide width into equal units (12, 16, or 24 units common)
- Elements span multiple units
- Allows flexible but structured layouts
**Example 12-Column Grid**:
```
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |10 |11 |12 |
|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| Block spanning 6 units| Block spanning 6 units|
| Block spanning 12 units |
| 4 units | 8 units (emphasized) |
```
**LaTeX Grid Helper**:
```latex
% Debug grid overlay (remove for final version)
\usepackage{tikz}
\AddToShipoutPictureBG{
\begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture, overlay]
\draw[help lines, step=5cm, very thin, gray!30]
(current page.south west) grid (current page.north east);
\end{tikzpicture}
}
```
## Visual Flow and Reading Patterns
### Z-Pattern (Landscape Posters)
Viewers' eyes naturally follow a Z-shape on landscape layouts:
```
START → → → → → → → → → → → → → → TOP RIGHT
↓ ↓
↓ ↓
MIDDLE LEFT → → → → → → → → → MIDDLE RIGHT
↓ ↓
↓ ↓
BOTTOM LEFT → → → → → → → → → → → → END
```
**Design Strategy**:
1. **Top-left**: Title and introduction (entry point)
2. **Top-right**: Institution logo, QR code
3. **Center**: Key result or main figure
4. **Bottom-right**: Conclusions and contact (exit point)
**Content Placement**:
- Critical information at corners and center
- Support information along diagonal paths
- Use arrows or visual cues to reinforce flow
### F-Pattern (Portrait Posters)
Portrait posters follow F-shaped eye movement:
```
TITLE → → → → → → → → → → → →
INTRO → → → →
METHODS
RESULTS → → →
RESULTS (cont.)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS → → → → → → → → →
```
**Design Strategy**:
1. Place engaging content at top-left
2. Use section headers to create horizontal scan points
3. Most important figures in upper-middle area
4. Conclusions visible without scrolling (if digital) or from distance
### Gutenberg Diagram
Classic newspaper layout principle:
```
+------------------+------------------+
| PRIMARY AREA | STRONG FALLOW |
| (most attention) | (moderate attn) |
| ↓ | ↓ |
+------------------+------------------+
| WEAK FALLOW | TERMINAL AREA |
| (least attention)| (final resting) |
| | ↑ |
+------------------+------------------+
```
**Optimization**:
- **Primary Area** (top-left): Introduction, problem statement
- **Strong Fallow** (top-right): Supporting figure, logo
- **Weak Fallow** (bottom-left): Methods details, references
- **Terminal Area** (bottom-right): Conclusions, take-home message
### Directional Cues
Guide viewers explicitly through content:
**Numerical Ordering**:
```latex
\block{❶ Introduction}{...}
\block{❷ Methods}{...}
\block{❸ Results}{...}
\block{❹ Conclusions}{...}
```
**Arrows and Lines**:
```latex
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[block] (intro) {Introduction};
\node[block, right=of intro] (methods) {Methods};
\node[block, right=of methods] (results) {Results};
\draw[->, thick, blue] (intro) -- (methods);
\draw[->, thick, blue] (methods) -- (results);
\end{tikzpicture}
```
**Color Progression**:
- Light to dark shades indicating progression
- Cool to warm colors showing importance increase
- Consistent color for related sections
## Spatial Organization Strategies
### Header/Title Area
**Typical Size**: 10-15% of total poster height
**Essential Elements**:
- **Title**: Concise, descriptive (10-15 words max)
- **Authors**: Full names, presenting author emphasized
- **Affiliations**: Institutions, departments
- **Logos**: University, funding agencies (2-4 max)
- **Conference info** (optional): Name, date, location
**Layout Options**:
**Centered**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| [Logo] POSTER TITLE HERE [Logo]|
| Authors and Affiliations |
| email@university.edu |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**Left-aligned**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| POSTER TITLE HERE [Logo] |
| Authors and Affiliations [Logo] |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**Split**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| [Logo] | Authors & Affil. |
| POSTER TITLE | email@edu |
| | [QR Code] |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Header (beamerposter)**:
```latex
\begin{columns}[T]
\begin{column}{.15\linewidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{logo1.pdf}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.7\linewidth}
\centering
{\VeryHuge\textbf{Your Research Title Here}}\\[0.5cm]
{\Large Author One\textsuperscript{1}, Author Two\textsuperscript{2}}\\[0.3cm]
{\normalsize \textsuperscript{1}University A, \textsuperscript{2}University B}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{.15\linewidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{logo2.pdf}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
```
### Main Content Area
**Typical Size**: 70-80% of total poster
**Organization Principles**:
**1. Top-to-Bottom Flow**:
```
Introduction/Background
Methods/Approach
Results (Multiple panels)
Discussion/Conclusions
```
**2. Left-to-Right, Top-to-Bottom**:
```
[Intro] [Results 1] [Results 3]
[Methods] [Results 2] [Discussion]
```
**3. Centralized Main Figure**:
```
[Intro] [Main Figure] [Discussion]
[Methods] (center) [Conclusions]
```
**Section Sizing**:
- Introduction: 10-15% of content area
- Methods: 15-20%
- Results: 40-50% (largest section)
- Discussion/Conclusions: 15-20%
### Footer Area
**Typical Size**: 5-10% of total poster height
**Common Elements**:
- References (abbreviated, 5-10 key citations)
- Acknowledgments (funding, collaborators)
- Contact information
- QR codes (paper, code, data)
- Social media handles (optional)
- Conference hashtags
**Layout**:
```
+----------------------------------------+
| References: 1. Author (2023) ... | 📱 |
| Acknowledgments: Funded by ... | QR |
| Contact: name@email.edu | Code |
+----------------------------------------+
```
**LaTeX Footer**:
```latex
\begin{block}{}
\footnotesize
\begin{columns}[T]
\begin{column}{0.7\linewidth}
\textbf{References}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Author A et al. (2023). Journal. doi:...
\item Author B et al. (2024). Conference.
\end{enumerate}
\textbf{Acknowledgments}
This work was supported by Grant XYZ.
\textbf{Contact}: firstname.lastname@university.edu
\end{column}
\begin{column}{0.25\linewidth}
\centering
\qrcode[height=3cm]{https://doi.org/10.1234/paper}\\
\tiny Scan for full paper
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{block}
```
## White Space Management
### Margins and Padding
**Outer Margins**:
- Minimum: 2-3cm (0.75-1 inch)
- Recommended: 3-5cm (1-2 inches)
- Prevents edge trimming issues in printing
- Provides visual breathing room
**Inner Spacing**:
- Between columns: 1-2cm
- Between blocks: 1-2cm
- Inside blocks (padding): 0.5-1.5cm
- Around figures: 0.5-1cm
**LaTeX Margin Control**:
```latex
% beamerposter
\usepackage[size=a0, scale=1.4]{beamerposter}
\setbeamersize{text margin left=3cm, text margin right=3cm}
% tikzposter
\documentclass[..., margin=30mm, innermargin=15mm]{tikzposter}
% baposter
\begin{poster}{
colspacing=1.5em, % Horizontal spacing
...
}
```
### Active White Space vs. Passive White Space
**Active White Space**: Intentionally placed for specific purpose
- Around key figures (draws attention)
- Between major sections (creates clear separation)
- Above/below titles (emphasizes hierarchy)
**Passive White Space**: Natural result of layout
- Margins and borders
- Line spacing
- Gaps between elements
**Balance**: Aim for 30-40% white space overall
### Visual Breathing Room
**Avoid**:
- ❌ Elements touching edges
- ❌ Text blocks directly adjacent
- ❌ Figures without surrounding space
- ❌ Cramped, claustrophobic feel
**Implement**:
- ✅ Clear separation between sections
- ✅ Space around focal points
- ✅ Generous padding inside boxes
- ✅ Balanced distribution of content
## Block and Box Design
### Block Types and Functions
**Title Block**: Poster header
- Full width, top position
- High visual weight
- Contains identifying information
**Content Blocks**: Main sections
- Column-based or free-floating
- Hierarchical sizing (larger = more important)
- Clear headers and structure
**Callout Blocks**: Emphasized information
- Key findings or quotes
- Different color or style
- Visually distinct
**Reference Blocks**: Supporting info
- Footer position
- Smaller, less prominent
- Informational, not critical
### Block Styling Options
**Border Styles**:
```latex
% Rounded corners (friendly, modern)
\begin{block}{Title}
% beamerposter with rounded
\setbeamertemplate{block begin}[rounded]
% Sharp corners (formal, traditional)
\setbeamertemplate{block begin}[default]
% No border (minimal, clean)
\setbeamercolor{block title}{bg=white, fg=black}
\setbeamercolor{block body}{bg=white, fg=black}
```
**Shadow and Depth**:
```latex
% tikzposter shadow
\tikzset{
block/.append style={
drop shadow={shadow xshift=2mm, shadow yshift=-2mm}
}
}
% tcolorbox drop shadow
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced, drop shadow]
Content with shadow
\end{tcolorbox}
```
**Background Shading**:
- **Solid**: Clean, professional
- **Gradient**: Modern, dynamic
- **Transparent**: Layered, sophisticated
### Relationship and Grouping
**Visual Grouping Techniques**:
**1. Proximity**: Place related items close
```
[Intro Text]
[Related Figure]
↓ grouped
[Methods Text]
[Methods Diagram]
```
**2. Color Coding**: Use color to show relationships
- All "Methods" blocks in blue
- All "Results" blocks in green
- Conclusions in orange
**3. Borders**: Enclose related elements
```latex
\begin{tcolorbox}[title=Experimental Pipeline]
\begin{enumerate}
\item Sample preparation
\item Data collection
\item Analysis
\end{enumerate}
\end{tcolorbox}
```
**4. Alignment**: Aligned elements appear related
```
[Block A Left-aligned]
[Block B Left-aligned]
vs.
[Block C Centered]
```
## Responsive and Adaptive Layouts
### Designing for Different Poster Sizes
**Scaling Strategy**:
- Design for target size (e.g., A0)
- Test at other common sizes (A1, 36×48")
- Use relative sizing (percentages, not absolute)
**Font Scaling**:
```latex
% Scale fonts proportionally
\usepackage[size=a0, scale=1.4]{beamerposter} % A0 at 140%
\usepackage[size=a1, scale=1.0]{beamerposter} % A1 at 100%
% Or define sizes relatively
\newcommand{\titlesize}{\fontsize{96}{110}\selectfont}
\newcommand{\headersize}{\fontsize{60}{72}\selectfont}
```
**Content Adaptation**:
- **A0 (full)**: All content, 5-6 figures
- **A1 (reduced)**: Condense to 3-4 main figures
- **A2 (compact)**: Key finding only, 1-2 figures
### Portrait vs. Landscape Orientation
**Portrait (Vertical)**:
- **Pros**: Traditional, more common stands, natural reading flow
- **Cons**: Less width for figures, can feel cramped
- **Best for**: Text-heavy posters, multi-section flow, conferences
**Landscape (Horizontal)**:
- **Pros**: Wide figures, natural for timelines, modern feel
- **Cons**: Harder to read from distance, less common
- **Best for**: Timelines, wide data visualizations, non-traditional venues
**LaTeX Orientation**:
```latex
% Portrait
\usepackage[size=a0, orientation=portrait]{beamerposter}
\documentclass[..., portrait]{tikzposter}
% Landscape
\usepackage[size=a0, orientation=landscape]{beamerposter}
\documentclass[..., landscape]{tikzposter}
```
## Layout Patterns by Research Type
### Experimental Research
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Background | Methods |
| Problem | (Diagram) |
+---------------------------+
| Results (Figure 1) |
| Results (Figure 2) |
+---------------------------+
| Discussion | Conclusions |
| Limitations| Future Work |
+---------------------------+
[References and Contact]
```
**Emphasis**: Visual results, clear methodology
### Computational/Modeling
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Motivation | Algorithm |
| | (Flowchart) |
+---------------------------+
| Implementation Details |
+---------------------------+
| Results | Results |
| (Benchmark)| (Comparison) |
+---------------------------+
| Conclusions| Code QR |
+---------------------------+
[GitHub, Docker, Documentation]
```
**Emphasis**: Algorithm clarity, reproducibility
### Clinical/Medical
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Background | Methods |
| Clinical | - Design |
| Need | - Population |
| | - Outcomes |
+---------------------------+
| Results | |
| (Primary Outcome) | Key|
| | Fig|
+---------------------------+
| Discussion | Clinical |
| | Implications |
+---------------------------+
[Trial Registration, Ethics, Funding]
```
**Emphasis**: Patient outcomes, clinical relevance
### Review/Meta-Analysis
**Typical Flow**:
```
[Title and Authors]
+---------------------------+
| Research | Search |
| Question | Strategy |
| | (PRISMA Flow) |
+---------------------------+
| Included Studies Overview |
+---------------------------+
| Findings | Findings |
| (Theme 1) | (Theme 2) |
+---------------------------+
| Synthesis | Gaps & |
| | Future Needs |
+---------------------------+
[Systematic Review Registration]
```
**Emphasis**: Comprehensive coverage, synthesis
## Layout Testing and Iteration
### Design Iteration Process
**1. Sketch Phase**:
- Hand-draw rough layout
- Experiment with different arrangements
- Mark primary, secondary, tertiary content
**2. Digital Mockup**:
- Create low-fidelity version in LaTeX
- Use placeholder text/figures
- Test different grid systems
**3. Content Integration**:
- Replace placeholders with actual content
- Adjust spacing and sizing
- Refine visual hierarchy
**4. Refinement**:
- Fine-tune alignment
- Balance visual weight
- Optimize white space
**5. Testing**:
- Print at reduced scale (25%)
- View from distance
- Get colleague feedback
### Feedback Checklist
**Visual Balance**:
- [ ] No single area feels too heavy or too light
- [ ] Color distributed evenly across poster
- [ ] Text and figures balanced
- [ ] White space well-distributed
**Hierarchy and Flow**:
- [ ] Clear entry point (title visible)
- [ ] Logical reading path
- [ ] Section relationships clear
- [ ] Conclusions easy to find
**Technical Execution**:
- [ ] Consistent alignment
- [ ] Uniform spacing
- [ ] Professional appearance
- [ ] No awkward breaks or orphans
## Common Layout Mistakes
**1. Unbalanced Visual Weight**
- ❌ All content on left, empty right side
- ❌ Large figure dominating, tiny text elsewhere
- ✅ Distribute content evenly across poster
**2. Inconsistent Spacing**
- ❌ Random gaps between blocks
- ❌ Elements touching in some places, spaced in others
- ✅ Use consistent spacing values throughout
**3. Poor Column Width**
- ❌ Extremely narrow columns (hard to read)
- ❌ Very wide columns (eye tracking difficult)
- ✅ Optimal: 40-80 characters per line
**4. Ignoring Grid**
- ❌ Random placement of elements
- ❌ Misaligned blocks
- ✅ Align to invisible grid, consistent positioning
**5. Overcrowding**
- ❌ No white space, cramped feel
- ❌ Trying to fit too much content
- ✅ Generous margins, clear separation
## Conclusion
Effective layout design:
- Uses appropriate grid systems (2, 3, or 4 columns)
- Follows natural eye movement patterns
- Maintains visual balance and hierarchy
- Provides adequate white space
- Groups related content clearly
- Adapts to different poster sizes and orientations
Remember: Layout should support content, not compete with it. When viewers focus on your research rather than your design, you've succeeded.