Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,529 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[10pt,letterpaper]{article}
|
||||
|
||||
% Packages
|
||||
\usepackage[margin=0.5in]{geometry}
|
||||
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
||||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||||
\usepackage{helvet}
|
||||
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
|
||||
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
||||
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
|
||||
\usepackage{array}
|
||||
\usepackage{tabularx}
|
||||
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
||||
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
||||
\usepackage{titlesec}
|
||||
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
|
||||
\usepackage{multicol}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{tikz}
|
||||
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning}
|
||||
|
||||
% Color definitions
|
||||
\definecolor{headerblue}{RGB}{0,102,204}
|
||||
\definecolor{stronggreen}{RGB}{0,153,76}
|
||||
\definecolor{conditionalyellow}{RGB}{255,193,7}
|
||||
\definecolor{researchblue}{RGB}{33,150,243}
|
||||
\definecolor{warningred}{RGB}{204,0,0}
|
||||
\definecolor{highlightgray}{RGB}{240,240,240}
|
||||
|
||||
% Section formatting - compact
|
||||
\titleformat{\section}{\normalfont\fontsize{11}{12}\bfseries\color{headerblue}}{\thesection}{0.5em}{}
|
||||
\titlespacing*{\section}{0pt}{4pt}{2pt}
|
||||
|
||||
\titleformat{\subsection}{\normalfont\fontsize{10}{11}\bfseries}{\thesubsection}{0.5em}{}
|
||||
\titlespacing*{\subsection}{0pt}{3pt}{1pt}
|
||||
|
||||
% List formatting - ultra compact
|
||||
\setlist[itemize]{leftmargin=*,itemsep=0pt,parsep=0pt,topsep=1pt}
|
||||
\setlist[enumerate]{leftmargin=*,itemsep=0pt,parsep=0pt,topsep=1pt}
|
||||
|
||||
% Remove paragraph indentation
|
||||
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
|
||||
\setlength{\parskip}{2pt}
|
||||
|
||||
% Header/footer
|
||||
\pagestyle{fancy}
|
||||
\fancyhf{}
|
||||
\fancyhead[L]{\footnotesize \textbf{Treatment Recommendations: [CONDITION]}}
|
||||
\fancyhead[R]{\footnotesize Page \thepage}
|
||||
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.5pt}
|
||||
\fancyfoot[C]{\footnotesize Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline - For Professional Use Only}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
% Title block
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
{\fontsize{14}{16}\selectfont\bfseries\color{headerblue} EVIDENCE-BASED TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS}\\[2pt]
|
||||
{\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont\bfseries [Disease/Condition - e.g., HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer]}\\[2pt]
|
||||
{\fontsize{10}{12}\selectfont [Institution/Organization]}\\[1pt]
|
||||
{\fontsize{9}{11}\selectfont Version X.X | Effective Date: [Date] | Next Review: [Date]}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{4pt}
|
||||
|
||||
% Recommendation Strength Legend
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=highlightgray,colframe=black,title=\textbf{Recommendation Strength Key},fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=black]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \colorbox{stronggreen!30}{\textbf{STRONG (Grade 1)}} - Benefits clearly outweigh risks; most patients should receive intervention
|
||||
\item \colorbox{conditionalyellow!30}{\textbf{CONDITIONAL (Grade 2)}} - Trade-offs exist; shared decision-making essential
|
||||
\item \colorbox{researchblue!30}{\textbf{RESEARCH (Grade R)}} - Insufficient evidence; clinical trial enrollment preferred
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence Quality}: \textbf{A} = High (RCTs), \textbf{B} = Moderate (RCTs with limitations), \textbf{C} = Low (observational), \textbf{D} = Very low (expert opinion)
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{2pt}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Clinical Context}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Disease Overview}
|
||||
|
||||
[Brief description of disease state, epidemiology, natural history]
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Patient Population}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Target Population}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item [Demographic characteristics - e.g., Adults $\geq$18 years]
|
||||
\item [Disease stage/severity - e.g., Metastatic disease, Stage IV]
|
||||
\item [Biomarker status - e.g., HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH+)]
|
||||
\item [Performance status - e.g., ECOG 0-2]
|
||||
\item [Line of therapy - e.g., First-line, previously untreated]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Exclusions}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item [Contraindications to recommended therapies]
|
||||
\item [Comorbidities affecting eligibility]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Evidence Review}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Key Clinical Trials}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{[Trial Name 1]} (Author, Journal Year):
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Design}: Phase 3 RCT, n=XXX, [Treatment A] vs [Treatment B]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Population}: [Key eligibility criteria]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Primary Endpoint}: [Outcome] - XX vs XX months (HR X.XX, 95\% CI X.XX-X.XX, p<X.XXX)
|
||||
\item \textbf{Secondary Endpoints}: [Additional outcomes]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Safety}: Grade 3-4 AEs XX\% vs XX\%
|
||||
\item \textbf{Quality}: \textbf{High} (low risk of bias, adequate power, intention-to-treat analysis)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{[Trial Name 2]} (Author, Journal Year):
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Design}: Phase 3 RCT, n=XXX, [Treatment C] vs [Standard of care]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Primary Endpoint}: [Outcome and results]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Quality}: \textbf{Moderate} (some limitations)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Guideline Concordance}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\small
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{lll}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
\textbf{Guideline} & \textbf{Recommendation} & \textbf{Evidence Level} \\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
NCCN vX.XXXX & [Specific recommendation] & Category 1 (preferred) \\
|
||||
ASCO Year & [Recommendation] & Strong, Evidence A \\
|
||||
ESMO Year & [Recommendation] & Grade I, A \\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Major guideline recommendations}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Treatment Options}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{First-Line Therapy}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,colback=stronggreen!10,colframe=stronggreen,
|
||||
title={\textbf{Option 1: [Regimen Name]} \hfill \colorbox{white}{\textbf{STRONG (1A)}}},
|
||||
fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=black]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\textbf{Regimen}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item [Drug A]: XX mg [IV/PO] [schedule]
|
||||
\item [Drug B]: XX mg [IV/PO] [schedule]
|
||||
\item Cycle length: XX days
|
||||
\item Duration: Until progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence Basis}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Primary study: [Trial name], n=XXX
|
||||
\item Primary outcome: [Endpoint] XX vs XX months (HR X.XX, p<X.XXX)
|
||||
\item ORR: XX\% vs XX\% (control)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Indications}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item [Biomarker-defined population or all patients]
|
||||
\item [Performance status requirement]
|
||||
\item [Organ function requirements]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Key Toxicities}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Grade 3-4 AEs: XX\%
|
||||
\item Common: [List 3-5 most common AEs with incidence]
|
||||
\item Serious: [SAEs, discontinuation rate]
|
||||
\item Management: [Key mitigation strategies]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Monitoring}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Labs: [Specific tests, frequency]
|
||||
\item Imaging: Every [X weeks] (RECIST v1.1)
|
||||
\item Clinical assessment: Every cycle
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Recommendation Strength}: \textbf{STRONG} - Benefits clearly outweigh risks\\
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence Quality}: \textbf{HIGH} - Well-designed RCT with consistent results
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{3pt}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,colback=conditionalyellow!10,colframe=conditionalyellow,
|
||||
title={\textbf{Option 2: [Alternative Regimen]} \hfill \colorbox{white}{\textbf{CONDITIONAL (2B)}}},
|
||||
fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=black]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\textbf{Regimen}: [Dosing details]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence Basis}: [Moderate-quality evidence or specific population subset]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Indications}: [When to consider this option - e.g., patient preference for oral therapy, specific contraindication to Option 1]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Trade-offs}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Advantages: [e.g., Oral administration, better tolerability]
|
||||
\item Disadvantages: [e.g., Lower response rate, less survival benefit]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Recommendation Strength}: \textbf{CONDITIONAL} - Patient values important in decision\\
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence Quality}: \textbf{MODERATE} - Some limitations in evidence base
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{3pt}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,colback=researchblue!10,colframe=researchblue,
|
||||
title={\textbf{Option 3: Clinical Trial} \hfill \colorbox{white}{\textbf{RESEARCH (R)}}},
|
||||
fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=black]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\textbf{Recommendation}: Consider clinical trial enrollment for [specific scenario - e.g., biomarker-selected patients, refractory disease]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Available Trials}: [List relevant trials if known, or state "ClinicalTrials.gov search"]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Rationale}: [Why clinical trial appropriate - e.g., novel mechanism, unmet medical need, investigational biomarker]
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Second-Line and Beyond}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{At Progression on First-Line Therapy}:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Biomarker Re-Testing}: [If applicable - e.g., liquid biopsy for resistance mutations]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Second-Line Options}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Preferred: [Regimen] (Evidence level)
|
||||
\item Alternative: [Regimen] (Evidence level)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Third-Line Options}: [Subsequent therapy options]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Special Populations}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Elderly Patients ($\geq$70 years)}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Considerations}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Geriatric assessment recommended (G8 screening tool)
|
||||
\item Dose reductions: [Specific adjustments for frail patients]
|
||||
\item Monitoring: More frequent assessments for toxicity
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Regimen Modifications}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item [Reduced-intensity regimens if appropriate]
|
||||
\item [Single-agent vs combination considerations]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Renal Impairment}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{lll}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
\textbf{eGFR (mL/min/1.73m²)} & \textbf{Category} & \textbf{Dose Adjustment} \\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
$\geq$60 & Normal/Mild & Standard dosing \\
|
||||
30-59 & Moderate & [Specific adjustment - e.g., Reduce 25\%] \\
|
||||
15-29 & Severe & [Specific adjustment - e.g., Reduce 50\% or avoid] \\
|
||||
<15 or dialysis & ESRD & [Use with caution or contraindicated] \\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Dose adjustments for renal impairment}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Hepatic Impairment}
|
||||
|
||||
[Similar table for hepatic dose adjustments using Child-Pugh class or bilirubin/transaminases]
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Clinical Decision Algorithm}
|
||||
|
||||
% Simple flowchart example - can be expanded with more complex TikZ
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=1.8cm, auto,
|
||||
decision/.style={diamond, draw, fill=conditionalyellow!30, text width=4.5em, text centered, inner sep=1pt, font=\tiny},
|
||||
process/.style={rectangle, draw, fill=stronggreen!20, text width=5.5em, text centered, rounded corners, minimum height=2em, font=\tiny},
|
||||
terminal/.style={rectangle, draw, fill=highlightgray, text width=5.5em, text centered, rounded corners=6pt, minimum height=2em, font=\tiny},
|
||||
alert/.style={rectangle, draw=warningred, line width=1pt, fill=warningred!10, text width=5.5em, text centered, rounded corners, minimum height=2em, font=\tiny\bfseries},
|
||||
arrow/.style={thick,->,>=stealth}]
|
||||
|
||||
\node [terminal] (start) {[Disease] Diagnosis Confirmed};
|
||||
\node [decision, below of=start, node distance=1.8cm] (biomarker) {Biomarker\\ Positive?};
|
||||
\node [process, left of=biomarker, node distance=3.5cm] (optionA) {Targeted\\ Therapy};
|
||||
\node [process, right of=biomarker, node distance=3.5cm] (optionB) {Standard\\ Therapy};
|
||||
\node [terminal, below of=biomarker, node distance=2.5cm] (monitor) {Monitor Response\\ Every X weeks};
|
||||
|
||||
\draw [arrow] (start) -- (biomarker);
|
||||
\draw [arrow] (biomarker) -- node[above] {Yes} (optionA);
|
||||
\draw [arrow] (biomarker) -- node[above] {No} (optionB);
|
||||
\draw [arrow] (optionA) |- (monitor);
|
||||
\draw [arrow] (optionB) |- (monitor);
|
||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
|
||||
{\footnotesize \textit{Figure 1: Simplified treatment selection algorithm. See detailed algorithm in references for complete decision pathway.}}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Monitoring Protocol}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{On-Treatment Monitoring}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{lccl}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
\textbf{Assessment} & \textbf{Baseline} & \textbf{Frequency} & \textbf{Rationale} \\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
CBC with differential & $\checkmark$ & Before each cycle & Myelosuppression \\
|
||||
Comprehensive metabolic panel & $\checkmark$ & Before each cycle & Organ function \\
|
||||
[Specific biomarker] & $\checkmark$ & Every X cycles & [Reason] \\
|
||||
Imaging (CT chest/abd/pelvis) & $\checkmark$ & Every X weeks & Response assessment \\
|
||||
ECOG performance status & $\checkmark$ & Every visit & Functional status \\
|
||||
Toxicity assessment (CTCAE) & - & Every visit & Safety monitoring \\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Recommended monitoring schedule}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Dose Modification Guidelines}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Hematologic Toxicity}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{ANC <1.0 or Platelets <75k}: Delay treatment, recheck weekly, dose reduce 20\% when recovered
|
||||
\item \textbf{ANC <0.5 or Platelets <50k}: Hold treatment, G-CSF support, dose reduce 25-40\%
|
||||
\item \textbf{Febrile neutropenia}: Hold, hospitalize, antibiotics, dose reduce 25\% when recovered
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Non-Hematologic Toxicity}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Grade 2}: Continue with supportive care, consider dose modification if persistent
|
||||
\item \textbf{Grade 3}: Hold until $\leq$Grade 1, resume at reduced dose (20-25\% reduction)
|
||||
\item \textbf{Grade 4}: Discontinue treatment or hold pending recovery (case-by-case)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Specific Toxicity Management}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{[Specific AE]}: [Management approach - e.g., Diarrhea Grade 3: Hold treatment, loperamide, hydration, resume at reduced dose when $\leq$Grade 1]
|
||||
\item \textbf{[Immune-related AE]}: [Management - e.g., Pneumonitis Grade 2+: Hold immunotherapy, corticosteroids, pulmonology consultation]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Treatment Recommendations by Clinical Scenario}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Scenario 1: [Specific Clinical Situation]}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,colback=stronggreen!10,colframe=stronggreen,
|
||||
title={\textbf{RECOMMENDATION} \hfill \textbf{GRADE: 1A}},
|
||||
fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=black]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\textbf{We recommend} [specific intervention] for [patient population].
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item [Primary supporting evidence with results]
|
||||
\item [Guideline concordance - NCCN, ASCO, ESMO]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Benefits}: [Quantified improvements - e.g., 8.7-month PFS benefit, HR 0.46]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Harms}: [Quantified risks - e.g., 15\% grade 3-4 immune-related AEs]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Balance}: Benefits clearly outweigh harms for most patients
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Scenario 2: [Alternative Clinical Situation]}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,colback=conditionalyellow!10,colframe=conditionalyellow,
|
||||
title={\textbf{RECOMMENDATION} \hfill \textbf{GRADE: 2B}},
|
||||
fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=black]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\textbf{We suggest} [intervention] for [patient population] who value [specific outcome].
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence}: [Moderate-quality evidence summary]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Trade-offs}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Advantages}: [e.g., Oral administration, less frequent monitoring]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Disadvantages}: [e.g., Lower response rate, more out-of-pocket cost]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Patient Values}: Substantial variability in how patients value outcomes; shared decision-making essential
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Alternative Approaches}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Non-Recommended Options}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,colback=warningred!10,colframe=warningred,
|
||||
title={\textbf{NOT RECOMMENDED}},
|
||||
fonttitle=\bfseries\small,coltitle=white,colbacktitle=warningred]
|
||||
{\small
|
||||
\textbf{[Intervention X]} is \textbf{not recommended} for [population].
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Reason}: [Evidence of harm, lack of benefit, or superior alternatives available]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence}: [Supporting data showing no benefit or harm]
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{tcolorbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Supportive Care}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Symptom Management}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Pain Control}: [Analgesic recommendations, WHO ladder]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Nausea Prevention}: [Antiemetics - e.g., 5-HT3 antagonists, NK1 antagonists for highly emetogenic]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Bone Health}: [e.g., Bisphosphonates or denosumab if bone metastases]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Nutritional Support}: [Consult if weight loss >5\%, cachexia management]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Psychosocial Support}: [Depression screening, support groups, palliative care early integration]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Growth Factor Support}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{G-CSF Prophylaxis}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Primary prophylaxis}: If febrile neutropenia risk $\geq$20\%
|
||||
\item \textbf{Secondary prophylaxis}: After prior febrile neutropenia episode
|
||||
\item Agent: [Pegfilgrastim 6 mg SC day 2 or filgrastim 5 mcg/kg SC daily days 3-10]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Follow-Up and Surveillance}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{During Active Treatment}
|
||||
|
||||
[Schedule outlined in Monitoring Protocol section above]
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Post-Treatment Surveillance}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
\textbf{Time Period} & \textbf{Imaging} & \textbf{Labs} & \textbf{Clinical Visits} \\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
Year 1 & Every 3 months & Every 3 months & Every 3 months \\
|
||||
Year 2 & Every 3-4 months & Every 3-4 months & Every 3-4 months \\
|
||||
Years 3-5 & Every 6 months & Every 6 months & Every 6 months \\
|
||||
Year 5+ & Annually & Annually & Annually \\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Post-treatment surveillance schedule (adjust based on risk of recurrence)}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Clinical Trial Opportunities}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{When to Consider Clinical Trials}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item After progression on standard therapies
|
||||
\item High-risk disease with poor prognosis on standard therapy
|
||||
\item Novel biomarker potentially predictive of response
|
||||
\item Patient preference for investigational approach
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Resources}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item ClinicalTrials.gov search: [Specific keywords]
|
||||
\item [Institution] clinical trials office: [Contact information]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Shared Decision-Making}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Key Discussion Points}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Goals of Care}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Curative intent vs prolonged disease control vs palliation
|
||||
\item Quality of life vs quantity of life trade-offs
|
||||
\item Functional independence goals
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Treatment Options Counseling}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Expected benefits (median survival, response rates)
|
||||
\item Potential harms (toxicity profile, quality of life impact)
|
||||
\item Treatment schedule and logistics (frequency of visits, IV vs oral)
|
||||
\item Financial considerations (out-of-pocket costs, time off work)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Decision Aids}:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Number Needed to Treat: [e.g., Treat X patients to prevent 1 progression event]
|
||||
\item Survival benefit visualization: [X-month improvement in median survival]
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{References}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item [Primary clinical trial reference]
|
||||
\item [Secondary supporting trial]
|
||||
\item [NCCN Guidelines, version]
|
||||
\item [ASCO/ESMO Guideline reference]
|
||||
\item [Meta-analysis or systematic review if applicable]
|
||||
\item [Biomarker validation reference]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{10pt}
|
||||
|
||||
\hrule
|
||||
\vspace{4pt}
|
||||
{\footnotesize
|
||||
\textbf{Guideline Development Committee}:\\
|
||||
[Names and titles of committee members, affiliations]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Evidence Review Date}: [Date]\\
|
||||
\textbf{Guideline Effective Date}: [Date]\\
|
||||
\textbf{Next Scheduled Review}: [Date] (or earlier if practice-changing evidence published)
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Conflicts of Interest}: [None / See disclosure statements]
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{Methodology}: GRADE framework for evidence evaluation and recommendation development. Systematic literature review conducted [date range]. Guidelines concordance checked with NCCN, ASCO, ESMO current versions.
|
||||
|
||||
\textbf{For Questions}: Contact [Name], [Title] at [Email/Phone]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user