# Retrosynthesis ## Overview Retrosynthesis is the process of planning synthetic routes from target molecules back to commercially available starting materials. TorchDrug provides tools for learning-based retrosynthesis prediction, breaking down the complex task into manageable subtasks. ## Available Datasets ### USPTO-50K The standard benchmark dataset for retrosynthesis derived from US patent literature. **Statistics:** - 50,017 reaction examples - Single-step reactions - Filtered for quality and canonicalization - Contains atom mapping for reaction center identification **Reaction Types:** - Diverse organic reactions - Drug-like transformations - Well-balanced across common reaction classes **Data Splits:** - Training: ~40k reactions - Validation: ~5k reactions - Test: ~5k reactions **Format:** - Product → Reactants - SMILES representation - Atom-mapped reactions for training ## Task Types TorchDrug decomposes retrosynthesis into a multi-step pipeline: ### 1. CenterIdentification Identifies the reaction center - which bonds were formed/broken in the forward reaction. **Input:** Product molecule **Output:** Probability for each bond of being part of reaction center **Purpose:** - Locate where chemistry happened - Guide subsequent synthon generation - Reduce search space dramatically **Model Architecture:** - Graph neural network on product molecule - Edge-level classification - Attention mechanisms to highlight reactive regions **Evaluation Metrics:** - **Top-K Accuracy**: Correct reaction center in top K predictions - **Bond-level F1**: Precision and recall for bond predictions ### 2. SynthonCompletion Given the product and identified reaction center, predict the reactant structures (synthons). **Input:** - Product molecule - Identified reaction center (broken/formed bonds) **Output:** - Predicted reactant molecules (synthons) **Process:** 1. Break bonds at reaction center 2. Modify atom environments (valence, charges) 3. Determine leaving groups and protecting groups 4. Generate complete reactant structures **Challenges:** - Multiple valid reactant sets - Stereospecificity - Atom environment changes (hybridization, charge) - Leaving group selection **Evaluation:** - **Exact Match**: Generated reactants exactly match ground truth - **Top-K Accuracy**: Correct reactants in top K predictions - **Chemical Validity**: Generated molecules are valid ### 3. Retrosynthesis (End-to-End) Combines center identification and synthon completion into a unified pipeline. **Input:** Target product molecule **Output:** Ranked list of reactant sets (synthesis pathways) **Workflow:** 1. Identify top-K reaction centers 2. For each center, generate reactant candidates 3. Rank combinations by model confidence 4. Filter for commercial availability and feasibility **Advantages:** - Single model to train and deploy - Joint optimization of subtasks - Error propagation from center identification accounted for ## Training Workflows ### Basic Pipeline ```python from torchdrug import datasets, models, tasks # Load dataset dataset = datasets.USPTO50k("~/retro-datasets/") # For center identification model_center = models.RGCN( input_dim=dataset.node_feature_dim, num_relation=dataset.num_bond_type, hidden_dims=[256, 256, 256] ) task_center = tasks.CenterIdentification( model_center, top_k=3 # Consider top 3 reaction centers ) # For synthon completion model_synthon = models.GIN( input_dim=dataset.node_feature_dim, hidden_dims=[256, 256, 256] ) task_synthon = tasks.SynthonCompletion( model_synthon, center_topk=3, # Use top 3 from center identification num_synthon_beam=5 # Beam search for synthon generation ) # End-to-end task_retro = tasks.Retrosynthesis( model=model_center, synthon_model=model_synthon, center_topk=5, num_synthon_beam=10 ) ``` ### Transfer Learning Pre-train on large reaction datasets (e.g., USPTO-full with 1M+ reactions), then fine-tune on specific reaction classes. **Benefits:** - Better generalization to rare reaction types - Improved performance on small datasets - Learn general reaction patterns ### Multi-Task Learning Train jointly on: - Forward reaction prediction - Retrosynthesis - Reaction type classification - Yield prediction **Advantages:** - Shared representations of chemistry - Better sample efficiency - Improved robustness ## Model Architectures ### Graph Neural Networks **RGCN (Relational Graph Convolutional Network):** - Handles multiple bond types (single, double, triple, aromatic) - Edge-type-specific transformations - Good for reaction center identification **GIN (Graph Isomorphism Network):** - Powerful message passing - Captures structural patterns - Works well for synthon completion **GAT (Graph Attention Network):** - Attention weights highlight important atoms/bonds - Interpretable reaction center predictions - Flexible for various reaction types ### Sequence-Based Models **Transformer Models:** - SMILES-to-SMILES translation - Can capture long-range dependencies - Require large datasets **LSTM/GRU:** - Sequence generation for reactants - Autoregressive decoding - Good for small molecules ### Hybrid Approaches Combine graph and sequence representations: - Graph encoder for products - Sequence decoder for reactants - Best of both representations ## Reaction Chemistry Considerations ### Reaction Classes **Common Transformations:** - C-C bond formation (coupling, addition) - Functional group interconversions (oxidation, reduction) - Heterocycle synthesis (cyclizations) - Protection/deprotection - Aromatic substitutions **Rare Reactions:** - Novel coupling methods - Complex rearrangements - Multi-component reactions ### Selectivity Issues **Regioselectivity:** - Which position reacts on molecule - Requires understanding of electronics and sterics **Stereoselectivity:** - Control of stereochemistry - Diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity - Critical for drug synthesis **Chemoselectivity:** - Which functional group reacts - Requires protecting group strategies ### Reaction Conditions While TorchDrug focuses on reaction connectivity, consider: - Temperature and pressure - Catalysts and reagents - Solvents - Reaction time - Work-up and purification ## Multi-Step Synthesis Planning ### Single-Step Retrosynthesis Predict immediate precursors for target molecule. **Use Case:** - Late-stage transformations - Simple molecules (1-2 steps from commercial) - Initial route scouting ### Multi-Step Planning Recursively apply retrosynthesis to each predicted reactant until reaching commercial building blocks. **Tree Search Strategies:** **Breadth-First Search:** - Explore all routes to same depth - Find shortest routes - Memory intensive **Depth-First Search:** - Follow each route to completion - Memory efficient - May miss optimal routes **Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS):** - Balance exploration and exploitation - Guided by model confidence - State-of-the-art for multi-step planning **A\* Search:** - Heuristic-guided search - Optimizes for cost, complexity, or feasibility - Efficient for finding best routes ### Route Scoring Rank synthetic routes by: 1. **Number of Steps**: Fewer is better (efficiency) 2. **Convergent vs Linear**: Convergent routes preferred 3. **Commercial Availability**: How many steps to buyable compounds 4. **Reaction Feasibility**: Likelihood each step works 5. **Overall Yield**: Estimated end-to-end yield 6. **Cost**: Reagents, labor, equipment 7. **Green Chemistry**: Environmental impact, safety ### Stopping Criteria Stop retrosynthesis when reaching: - **Commercial Compounds**: Available from vendors (e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Enamine) - **Building Blocks**: Standard synthetic intermediates - **Max Depth**: e.g., 6-10 steps - **Low Confidence**: Model uncertainty too high ## Validation and Filtering ### Chemical Validity Check each predicted reaction: - Reactants are valid molecules - Reaction is chemically reasonable - Atom mapping is consistent - Stoichiometry balances ### Synthetic Feasibility **Filters:** - Reaction precedent (literature examples) - Functional group compatibility - Typical reaction conditions - Expected yield ranges **Expert Systems:** - Rule-based validation (e.g., ARChem Route Designer) - Check for incompatible functional groups - Identify protection/deprotection needs ### Commercial Availability **Databases:** - eMolecules: 10M+ commercial compounds - ZINC: Annotated with vendor info - Reaxys: Commercially available building blocks **Considerations:** - Cost per gram - Purity and quality - Lead time for delivery - Minimum order quantities ## Integration with Other Tools ### Reaction Prediction (Forward) Train forward reaction prediction models to validate retrosynthetic proposals: - Predict products from proposed reactants - Validate reaction feasibility - Estimate yields ### Retrosynthesis Software **Integration with:** - SciFinder (CAS) - Reaxys (Elsevier) - ARChem Route Designer - IBM RXN for Chemistry **TorchDrug as Component:** - Use TorchDrug models within larger planning systems - Combine ML predictions with rule-based systems - Hybrid AI + expert system approaches ### Experimental Validation **High-Throughput Screening:** - Rapid testing of predicted reactions - Automated synthesis platforms - Feedback loop to improve models **Robotic Synthesis:** - Automated execution of planned routes - Real-time optimization - Data generation for model improvement ## Best Practices 1. **Ensemble Predictions**: Use multiple models for robustness 2. **Reaction Validation**: Always validate with chemistry rules 3. **Commercial Check**: Verify building block availability early 4. **Diversity**: Generate multiple diverse routes, not just top-1 5. **Expert Review**: Have chemists evaluate proposed routes 6. **Literature Search**: Check for precedents of key steps 7. **Iterative Refinement**: Update models with experimental feedback 8. **Interpretability**: Understand why model suggests each step 9. **Edge Cases**: Handle unusual functional groups and scaffolds 10. **Benchmarking**: Compare against known synthesis routes ## Common Applications ### Drug Synthesis Planning - Small molecule drugs - Natural product total synthesis - Late-stage functionalization strategies ### Library Enumeration - Virtual library design - Retrosynthetic filtering of generated molecules - Prioritize synthesizable compounds ### Process Chemistry - Route scouting for large-scale synthesis - Cost optimization - Green chemistry alternatives ### Synthetic Method Development - Identify gaps in synthetic methodology - Guide development of new reactions - Expand retrosynthesis model capabilities ## Challenges and Future Directions ### Current Limitations - Limited to single-step predictions (most models) - Doesn't consider reaction conditions explicitly - Stereochemistry handling is challenging - Rare reaction types underrepresented ### Active Research Areas - End-to-end multi-step planning - Incorporation of reaction conditions - Stereoselective retrosynthesis - Integration with robotics for closed-loop optimization - Semi-template methods (balance templates and templates-free) - Uncertainty quantification for predictions ### Emerging Techniques - Large language models for chemistry (ChemGPT, MolT5) - Reinforcement learning for route optimization - Graph transformers for long-range interactions - Self-supervised pre-training on reaction databases