Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-30 08:30:10 +08:00
commit f0bd18fb4e
824 changed files with 331919 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,436 @@
# Retrosynthesis
## Overview
Retrosynthesis is the process of planning synthetic routes from target molecules back to commercially available starting materials. TorchDrug provides tools for learning-based retrosynthesis prediction, breaking down the complex task into manageable subtasks.
## Available Datasets
### USPTO-50K
The standard benchmark dataset for retrosynthesis derived from US patent literature.
**Statistics:**
- 50,017 reaction examples
- Single-step reactions
- Filtered for quality and canonicalization
- Contains atom mapping for reaction center identification
**Reaction Types:**
- Diverse organic reactions
- Drug-like transformations
- Well-balanced across common reaction classes
**Data Splits:**
- Training: ~40k reactions
- Validation: ~5k reactions
- Test: ~5k reactions
**Format:**
- Product → Reactants
- SMILES representation
- Atom-mapped reactions for training
## Task Types
TorchDrug decomposes retrosynthesis into a multi-step pipeline:
### 1. CenterIdentification
Identifies the reaction center - which bonds were formed/broken in the forward reaction.
**Input:** Product molecule
**Output:** Probability for each bond of being part of reaction center
**Purpose:**
- Locate where chemistry happened
- Guide subsequent synthon generation
- Reduce search space dramatically
**Model Architecture:**
- Graph neural network on product molecule
- Edge-level classification
- Attention mechanisms to highlight reactive regions
**Evaluation Metrics:**
- **Top-K Accuracy**: Correct reaction center in top K predictions
- **Bond-level F1**: Precision and recall for bond predictions
### 2. SynthonCompletion
Given the product and identified reaction center, predict the reactant structures (synthons).
**Input:**
- Product molecule
- Identified reaction center (broken/formed bonds)
**Output:**
- Predicted reactant molecules (synthons)
**Process:**
1. Break bonds at reaction center
2. Modify atom environments (valence, charges)
3. Determine leaving groups and protecting groups
4. Generate complete reactant structures
**Challenges:**
- Multiple valid reactant sets
- Stereospecificity
- Atom environment changes (hybridization, charge)
- Leaving group selection
**Evaluation:**
- **Exact Match**: Generated reactants exactly match ground truth
- **Top-K Accuracy**: Correct reactants in top K predictions
- **Chemical Validity**: Generated molecules are valid
### 3. Retrosynthesis (End-to-End)
Combines center identification and synthon completion into a unified pipeline.
**Input:** Target product molecule
**Output:** Ranked list of reactant sets (synthesis pathways)
**Workflow:**
1. Identify top-K reaction centers
2. For each center, generate reactant candidates
3. Rank combinations by model confidence
4. Filter for commercial availability and feasibility
**Advantages:**
- Single model to train and deploy
- Joint optimization of subtasks
- Error propagation from center identification accounted for
## Training Workflows
### Basic Pipeline
```python
from torchdrug import datasets, models, tasks
# Load dataset
dataset = datasets.USPTO50k("~/retro-datasets/")
# For center identification
model_center = models.RGCN(
input_dim=dataset.node_feature_dim,
num_relation=dataset.num_bond_type,
hidden_dims=[256, 256, 256]
)
task_center = tasks.CenterIdentification(
model_center,
top_k=3 # Consider top 3 reaction centers
)
# For synthon completion
model_synthon = models.GIN(
input_dim=dataset.node_feature_dim,
hidden_dims=[256, 256, 256]
)
task_synthon = tasks.SynthonCompletion(
model_synthon,
center_topk=3, # Use top 3 from center identification
num_synthon_beam=5 # Beam search for synthon generation
)
# End-to-end
task_retro = tasks.Retrosynthesis(
model=model_center,
synthon_model=model_synthon,
center_topk=5,
num_synthon_beam=10
)
```
### Transfer Learning
Pre-train on large reaction datasets (e.g., USPTO-full with 1M+ reactions), then fine-tune on specific reaction classes.
**Benefits:**
- Better generalization to rare reaction types
- Improved performance on small datasets
- Learn general reaction patterns
### Multi-Task Learning
Train jointly on:
- Forward reaction prediction
- Retrosynthesis
- Reaction type classification
- Yield prediction
**Advantages:**
- Shared representations of chemistry
- Better sample efficiency
- Improved robustness
## Model Architectures
### Graph Neural Networks
**RGCN (Relational Graph Convolutional Network):**
- Handles multiple bond types (single, double, triple, aromatic)
- Edge-type-specific transformations
- Good for reaction center identification
**GIN (Graph Isomorphism Network):**
- Powerful message passing
- Captures structural patterns
- Works well for synthon completion
**GAT (Graph Attention Network):**
- Attention weights highlight important atoms/bonds
- Interpretable reaction center predictions
- Flexible for various reaction types
### Sequence-Based Models
**Transformer Models:**
- SMILES-to-SMILES translation
- Can capture long-range dependencies
- Require large datasets
**LSTM/GRU:**
- Sequence generation for reactants
- Autoregressive decoding
- Good for small molecules
### Hybrid Approaches
Combine graph and sequence representations:
- Graph encoder for products
- Sequence decoder for reactants
- Best of both representations
## Reaction Chemistry Considerations
### Reaction Classes
**Common Transformations:**
- C-C bond formation (coupling, addition)
- Functional group interconversions (oxidation, reduction)
- Heterocycle synthesis (cyclizations)
- Protection/deprotection
- Aromatic substitutions
**Rare Reactions:**
- Novel coupling methods
- Complex rearrangements
- Multi-component reactions
### Selectivity Issues
**Regioselectivity:**
- Which position reacts on molecule
- Requires understanding of electronics and sterics
**Stereoselectivity:**
- Control of stereochemistry
- Diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity
- Critical for drug synthesis
**Chemoselectivity:**
- Which functional group reacts
- Requires protecting group strategies
### Reaction Conditions
While TorchDrug focuses on reaction connectivity, consider:
- Temperature and pressure
- Catalysts and reagents
- Solvents
- Reaction time
- Work-up and purification
## Multi-Step Synthesis Planning
### Single-Step Retrosynthesis
Predict immediate precursors for target molecule.
**Use Case:**
- Late-stage transformations
- Simple molecules (1-2 steps from commercial)
- Initial route scouting
### Multi-Step Planning
Recursively apply retrosynthesis to each predicted reactant until reaching commercial building blocks.
**Tree Search Strategies:**
**Breadth-First Search:**
- Explore all routes to same depth
- Find shortest routes
- Memory intensive
**Depth-First Search:**
- Follow each route to completion
- Memory efficient
- May miss optimal routes
**Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS):**
- Balance exploration and exploitation
- Guided by model confidence
- State-of-the-art for multi-step planning
**A\* Search:**
- Heuristic-guided search
- Optimizes for cost, complexity, or feasibility
- Efficient for finding best routes
### Route Scoring
Rank synthetic routes by:
1. **Number of Steps**: Fewer is better (efficiency)
2. **Convergent vs Linear**: Convergent routes preferred
3. **Commercial Availability**: How many steps to buyable compounds
4. **Reaction Feasibility**: Likelihood each step works
5. **Overall Yield**: Estimated end-to-end yield
6. **Cost**: Reagents, labor, equipment
7. **Green Chemistry**: Environmental impact, safety
### Stopping Criteria
Stop retrosynthesis when reaching:
- **Commercial Compounds**: Available from vendors (e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Enamine)
- **Building Blocks**: Standard synthetic intermediates
- **Max Depth**: e.g., 6-10 steps
- **Low Confidence**: Model uncertainty too high
## Validation and Filtering
### Chemical Validity
Check each predicted reaction:
- Reactants are valid molecules
- Reaction is chemically reasonable
- Atom mapping is consistent
- Stoichiometry balances
### Synthetic Feasibility
**Filters:**
- Reaction precedent (literature examples)
- Functional group compatibility
- Typical reaction conditions
- Expected yield ranges
**Expert Systems:**
- Rule-based validation (e.g., ARChem Route Designer)
- Check for incompatible functional groups
- Identify protection/deprotection needs
### Commercial Availability
**Databases:**
- eMolecules: 10M+ commercial compounds
- ZINC: Annotated with vendor info
- Reaxys: Commercially available building blocks
**Considerations:**
- Cost per gram
- Purity and quality
- Lead time for delivery
- Minimum order quantities
## Integration with Other Tools
### Reaction Prediction (Forward)
Train forward reaction prediction models to validate retrosynthetic proposals:
- Predict products from proposed reactants
- Validate reaction feasibility
- Estimate yields
### Retrosynthesis Software
**Integration with:**
- SciFinder (CAS)
- Reaxys (Elsevier)
- ARChem Route Designer
- IBM RXN for Chemistry
**TorchDrug as Component:**
- Use TorchDrug models within larger planning systems
- Combine ML predictions with rule-based systems
- Hybrid AI + expert system approaches
### Experimental Validation
**High-Throughput Screening:**
- Rapid testing of predicted reactions
- Automated synthesis platforms
- Feedback loop to improve models
**Robotic Synthesis:**
- Automated execution of planned routes
- Real-time optimization
- Data generation for model improvement
## Best Practices
1. **Ensemble Predictions**: Use multiple models for robustness
2. **Reaction Validation**: Always validate with chemistry rules
3. **Commercial Check**: Verify building block availability early
4. **Diversity**: Generate multiple diverse routes, not just top-1
5. **Expert Review**: Have chemists evaluate proposed routes
6. **Literature Search**: Check for precedents of key steps
7. **Iterative Refinement**: Update models with experimental feedback
8. **Interpretability**: Understand why model suggests each step
9. **Edge Cases**: Handle unusual functional groups and scaffolds
10. **Benchmarking**: Compare against known synthesis routes
## Common Applications
### Drug Synthesis Planning
- Small molecule drugs
- Natural product total synthesis
- Late-stage functionalization strategies
### Library Enumeration
- Virtual library design
- Retrosynthetic filtering of generated molecules
- Prioritize synthesizable compounds
### Process Chemistry
- Route scouting for large-scale synthesis
- Cost optimization
- Green chemistry alternatives
### Synthetic Method Development
- Identify gaps in synthetic methodology
- Guide development of new reactions
- Expand retrosynthesis model capabilities
## Challenges and Future Directions
### Current Limitations
- Limited to single-step predictions (most models)
- Doesn't consider reaction conditions explicitly
- Stereochemistry handling is challenging
- Rare reaction types underrepresented
### Active Research Areas
- End-to-end multi-step planning
- Incorporation of reaction conditions
- Stereoselective retrosynthesis
- Integration with robotics for closed-loop optimization
- Semi-template methods (balance templates and templates-free)
- Uncertainty quantification for predictions
### Emerging Techniques
- Large language models for chemistry (ChemGPT, MolT5)
- Reinforcement learning for route optimization
- Graph transformers for long-range interactions
- Self-supervised pre-training on reaction databases