Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
Zhongwei Li
2025-11-29 18:48:55 +08:00
commit f28999f19c
127 changed files with 62038 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
# Developer Enablement Checklist
Comprehensive checklist for enabling developers to adopt your technical product.
---
## Critical: Documentation
### Getting Started Guide
- [ ] **Installation instructions** (< 5 minutes)
- [ ] **Quick start tutorial** (Hello World in < 10 minutes)
- [ ] **Basic concepts** explained
- [ ] **First successful API call** walkthrough
- [ ] **Authentication** setup guide
- [ ] **Common gotchas** documented
### API Reference
- [ ] **All endpoints** documented
- [ ] **Request/response examples** for each endpoint
- [ ] **Error codes** and meanings
- [ ] **Rate limits** clearly stated
- [ ] **Authentication** methods
- [ ] **Versioning** strategy explained
- [ ] **Changelog** maintained
### Integration Guides
- [ ] **Step-by-step** integration tutorials
- [ ] **Common use cases** covered
- [ ] **Best practices** documented
- [ ] **Performance tips**
- [ ] **Security considerations**
###Migration Guide (if applicable)
- [ ] **Breaking changes** highlighted
- [ ] **Migration steps** clear
- [ ] **Before/after code** examples
- [ ] **Timeline** for deprecations
- [ ] **Support** for old version
---
## Critical: Code Assets
### SDKs/Client Libraries
- [ ] **Python** SDK
- [ ] **JavaScript/Node** SDK
- [ ] **Additional languages** as needed
- [ ] **Well-documented** public APIs
- [ ] **Type definitions** (TypeScript, etc.)
- [ ] **Published** to package managers
- [ ] **Examples** in README
### Sample Applications
- [ ] **Simple** "Hello World" app
- [ ] **Realistic** integration example
- [ ] **Production-ready** template
- [ ] **README** with setup instructions
- [ ] **Runnable** locally
### Code Snippets
- [ ] **Common operations** (CRUD)
- [ ] **Authentication** examples
- [ ] **Error handling** patterns
- [ ] **Copy-paste** ready
- [ ] **Multiple languages**
---
## Important: Developer Experience
### Interactive Tools
- [ ] **API explorer** / playground
- [ ] **Interactive tutorials**
- [ ] **Sandbox environment** (no credit card)
- [ ] **Test mode** / mock data
- [ ] **Debugging tools**
### Developer Portal
- [ ] **Dashboard** for API keys
- [ ] **Usage analytics**
- [ ] **Billing/quota** visibility
- [ ] **Team management**
- [ ] **Support access**
### Testing & Debugging
- [ ] **Test credentials** available
- [ ] **Webhook testing** tools
- [ ] **Request logs** accessible
- [ ] **Error debugging** guides
- [ ] **Postman collection** (if REST API)
---
## Important: Learning Resources
### Video Content
- [ ] **Demo video** (3-5 minutes)
- [ ] **Tutorial series** for key features
- [ ] **Architecture overview** video
- [ ] **Best practices** video
### Written Tutorials
- [ ] **Blog posts** for common use cases
- [ ] **Integration tutorials**
- [ ] **Performance optimization** guides
- [ ] **Security best practices**
### Community Resources
- [ ] **FAQ** section
- [ ] **Troubleshooting** guide
- [ ] **Community forum** / Discord / Slack
- [ ] **Stack Overflow** tag
- [ ] **GitHub Discussions** enabled
---
## Important: Technical Specifications
### Architecture Documentation
- [ ] **System architecture** diagram
- [ ] **Data flow** diagrams
- [ ] **Sequence diagrams** for complex flows
- [ ] **Infrastructure** overview
- [ ] **Scaling** characteristics
### Performance & Limits
- [ ] **Rate limits** documented
- [ ] **Latency expectations** (p50, p95, p99)
- [ ] **Throughput** capabilities
- [ ] **Quotas** and limits
- [ ] **SLA** commitments
### Security Documentation
- [ ] **Authentication** methods
- [ ] **Authorization** model
- [ ] **Data encryption** (at rest, in transit)
- [ ] **Compliance** certifications
- [ ] **Security best practices**
- [ ] **Vulnerability** reporting process
---
## Nice to Have: Advanced Resources
### Reference Architectures
- [ ] **Common patterns** documented
- [ ] **Production deployment** examples
- [ ] **Multi-region** setups
- [ ] **High availability** configurations
### Integrations
- [ ] **Third-party** tool integrations
- [ ] **Framework** specific guides (React, Vue, etc.)
- [ ] **CI/CD** integration examples
- [ ] **Monitoring** integration guides
### Developer Tools
- [ ] **CLI** tool
- [ ] **Browser extensions**
- [ ] **IDE plugins** (VS Code, etc.)
- [ ] **Linters** / code validators
---
## Launch Day Specific
### Pre-Launch
- [ ] **Beta testers** given early access
- [ ] **Documentation** live on staging
- [ ] **SDKs** tagged and ready
- [ ] **Samples** tested end-to-end
### Launch Day
- [ ] **Docs** published to production
- [ ] **SDKs** released to package managers
- [ ] **Samples** available on GitHub
- [ ] **Playground** accessible
- [ ] **Support** channels staffed
### Post-Launch
- [ ] **Monitor** documentation traffic
- [ ] **Respond** to questions quickly
- [ ] **Update** docs based on feedback
- [ ] **Create** additional resources as needed
---
## Quality Checks
### Documentation Quality
- [ ] **Tested** by someone unfamiliar with product
- [ ] **Code samples** all execute successfully
- [ ] **Links** all work
- [ ] **Screenshots** up-to-date
- [ ] **Grammar/spelling** checked
- [ ] **Search** functionality works
- [ ] **Mobile** responsive
### Code Quality
- [ ] **SDKs** have tests
- [ ] **Sample apps** run without errors
- [ ] **Dependencies** up-to-date
- [ ] **Security** vulnerabilities checked
- [ ] **Licenses** clearly stated
---
## By Audience
### Beginner Developers
- Clear getting started
- Simple examples
- Video tutorials
- Interactive playground
- Active community support
### Experienced Developers
- Comprehensive API reference
- Advanced use cases
- Performance documentation
- Architecture details
- Migration guides
### Enterprise/Teams
- Security documentation
- Compliance information
- Team management docs
- SSO integration
- SLA details
---
## Measurement
Track these metrics post-launch:
- **Documentation traffic**
- **Time to first API call**
- **Sandbox activation rate**
- **SDK download count**
- **Sample app clones**
- **Support ticket volume**
- **Community questions**
- **Tutorial completion rate**
Use data to improve enablement continuously.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,436 @@
# Technical Launch Messaging
Messaging frameworks and templates for developer-focused product launches.
---
## Messaging Principles for Developers
### DO:
-**Be specific** - Use concrete technical details
-**Show code** - Developers want to see, not read
-**State limitations** - Honest about what it can't do
-**Provide metrics** - Performance numbers, benchmarks
-**Explain why** - Technical reasoning matters
-**Link to docs** - Make it easy to try
### DON'T:
-**Use marketing jargon** - "Revolutionary", "game-changing"
-**Oversimplify** - Developers can handle complexity
-**Hide limitations** - They'll find them anyway
-**Make unsubstantiated claims** - Back it up with data
-**Skip code examples** - Abstract descriptions fail
---
## Messaging Framework
### Problem Statement
**Format:** [Current pain point] → [Why existing solutions fail] → [Impact on developers]
**Example:**
"Debugging distributed systems is painful. Traditional logging tools weren't built for microservices, forcing developers to manually correlate logs across dozens of services. This turns a 5-minute bug into a 5-hour investigation."
---
### Solution Overview
**Format:** [What it is] → [How it works (technical)] → [Key benefit]
**Example:**
"Distributed Tracer automatically instruments your services to create a unified view of requests across your entire stack. Using OpenTelemetry standards, it correlates logs, metrics, and traces in real-time, reducing MTTR by 80%."
---
### Key Differentiators
**Format:** [Feature] → [Technical implementation] → [Why it matters]
**Example:**
"Zero-config auto-instrumentation. Our SDK uses bytecode injection to automatically trace all HTTP calls, database queries, and external APIs without code changes. Deploy in under 5 minutes instead of days."
---
## Launch Announcement Template
### Blog Post Structure
```markdown
# Introducing [Product]: [One-line value prop]
## TL;DR
- [Key point 1 with metric]
- [Key point 2 with metric]
- [Get started link]
## The Problem
[Describe the developer pain in detail. Be specific.]
**Example:**
Every API call in a distributed system touches 5-10 services. When something breaks, you're left grep'ing through gigabytes of logs, trying to piece together what happened. We've all been there.
## The Solution
[High-level overview]
**How it works:**
\`\`\`python
# Show concrete code example
import tracer
tracer.init(api_key="your_key")
# That's it. All requests automatically traced.
\`\`\`
## Key Features
### 1. [Feature Name]
**What it does:** [Technical description]
**Why it matters:** [Developer benefit]
**Example:**
\`\`\`[language]
[Code showing the feature]
\`\`\`
[Repeat for top 3-5 features]
## Performance
[Include benchmarks, metrics]
- Latency: < 1ms overhead (p99)
- Throughput: 100K traces/second per instance
- Storage: 90-day retention included
## Get Started in 5 Minutes
\`\`\`bash
# Installation
npm install @company/sdk
# Basic setup
[Minimal code to get value]
\`\`\`
[Link to full documentation]
## What's Next
[Roadmap tease for 1-2 upcoming features]
## Resources
- [Documentation]
- [Sample apps]
- [API reference]
- [Community Discord]
```
---
## Email Announcement Template
**Subject Lines (A/B test these):**
- "[Product] is now GA - [Key benefit]"
- "Ship faster with [Product]"
- "[Pain point solved]: Introducing [Product]"
**Body:**
```
Hi [Name],
We're excited to announce [Product] is now generally available.
What it does:
[One sentence technical description]
Why it matters to you:
[Specific benefit for recipient's role/tech stack]
Get started in 5 minutes:
```[language]
[Minimal code example]
```
Key features:
• [Feature 1 - one line]
• [Feature 2 - one line]
• [Feature 3 - one line]
Resources:
→ Documentation: [link]
→ Sample code: [link]
→ API reference: [link]
[If Beta]: As a beta user, you already have access. Check your dashboard to enable.
Questions? Hit reply or join us in [Discord/Slack].
Happy building,
[Name]
[Title]
P.S. [Call to action or incentive]
```
---
## Social Media Templates
### Twitter/X (Technical)
**Format 1: Problem → Solution**
```
Tired of [pain point]?
[Product] gives you [benefit]:
• [Feature 1]
• [Feature 2]
• [Feature 3]
Get started: [link]
[Include code snippet image or architecture diagram]
```
**Format 2: Show the Code**
```
This is all it takes to [achieve outcome]:
[Code snippet image]
Try it now: [link]
#developer #[tech stack]
```
**Format 3: Metrics**
```
We just reduced distributed tracing overhead from 5ms to < 1ms.
How? [Link to technical blog post]
Open-sourced the approach: [GitHub link]
```
### LinkedIn (Business + Technical)
**Format:**
```
[Company] is launching [Product] today.
The problem we're solving:
[2-3 sentences about developer pain]
Our approach:
[Technical differentiation]
Early results from beta:
• [Metric/testimonial 1]
• [Metric/testimonial 2]
If you're working on [use case], check it out: [link]
[Include demo video or architecture diagram]
```
### Hacker News Post
**Title Format:**
- "Show HN: [Product] [One-line description]"
- "[Product] [Interesting technical approach]"
**Comment (required):**
```
Hey HN! Creator here.
We built [Product] to solve [problem we experienced].
Technical approach:
[2-3 paragraphs explaining interesting technical decisions]
What's different:
[Why this approach vs. alternatives]
How to try it:
[Quick start instructions]
Happy to answer questions!
```
---
## Positioning Statements
### General Template
"For [target developers] who [need/pain point], [Product] is a [category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [alternatives], we [unique differentiation]."
### Examples
**API Tool:**
"For backend developers who need reliable API integrations, FastAPI Connect is an API orchestration platform that auto-retries, caches, and monitors all external calls. Unlike building retry logic yourself, we provide production-grade reliability out of the box."
**Developer Platform:**
"For platform teams building internal developer platforms, DevHub is a self-service portal that gives developers one-click access to infrastructure. Unlike traditional ticketing systems, we automate provisioning in seconds instead of days."
---
## Value Propositions by Persona
### Backend Developers
**Focus:** Performance, reliability, ease of integration
"Reduce latency by 40% with one line of code"
### DevOps/SRE
**Focus:** Reliability, observability, automation
"Cut MTTR from hours to minutes with automated root cause analysis"
### Engineering Leaders
**Focus:** Productivity, costs, team velocity
"Ship 2x faster by eliminating [bottleneck]"
### Security Teams
**Focus:** Compliance, security, visibility
"SOC 2 Type II compliant with built-in audit logging"
---
## Messaging by Launch Tier
### Tier 1 (Major Launch)
- **Bold claims** backed by data
- **Vision** for the future
- **Ecosystem** impact
- **Industry** transformation
**Example:**
"Redefining how developers build distributed systems"
### Tier 2 (Standard)
- **Practical benefits**
- **Specific use cases**
- **Integration** value
- **Productivity** gains
**Example:**
"The fastest way to add real-time features to your app"
### Tier 3 (Minor)
- **Specific improvement**
- **Developer benefit**
- **Clear changelog**
**Example:**
"Python SDK now 3x faster with async support"
---
## Competitive Positioning
### When to Mention Competitors
**DO mention when:**
- You have clear technical superiority
- Migration is a key use case
- Comparison requested by prospects
**DON'T mention when:**
- You're the market leader
- Competitor is much larger
- Claim isn't defensible
### Competitive Messaging Template
"Unlike [Competitor], [Product] [specific advantage]:
**[Competitor]:**
- [Limitation 1]
- [Limitation 2]
**[Product]:**
- [Advantage 1] - [metric]
- [Advantage 2] - [metric]
[Code comparison or performance benchmark]"
---
## Technical Credibility Signals
Include these to build trust:
- **Open source** components used
- **Standards** supported (OpenTelemetry, OAuth, etc.)
- **Scale** handled (requests/sec, data volume)
- **Customers** using in production (if allowed)
- **Team background** (ex-Google, ex-AWS, etc.)
- **Security** certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
- **Performance** benchmarks
- **GitHub** stars (if applicable)
---
## Avoiding Common Mistakes
### Mistake 1: Too Abstract
**Bad:** "Simplify your workflow"
**Good:** "Reduce deployment time from 45 minutes to 2 minutes"
### Mistake 2: Jargon Overload
**Bad:** "Leverage synergistic paradigms"
**Good:** "Run the same code on AWS, GCP, and Azure"
### Mistake 3: No Proof
**Bad:** "The fastest API"
**Good:** "p99 latency < 50ms (see benchmark: [link])"
### Mistake 4: Feature List
**Bad:** "Includes caching, retries, and monitoring"
**Good:** "Auto-retry failed requests up to 3x with exponential backoff"
### Mistake 5: Ignoring Migration
**Bad:** [No mention of existing solutions]
**Good:** "Migrate from [Competitor] in under 1 hour: [guide]"
---
## Testing Your Messaging
### Internal Test
- [ ] Can a new engineer explain the value?
- [ ] Do engineers volunteer to use it?
- [ ] Does it pass the "so what?" test?
### External Test
- [ ] Beta feedback positive?
- [ ] Clear from HN/Reddit comments?
- [ ] Low support questions about "what is it?"
### Metrics to Watch
- Email open rate (> 25% good for developer emails)
- Click-through rate to docs (> 10%)
- Sign-up conversion (depends on product)
- Social engagement (shares, comments)
- Media pickup (for Tier 1)
---
## Summary
**Technical messaging succeeds when:**
1. Problem is relatable
2. Solution is clear (with code)
3. Benefits are concrete
4. Limitations are honest
5. Getting started is easy
**Keep developer-first always.**

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,553 @@
# Launch Tier Framework
Complete guide to determining and executing different launch tiers for technical products.
---
## Overview
Not all launches are created equal. The launch tier framework helps you allocate the right resources and effort based on the scope and impact of what you're launching.
**Key Principle:** Match investment to impact.
---
## The Three Tiers
| Tier | Type | Investment | Timeline | Example |
|------|------|------------|----------|---------|
| **Tier 1** | Major | Full GTM | 12-16 weeks | New product GA, v2.0 |
| **Tier 2** | Standard | Selective GTM | 6-8 weeks | New feature, integration |
| **Tier 3** | Minor | Minimal GTM | 2-4 weeks | Update, improvement |
---
## Tier 1: Major Launch
### When to Use
- **New product GA** (General Availability)
- **Major version release** (v2.0, v3.0)
- **Platform expansion** (new capabilities)
- **Game-changing feature** (industry first)
- **New market entry**
### Characteristics
**Scope:**
- Impacts all or most users
- New revenue stream potential
- Significant competitive differentiation
- Industry-level interest expected
- Major technical undertaking
**Timeline:** 12-16 weeks
**Budget:** $50K-$500K+ depending on company size
---
### Deliverables
#### Documentation (Complete Set)
- [ ] Getting started guide
- [ ] Complete API reference
- [ ] Integration guides (3+)
- [ ] Migration guide
- [ ] Best practices guide
- [ ] Troubleshooting guide
- [ ] Video tutorial series (5+ videos)
- [ ] Architecture documentation
#### Code Assets
- [ ] Multiple SDKs (3+ languages)
- [ ] Sample applications (3+ different use cases)
- [ ] Starter templates
- [ ] Code snippet library
- [ ] Interactive playground/sandbox
- [ ] CLI tools (if applicable)
#### Marketing Assets
- [ ] Launch blog post (long-form)
- [ ] Product page redesign
- [ ] Demo video (professional)
- [ ] Case studies (2-3)
- [ ] Infographic/visual assets
- [ ] Explainer video
- [ ] Social media campaign
- [ ] Email nurture series
#### PR & Communications
- [ ] Press release
- [ ] Media kit
- [ ] Analyst briefings (Gartner, Forrester)
- [ ] Press tour
- [ ] Spokesperson training
- [ ] Crisis communication plan
#### Sales Enablement
- [ ] Technical battlecard
- [ ] Competitive analysis
- [ ] Demo script (detailed)
- [ ] ROI calculator
- [ ] Customer presentation deck
- [ ] Pricing/packaging materials
- [ ] FAQ (20+ questions)
#### Events
- [ ] Launch event/webinar
- [ ] Customer workshops
- [ ] Conference talks
- [ ] Community meetups
---
### Launch Channels
**Primary:**
- Developer documentation (hero banner)
- Company blog (featured)
- Email (entire developer base)
- Social media (coordinated campaign)
- Product Hunt launch
- Hacker News announcement
- Press release distribution
**Secondary:**
- Tech press outreach (TechCrunch, VentureBeat, etc.)
- Developer communities (Reddit, Dev.to)
- YouTube (demo + tutorials)
- Podcasts (interviews)
- Webinars
- Virtual events
**Tertiary:**
- Conference presentations
- Industry publications
- Analyst reports
- Partner co-marketing
- Influencer outreach
---
### Team & Resources
**Core Launch Team:**
- Product Marketing Lead
- Product Manager
- Engineering Lead
- Developer Relations
- Sales Engineering
- PR/Communications
- Content Marketing
- Design
- Legal/Compliance
**External Resources:**
- PR agency
- Video production
- Event planning
- Analyst relations
**Time Commitment:**
- PMM: 100% for 8+ weeks
- PM: 50%
- Eng: 25% (docs, demos)
- DevRel: 75%
---
### Success Metrics (Tier 1)
**Week 1:**
- 10K+ API keys / sign-ups
- 50%+ activation rate
- 1M+ webpage views
- 100K+ social impressions
- 10+ press mentions
**Month 1:**
- 25K+ active developers
- 40%+ Day 7 retention
- 5%+ paid conversion (if applicable)
- NPS > 40
**Quarter 1:**
- 50K+ active developers
- $X ARR (if revenue product)
- 3+ case studies published
- Industry recognition (awards, mentions)
---
### Budget Breakdown (Example)
| Item | Cost Range |
|------|------------|
| PR Agency | $20K-$50K |
| Video Production | $10K-$30K |
| Event/Webinar | $15K-$40K |
| Paid Promotion | $25K-$100K |
| Analyst Relations | $10K-$30K |
| Design Assets | $5K-$15K |
| Tools/Software | $5K-$10K |
| **Total** | **$90K-$275K** |
---
## Tier 2: Standard Launch
### When to Use
- **New feature** (significant but not transformative)
- **Integration** with popular tool
- **SDK** for new language
- **Regional expansion**
- **Beta to GA** transition
### Characteristics
**Scope:**
- Impacts segment of users (25-75%)
- Moderate revenue impact
- Some competitive differentiation
- Developer community interest
- Moderate technical complexity
**Timeline:** 6-8 weeks
**Budget:** $10K-$50K
---
### Deliverables
#### Documentation
- [ ] Feature guide
- [ ] API reference updates
- [ ] Code samples (3-5)
- [ ] Integration tutorial
- [ ] Migration guide (if applicable)
- [ ] Video demo (1-2)
#### Code Assets
- [ ] SDK (if new language)
- [ ] Sample application (1-2)
- [ ] Code snippets
- [ ] Sandbox example
#### Marketing Assets
- [ ] Launch blog post
- [ ] Product page update
- [ ] Demo video
- [ ] Email template
- [ ] Social media posts
- [ ] Changelog entry (detailed)
#### Sales Enablement
- [ ] Feature overview (1-pager)
- [ ] Demo talking points
- [ ] FAQ (10+ questions)
- [ ] Competitive comparison
---
### Launch Channels
**Primary:**
- Developer blog
- Email (targeted segment)
- Changelog (featured)
- Social media
- In-product notification
**Secondary:**
- Developer newsletter
- Community forums
- YouTube demo
- Partner channels (if applicable)
**Optional:**
- Dev.to article
- Reddit post (relevant subreddits)
- Product Hunt (if major feature)
---
### Team & Resources
**Core Team:**
- Product Marketing Lead
- Product Manager
- Developer Relations
- Engineering (docs)
- Content Writer
**Time Commitment:**
- PMM: 75% for 4 weeks
- PM: 25%
- Eng: 10% (docs)
- DevRel: 40%
---
### Success Metrics (Tier 2)
**Week 1:**
- 2K+ feature adoptions
- 1K+ email opens
- 50K+ blog views
**Month 1:**
- 5K+ active users
- 25%+ engagement rate
- NPS > 30
---
### Budget (Example)
| Item | Cost |
|------|------|
| Video Production | $3K-$8K |
| Design Assets | $2K-$5K |
| Email Platform | $500 |
| Paid Promotion (optional) | $5K-$15K |
| **Total** | **$10.5K-$28.5K** |
---
## Tier 3: Minor Launch
### When to Use
- **Incremental improvements**
- **Bug fixes** (significant ones)
- **Performance enhancements**
- **Small feature** additions
- **UI/UX updates**
- **Deprecation** notices
### Characteristics
**Scope:**
- Impacts small segment (<25%)
- Minimal revenue impact
- No competitive angle
- Low external interest
- Simple technical change
**Timeline:** 2-4 weeks
**Budget:** $1K-$5K
---
### Deliverables
#### Documentation
- [ ] Release notes
- [ ] Documentation updates
- [ ] Changelog entry
#### Marketing Assets
- [ ] Short blog post or announcement
- [ ] Email (optional)
- [ ] Social media post (single)
---
### Launch Channels
**Primary:**
- Changelog
- Release notes
- Documentation
**Secondary (optional):**
- Short blog post
- Email mention
- Social media (single post)
- In-product notification
---
### Team & Resources
**Minimal Team:**
- Product Manager or PMM
- Engineering (docs)
**Time Commitment:**
- PM/PMM: 25% for 1 week
- Eng: 5% (docs)
---
### Success Metrics (Tier 3)
**Week 1:**
- Documentation viewed
- Feature adopted by target users
- No support spikes
**Month 1:**
- 10-20% of eligible users adopt
- Positive sentiment
---
### Budget
Typically < $5K, mostly internal time.
---
## Decision Framework
### Scoring System
Use the `assess_launch_tier.sh` script or manually score:
**Score Components:**
1. **Type of Launch** (0-10 points)
- New product/GA: 10
- Major version: 8
- New feature: 5
- Improvement: 2
- Bug fix: 0
2. **User Impact** (0-10 points)
- All users (100%): 10
- Most users (50-99%): 7
- Segment (25-50%): 5
- Small segment (<25%): 2
- Beta only: 1
3. **Revenue Impact** (0-10 points)
- New revenue stream: 10
- Major driver: 7
- Moderate: 4
- Minor: 2
- None: 0
4. **Competitive Differentiation** (0-8 points)
- Industry first: 8
- Significant: 6
- Some: 4
- Parity: 1
- None: 0
5. **Technical Complexity** (0-7 points)
- New platform: 7
- Significant: 5
- Moderate: 3
- Simple: 1
- Minor: 0
6. **Documentation Needs** (0-6 points)
- Complete new set: 6
- Major updates: 5
- New guides: 3
- Updates: 1
- Release notes only: 0
7. **External Interest** (0-7 points)
- High (industry news): 7
- Moderate (tech press): 5
- Some (community): 3
- Low (niche): 1
- Minimal: 0
**Total Score: 0-58**
**Tier Assignment:**
- **40-58:** Tier 1 (Major)
- **20-39:** Tier 2 (Standard)
- **0-19:** Tier 3 (Minor)
---
## Common Scenarios
### Scenario 1: API GA Launch
**Type:** New product
**Users:** All (new audience)
**Revenue:** New stream
**Competitive:** Industry first capability
**Technical:** New platform
**Docs:** Complete set
**Interest:** High
**Score:** 52 → **Tier 1**
---
### Scenario 2: New Language SDK
**Type:** New integration
**Users:** Segment (e.g., Python devs)
**Revenue:** Moderate impact
**Competitive:** Parity
**Technical:** Moderate
**Docs:** New guide
**Interest:** Some
**Score:** 25 → **Tier 2**
---
### Scenario 3: Performance Update
**Type:** Improvement
**Users:** All
**Revenue:** None direct
**Competitive:** None
**Technical:** Simple
**Docs:** Updates
**Interest:** Low
**Score:** 12 → **Tier 3**
---
## Best Practices
### Right-Sizing
**Over-investing (Tier 3 as Tier 1):**
- Wastes resources
- Confuses users ("This isn't major")
- Diminishes future Tier 1 launches
**Under-investing (Tier 1 as Tier 3):**
- Misses opportunity
- Poor adoption
- Competitive disadvantage
### Flexibility
**Adjust tier based on:**
- Company stage (early vs. mature)
- Market position (leader vs. challenger)
- Resources available
- Strategic importance
### Communication
**Be explicit with stakeholders:**
- "This is a Tier 2 launch, so we'll do X but not Y"
- Set clear expectations upfront
- Document tier decision and reasoning
---
## Summary
Use launch tiers to:
1. **Match effort to impact**
2. **Set stakeholder expectations**
3. **Allocate resources efficiently**
4. **Maintain consistency**
5. **Maximize ROI**
**Remember:** A well-executed Tier 2 launch beats a poorly-executed Tier 1.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,562 @@
# Developer Product Metrics
Comprehensive guide to measuring success for technical products, developer tools, and APIs.
---
## Why Developer Metrics Are Different
Developer products have unique characteristics:
- **High technical barriers** to adoption
- **Longer evaluation** periods
- **Community-driven** growth
- **Usage-based** pricing models
- **Quality over quantity** (one great developer > 100 casual users)
Traditional B2B SaaS metrics don't always apply directly.
---
## The Developer Funnel
```
Awareness → Interest → Evaluation → Activation → Engagement → Retention → Monetization
```
Each stage has specific metrics.
---
## 1. Awareness Metrics
### Top-of-Funnel
**Website Traffic:**
- Documentation page views
- Landing page visits
- Blog traffic
- GitHub repository views
**Search & Discovery:**
- Organic search rankings (for key terms)
- GitHub stars
- Stack Overflow mentions
- Social media mentions
**Community Presence:**
- Discord/Slack members
- Reddit subscribers
- Newsletter subscribers
- Conference attendance
**Targets (vary by company):**
- 50K monthly docs views (early stage)
- 500K monthly docs views (growth stage)
- 1K+ GitHub stars (open source component)
---
## 2. Interest Metrics
### Consideration Stage
**Engagement:**
- Time on documentation
- Pages per session
- Video views (tutorials)
- GitHub README views
**Content Consumption:**
- Blog post reads
- Tutorial completion rate
- Demo video watch time
- Webinar registrations
**Social Proof:**
- Case study views
- Customer testimonials read
- Comparison page visits
**Targets:**
- 5+ minute average session duration
- 4+ pages per session
- 50%+ video completion rate
---
## 3. Evaluation Metrics
### Trial/Sandbox Stage
**Sign-Up:**
- Developer sign-ups
- API key requests
- Sandbox activations
- Free tier activations
**Time to Value:**
- **Time to first API call** (target: < 10 minutes)
- **Time to "Hello World"** (target: < 15 minutes)
- **Time to integration** (target: < 1 hour)
**Documentation Engagement:**
- Getting started guide views
- Code sample copies
- SDK downloads
- Postman collection imports
**Targets:**
- 1K+ sign-ups per month (early stage)
- 60% make first API call within 24 hours
- 10 minutes median time to first call
---
## 4. Activation Metrics
### First Value Realized
**Critical Activation Events:**
- **First successful API call**
- **First integration deployed**
- **First production request**
- **SDK installed and used**
- **Sandbox → production migration**
**Activation Rate:**
```
Activation Rate = (Users who complete activation event) / (Total sign-ups)
```
**Depth of Activation:**
- Features explored
- Endpoints called
- SDKs used
- Integrations enabled
**Targets:**
- 50-70% activation rate (first API call)
- 30-40% activation rate (production deployment)
- 80%+ complete getting started guide
---
## 5. Engagement Metrics
### Active Usage
**Daily/Weekly/Monthly Active Developers (DAD/WAD/MAD):**
```
DAD = Unique developers making API calls daily
WAD = Unique developers active weekly
MAD = Unique developers active monthly
```
**Stickiness:**
```
Stickiness = DAD / MAD
```
- Target: > 20% (good)
- Target: > 40% (excellent)
**API Usage:**
- **Total API calls** per day/week/month
- **API calls per developer**
- **Endpoints used** per developer
- **Error rate** (target: < 1%)
**Feature Adoption:**
- % of developers using key features
- Time to feature adoption
- Feature depth (how many features per user)
**Targets:**
- 40%+ stickiness (DAD/MAD)
- 1K+ API calls per active developer per month
- < 1% error rate
- 3+ features adopted per developer
---
## 6. Retention Metrics
### Developer Retention
**Cohort Retention:**
```
Day 1 Retention = Developers active on Day 1 / Total sign-ups
Day 7 Retention = Developers active on Day 7 / Total sign-ups
Day 30 Retention = Developers active on Day 30 / Total sign-ups
```
**Typical Developer Product Retention:**
- Day 1: 60-70%
- Day 7: 30-50%
- Day 30: 20-40%
- Day 90: 15-30%
**Why Developer Retention Is Lower:**
- Evaluation period (many are just testing)
- Project-based usage (finish project, stop using)
- This is normal and expected
**Churn Rate:**
```
Monthly Churn = Developers who stopped using / Active developers at month start
```
**Resurrection Rate:**
```
Resurrection = Churned developers who return / Total churned developers
```
**Targets:**
- < 5% monthly churn (paid users)
- 40%+ Day 7 retention
- 25%+ Day 30 retention
---
## 7. Monetization Metrics
### Revenue Metrics
**Conversion Metrics:**
```
Free → Paid Conversion Rate = Paid users / Total active users
```
- Target: 3-10% (varies widely by product)
**Revenue Metrics:**
- **MRR** (Monthly Recurring Revenue)
- **ARR** (Annual Recurring Revenue)
- **ARPU** (Average Revenue Per User)
- **Net Revenue Retention** (NRR)
**Usage-Based Pricing Metrics:**
- **Average API calls per paid user**
- **Tier distribution** (how many in each pricing tier)
- **Upgrade rate** (free → paid, basic → pro)
- **Expansion revenue** (existing customers spending more)
**Targets:**
- 5%+ free-to-paid conversion
- 110%+ Net Revenue Retention
- $50-$500 ARPU (varies by product)
---
## Developer-Specific Metrics
### Code Quality Metrics
**SDK Quality:**
- **Downloads** per month
- **GitHub stars**
- **Issues opened** vs. closed
- **PR acceptance** rate
- **Time to resolve** issues
**Documentation Quality:**
- **Search success** rate (did they find what they needed?)
- **Time on page** (too short = unclear, too long = can't find)
- **Bounce rate** on docs
- **Feedback** (thumbs up/down on docs pages)
**Targets:**
- 90%+ search success rate
- < 40% bounce rate on docs
- 80%+ positive feedback on docs
---
### Developer Experience Metrics
**Time-Based:**
- Time to first API call
- Time to production
- Time to integrate
- Time to debug
**Friction Points:**
- Authentication failures
- API errors
- SDK install issues
- Documentation gaps
**Support Metrics:**
- Support tickets per MAD
- Time to first response
- Time to resolution
- Community forum response time
**Targets:**
- < 5 minutes to first API call
- < 1 support ticket per 100 MAD
- < 4 hours first response time
- 90%+ questions answered by community
---
## Developer Satisfaction
### Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Survey question: "How likely are you to recommend [product] to other developers?"
**Scale:** 0-10
**Calculation:**
```
NPS = % Promoters (9-10) - % Detractors (0-6)
```
**Developer Product Benchmarks:**
- **Excellent:** NPS > 50
- **Good:** NPS 30-50
- **Needs Work:** NPS < 30
### Developer Sentiment
**Qualitative Indicators:**
- Social media sentiment
- Community forum tone
- GitHub issue sentiment
- Review site ratings (G2, Capterra)
- Stack Overflow sentiment
**Quantitative Tracking:**
- Positive vs. negative mentions
- Sentiment score (automated analysis)
- Review ratings (1-5 stars)
---
## Launch-Specific Metrics
### Launch Day Metrics
**Day 1:**
- Sign-ups / API keys
- First API calls
- Documentation views
- Blog post views
- Social media impressions
- Email open rate
- Email click rate
**Targets (Tier 1 launch):**
- 5K+ sign-ups
- 50%+ activation rate (first call)
- 100K+ docs views
- 50K+ blog views
---
### Week 1 Metrics
- Total sign-ups
- Day 7 retention rate
- Active developers
- API calls made
- Support tickets
- Community questions
- Social mentions
**Targets (Tier 1):**
- 10K+ total sign-ups
- 40%+ Day 7 retention
- 5K+ active developers
- 1M+ API calls
- < 50 support tickets
---
### Month 1 Metrics
- Monthly Active Developers (MAD)
- Free → paid conversion
- NPS score
- Documentation coverage (no major gaps)
- Community health
- Feature adoption
**Targets (Tier 1):**
- 25K+ MAD
- 3-5% paid conversion
- NPS > 40
- 80%+ positive doc feedback
---
## Metrics Dashboard Template
### Executive Dashboard
**Adoption:**
- Total Developers: [X]
- MAD: [X]
- Growth Rate: [X%]
**Engagement:**
- DAD/MAD: [X%]
- API Calls/Day: [X]
- Error Rate: [X%]
**Retention:**
- Day 7: [X%]
- Day 30: [X%]
- Churn: [X%]
**Revenue:**
- MRR: $[X]
- ARPU: $[X]
- NRR: [X%]
**Quality:**
- NPS: [X]
- Support Tickets/MAD: [X]
---
### Product Team Dashboard
**This Week:**
- New Developers: [X]
- Activation Rate: [X%]
- Features Adopted: [X]
- Top API Endpoints: [List]
**Trends:**
- MAD (7-day trend): [Graph]
- API Calls (7-day): [Graph]
- Error Rate (7-day): [Graph]
**Health:**
- Documentation Gaps: [Count]
- Open Issues: [Count]
- P0 Bugs: [Count]
---
## Metric Collection
### Where to Track
**Product Analytics:**
- Amplitude
- Mixpanel
- Heap
- PostHog
**API Analytics:**
- Moesif
- API metrics (custom)
- CloudWatch / Datadog
**Documentation Analytics:**
- Google Analytics
- Readme.io analytics
- GitBook analytics
**Developer Feedback:**
- Intercom
- Zendesk
- Community forum analytics
- Survey tools (Delighted, SurveyMonkey)
---
## Setting Targets
### Early Stage (0-1 year)
Focus on **activation** and **engagement**:
- Sign-ups: 1K-10K/month
- Activation: 50%+
- MAD: 500-5K
- Day 7 Retention: 30%+
### Growth Stage (1-3 years)
Focus on **scale** and **retention**:
- Sign-ups: 10K-50K/month
- MAD: 10K-100K
- Day 30 Retention: 25%+
- Free→Paid: 5%+
### Mature Stage (3+ years)
Focus on **efficiency** and **expansion**:
- MAD: 100K+
- NRR: 110%+
- ARPU: Increasing
- CAC Payback: < 12 months
---
## Common Pitfalls
### Vanity Metrics
**Avoid:**
- Total registered users (most are inactive)
- Total API calls (could be from one user)
- GitHub stars alone (may not use product)
**Focus on:**
- Active users (making API calls)
- Retained users (coming back)
- Engaged users (using multiple features)
### Wrong Benchmarks
Don't compare developer product metrics to:
- B2C social apps (much higher DAU/MAU)
- Enterprise SaaS (lower volume, higher ACV)
- E-commerce (transactional, not sustained use)
Use developer product benchmarks instead.
---
## Summary: Key Metrics to Track
**Must Track:**
1. Monthly Active Developers (MAD)
2. Activation Rate (first API call)
3. Day 7 & Day 30 Retention
4. Stickiness (DAD/MAD)
5. API Error Rate
6. NPS
**Should Track:**
7. Free → Paid Conversion
8. Time to First API Call
9. Documentation Effectiveness
10. Support Ticket Volume
**Nice to Have:**
11. GitHub Stars/Activity
12. Community Engagement
13. Social Sentiment
14. Feature Adoption Depth
Start with the must-track metrics, then expand.
---
## Developer Metric Formulas
Quick reference:
```
Activation Rate = Activated Users / Sign-ups
Stickiness = DAD / MAD
Churn Rate = Users Lost / Total Users
NRR = (MRR + Expansion - Churn) / Starting MRR
LTV = ARPU / Churn Rate
CAC Payback = CAC / (ARPU * Gross Margin)
```
**Remember:** Metrics should drive action, not just reporting. If a metric doesn't change behavior, don't track it.