Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
194
commands/multi-agent-review.md
Normal file
194
commands/multi-agent-review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
|
||||
# Multi-Agent Code Review Orchestration Tool
|
||||
|
||||
## Role: Expert Multi-Agent Review Orchestration Specialist
|
||||
|
||||
A sophisticated AI-powered code review system designed to provide comprehensive, multi-perspective analysis of software artifacts through intelligent agent coordination and specialized domain expertise.
|
||||
|
||||
## Context and Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The Multi-Agent Review Tool leverages a distributed, specialized agent network to perform holistic code assessments that transcend traditional single-perspective review approaches. By coordinating agents with distinct expertise, we generate a comprehensive evaluation that captures nuanced insights across multiple critical dimensions:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Depth**: Specialized agents dive deep into specific domains
|
||||
- **Breadth**: Parallel processing enables comprehensive coverage
|
||||
- **Intelligence**: Context-aware routing and intelligent synthesis
|
||||
- **Adaptability**: Dynamic agent selection based on code characteristics
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Arguments and Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Parameters
|
||||
- `$ARGUMENTS`: Target code/project for review
|
||||
- Supports: File paths, Git repositories, code snippets
|
||||
- Handles multiple input formats
|
||||
- Enables context extraction and agent routing
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Types
|
||||
1. Code Quality Reviewers
|
||||
2. Security Auditors
|
||||
3. Architecture Specialists
|
||||
4. Performance Analysts
|
||||
5. Compliance Validators
|
||||
6. Best Practices Experts
|
||||
|
||||
## Multi-Agent Coordination Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Agent Selection and Routing Logic
|
||||
- **Dynamic Agent Matching**:
|
||||
- Analyze input characteristics
|
||||
- Select most appropriate agent types
|
||||
- Configure specialized sub-agents dynamically
|
||||
- **Expertise Routing**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def route_agents(code_context):
|
||||
agents = []
|
||||
if is_web_application(code_context):
|
||||
agents.extend([
|
||||
"security-auditor",
|
||||
"web-architecture-reviewer"
|
||||
])
|
||||
if is_performance_critical(code_context):
|
||||
agents.append("performance-analyst")
|
||||
return agents
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Context Management and State Passing
|
||||
- **Contextual Intelligence**:
|
||||
- Maintain shared context across agent interactions
|
||||
- Pass refined insights between agents
|
||||
- Support incremental review refinement
|
||||
- **Context Propagation Model**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
class ReviewContext:
|
||||
def __init__(self, target, metadata):
|
||||
self.target = target
|
||||
self.metadata = metadata
|
||||
self.agent_insights = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def update_insights(self, agent_type, insights):
|
||||
self.agent_insights[agent_type] = insights
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Parallel vs Sequential Execution
|
||||
- **Hybrid Execution Strategy**:
|
||||
- Parallel execution for independent reviews
|
||||
- Sequential processing for dependent insights
|
||||
- Intelligent timeout and fallback mechanisms
|
||||
- **Execution Flow**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def execute_review(review_context):
|
||||
# Parallel independent agents
|
||||
parallel_agents = [
|
||||
"code-quality-reviewer",
|
||||
"security-auditor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Sequential dependent agents
|
||||
sequential_agents = [
|
||||
"architecture-reviewer",
|
||||
"performance-optimizer"
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Result Aggregation and Synthesis
|
||||
- **Intelligent Consolidation**:
|
||||
- Merge insights from multiple agents
|
||||
- Resolve conflicting recommendations
|
||||
- Generate unified, prioritized report
|
||||
- **Synthesis Algorithm**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def synthesize_review_insights(agent_results):
|
||||
consolidated_report = {
|
||||
"critical_issues": [],
|
||||
"important_issues": [],
|
||||
"improvement_suggestions": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Intelligent merging logic
|
||||
return consolidated_report
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Conflict Resolution Mechanism
|
||||
- **Smart Conflict Handling**:
|
||||
- Detect contradictory agent recommendations
|
||||
- Apply weighted scoring
|
||||
- Escalate complex conflicts
|
||||
- **Resolution Strategy**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def resolve_conflicts(agent_insights):
|
||||
conflict_resolver = ConflictResolutionEngine()
|
||||
return conflict_resolver.process(agent_insights)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Performance Optimization
|
||||
- **Efficiency Techniques**:
|
||||
- Minimal redundant processing
|
||||
- Cached intermediate results
|
||||
- Adaptive agent resource allocation
|
||||
- **Optimization Approach**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def optimize_review_process(review_context):
|
||||
return ReviewOptimizer.allocate_resources(review_context)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Quality Validation Framework
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Validation**:
|
||||
- Cross-agent result verification
|
||||
- Statistical confidence scoring
|
||||
- Continuous learning and improvement
|
||||
- **Validation Process**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def validate_review_quality(review_results):
|
||||
quality_score = QualityScoreCalculator.compute(review_results)
|
||||
return quality_score > QUALITY_THRESHOLD
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Implementations
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Parallel Code Review Scenario
|
||||
```python
|
||||
multi_agent_review(
|
||||
target="/path/to/project",
|
||||
agents=[
|
||||
{"type": "security-auditor", "weight": 0.3},
|
||||
{"type": "architecture-reviewer", "weight": 0.3},
|
||||
{"type": "performance-analyst", "weight": 0.2}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Sequential Workflow
|
||||
```python
|
||||
sequential_review_workflow = [
|
||||
{"phase": "design-review", "agent": "architect-reviewer"},
|
||||
{"phase": "implementation-review", "agent": "code-quality-reviewer"},
|
||||
{"phase": "testing-review", "agent": "test-coverage-analyst"},
|
||||
{"phase": "deployment-readiness", "agent": "devops-validator"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Hybrid Orchestration
|
||||
```python
|
||||
hybrid_review_strategy = {
|
||||
"parallel_agents": ["security", "performance"],
|
||||
"sequential_agents": ["architecture", "compliance"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference Implementations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Web Application Security Review**
|
||||
2. **Microservices Architecture Validation**
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices and Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- Maintain agent independence
|
||||
- Implement robust error handling
|
||||
- Use probabilistic routing
|
||||
- Support incremental reviews
|
||||
- Ensure privacy and security
|
||||
|
||||
## Extensibility
|
||||
|
||||
The tool is designed with a plugin-based architecture, allowing easy addition of new agent types and review strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
Target for review: $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user