Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
|
||||
# Concept Extraction Guide for Software Systems
|
||||
|
||||
This guide provides methodologies and techniques for identifying and extracting domain concepts, entities, and relationships from software codebases to build ontological documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Extraction Methodologies
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Static Code Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
#### Class and Interface Analysis
|
||||
- **Objective**: Identify conceptual entities and their hierarchies
|
||||
- **Sources**: Class definitions, interface declarations, type annotations
|
||||
- **Techniques**:
|
||||
- Parse AST (Abstract Syntax Trees) to find type definitions
|
||||
- Extract inheritance relationships (extends, implements)
|
||||
- Identify composition patterns through member variables
|
||||
- Analyze method signatures for behavioral concepts
|
||||
|
||||
#### Function and Method Analysis
|
||||
- **Objective**: Discover actions, processes, and behavioral concepts
|
||||
- **Sources**: Function definitions, method declarations
|
||||
- **Techniques**:
|
||||
- Group related functions into conceptual categories
|
||||
- Identify command/query patterns (CQRS)
|
||||
- Extract business process flows from method call chains
|
||||
- Map function parameters to conceptual relationships
|
||||
|
||||
#### Import and Dependency Analysis
|
||||
- **Objective**: Understand system boundaries and external dependencies
|
||||
- **Sources**: Import statements, package dependencies, service calls
|
||||
- **Techniques**:
|
||||
- Map module dependencies to conceptual relationships
|
||||
- Identify external system boundaries
|
||||
- Categorize dependencies (internal, external, third-party)
|
||||
- Analyze dependency graphs for architectural insights
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Naming Convention Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
#### Semantic Naming Patterns
|
||||
- **Entity Nouns**: User, Order, Product, Account (domain objects)
|
||||
- **Process Verbs**: ProcessPayment, ValidateInput, SendEmail (actions)
|
||||
- **State Adjectives**: Active, Pending, Completed, Expired (states)
|
||||
- **Role-based Names**: AdminService, UserGateway, PaymentProcessor (roles)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Naming Pattern Recognition
|
||||
```
|
||||
Entity + Pattern = Concept Type
|
||||
- User + Repository = Data Access Concept
|
||||
- Order + Service = Business Logic Concept
|
||||
- Payment + Gateway = Integration Concept
|
||||
- Notification + Event = Event Concept
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Data Structure Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
#### Database Schema Analysis
|
||||
- **Tables as Entities**: Each table represents a domain concept
|
||||
- **Foreign Keys as Relationships**: FKs define relationships between concepts
|
||||
- **Indexes as Properties**: Important attributes for concept identification
|
||||
- **Constraints as Rules**: Business rules and validation logic
|
||||
|
||||
#### API Contract Analysis
|
||||
- **REST Resources**: URL paths often map to domain concepts
|
||||
- **GraphQL Types**: Schema types define conceptual models
|
||||
- **Message Schemas**: Event/message structures reveal concepts
|
||||
- **OpenAPI Specifications**: Complete conceptual model of external interface
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Configuration and Metadata Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
#### Configuration Files
|
||||
- **Application Settings**: System behavior concepts
|
||||
- **Feature Flags**: Feature-based concept organization
|
||||
- **Environment Variables**: Deployment and environment concepts
|
||||
- **Routing Tables**: Navigation and flow concepts
|
||||
|
||||
#### Documentation and Comments
|
||||
- **README Files**: High-level conceptual overview
|
||||
- **Code Comments**: Designer intent and conceptual explanations
|
||||
- **API Documentation**: External conceptual contracts
|
||||
- **Architecture Diagrams**: Visual conceptual relationships
|
||||
|
||||
## Extraction Techniques by Language
|
||||
|
||||
### Python
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Key patterns to identify:
|
||||
class UserService: # Service concept
|
||||
def __init__(self, user_repo): # Dependency relationship
|
||||
self.user_repo = user_repo
|
||||
|
||||
def create_user(self, user_dto): # Action concept
|
||||
# Domain logic here
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# Look for:
|
||||
# - Class definitions (entities, services, repositories)
|
||||
# - Method names (actions, processes)
|
||||
# - Parameter types (relationships)
|
||||
# - Decorators (cross-cutting concerns)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### JavaScript/TypeScript
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Key patterns to identify:
|
||||
interface User { # Entity concept
|
||||
id: string;
|
||||
name: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class UserService { # Service concept
|
||||
constructor(private userRepo: UserRepository) {} # Dependency
|
||||
|
||||
async createUser(userData: CreateUserDto): Promise<User> { # Action + types
|
||||
// Implementation
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Look for:
|
||||
# - Interface definitions (contracts, entities)
|
||||
# - Class definitions (services, controllers)
|
||||
# - Type annotations (concept properties)
|
||||
# - Decorators (metadata, concerns)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Java
|
||||
```java
|
||||
// Key patterns to identify:
|
||||
@Entity # Entity annotation
|
||||
public class User { # Entity concept
|
||||
@Id
|
||||
private Long id;
|
||||
|
||||
@OneToMany # Relationship annotation
|
||||
private List<Order> orders;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Service # Service annotation
|
||||
public class UserService { # Service concept
|
||||
@Autowired # Dependency injection
|
||||
private UserRepository userRepo;
|
||||
|
||||
public User createUser(UserDto userDto) { // Action + type
|
||||
// Implementation
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Look for:
|
||||
# - Annotations (component types, relationships)
|
||||
# - Class definitions (entities, services)
|
||||
# - Interface definitions (contracts)
|
||||
# - Method signatures (actions, processes)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Concept Categorization Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Categories
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Domain Entities** (Nouns)
|
||||
- Core business objects: User, Order, Product, Account
|
||||
- Usually persistent, have identity
|
||||
- Contain business logic and state
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Value Objects** (Nouns)
|
||||
- Immutable concepts without identity: Address, Money, DateRange
|
||||
- Defined by their attributes
|
||||
- Often embedded in entities
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Services** (Verb + Noun)
|
||||
- Business logic coordinators: UserService, PaymentService
|
||||
- Stateless operations
|
||||
- Orchestrate domain objects
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Repositories** (Noun + Repository/Store)
|
||||
- Data access abstractions: UserRepository, OrderRepository
|
||||
- Collection-like interfaces
|
||||
- Hide storage details
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Controllers/Handlers** (Noun + Controller/Handler)
|
||||
- Request/response coordination: UserController, OrderController
|
||||
- Interface between external world and domain
|
||||
- Thin layer, delegate to services
|
||||
|
||||
### Secondary Categories
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Events/Notifications** (Past Tense Verbs + Noun)
|
||||
- State changes: OrderCreated, PaymentProcessed, UserRegistered
|
||||
- Asynchronous communication
|
||||
- Decouple system components
|
||||
|
||||
7. **DTOs/Models** (Noun + Dto/Model)
|
||||
- Data transfer objects: UserDto, OrderModel
|
||||
- External contract representations
|
||||
- No business logic
|
||||
|
||||
8. **Utilities/Helpers** (Adjective/Noun + Utility/Helper)
|
||||
- Cross-cutting functionality: ValidationHelper, EmailUtility
|
||||
- Reusable operations
|
||||
- No domain concepts
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship Identification
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Relationships
|
||||
- **Inheritance**: `class Admin extends User` (Is-A)
|
||||
- **Composition**: `class Order { private List<OrderLine> lines; }` (Part-Of)
|
||||
- **Dependency**: `UserService(UserRepository repo)` (Depends-On)
|
||||
|
||||
### Indirect Relationships
|
||||
- **Shared Interfaces**: Implement same interface (Associates-With)
|
||||
- **Common Patterns**: Similar naming or structure (Similar-To)
|
||||
- **Event Connections**: Producer-consumer patterns (Communicates-With)
|
||||
|
||||
### Semantic Relationships
|
||||
- **Temporal**: CreatedBefore, UpdatedAfter
|
||||
- **Spatial**: Contains, LocatedWithin
|
||||
- **Causal**: Triggers, Enables, Prevents
|
||||
- **Logical**: Implies, Contradicts, Equivalent
|
||||
|
||||
## Extraction Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Automated Extraction
|
||||
1. Run static analysis tools to identify:
|
||||
- Class/interface definitions
|
||||
- Inheritance hierarchies
|
||||
- Import dependencies
|
||||
- Method signatures
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Manual Analysis
|
||||
1. Review automated results for semantic accuracy
|
||||
2. Identify implicit concepts not captured by code
|
||||
3. Map business terminology to technical concepts
|
||||
4. Validate relationships with domain experts
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Ontology Construction
|
||||
1. Organize concepts into hierarchies
|
||||
2. Define relationships between concepts
|
||||
3. Add semantic metadata and descriptions
|
||||
4. Validate completeness and consistency
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Documentation Generation
|
||||
1. Create visual representations
|
||||
2. Generate textual documentation
|
||||
3. Create interactive navigation
|
||||
4. Establish maintenance processes
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Checks
|
||||
- [ ] All identified concepts have clear definitions
|
||||
- [ ] Relationships are correctly classified
|
||||
- [ ] No circular inheritance exists
|
||||
- [ ] Domain terminology is consistent
|
||||
- [ ] Technical and business concepts are aligned
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Process
|
||||
1. **Developer Review**: Technical accuracy and completeness
|
||||
2. **Domain Expert Review**: Business concept validation
|
||||
3. **Architecture Review**: Consistency with system design
|
||||
4. **Documentation Review**: Clarity and usability
|
||||
|
||||
## Maintenance Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### Continuous Updates
|
||||
- Monitor code changes for new concepts
|
||||
- Update ontology when requirements evolve
|
||||
- Regular reviews with stakeholders
|
||||
- Automated validation checks
|
||||
|
||||
### Version Management
|
||||
- Tag ontology versions with releases
|
||||
- Track concept evolution over time
|
||||
- Maintain change logs
|
||||
- Backward compatibility considerations
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user